PLoS One-期刊论坛，投稿经验-MedSci.cn

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501237, encodeId=804150123e39, content=PLoS One2012年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=133, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 11:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501238, encodeId=0523501238ff, content= PLoS One，2014年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=146, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 11:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501235, encodeId=f3a4501235e0, content=2013年，plos one上中国人文章占21% （medsci上写的）。去年总数量在30000篇，意味着中国人文章多达6000篇左右，真吓人, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=128, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20220519/c2ab253484ee4527a2d4e9589a4821ac/45de9bf494a54becb2ea4369c9d11e85.jpg, createdBy=7a3710, createdName=lovetcm, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 09:36:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501233, encodeId=3c0e50123338, content=12月末submit 1月中旬大修 还好问题与我接下来的工作相关所以改得很好 2月10号修回 2月21accept 审稿人的意见很中肯，讲在了点子上，editor动作也很迅速 最终稿改了很多，投JBC也没问题，有点可惜。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=168, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=2eb315758, createdName=gp4444, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 08:54:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501208, encodeId=6584501208de, content=图片质量欠佳-纯属扯淡，伦理学声明没有编号-大家都有伦理学编号吗？基金没提供编号-这也是拒稿的理由？ PCR 做了4个基因嫌少，也是拒稿的理由。 可气的是，这个编辑就没送外审，全是自己的意见，一点具体的意见也没有，对文章本身不会有任何提高。 综上所述，这是个垃圾的不能再垃圾的编辑，人品严重低劣。碰上了自认倒霉。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=123, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=winner01072, createdTime=Thu Feb 20 09:05:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501207, encodeId=307f50120ea3, content=大家都过来围观看看，PLOS ONE 的流氓编辑不到一个月就给出意见了，没送外审。 Dear Prof XXX, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we have decided that your manuscript does not meet our criteria for publication and must therefore be rejected. Specifically: The graphs are of sub-optimal quality; Ethical approval number was not provided; Funding bodies were not acknowledged; Protein / gene analysis assays were limited to only a few molecules. I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion, but hope that you appreciate the reasons for this decision. Yours sincerely, Dimitrios Zeugolis, BSc(Hons), MSc, PhD Academic Editor PLOS ONE, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Feb 20 08:59:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501204, encodeId=545e501204e1, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：目前大修的稿子刚投过去，不知道结果如何，现在with editor了，希望好运！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=102, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 22:55:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501203, encodeId=633e5012034c, content=好的编辑让您记住他的好，但有的流氓编辑就气得您吐血。我有一篇“创新过分”的稿子投到 AIP Advaces，这个杂志通常只有一个审稿人。第一个审稿人的意见是：Publish with optional revision. 但编辑总是想把我稿子退了。说是为了公平起见，还要再审。找来找去，终于找到了一个大外行，胡说八道地伪造了一大堆的理由把我退了。按一般规则，一个 Publish with optional revision，一个 Reject，应该让作者作出答复再审。可是这个印度流氓编辑连这样的机会都不给。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=119, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 22:11:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501187, encodeId=1ecd50118e65, content=投稿命中率:50.0 经验分享：12月18号 submit 1月8号 under review 直到现在过了1个半月还是under review； 怎么办啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=121, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 09:44:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501164, encodeId=c94950116434, content=这些审稿快的，有没有语言润色啊？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Feb 18 12:41:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2014-02-21 匿名用户

