ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH-期刊论坛，投稿经验-MedSci.cn

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087568, encodeId=9d02108e5680f, content=审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=49, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087567, encodeId=62cc108e567c5, content=关键词能否从题目中提炼？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=52, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861338, encodeId=ed5c86133880, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=119, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 05:04:01 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860675, encodeId=17358606e54d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=55d45413963, createdName=ms2535923852153051, createdTime=Sun May 17 23:35:10 CST 2020, time=2020-05-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860570, encodeId=1bef8605e004, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ba95414104, createdName=ms272453986362045, createdTime=Fri May 15 01:36:44 CST 2020, time=2020-05-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=854910, encodeId=7de8854910ec, content=地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。 submit: 06/16/2019 under revision: 07/23/2019 submit revised version: 09/18/2019 under review: 10/06/2019 pending decision: 10/16/2019 accepted: 10/28/2019 online:10/29/2019 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Tue Nov 12 09:02:41 CST 2019, time=2019-11-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847046, encodeId=f8d184e046b4, content=received september 2017 received in revised form march 2018 accepted may 2018 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2dd45414101, createdName=ms4600813998468978, createdTime=Thu Sep 06 16:27:33 CST 2018, time=2018-09-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846430, encodeId=78a28464308e, content=大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Sun Aug 19 16:29:26 CST 2018, time=2018-08-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845594, encodeId=09ad84559463, content=received at editorial office: 2018.04.17 revised requested: 2018.06.01 article revised: 2018.07.18 article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23 2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d2bd5414155, createdName=ms4729674192825029, createdTime=Tue Jul 24 15:26:52 CST 2018, time=2018-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844532, encodeId=5b9e844532dc, content=2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右 投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=109, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Thu Jun 28 16:09:53 CST 2018, time=2018-06-28, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2021-12-29 Gym璨烨

审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？

49 1

展开1条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087568, encodeId=9d02108e5680f, content=审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=49, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087567, encodeId=62cc108e567c5, content=关键词能否从题目中提炼？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=52, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861338, encodeId=ed5c86133880, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=119, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 05:04:01 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860675, encodeId=17358606e54d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=55d45413963, createdName=ms2535923852153051, createdTime=Sun May 17 23:35:10 CST 2020, time=2020-05-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860570, encodeId=1bef8605e004, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ba95414104, createdName=ms272453986362045, createdTime=Fri May 15 01:36:44 CST 2020, time=2020-05-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=854910, encodeId=7de8854910ec, content=地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。 submit: 06/16/2019 under revision: 07/23/2019 submit revised version: 09/18/2019 under review: 10/06/2019 pending decision: 10/16/2019 accepted: 10/28/2019 online:10/29/2019 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Tue Nov 12 09:02:41 CST 2019, time=2019-11-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847046, encodeId=f8d184e046b4, content=received september 2017 received in revised form march 2018 accepted may 2018 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2dd45414101, createdName=ms4600813998468978, createdTime=Thu Sep 06 16:27:33 CST 2018, time=2018-09-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846430, encodeId=78a28464308e, content=大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Sun Aug 19 16:29:26 CST 2018, time=2018-08-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845594, encodeId=09ad84559463, content=received at editorial office: 2018.04.17 revised requested: 2018.06.01 article revised: 2018.07.18 article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23 2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d2bd5414155, createdName=ms4729674192825029, createdTime=Tue Jul 24 15:26:52 CST 2018, time=2018-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844532, encodeId=5b9e844532dc, content=2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右 投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=109, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Thu Jun 28 16:09:53 CST 2018, time=2018-06-28, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2021-12-28 衣谷

