PLOS ONE 润色咨询

PLoS One

出版年份:2006 年文章数:239709 投稿命中率: 开通期刊会员,数据随心看

出版周期:Irregular 自引率:6.0% 审稿周期: 开通期刊会员,数据随心看

前往期刊查询

期刊讨论

  1. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499921, encodeId=884e49992121, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。 <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧! <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴. <br> <br> ———————————————————— <br> 你挺狡猾的,要我发PLOS ONE,想把我拉下水,不好意思再批你们啊!我才不跟你们同流合污呢!!我要坚决与你们这种年年发PLOS ONE的人划清界限。在这里批判你们就是最好的行动证明。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=85, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 11:20:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499920, encodeId=cb9849992015, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。 <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧! <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 10:48:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499917, encodeId=c47049991eec, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=93, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 09:12:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499916, encodeId=687d499916b8, content=吃饱了撑得,吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。如果你觉着plos one不好,你就投Science, nature或专业顶级刊物。 <br> 争来争去,有什么用?如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。犯不着争得面红耳赤,却谁也说服不了谁。有时间去做自己的研究吧。 <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=101, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 09:10:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499914, encodeId=d02449991490, content=plos one的创始人考虑到很多开创新的工作反而容易被埋没,就像爱因斯坦的相对论那样。越是开创性的工作,越难以得到认可。为了给类似工作提供发表途径,于是创建plos one。 <br> <br> 既然plos one有引用,就说明其文章还是有价值的,对科学还是有贡献的。如果完完全全垃圾一堆,就不会有人去看,也不会有人去引用。虽然此刊不强调创新,但是毫无新意,仅仅是重复和模仿别人的工作,是不可能发表的。 <br> <br> 出版面费发文章,这无可非议呀。它是开源期刊嘛,不收作者的,就收读者的。何况他收的钱不多呀。国内刊物不也收嘛,收的也不少呀,经常几千元。国内有些刊物很好,却得不到认可。据我看,有些刊物发的文章,其新意、意义不亚于1-2分的SCI。当然,与plos one上的大部分文章相比,还是有点距离的。 <br> <br> 能投plos one 还是不错的选择。很多专业顶级刊物对中国人就歧视,好不容易有个刊物不歧视中国人啦。还有人说三道四,真不知道这些人是什么心态。爱国乎,崇洋媚外乎,愚蠢乎,自贱乎?我看不透,也说不清。以后不再来这个地方啦。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=98, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 06:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499913, encodeId=1532499913c6, content=英国《自然》杂志为了赚*钱,近年出版《Nature Communiacation》,《细胞》出版社出版《Cell Reports》,前几年另一国外出版社出版了《Plos One》,这些以版面费牟*利的杂志,大量收到中国的投稿,它们不代表中国科学的水平有所提高,仅是低水平论文数量增加而已。 <br> <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 06:46:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499912, encodeId=c7fd499912be, content=PLOS ONE Publication Criteria <br> 1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research. <br> (primary翻译过来不知是“原始的"还是"初级的"意思。希望是原始的意思) <br> 2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere. <br> (那个杂志都一样,一女不嫁二夫吗) <br> 3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail. <br> (那个杂志都一样,实验数据不能支持你的结论,肯定不行) <br> 4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data. <br> (同上) <br> 5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English. <br> (用英语写,绝大多数英语国家杂志都这样要求) <br> 6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity. <br> (多数杂志都有这个要求,不奇怪) <br> 7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability. <br> (同上) <br> <br> +++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 整个要求就没提到这个要求这个工作很重要,对科学发展有贡献啊?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 05:15:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499911, encodeId=dc674999115e, content=各位是老师?科研院所的?学生? <br> 要是学生在这里吵几句,就算了,又不涉及利益。 <br> 要是一帮老师或者科研院所的。。。 <br> 把这几页帖子做成图片公布到社会上,看看中国科研人员的素质,让世界知道中国科研的现状,不是因为学术争,而是因为这个!争的你死我活。 <br> 真丢人!!!!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=92, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 02:50:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499908, encodeId=5d7849990808, content=PLOS ONE Publication Criteria <br> 1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research. <br> 2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere. <br> 3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail. <br> 4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data. <br> 5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English. <br> 6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity. <br> 7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability. <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Nov 19 23:50:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499907, encodeId=182f49990e57, content=双方争论相当精彩,建议将争论内容翻译成英文,投PLOS one, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=113, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Nov 19 22:47:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2013-11-20 匿名用户

    吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。
    如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++
    废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧!
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++
    睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴.