PLoS One2012年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒

133 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501237, encodeId=804150123e39, content=PLoS One2012年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=133, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 11:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501238, encodeId=0523501238ff, content= PLoS One，2014年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=146, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 11:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501235, encodeId=f3a4501235e0, content=2013年，plos one上中国人文章占21% （medsci上写的）。去年总数量在30000篇，意味着中国人文章多达6000篇左右，真吓人, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=128, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20220519/c2ab253484ee4527a2d4e9589a4821ac/45de9bf494a54becb2ea4369c9d11e85.jpg, createdBy=7a3710, createdName=lovetcm, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 09:36:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501233, encodeId=3c0e50123338, content=12月末submit 1月中旬大修 还好问题与我接下来的工作相关所以改得很好 2月10号修回 2月21accept 审稿人的意见很中肯，讲在了点子上，editor动作也很迅速 最终稿改了很多，投JBC也没问题，有点可惜。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=168, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=2eb315758, createdName=gp4444, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 08:54:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501208, encodeId=6584501208de, content=图片质量欠佳-纯属扯淡，伦理学声明没有编号-大家都有伦理学编号吗？基金没提供编号-这也是拒稿的理由？ PCR 做了4个基因嫌少，也是拒稿的理由。 可气的是，这个编辑就没送外审，全是自己的意见，一点具体的意见也没有，对文章本身不会有任何提高。 综上所述，这是个垃圾的不能再垃圾的编辑，人品严重低劣。碰上了自认倒霉。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=123, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=winner01072, createdTime=Thu Feb 20 09:05:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501207, encodeId=307f50120ea3, content=大家都过来围观看看，PLOS ONE 的流氓编辑不到一个月就给出意见了，没送外审。 Dear Prof XXX, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we have decided that your manuscript does not meet our criteria for publication and must therefore be rejected. Specifically: The graphs are of sub-optimal quality; Ethical approval number was not provided; Funding bodies were not acknowledged; Protein / gene analysis assays were limited to only a few molecules. I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion, but hope that you appreciate the reasons for this decision. Yours sincerely, Dimitrios Zeugolis, BSc(Hons), MSc, PhD Academic Editor PLOS ONE, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Feb 20 08:59:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501204, encodeId=545e501204e1, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：目前大修的稿子刚投过去，不知道结果如何，现在with editor了，希望好运！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=102, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 22:55:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501203, encodeId=633e5012034c, content=好的编辑让您记住他的好，但有的流氓编辑就气得您吐血。我有一篇“创新过分”的稿子投到 AIP Advaces，这个杂志通常只有一个审稿人。第一个审稿人的意见是：Publish with optional revision. 但编辑总是想把我稿子退了。说是为了公平起见，还要再审。找来找去，终于找到了一个大外行，胡说八道地伪造了一大堆的理由把我退了。按一般规则，一个 Publish with optional revision，一个 Reject，应该让作者作出答复再审。可是这个印度流氓编辑连这样的机会都不给。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=119, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 22:11:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501187, encodeId=1ecd50118e65, content=投稿命中率:50.0 经验分享：12月18号 submit 1月8号 under review 直到现在过了1个半月还是under review； 怎么办啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=121, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 09:44:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501164, encodeId=c94950116434, content=这些审稿快的，有没有语言润色啊？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Feb 18 12:41:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2014-02-21 匿名用户

PLoS One，2014年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒

146 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501237, encodeId=804150123e39, content=PLoS One2012年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=133, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 11:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501238, encodeId=0523501238ff, content= PLoS One，2014年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=146, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 11:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501235, encodeId=f3a4501235e0, content=2013年，plos one上中国人文章占21% （medsci上写的）。去年总数量在30000篇，意味着中国人文章多达6000篇左右，真吓人, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=128, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20220519/c2ab253484ee4527a2d4e9589a4821ac/45de9bf494a54becb2ea4369c9d11e85.jpg, createdBy=7a3710, createdName=lovetcm, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 09:36:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501233, encodeId=3c0e50123338, content=12月末submit 1月中旬大修 还好问题与我接下来的工作相关所以改得很好 2月10号修回 2月21accept 审稿人的意见很中肯，讲在了点子上，editor动作也很迅速 最终稿改了很多，投JBC也没问题，有点可惜。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=168, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=2eb315758, createdName=gp4444, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 08:54:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501208, encodeId=6584501208de, content=图片质量欠佳-纯属扯淡，伦理学声明没有编号-大家都有伦理学编号吗？基金没提供编号-这也是拒稿的理由？ PCR 做了4个基因嫌少，也是拒稿的理由。 可气的是，这个编辑就没送外审，全是自己的意见，一点具体的意见也没有，对文章本身不会有任何提高。 综上所述，这是个垃圾的不能再垃圾的编辑，人品严重低劣。碰上了自认倒霉。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=123, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=winner01072, createdTime=Thu Feb 20 09:05:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501207, encodeId=307f50120ea3, content=大家都过来围观看看，PLOS ONE 的流氓编辑不到一个月就给出意见了，没送外审。 Dear Prof XXX, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we have decided that your manuscript does not meet our criteria for publication and must therefore be rejected. Specifically: The graphs are of sub-optimal quality; Ethical approval number was not provided; Funding bodies were not acknowledged; Protein / gene analysis assays were limited to only a few molecules. I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion, but hope that you appreciate the reasons for this decision. Yours sincerely, Dimitrios Zeugolis, BSc(Hons), MSc, PhD Academic Editor PLOS ONE, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Feb 20 08:59:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501204, encodeId=545e501204e1, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：目前大修的稿子刚投过去，不知道结果如何，现在with editor了，希望好运！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=102, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 22:55:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501203, encodeId=633e5012034c, content=好的编辑让您记住他的好，但有的流氓编辑就气得您吐血。我有一篇“创新过分”的稿子投到 AIP Advaces，这个杂志通常只有一个审稿人。第一个审稿人的意见是：Publish with optional revision. 但编辑总是想把我稿子退了。说是为了公平起见，还要再审。找来找去，终于找到了一个大外行，胡说八道地伪造了一大堆的理由把我退了。按一般规则，一个 Publish with optional revision，一个 Reject，应该让作者作出答复再审。可是这个印度流氓编辑连这样的机会都不给。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=119, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 22:11:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501187, encodeId=1ecd50118e65, content=投稿命中率:50.0 经验分享：12月18号 submit 1月8号 under review 直到现在过了1个半月还是under review； 怎么办啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=121, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 09:44:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501164, encodeId=c94950116434, content=这些审稿快的，有没有语言润色啊？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Feb 18 12:41:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2014-02-21 lovetcm