关键词能否从题目中提炼？

52 1

展开1条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087568, encodeId=9d02108e5680f, content=审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=49, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087567, encodeId=62cc108e567c5, content=关键词能否从题目中提炼？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=52, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861338, encodeId=ed5c86133880, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=119, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 05:04:01 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860675, encodeId=17358606e54d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=55d45413963, createdName=ms2535923852153051, createdTime=Sun May 17 23:35:10 CST 2020, time=2020-05-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860570, encodeId=1bef8605e004, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ba95414104, createdName=ms272453986362045, createdTime=Fri May 15 01:36:44 CST 2020, time=2020-05-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=854910, encodeId=7de8854910ec, content=地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。 submit: 06/16/2019 under revision: 07/23/2019 submit revised version: 09/18/2019 under review: 10/06/2019 pending decision: 10/16/2019 accepted: 10/28/2019 online:10/29/2019 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Tue Nov 12 09:02:41 CST 2019, time=2019-11-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847046, encodeId=f8d184e046b4, content=received september 2017 received in revised form march 2018 accepted may 2018 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2dd45414101, createdName=ms4600813998468978, createdTime=Thu Sep 06 16:27:33 CST 2018, time=2018-09-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846430, encodeId=78a28464308e, content=大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Sun Aug 19 16:29:26 CST 2018, time=2018-08-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845594, encodeId=09ad84559463, content=received at editorial office: 2018.04.17 revised requested: 2018.06.01 article revised: 2018.07.18 article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23 2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d2bd5414155, createdName=ms4729674192825029, createdTime=Tue Jul 24 15:26:52 CST 2018, time=2018-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844532, encodeId=5b9e844532dc, content=2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右 投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=109, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Thu Jun 28 16:09:53 CST 2018, time=2018-06-28, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2020-06-03 ms9669734295150018

审稿速度:1.0
经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。

119 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087568, encodeId=9d02108e5680f, content=审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=49, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087567, encodeId=62cc108e567c5, content=关键词能否从题目中提炼？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=52, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861338, encodeId=ed5c86133880, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=119, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 05:04:01 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860675, encodeId=17358606e54d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=55d45413963, createdName=ms2535923852153051, createdTime=Sun May 17 23:35:10 CST 2020, time=2020-05-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860570, encodeId=1bef8605e004, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ba95414104, createdName=ms272453986362045, createdTime=Fri May 15 01:36:44 CST 2020, time=2020-05-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=854910, encodeId=7de8854910ec, content=地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。 submit: 06/16/2019 under revision: 07/23/2019 submit revised version: 09/18/2019 under review: 10/06/2019 pending decision: 10/16/2019 accepted: 10/28/2019 online:10/29/2019 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Tue Nov 12 09:02:41 CST 2019, time=2019-11-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847046, encodeId=f8d184e046b4, content=received september 2017 received in revised form march 2018 accepted may 2018 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2dd45414101, createdName=ms4600813998468978, createdTime=Thu Sep 06 16:27:33 CST 2018, time=2018-09-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846430, encodeId=78a28464308e, content=大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Sun Aug 19 16:29:26 CST 2018, time=2018-08-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845594, encodeId=09ad84559463, content=received at editorial office: 2018.04.17 revised requested: 2018.06.01 article revised: 2018.07.18 article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23 2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d2bd5414155, createdName=ms4729674192825029, createdTime=Tue Jul 24 15:26:52 CST 2018, time=2018-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844532, encodeId=5b9e844532dc, content=2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右 投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=109, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Thu Jun 28 16:09:53 CST 2018, time=2018-06-28, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2020-05-17 ms2535923852153051

审稿速度:1.0
经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题

110 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087568, encodeId=9d02108e5680f, content=审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=49, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087567, encodeId=62cc108e567c5, content=关键词能否从题目中提炼？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=52, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861338, encodeId=ed5c86133880, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=119, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 05:04:01 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860675, encodeId=17358606e54d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=55d45413963, createdName=ms2535923852153051, createdTime=Sun May 17 23:35:10 CST 2020, time=2020-05-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860570, encodeId=1bef8605e004, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ba95414104, createdName=ms272453986362045, createdTime=Fri May 15 01:36:44 CST 2020, time=2020-05-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=854910, encodeId=7de8854910ec, content=地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。 submit: 06/16/2019 under revision: 07/23/2019 submit revised version: 09/18/2019 under review: 10/06/2019 pending decision: 10/16/2019 accepted: 10/28/2019 online:10/29/2019 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Tue Nov 12 09:02:41 CST 2019, time=2019-11-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847046, encodeId=f8d184e046b4, content=received september 2017 received in revised form march 2018 accepted may 2018 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2dd45414101, createdName=ms4600813998468978, createdTime=Thu Sep 06 16:27:33 CST 2018, time=2018-09-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846430, encodeId=78a28464308e, content=大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Sun Aug 19 16:29:26 CST 2018, time=2018-08-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845594, encodeId=09ad84559463, content=received at editorial office: 2018.04.17 revised requested: 2018.06.01 article revised: 2018.07.18 article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23 2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d2bd5414155, createdName=ms4729674192825029, createdTime=Tue Jul 24 15:26:52 CST 2018, time=2018-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844532, encodeId=5b9e844532dc, content=2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右 投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=109, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Thu Jun 28 16:09:53 CST 2018, time=2018-06-28, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2020-05-15 ms272453986362045