    ————————————————————
    你挺狡猾的,要我发PLOS ONE,想把我拉下水,不好意思再批你们啊!我才不跟你们同流合污呢!!我要坚决与你们这种年年发PLOS ONE的人划清界限。在这里批判你们就是最好的行动证明。

    0

  2. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499921, encodeId=884e49992121, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。 <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧! <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴. <br> <br> ———————————————————— <br> 你挺狡猾的,要我发PLOS ONE,想把我拉下水,不好意思再批你们啊!我才不跟你们同流合污呢!!我要坚决与你们这种年年发PLOS ONE的人划清界限。在这里批判你们就是最好的行动证明。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=85, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 11:20:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499920, encodeId=cb9849992015, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。 <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧! <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 10:48:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499917, encodeId=c47049991eec, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=93, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 09:12:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499916, encodeId=687d499916b8, content=吃饱了撑得,吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。如果你觉着plos one不好,你就投Science, nature或专业顶级刊物。 <br> 争来争去,有什么用?如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。犯不着争得面红耳赤,却谁也说服不了谁。有时间去做自己的研究吧。 <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=101, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 09:10:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499914, encodeId=d02449991490, content=plos one的创始人考虑到很多开创新的工作反而容易被埋没,就像爱因斯坦的相对论那样。越是开创性的工作,越难以得到认可。为了给类似工作提供发表途径,于是创建plos one。 <br> <br> 既然plos one有引用,就说明其文章还是有价值的,对科学还是有贡献的。如果完完全全垃圾一堆,就不会有人去看,也不会有人去引用。虽然此刊不强调创新,但是毫无新意,仅仅是重复和模仿别人的工作,是不可能发表的。 <br> <br> 出版面费发文章,这无可非议呀。它是开源期刊嘛,不收作者的,就收读者的。何况他收的钱不多呀。国内刊物不也收嘛,收的也不少呀,经常几千元。国内有些刊物很好,却得不到认可。据我看,有些刊物发的文章,其新意、意义不亚于1-2分的SCI。当然,与plos one上的大部分文章相比,还是有点距离的。 <br> <br> 能投plos one 还是不错的选择。很多专业顶级刊物对中国人就歧视,好不容易有个刊物不歧视中国人啦。还有人说三道四,真不知道这些人是什么心态。爱国乎,崇洋媚外乎,愚蠢乎,自贱乎?我看不透,也说不清。以后不再来这个地方啦。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=98, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 06:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499913, encodeId=1532499913c6, content=英国《自然》杂志为了赚*钱,近年出版《Nature Communiacation》,《细胞》出版社出版《Cell Reports》,前几年另一国外出版社出版了《Plos One》,这些以版面费牟*利的杂志,大量收到中国的投稿,它们不代表中国科学的水平有所提高,仅是低水平论文数量增加而已。 <br> <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 06:46:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499912, encodeId=c7fd499912be, content=PLOS ONE Publication Criteria <br> 1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research. <br> (primary翻译过来不知是“原始的"还是"初级的"意思。希望是原始的意思) <br> 2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere. <br> (那个杂志都一样,一女不嫁二夫吗) <br> 3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail. <br> (那个杂志都一样,实验数据不能支持你的结论,肯定不行) <br> 4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data. <br> (同上) <br> 5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English. <br> (用英语写,绝大多数英语国家杂志都这样要求) <br> 6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity. <br> (多数杂志都有这个要求,不奇怪) <br> 7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability. <br> (同上) <br> <br> +++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 整个要求就没提到这个要求这个工作很重要,对科学发展有贡献啊?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 05:15:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499911, encodeId=dc674999115e, content=各位是老师?科研院所的?学生? <br> 要是学生在这里吵几句,就算了,又不涉及利益。 <br> 要是一帮老师或者科研院所的。。。 <br> 把这几页帖子做成图片公布到社会上,看看中国科研人员的素质,让世界知道中国科研的现状,不是因为学术争,而是因为这个!争的你死我活。 <br> 真丢人!!!!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=92, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 02:50:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499908, encodeId=5d7849990808, content=PLOS ONE Publication Criteria <br> 1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research. <br> 2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere. <br> 3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail. <br> 4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data. <br> 5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English. <br> 6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity. <br> 7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability. <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Nov 19 23:50:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499907, encodeId=182f49990e57, content=双方争论相当精彩,建议将争论内容翻译成英文,投PLOS one, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=113, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Nov 19 22:47:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2013-11-20 匿名用户

    吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。
    如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++
    废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧!
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++
    睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴.