2013年，plos one上中国人文章占21% （medsci上写的）。去年总数量在30000篇，意味着中国人文章多达6000篇左右，真吓人

128 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501237, encodeId=804150123e39, content=PLoS One2012年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=133, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 11:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501238, encodeId=0523501238ff, content= PLoS One，2014年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=146, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 11:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501235, encodeId=f3a4501235e0, content=2013年，plos one上中国人文章占21% （medsci上写的）。去年总数量在30000篇，意味着中国人文章多达6000篇左右，真吓人, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=128, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20220519/c2ab253484ee4527a2d4e9589a4821ac/45de9bf494a54becb2ea4369c9d11e85.jpg, createdBy=7a3710, createdName=lovetcm, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 09:36:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501233, encodeId=3c0e50123338, content=12月末submit 1月中旬大修 还好问题与我接下来的工作相关所以改得很好 2月10号修回 2月21accept 审稿人的意见很中肯，讲在了点子上，editor动作也很迅速 最终稿改了很多，投JBC也没问题，有点可惜。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=168, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=2eb315758, createdName=gp4444, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 08:54:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501208, encodeId=6584501208de, content=图片质量欠佳-纯属扯淡，伦理学声明没有编号-大家都有伦理学编号吗？基金没提供编号-这也是拒稿的理由？ PCR 做了4个基因嫌少，也是拒稿的理由。 可气的是，这个编辑就没送外审，全是自己的意见，一点具体的意见也没有，对文章本身不会有任何提高。 综上所述，这是个垃圾的不能再垃圾的编辑，人品严重低劣。碰上了自认倒霉。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=123, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=winner01072, createdTime=Thu Feb 20 09:05:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501207, encodeId=307f50120ea3, content=大家都过来围观看看，PLOS ONE 的流氓编辑不到一个月就给出意见了，没送外审。 Dear Prof XXX, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we have decided that your manuscript does not meet our criteria for publication and must therefore be rejected. Specifically: The graphs are of sub-optimal quality; Ethical approval number was not provided; Funding bodies were not acknowledged; Protein / gene analysis assays were limited to only a few molecules. I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion, but hope that you appreciate the reasons for this decision. Yours sincerely, Dimitrios Zeugolis, BSc(Hons), MSc, PhD Academic Editor PLOS ONE, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Feb 20 08:59:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501204, encodeId=545e501204e1, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：目前大修的稿子刚投过去，不知道结果如何，现在with editor了，希望好运！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=102, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 22:55:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501203, encodeId=633e5012034c, content=好的编辑让您记住他的好，但有的流氓编辑就气得您吐血。我有一篇“创新过分”的稿子投到 AIP Advaces，这个杂志通常只有一个审稿人。第一个审稿人的意见是：Publish with optional revision. 但编辑总是想把我稿子退了。说是为了公平起见，还要再审。找来找去，终于找到了一个大外行，胡说八道地伪造了一大堆的理由把我退了。按一般规则，一个 Publish with optional revision，一个 Reject，应该让作者作出答复再审。可是这个印度流氓编辑连这样的机会都不给。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=119, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 22:11:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501187, encodeId=1ecd50118e65, content=投稿命中率:50.0 经验分享：12月18号 submit 1月8号 under review 直到现在过了1个半月还是under review； 怎么办啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=121, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 09:44:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501164, encodeId=c94950116434, content=这些审稿快的，有没有语言润色啊？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Feb 18 12:41:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2014-02-21 gp4444