审稿速度:1.0
经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。

125 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087568, encodeId=9d02108e5680f, content=审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=49, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087567, encodeId=62cc108e567c5, content=关键词能否从题目中提炼？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=52, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861338, encodeId=ed5c86133880, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=119, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 05:04:01 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860675, encodeId=17358606e54d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=55d45413963, createdName=ms2535923852153051, createdTime=Sun May 17 23:35:10 CST 2020, time=2020-05-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860570, encodeId=1bef8605e004, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ba95414104, createdName=ms272453986362045, createdTime=Fri May 15 01:36:44 CST 2020, time=2020-05-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=854910, encodeId=7de8854910ec, content=地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。 submit: 06/16/2019 under revision: 07/23/2019 submit revised version: 09/18/2019 under review: 10/06/2019 pending decision: 10/16/2019 accepted: 10/28/2019 online:10/29/2019 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Tue Nov 12 09:02:41 CST 2019, time=2019-11-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847046, encodeId=f8d184e046b4, content=received september 2017 received in revised form march 2018 accepted may 2018 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2dd45414101, createdName=ms4600813998468978, createdTime=Thu Sep 06 16:27:33 CST 2018, time=2018-09-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846430, encodeId=78a28464308e, content=大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Sun Aug 19 16:29:26 CST 2018, time=2018-08-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845594, encodeId=09ad84559463, content=received at editorial office: 2018.04.17 revised requested: 2018.06.01 article revised: 2018.07.18 article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23 2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d2bd5414155, createdName=ms4729674192825029, createdTime=Tue Jul 24 15:26:52 CST 2018, time=2018-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844532, encodeId=5b9e844532dc, content=2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右 投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=109, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Thu Jun 28 16:09:53 CST 2018, time=2018-06-28, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2019-11-12 ms5619336576777824

地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。
submit: 06/16/2019
under revision: 07/23/2019
submit revised version: 09/18/2019
under review: 10/06/2019
pending decision: 10/16/2019
accepted: 10/28/2019
online:10/29/2019

134 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087568, encodeId=9d02108e5680f, content=审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=49, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087567, encodeId=62cc108e567c5, content=关键词能否从题目中提炼？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=52, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861338, encodeId=ed5c86133880, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=119, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 05:04:01 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860675, encodeId=17358606e54d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=55d45413963, createdName=ms2535923852153051, createdTime=Sun May 17 23:35:10 CST 2020, time=2020-05-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860570, encodeId=1bef8605e004, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ba95414104, createdName=ms272453986362045, createdTime=Fri May 15 01:36:44 CST 2020, time=2020-05-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=854910, encodeId=7de8854910ec, content=地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。 submit: 06/16/2019 under revision: 07/23/2019 submit revised version: 09/18/2019 under review: 10/06/2019 pending decision: 10/16/2019 accepted: 10/28/2019 online:10/29/2019 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Tue Nov 12 09:02:41 CST 2019, time=2019-11-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847046, encodeId=f8d184e046b4, content=received september 2017 received in revised form march 2018 accepted may 2018 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2dd45414101, createdName=ms4600813998468978, createdTime=Thu Sep 06 16:27:33 CST 2018, time=2018-09-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846430, encodeId=78a28464308e, content=大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Sun Aug 19 16:29:26 CST 2018, time=2018-08-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845594, encodeId=09ad84559463, content=received at editorial office: 2018.04.17 revised requested: 2018.06.01 article revised: 2018.07.18 article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23 2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d2bd5414155, createdName=ms4729674192825029, createdTime=Tue Jul 24 15:26:52 CST 2018, time=2018-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844532, encodeId=5b9e844532dc, content=2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右 投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=109, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Thu Jun 28 16:09:53 CST 2018, time=2018-06-28, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2018-09-06 ms4600813998468978