    0

  3. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499921, encodeId=884e49992121, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。 <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧! <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴. <br> <br> ———————————————————— <br> 你挺狡猾的,要我发PLOS ONE,想把我拉下水,不好意思再批你们啊!我才不跟你们同流合污呢!!我要坚决与你们这种年年发PLOS ONE的人划清界限。在这里批判你们就是最好的行动证明。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=85, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 11:20:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499920, encodeId=cb9849992015, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。 <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧! <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 10:48:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499917, encodeId=c47049991eec, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=93, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 09:12:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499916, encodeId=687d499916b8, content=吃饱了撑得,吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。如果你觉着plos one不好,你就投Science, nature或专业顶级刊物。 <br> 争来争去,有什么用?如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。犯不着争得面红耳赤,却谁也说服不了谁。有时间去做自己的研究吧。 <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=101, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 09:10:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499914, encodeId=d02449991490, content=plos one的创始人考虑到很多开创新的工作反而容易被埋没,就像爱因斯坦的相对论那样。越是开创性的工作,越难以得到认可。为了给类似工作提供发表途径,于是创建plos one。 <br> <br> 既然plos one有引用,就说明其文章还是有价值的,对科学还是有贡献的。如果完完全全垃圾一堆,就不会有人去看,也不会有人去引用。虽然此刊不强调创新,但是毫无新意,仅仅是重复和模仿别人的工作,是不可能发表的。 <br> <br> 出版面费发文章,这无可非议呀。它是开源期刊嘛,不收作者的,就收读者的。何况他收的钱不多呀。国内刊物不也收嘛,收的也不少呀,经常几千元。国内有些刊物很好,却得不到认可。据我看,有些刊物发的文章,其新意、意义不亚于1-2分的SCI。当然,与plos one上的大部分文章相比,还是有点距离的。 <br> <br> 能投plos one 还是不错的选择。很多专业顶级刊物对中国人就歧视,好不容易有个刊物不歧视中国人啦。还有人说三道四,真不知道这些人是什么心态。爱国乎,崇洋媚外乎,愚蠢乎,自贱乎?我看不透,也说不清。以后不再来这个地方啦。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=98, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 06:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499913, encodeId=1532499913c6, content=英国《自然》杂志为了赚*钱,近年出版《Nature Communiacation》,《细胞》出版社出版《Cell Reports》,前几年另一国外出版社出版了《Plos One》,这些以版面费牟*利的杂志,大量收到中国的投稿,它们不代表中国科学的水平有所提高,仅是低水平论文数量增加而已。 <br> <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 06:46:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499912, encodeId=c7fd499912be, content=PLOS ONE Publication Criteria <br> 1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research. <br> (primary翻译过来不知是“原始的"还是"初级的"意思。希望是原始的意思) <br> 2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere. <br> (那个杂志都一样,一女不嫁二夫吗) <br> 3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail. <br> (那个杂志都一样,实验数据不能支持你的结论,肯定不行) <br> 4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data. <br> (同上) <br> 5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English. <br> (用英语写,绝大多数英语国家杂志都这样要求) <br> 6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity. <br> (多数杂志都有这个要求,不奇怪) <br> 7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability. <br> (同上) <br> <br> +++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 整个要求就没提到这个要求这个工作很重要,对科学发展有贡献啊?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 05:15:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499911, encodeId=dc674999115e, content=各位是老师?科研院所的?学生? <br> 要是学生在这里吵几句,就算了,又不涉及利益。 <br> 要是一帮老师或者科研院所的。。。 <br> 把这几页帖子做成图片公布到社会上,看看中国科研人员的素质,让世界知道中国科研的现状,不是因为学术争,而是因为这个!争的你死我活。 <br> 真丢人!!!!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=92, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 02:50:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499908, encodeId=5d7849990808, content=PLOS ONE Publication Criteria <br> 1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research. <br> 2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere. <br> 3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail. <br> 4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data. <br> 5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English. <br> 6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity. <br> 7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability. <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Nov 19 23:50:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499907, encodeId=182f49990e57, content=双方争论相当精彩,建议将争论内容翻译成英文,投PLOS one, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=113, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Nov 19 22:47:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2013-11-20 匿名用户

    吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。
    如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。