12月末submit
1月中旬大修
还好问题与我接下来的工作相关所以改得很好
2月10号修回
2月21accept

审稿人的意见很中肯，讲在了点子上，editor动作也很迅速

最终稿改了很多，投JBC也没问题，有点可惜。

168 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501237, encodeId=804150123e39, content=PLoS One2012年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=133, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 11:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501238, encodeId=0523501238ff, content= PLoS One，2014年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=146, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 11:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501235, encodeId=f3a4501235e0, content=2013年，plos one上中国人文章占21% （medsci上写的）。去年总数量在30000篇，意味着中国人文章多达6000篇左右，真吓人, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=128, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20220519/c2ab253484ee4527a2d4e9589a4821ac/45de9bf494a54becb2ea4369c9d11e85.jpg, createdBy=7a3710, createdName=lovetcm, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 09:36:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501233, encodeId=3c0e50123338, content=12月末submit 1月中旬大修 还好问题与我接下来的工作相关所以改得很好 2月10号修回 2月21accept 审稿人的意见很中肯，讲在了点子上，editor动作也很迅速 最终稿改了很多，投JBC也没问题，有点可惜。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=168, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=2eb315758, createdName=gp4444, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 08:54:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501208, encodeId=6584501208de, content=图片质量欠佳-纯属扯淡，伦理学声明没有编号-大家都有伦理学编号吗？基金没提供编号-这也是拒稿的理由？ PCR 做了4个基因嫌少，也是拒稿的理由。 可气的是，这个编辑就没送外审，全是自己的意见，一点具体的意见也没有，对文章本身不会有任何提高。 综上所述，这是个垃圾的不能再垃圾的编辑，人品严重低劣。碰上了自认倒霉。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=123, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=winner01072, createdTime=Thu Feb 20 09:05:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501207, encodeId=307f50120ea3, content=大家都过来围观看看，PLOS ONE 的流氓编辑不到一个月就给出意见了，没送外审。 Dear Prof XXX, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we have decided that your manuscript does not meet our criteria for publication and must therefore be rejected. Specifically: The graphs are of sub-optimal quality; Ethical approval number was not provided; Funding bodies were not acknowledged; Protein / gene analysis assays were limited to only a few molecules. I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion, but hope that you appreciate the reasons for this decision. Yours sincerely, Dimitrios Zeugolis, BSc(Hons), MSc, PhD Academic Editor PLOS ONE, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Feb 20 08:59:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501204, encodeId=545e501204e1, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：目前大修的稿子刚投过去，不知道结果如何，现在with editor了，希望好运！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=102, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 22:55:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501203, encodeId=633e5012034c, content=好的编辑让您记住他的好，但有的流氓编辑就气得您吐血。我有一篇“创新过分”的稿子投到 AIP Advaces，这个杂志通常只有一个审稿人。第一个审稿人的意见是：Publish with optional revision. 但编辑总是想把我稿子退了。说是为了公平起见，还要再审。找来找去，终于找到了一个大外行，胡说八道地伪造了一大堆的理由把我退了。按一般规则，一个 Publish with optional revision，一个 Reject，应该让作者作出答复再审。可是这个印度流氓编辑连这样的机会都不给。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=119, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 22:11:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501187, encodeId=1ecd50118e65, content=投稿命中率:50.0 经验分享：12月18号 submit 1月8号 under review 直到现在过了1个半月还是under review； 怎么办啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=121, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 09:44:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501164, encodeId=c94950116434, content=这些审稿快的，有没有语言润色啊？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Feb 18 12:41:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2014-02-20 winner01072

图片质量欠佳-纯属扯淡，伦理学声明没有编号-大家都有伦理学编号吗？基金没提供编号-这也是拒稿的理由？ PCR 做了4个基因嫌少，也是拒稿的理由。
可气的是，这个编辑就没送外审，全是自己的意见，一点具体的意见也没有，对文章本身不会有任何提高。
综上所述，这是个垃圾的不能再垃圾的编辑，人品严重低劣。碰上了自认倒霉。

