有关RR和OR的异同的权威解释

2013-08-16 MedSci MedSci原创

Some studies use relative risks (RRs) to describe results; others use odds ratios (ORs). Both are calculated from simple 2x2 tables. The question of which statistic to use is subtle but very

Some studies use relative risks (RRs) to describe results; others use odds ratios (ORs). Both are calculated from simple 2x2 tables. The question of which statistic to use is subtle but very important.

Relative risk

Probability is the likelihood of an event in relation to all possible events. If a horse wins 2 out of every 5 races, its probability of winning is 2/5 (40%).

Relative risk is a ratio of probabilities. It compares the incidence or risk of an event among those with a specific exposure with those who were not exposed (eg, myocardial infarctions in those who smoke cigarettes compared with those who do not) . RR is based upon the incidence of an event given that we already know the study partic-ipants’ exposure status. It is only appropriate, therefore, to use RR for prospective cohort studies.

FIGURE



Source for MI data: Njolstad I, et al. Smoking, serum lipids, blood pressure, and sex differences in myocardial infarction. Circulation 1996; 93:450-456.

Odds ratio

Odds compare events with nonevents. If a horse wins 2 out of every 5 races, its odds of winning are 2 to 3 (expressed as 2:3). An odds ratio is a ratio of ratios. It compares the presence to absence of an exposure given that we already know about a specific outcome (eg, presence-to-absence ratio of cigarette smoking in those who had an MI compared with the same ratio in those who did not have an MI) . OR can be used to describe the results of case control as well as prospective cohort studies.

Comparing the two

OR and RR are usually comparable in magnitude when the disease studied is rare (eg, most can-cers). However, an OR can overestimate and magnify risk, especially when the disease is more common (eg, hypertension) and should be avoided in such cases if RR can be used.

当疾病发生率比较低时,建议采用RR或OR表示。如果是常见疾病,或发生率较高,不推荐用OR,它可能会放大风险。

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_O6loFBdyq08/Slj_S4ndGfI/AAAAAAAAAD0/uNOSJuKgY10/s320/img006.gif

从这幅图可以清晰看到RR与OR的差别。

著名统计学家Steve Simon曾写了有关二者的权威解释。
MedSci注:一般来说,在流行病学研究领域,进行case control研究,建议使用OR,而队列研究则建议使用RR。对于横断面研究,RR和OR都是合适的。但是在临床上并没有极其严格区分,主要根据临床研究的目的与意义,以及选择的统计学方法决定。如采用logistic回归,得出的就是OR。

版权声明:
本网站所有内容来源注明为“梅斯医学”或“MedSci原创”的文字、图片和音视频资料,版权均属于梅斯医学所有。非经授权,任何媒体、网站或个人不得转载,授权转载时须注明来源为“梅斯医学”。其它来源的文章系转载文章,或“梅斯号”自媒体发布的文章,仅系出于传递更多信息之目的,本站仅负责审核内容合规,其内容不代表本站立场,本站不负责内容的准确性和版权。如果存在侵权、或不希望被转载的媒体或个人可与我们联系,我们将立即进行删除处理。
在此留言
评论区 (0)
#插入话题

相关资讯

Lancet Diab & Endo:荟萃分析显示糖尿病增加肢体残疾风险

依据先前的报道,由于糖尿病引起残疾的风险从零到双倍不等。残疾是一种重要的衡量健康的指标,且鉴于全球糖尿病的流行,评估糖尿病引起残疾的风险是非常重要的。为此,来自澳大利亚莫纳什大学的Evelyn Wong教授及其团队进行了一项系统性回顾和荟萃分析,评估糖尿病引起残疾的风险。该研究结果在线发表在2013年7月24的《柳叶刀糖尿病与内分泌学》(The Lancet Diab

统计学中RR OR AR HR的区别

一、相对危险度(RR)——队列研究中分析暴露因素与发病的关联程度     队列研究是选择暴露及未暴露于某一因素的两组人群,追踪其各自的发病结局,比较两组发病结局的差异,从而判定暴露因素与疾病有无关联及关联大小的一种观察性研究。通常,暴露可以指危险因素,比如吸烟、高血压,也可指服用某种药物。而事件可以是疾病发生,比如肺癌、心血管病,也可指服药后的治疗效果。