    0

  4. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499921, encodeId=884e49992121, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。 <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧! <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴. <br> <br> ———————————————————— <br> 你挺狡猾的,要我发PLOS ONE,想把我拉下水,不好意思再批你们啊!我才不跟你们同流合污呢!!我要坚决与你们这种年年发PLOS ONE的人划清界限。在这里批判你们就是最好的行动证明。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=85, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 11:20:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499920, encodeId=cb9849992015, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。 <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧! <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 10:48:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499917, encodeId=c47049991eec, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=93, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 09:12:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499916, encodeId=687d499916b8, content=吃饱了撑得,吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。如果你觉着plos one不好,你就投Science, nature或专业顶级刊物。 <br> 争来争去,有什么用?如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。犯不着争得面红耳赤,却谁也说服不了谁。有时间去做自己的研究吧。 <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=101, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 09:10:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499914, encodeId=d02449991490, content=plos one的创始人考虑到很多开创新的工作反而容易被埋没,就像爱因斯坦的相对论那样。越是开创性的工作,越难以得到认可。为了给类似工作提供发表途径,于是创建plos one。 <br> <br> 既然plos one有引用,就说明其文章还是有价值的,对科学还是有贡献的。如果完完全全垃圾一堆,就不会有人去看,也不会有人去引用。虽然此刊不强调创新,但是毫无新意,仅仅是重复和模仿别人的工作,是不可能发表的。 <br> <br> 出版面费发文章,这无可非议呀。它是开源期刊嘛,不收作者的,就收读者的。何况他收的钱不多呀。国内刊物不也收嘛,收的也不少呀,经常几千元。国内有些刊物很好,却得不到认可。据我看,有些刊物发的文章,其新意、意义不亚于1-2分的SCI。当然,与plos one上的大部分文章相比,还是有点距离的。 <br> <br> 能投plos one 还是不错的选择。很多专业顶级刊物对中国人就歧视,好不容易有个刊物不歧视中国人啦。还有人说三道四,真不知道这些人是什么心态。爱国乎,崇洋媚外乎,愚蠢乎,自贱乎?我看不透,也说不清。以后不再来这个地方啦。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=98, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 06:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499913, encodeId=1532499913c6, content=英国《自然》杂志为了赚*钱,近年出版《Nature Communiacation》,《细胞》出版社出版《Cell Reports》,前几年另一国外出版社出版了《Plos One》,这些以版面费牟*利的杂志,大量收到中国的投稿,它们不代表中国科学的水平有所提高,仅是低水平论文数量增加而已。 <br> <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 06:46:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499912, encodeId=c7fd499912be, content=PLOS ONE Publication Criteria <br> 1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research. <br> (primary翻译过来不知是“原始的"还是"初级的"意思。希望是原始的意思) <br> 2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere. <br> (那个杂志都一样,一女不嫁二夫吗) <br> 3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail. <br> (那个杂志都一样,实验数据不能支持你的结论,肯定不行) <br> 4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data. <br> (同上) <br> 5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English. <br> (用英语写,绝大多数英语国家杂志都这样要求) <br> 6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity. <br> (多数杂志都有这个要求,不奇怪) <br> 7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability. <br> (同上) <br> <br> +++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 整个要求就没提到这个要求这个工作很重要,对科学发展有贡献啊?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 05:15:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499911, encodeId=dc674999115e, content=各位是老师?科研院所的?学生? <br> 要是学生在这里吵几句,就算了,又不涉及利益。 <br> 要是一帮老师或者科研院所的。。。 <br> 把这几页帖子做成图片公布到社会上,看看中国科研人员的素质,让世界知道中国科研的现状,不是因为学术争,而是因为这个!争的你死我活。 <br> 真丢人!!!!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=92, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 02:50:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499908, encodeId=5d7849990808, content=PLOS ONE Publication Criteria <br> 1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research. <br> 2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere. <br> 3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail. <br> 4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data. <br> 5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English. <br> 6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity. <br> 7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability. <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Nov 19 23:50:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499907, encodeId=182f49990e57, content=双方争论相当精彩,建议将争论内容翻译成英文,投PLOS one, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=113, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Nov 19 22:47:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2013-11-20 匿名用户

    吃饱了撑得,吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。如果你觉着plos one不好,你就投Science, nature或专业顶级刊物。
    争来争去,有什么用?如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。犯不着争得面红耳赤,却谁也说服不了谁。有时间去做自己的研究吧。