123 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501237, encodeId=804150123e39, content=PLoS One2012年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=133, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 11:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501238, encodeId=0523501238ff, content= PLoS One，2014年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=146, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 11:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501235, encodeId=f3a4501235e0, content=2013年，plos one上中国人文章占21% （medsci上写的）。去年总数量在30000篇，意味着中国人文章多达6000篇左右，真吓人, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=128, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20220519/c2ab253484ee4527a2d4e9589a4821ac/45de9bf494a54becb2ea4369c9d11e85.jpg, createdBy=7a3710, createdName=lovetcm, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 09:36:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501233, encodeId=3c0e50123338, content=12月末submit 1月中旬大修 还好问题与我接下来的工作相关所以改得很好 2月10号修回 2月21accept 审稿人的意见很中肯，讲在了点子上，editor动作也很迅速 最终稿改了很多，投JBC也没问题，有点可惜。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=168, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=2eb315758, createdName=gp4444, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 08:54:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501208, encodeId=6584501208de, content=图片质量欠佳-纯属扯淡，伦理学声明没有编号-大家都有伦理学编号吗？基金没提供编号-这也是拒稿的理由？ PCR 做了4个基因嫌少，也是拒稿的理由。 可气的是，这个编辑就没送外审，全是自己的意见，一点具体的意见也没有，对文章本身不会有任何提高。 综上所述，这是个垃圾的不能再垃圾的编辑，人品严重低劣。碰上了自认倒霉。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=123, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=winner01072, createdTime=Thu Feb 20 09:05:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501207, encodeId=307f50120ea3, content=大家都过来围观看看，PLOS ONE 的流氓编辑不到一个月就给出意见了，没送外审。 Dear Prof XXX, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we have decided that your manuscript does not meet our criteria for publication and must therefore be rejected. Specifically: The graphs are of sub-optimal quality; Ethical approval number was not provided; Funding bodies were not acknowledged; Protein / gene analysis assays were limited to only a few molecules. I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion, but hope that you appreciate the reasons for this decision. Yours sincerely, Dimitrios Zeugolis, BSc(Hons), MSc, PhD Academic Editor PLOS ONE, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Feb 20 08:59:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501204, encodeId=545e501204e1, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：目前大修的稿子刚投过去，不知道结果如何，现在with editor了，希望好运！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=102, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 22:55:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501203, encodeId=633e5012034c, content=好的编辑让您记住他的好，但有的流氓编辑就气得您吐血。我有一篇“创新过分”的稿子投到 AIP Advaces，这个杂志通常只有一个审稿人。第一个审稿人的意见是：Publish with optional revision. 但编辑总是想把我稿子退了。说是为了公平起见，还要再审。找来找去，终于找到了一个大外行，胡说八道地伪造了一大堆的理由把我退了。按一般规则，一个 Publish with optional revision，一个 Reject，应该让作者作出答复再审。可是这个印度流氓编辑连这样的机会都不给。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=119, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 22:11:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501187, encodeId=1ecd50118e65, content=投稿命中率:50.0 经验分享：12月18号 submit 1月8号 under review 直到现在过了1个半月还是under review； 怎么办啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=121, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 09:44:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501164, encodeId=c94950116434, content=这些审稿快的，有没有语言润色啊？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Feb 18 12:41:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2014-02-20 匿名用户

大家都过来围观看看，PLOS ONE 的流氓编辑不到一个月就给出意见了，没送外审。
Dear Prof XXX,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we have decided that your manuscript does not meet our criteria for publication and must therefore be rejected.

Specifically:

The graphs are of sub-optimal quality; Ethical approval number was not provided; Funding bodies were not acknowledged; Protein / gene analysis assays were limited to only a few molecules.

I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion, but hope that you appreciate the reasons for this decision.