received september 2017
received in revised form march 2018
accepted may 2018

110 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087568, encodeId=9d02108e5680f, content=审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=49, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087567, encodeId=62cc108e567c5, content=关键词能否从题目中提炼？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=52, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861338, encodeId=ed5c86133880, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=119, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 05:04:01 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860675, encodeId=17358606e54d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=55d45413963, createdName=ms2535923852153051, createdTime=Sun May 17 23:35:10 CST 2020, time=2020-05-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860570, encodeId=1bef8605e004, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ba95414104, createdName=ms272453986362045, createdTime=Fri May 15 01:36:44 CST 2020, time=2020-05-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=854910, encodeId=7de8854910ec, content=地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。 submit: 06/16/2019 under revision: 07/23/2019 submit revised version: 09/18/2019 under review: 10/06/2019 pending decision: 10/16/2019 accepted: 10/28/2019 online:10/29/2019 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Tue Nov 12 09:02:41 CST 2019, time=2019-11-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847046, encodeId=f8d184e046b4, content=received september 2017 received in revised form march 2018 accepted may 2018 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2dd45414101, createdName=ms4600813998468978, createdTime=Thu Sep 06 16:27:33 CST 2018, time=2018-09-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846430, encodeId=78a28464308e, content=大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Sun Aug 19 16:29:26 CST 2018, time=2018-08-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845594, encodeId=09ad84559463, content=received at editorial office: 2018.04.17 revised requested: 2018.06.01 article revised: 2018.07.18 article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23 2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d2bd5414155, createdName=ms4729674192825029, createdTime=Tue Jul 24 15:26:52 CST 2018, time=2018-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844532, encodeId=5b9e844532dc, content=2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右 投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=109, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Thu Jun 28 16:09:53 CST 2018, time=2018-06-28, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2018-08-19 ms8261913720762277

大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快

134 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087568, encodeId=9d02108e5680f, content=审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=49, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087567, encodeId=62cc108e567c5, content=关键词能否从题目中提炼？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=52, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861338, encodeId=ed5c86133880, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=119, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 05:04:01 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860675, encodeId=17358606e54d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=55d45413963, createdName=ms2535923852153051, createdTime=Sun May 17 23:35:10 CST 2020, time=2020-05-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860570, encodeId=1bef8605e004, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ba95414104, createdName=ms272453986362045, createdTime=Fri May 15 01:36:44 CST 2020, time=2020-05-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=854910, encodeId=7de8854910ec, content=地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。 submit: 06/16/2019 under revision: 07/23/2019 submit revised version: 09/18/2019 under review: 10/06/2019 pending decision: 10/16/2019 accepted: 10/28/2019 online:10/29/2019 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Tue Nov 12 09:02:41 CST 2019, time=2019-11-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847046, encodeId=f8d184e046b4, content=received september 2017 received in revised form march 2018 accepted may 2018 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2dd45414101, createdName=ms4600813998468978, createdTime=Thu Sep 06 16:27:33 CST 2018, time=2018-09-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846430, encodeId=78a28464308e, content=大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Sun Aug 19 16:29:26 CST 2018, time=2018-08-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845594, encodeId=09ad84559463, content=received at editorial office: 2018.04.17 revised requested: 2018.06.01 article revised: 2018.07.18 article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23 2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d2bd5414155, createdName=ms4729674192825029, createdTime=Tue Jul 24 15:26:52 CST 2018, time=2018-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844532, encodeId=5b9e844532dc, content=2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右 投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=109, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Thu Jun 28 16:09:53 CST 2018, time=2018-06-28, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2018-07-24 ms4729674192825029

received at editorial office: 2018.04.17
revised requested: 2018.06.01
article revised: 2018.07.18
article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23
2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。