Yours sincerely,

Dimitrios Zeugolis, BSc(Hons), MSc, PhD
Academic Editor
PLOS ONE

110 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501237, encodeId=804150123e39, content=PLoS One2012年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=133, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 11:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501238, encodeId=0523501238ff, content= PLoS One，2014年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=146, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 11:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501235, encodeId=f3a4501235e0, content=2013年，plos one上中国人文章占21% （medsci上写的）。去年总数量在30000篇，意味着中国人文章多达6000篇左右，真吓人, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=128, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20220519/c2ab253484ee4527a2d4e9589a4821ac/45de9bf494a54becb2ea4369c9d11e85.jpg, createdBy=7a3710, createdName=lovetcm, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 09:36:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501233, encodeId=3c0e50123338, content=12月末submit 1月中旬大修 还好问题与我接下来的工作相关所以改得很好 2月10号修回 2月21accept 审稿人的意见很中肯，讲在了点子上，editor动作也很迅速 最终稿改了很多，投JBC也没问题，有点可惜。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=168, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=2eb315758, createdName=gp4444, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 08:54:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501208, encodeId=6584501208de, content=图片质量欠佳-纯属扯淡，伦理学声明没有编号-大家都有伦理学编号吗？基金没提供编号-这也是拒稿的理由？ PCR 做了4个基因嫌少，也是拒稿的理由。 可气的是，这个编辑就没送外审，全是自己的意见，一点具体的意见也没有，对文章本身不会有任何提高。 综上所述，这是个垃圾的不能再垃圾的编辑，人品严重低劣。碰上了自认倒霉。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=123, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=winner01072, createdTime=Thu Feb 20 09:05:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501207, encodeId=307f50120ea3, content=大家都过来围观看看，PLOS ONE 的流氓编辑不到一个月就给出意见了，没送外审。 Dear Prof XXX, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we have decided that your manuscript does not meet our criteria for publication and must therefore be rejected. Specifically: The graphs are of sub-optimal quality; Ethical approval number was not provided; Funding bodies were not acknowledged; Protein / gene analysis assays were limited to only a few molecules. I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion, but hope that you appreciate the reasons for this decision. Yours sincerely, Dimitrios Zeugolis, BSc(Hons), MSc, PhD Academic Editor PLOS ONE, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Feb 20 08:59:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501204, encodeId=545e501204e1, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：目前大修的稿子刚投过去，不知道结果如何，现在with editor了，希望好运！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=102, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 22:55:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501203, encodeId=633e5012034c, content=好的编辑让您记住他的好，但有的流氓编辑就气得您吐血。我有一篇“创新过分”的稿子投到 AIP Advaces，这个杂志通常只有一个审稿人。第一个审稿人的意见是：Publish with optional revision. 但编辑总是想把我稿子退了。说是为了公平起见，还要再审。找来找去，终于找到了一个大外行，胡说八道地伪造了一大堆的理由把我退了。按一般规则，一个 Publish with optional revision，一个 Reject，应该让作者作出答复再审。可是这个印度流氓编辑连这样的机会都不给。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=119, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 22:11:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501187, encodeId=1ecd50118e65, content=投稿命中率:50.0 经验分享：12月18号 submit 1月8号 under review 直到现在过了1个半月还是under review； 怎么办啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=121, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 09:44:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501164, encodeId=c94950116434, content=这些审稿快的，有没有语言润色啊？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Feb 18 12:41:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2014-02-19 匿名用户

审稿速度:2.0
经验分享：目前大修的稿子刚投过去，不知道结果如何，现在with editor了，希望好运！

102 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501237, encodeId=804150123e39, content=PLoS One2012年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=133, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 11:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501238, encodeId=0523501238ff, content= PLoS One，2014年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=146, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 11:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501235, encodeId=f3a4501235e0, content=2013年，plos one上中国人文章占21% （medsci上写的）。去年总数量在30000篇，意味着中国人文章多达6000篇左右，真吓人, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=128, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20220519/c2ab253484ee4527a2d4e9589a4821ac/45de9bf494a54becb2ea4369c9d11e85.jpg, createdBy=7a3710, createdName=lovetcm, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 09:36:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501233, encodeId=3c0e50123338, content=12月末submit 1月中旬大修 还好问题与我接下来的工作相关所以改得很好 2月10号修回 2月21accept 审稿人的意见很中肯，讲在了点子上，editor动作也很迅速 最终稿改了很多，投JBC也没问题，有点可惜。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=168, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=2eb315758, createdName=gp4444, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 08:54:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501208, encodeId=6584501208de, content=图片质量欠佳-纯属扯淡，伦理学声明没有编号-大家都有伦理学编号吗？基金没提供编号-这也是拒稿的理由？ PCR 做了4个基因嫌少，也是拒稿的理由。 可气的是，这个编辑就没送外审，全是自己的意见，一点具体的意见也没有，对文章本身不会有任何提高。 综上所述，这是个垃圾的不能再垃圾的编辑，人品严重低劣。碰上了自认倒霉。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=123, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=winner01072, createdTime=Thu Feb 20 09:05:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501207, encodeId=307f50120ea3, content=大家都过来围观看看，PLOS ONE 的流氓编辑不到一个月就给出意见了，没送外审。 Dear Prof XXX, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we have decided that your manuscript does not meet our criteria for publication and must therefore be rejected. Specifically: The graphs are of sub-optimal quality; Ethical approval number was not provided; Funding bodies were not acknowledged; Protein / gene analysis assays were limited to only a few molecules. I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion, but hope that you appreciate the reasons for this decision. Yours sincerely, Dimitrios Zeugolis, BSc(Hons), MSc, PhD Academic Editor PLOS ONE, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Feb 20 08:59:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501204, encodeId=545e501204e1, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：目前大修的稿子刚投过去，不知道结果如何，现在with editor了，希望好运！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=102, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 22:55:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501203, encodeId=633e5012034c, content=好的编辑让您记住他的好，但有的流氓编辑就气得您吐血。我有一篇“创新过分”的稿子投到 AIP Advaces，这个杂志通常只有一个审稿人。第一个审稿人的意见是：Publish with optional revision. 但编辑总是想把我稿子退了。说是为了公平起见，还要再审。找来找去，终于找到了一个大外行，胡说八道地伪造了一大堆的理由把我退了。按一般规则，一个 Publish with optional revision，一个 Reject，应该让作者作出答复再审。可是这个印度流氓编辑连这样的机会都不给。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=119, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 22:11:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501187, encodeId=1ecd50118e65, content=投稿命中率:50.0 经验分享：12月18号 submit 1月8号 under review 直到现在过了1个半月还是under review； 怎么办啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=121, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 09:44:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501164, encodeId=c94950116434, content=这些审稿快的，有没有语言润色啊？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Feb 18 12:41:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2014-02-19 匿名用户

好的编辑让您记住他的好，但有的流氓编辑就气得您吐血。我有一篇“创新过分”的稿子投到 AIP Advaces，这个杂志通常只有一个审稿人。第一个审稿人的意见是：Publish with optional revision. 但编辑总是想把我稿子退了。说是为了公平起见，还要再审。找来找去，终于找到了一个大外行，胡说八道地伪造了一大堆的理由把我退了。按一般规则，一个 Publish with optional revision，一个 Reject，应该让作者作出答复再审。可是这个印度流氓编辑连这样的机会都不给。

119 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501237, encodeId=804150123e39, content=PLoS One2012年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=133, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 11:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501238, encodeId=0523501238ff, content= PLoS One，2014年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=146, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 11:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501235, encodeId=f3a4501235e0, content=2013年，plos one上中国人文章占21% （medsci上写的）。去年总数量在30000篇，意味着中国人文章多达6000篇左右，真吓人, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=128, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20220519/c2ab253484ee4527a2d4e9589a4821ac/45de9bf494a54becb2ea4369c9d11e85.jpg, createdBy=7a3710, createdName=lovetcm, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 09:36:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501233, encodeId=3c0e50123338, content=12月末submit 1月中旬大修 还好问题与我接下来的工作相关所以改得很好 2月10号修回 2月21accept 审稿人的意见很中肯，讲在了点子上，editor动作也很迅速 最终稿改了很多，投JBC也没问题，有点可惜。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=168, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=2eb315758, createdName=gp4444, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 08:54:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501208, encodeId=6584501208de, content=图片质量欠佳-纯属扯淡，伦理学声明没有编号-大家都有伦理学编号吗？基金没提供编号-这也是拒稿的理由？ PCR 做了4个基因嫌少，也是拒稿的理由。 可气的是，这个编辑就没送外审，全是自己的意见，一点具体的意见也没有，对文章本身不会有任何提高。 综上所述，这是个垃圾的不能再垃圾的编辑，人品严重低劣。碰上了自认倒霉。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=123, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=winner01072, createdTime=Thu Feb 20 09:05:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501207, encodeId=307f50120ea3, content=大家都过来围观看看，PLOS ONE 的流氓编辑不到一个月就给出意见了，没送外审。 Dear Prof XXX, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we have decided that your manuscript does not meet our criteria for publication and must therefore be rejected. Specifically: The graphs are of sub-optimal quality; Ethical approval number was not provided; Funding bodies were not acknowledged; Protein / gene analysis assays were limited to only a few molecules. I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion, but hope that you appreciate the reasons for this decision. Yours sincerely, Dimitrios Zeugolis, BSc(Hons), MSc, PhD Academic Editor PLOS ONE, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Feb 20 08:59:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501204, encodeId=545e501204e1, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：目前大修的稿子刚投过去，不知道结果如何，现在with editor了，希望好运！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=102, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 22:55:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501203, encodeId=633e5012034c, content=好的编辑让您记住他的好，但有的流氓编辑就气得您吐血。我有一篇“创新过分”的稿子投到 AIP Advaces，这个杂志通常只有一个审稿人。第一个审稿人的意见是：Publish with optional revision. 但编辑总是想把我稿子退了。说是为了公平起见，还要再审。找来找去，终于找到了一个大外行，胡说八道地伪造了一大堆的理由把我退了。按一般规则，一个 Publish with optional revision，一个 Reject，应该让作者作出答复再审。可是这个印度流氓编辑连这样的机会都不给。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=119, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 22:11:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501187, encodeId=1ecd50118e65, content=投稿命中率:50.0 经验分享：12月18号 submit 1月8号 under review 直到现在过了1个半月还是under review； 怎么办啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=121, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 09:44:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501164, encodeId=c94950116434, content=这些审稿快的，有没有语言润色啊？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Feb 18 12:41:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2014-02-19 匿名用户