118 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087568, encodeId=9d02108e5680f, content=审稿人会不会通过我提供的关键词检索创新性？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=49, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=edd01701426, createdName=Gym璨烨, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1087567, encodeId=62cc108e567c5, content=关键词能否从题目中提炼？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=52, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=33c12179121, createdName=衣谷, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:47 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861338, encodeId=ed5c86133880, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：我是18楼的。目前被该ar拒稿转投自己领域顶刊jhm，第一轮审稿意见是大修。我觉得ar的主编在如何寻找文稿领域的审稿人上有很大改进空间。我文章被拒不是因为创新问题，而是审稿人不行，看不懂文章，还自以为是。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=119, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 05:04:01 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860675, encodeId=17358606e54d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：跟楼上一样，自认为很有创新的一篇文章投过去一个月左右返回意见，一个大修一个拒稿，理由是没有创新，没其他意见直接就拒了。感觉选的审稿人都是脑子有问题 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=55d45413963, createdName=ms2535923852153051, createdTime=Sun May 17 23:35:10 CST 2020, time=2020-05-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860570, encodeId=1bef8605e004, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：4月初投了一篇文章到该期刊，导师要求的，个人觉得文章投这个期刊亏了。刚好20天两个审稿意见回来，拒了。第一个审稿人，洋洋洒洒给了10个意见，主要说文章没创新，结论跟先前文章基本一致，但没给出是哪些文章。发现是这个审稿人没看懂我文章，我做的是评估不确定，他以为我做的是卫星观测的不确定性。第二个审稿人，可以肯定不是我这个领域的，唯一的意见犯了最基本的错误。后面改投了行业顶刊jhm，目前还在审稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ba95414104, createdName=ms272453986362045, createdTime=Fri May 15 01:36:44 CST 2020, time=2020-05-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=854910, encodeId=7de8854910ec, content=地学领域较为基础的期刊，较适用于初出茅庐者。 submit: 06/16/2019 under revision: 07/23/2019 submit revised version: 09/18/2019 under review: 10/06/2019 pending decision: 10/16/2019 accepted: 10/28/2019 online:10/29/2019 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Tue Nov 12 09:02:41 CST 2019, time=2019-11-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=847046, encodeId=f8d184e046b4, content=received september 2017 received in revised form march 2018 accepted may 2018 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2dd45414101, createdName=ms4600813998468978, createdTime=Thu Sep 06 16:27:33 CST 2018, time=2018-09-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846430, encodeId=78a28464308e, content=大气领域中上的期刊，也接受水文气象类的文章，相比jc跟cd比较好中，速度比较快 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Sun Aug 19 16:29:26 CST 2018, time=2018-08-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845594, encodeId=09ad84559463, content=received at editorial office: 2018.04.17 revised requested: 2018.06.01 article revised: 2018.07.18 article accepted for publication: 2018.07.23 2017年投aas给的major revision，修改后被拒，耽误了整整一年时间；遂努力修改文章结构和语言表达，转投ar，1个半月审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个推荐发表，一个大修；小心翼翼的修改了48天才返回，5天后通知文章接收。总而言之：审稿专家很专业，编辑很负责，速度中等偏快；个人觉得ar十分注重研究方向、文章结构和语言表述。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d2bd5414155, createdName=ms4729674192825029, createdTime=Tue Jul 24 15:26:52 CST 2018, time=2018-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844532, encodeId=5b9e844532dc, content=2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右 投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=109, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd9c5414099, createdName=ms4294801609865205, createdTime=Thu Jun 28 16:09:53 CST 2018, time=2018-06-28, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2018-06-28 ms4294801609865205

2017.9.15投稿，2017.9.27送审，2018.2.21初稿两个大修，3.18修改投出，4.22一个大修一个小修，5.16修完投出，6.11一个小修一个录用，6.17修完投出，6.28录用，前后共计十个月左右
投稿地址已经更换了https://www.evise.com/evise/faces/pages/homepage/homepage.jspx?_adf.ctrl-state=77wta6c8d_57

109 0

内科

外科

专科科室

热点

按科室浏览

临床工具

科研工具

其他工具

科研数智化

真实世界研究解决方案

数字化学术传播解决方案

其它

期刊讨论

科室

工具

服务