投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：12月18号 submit
1月8号 under review
直到现在过了1个半月还是under review；
怎么办啊！

121 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501237, encodeId=804150123e39, content=PLoS One2012年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=133, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 11:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501238, encodeId=0523501238ff, content= PLoS One，2014年审稿极其严格，一点小问题，都会被拒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=146, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 11:09:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501235, encodeId=f3a4501235e0, content=2013年，plos one上中国人文章占21% （medsci上写的）。去年总数量在30000篇，意味着中国人文章多达6000篇左右，真吓人, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=128, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20220519/c2ab253484ee4527a2d4e9589a4821ac/45de9bf494a54becb2ea4369c9d11e85.jpg, createdBy=7a3710, createdName=lovetcm, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 09:36:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501233, encodeId=3c0e50123338, content=12月末submit 1月中旬大修 还好问题与我接下来的工作相关所以改得很好 2月10号修回 2月21accept 审稿人的意见很中肯，讲在了点子上，editor动作也很迅速 最终稿改了很多，投JBC也没问题，有点可惜。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=168, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=2eb315758, createdName=gp4444, createdTime=Fri Feb 21 08:54:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501208, encodeId=6584501208de, content=图片质量欠佳-纯属扯淡，伦理学声明没有编号-大家都有伦理学编号吗？基金没提供编号-这也是拒稿的理由？ PCR 做了4个基因嫌少，也是拒稿的理由。 可气的是，这个编辑就没送外审，全是自己的意见，一点具体的意见也没有，对文章本身不会有任何提高。 综上所述，这是个垃圾的不能再垃圾的编辑，人品严重低劣。碰上了自认倒霉。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=123, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=winner01072, createdTime=Thu Feb 20 09:05:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501207, encodeId=307f50120ea3, content=大家都过来围观看看，PLOS ONE 的流氓编辑不到一个月就给出意见了，没送外审。 Dear Prof XXX, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we have decided that your manuscript does not meet our criteria for publication and must therefore be rejected. Specifically: The graphs are of sub-optimal quality; Ethical approval number was not provided; Funding bodies were not acknowledged; Protein / gene analysis assays were limited to only a few molecules. I am sorry that we cannot be more positive on this occasion, but hope that you appreciate the reasons for this decision. Yours sincerely, Dimitrios Zeugolis, BSc(Hons), MSc, PhD Academic Editor PLOS ONE, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=110, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Feb 20 08:59:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501204, encodeId=545e501204e1, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：目前大修的稿子刚投过去，不知道结果如何，现在with editor了，希望好运！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=102, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 22:55:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501203, encodeId=633e5012034c, content=好的编辑让您记住他的好，但有的流氓编辑就气得您吐血。我有一篇“创新过分”的稿子投到 AIP Advaces，这个杂志通常只有一个审稿人。第一个审稿人的意见是：Publish with optional revision. 但编辑总是想把我稿子退了。说是为了公平起见，还要再审。找来找去，终于找到了一个大外行，胡说八道地伪造了一大堆的理由把我退了。按一般规则，一个 Publish with optional revision，一个 Reject，应该让作者作出答复再审。可是这个印度流氓编辑连这样的机会都不给。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=119, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 22:11:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501187, encodeId=1ecd50118e65, content=投稿命中率:50.0 经验分享：12月18号 submit 1月8号 under review 直到现在过了1个半月还是under review； 怎么办啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=121, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Feb 19 09:44:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501164, encodeId=c94950116434, content=这些审稿快的，有没有语言润色啊？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Feb 18 12:41:00 CST 2014, time=2014-02-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2014-02-18 匿名用户

这些审稿快的，有没有语言润色啊？

106 0

内科

外科

专科科室

热点

按科室浏览

临床工具

科研工具

其他工具

科研数智化

真实世界研究解决方案

数字化学术传播解决方案

其它

期刊讨论

科室

工具

服务