    0

  5. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499921, encodeId=884e49992121, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。 <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧! <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴. <br> <br> ———————————————————— <br> 你挺狡猾的,要我发PLOS ONE,想把我拉下水,不好意思再批你们啊!我才不跟你们同流合污呢!!我要坚决与你们这种年年发PLOS ONE的人划清界限。在这里批判你们就是最好的行动证明。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=85, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 11:20:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499920, encodeId=cb9849992015, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。 <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧! <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 10:48:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499917, encodeId=c47049991eec, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=93, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 09:12:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499916, encodeId=687d499916b8, content=吃饱了撑得,吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。如果你觉着plos one不好,你就投Science, nature或专业顶级刊物。 <br> 争来争去,有什么用?如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。犯不着争得面红耳赤,却谁也说服不了谁。有时间去做自己的研究吧。 <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=101, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 09:10:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499914, encodeId=d02449991490, content=plos one的创始人考虑到很多开创新的工作反而容易被埋没,就像爱因斯坦的相对论那样。越是开创性的工作,越难以得到认可。为了给类似工作提供发表途径,于是创建plos one。 <br> <br> 既然plos one有引用,就说明其文章还是有价值的,对科学还是有贡献的。如果完完全全垃圾一堆,就不会有人去看,也不会有人去引用。虽然此刊不强调创新,但是毫无新意,仅仅是重复和模仿别人的工作,是不可能发表的。 <br> <br> 出版面费发文章,这无可非议呀。它是开源期刊嘛,不收作者的,就收读者的。何况他收的钱不多呀。国内刊物不也收嘛,收的也不少呀,经常几千元。国内有些刊物很好,却得不到认可。据我看,有些刊物发的文章,其新意、意义不亚于1-2分的SCI。当然,与plos one上的大部分文章相比,还是有点距离的。 <br> <br> 能投plos one 还是不错的选择。很多专业顶级刊物对中国人就歧视,好不容易有个刊物不歧视中国人啦。还有人说三道四,真不知道这些人是什么心态。爱国乎,崇洋媚外乎,愚蠢乎,自贱乎?我看不透,也说不清。以后不再来这个地方啦。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=98, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 06:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499913, encodeId=1532499913c6, content=英国《自然》杂志为了赚*钱,近年出版《Nature Communiacation》,《细胞》出版社出版《Cell Reports》,前几年另一国外出版社出版了《Plos One》,这些以版面费牟*利的杂志,大量收到中国的投稿,它们不代表中国科学的水平有所提高,仅是低水平论文数量增加而已。 <br> <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 06:46:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499912, encodeId=c7fd499912be, content=PLOS ONE Publication Criteria <br> 1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research. <br> (primary翻译过来不知是“原始的"还是"初级的"意思。希望是原始的意思) <br> 2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere. <br> (那个杂志都一样,一女不嫁二夫吗) <br> 3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail. <br> (那个杂志都一样,实验数据不能支持你的结论,肯定不行) <br> 4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data. <br> (同上) <br> 5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English. <br> (用英语写,绝大多数英语国家杂志都这样要求) <br> 6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity. <br> (多数杂志都有这个要求,不奇怪) <br> 7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability. <br> (同上) <br> <br> +++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 整个要求就没提到这个要求这个工作很重要,对科学发展有贡献啊?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 05:15:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499911, encodeId=dc674999115e, content=各位是老师?科研院所的?学生? <br> 要是学生在这里吵几句,就算了,又不涉及利益。 <br> 要是一帮老师或者科研院所的。。。 <br> 把这几页帖子做成图片公布到社会上,看看中国科研人员的素质,让世界知道中国科研的现状,不是因为学术争,而是因为这个!争的你死我活。 <br> 真丢人!!!!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=92, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 02:50:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499908, encodeId=5d7849990808, content=PLOS ONE Publication Criteria <br> 1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research. <br> 2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere. <br> 3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail. <br> 4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data. <br> 5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English. <br> 6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity. <br> 7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability. <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Nov 19 23:50:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499907, encodeId=182f49990e57, content=双方争论相当精彩,建议将争论内容翻译成英文,投PLOS one, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=113, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Nov 19 22:47:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2013-11-20 匿名用户

    plos one的创始人考虑到很多开创新的工作反而容易被埋没,就像爱因斯坦的相对论那样。越是开创性的工作,越难以得到认可。为了给类似工作提供发表途径,于是创建plos one。

    既然plos one有引用,就说明其文章还是有价值的,对科学还是有贡献的。如果完完全全垃圾一堆,就不会有人去看,也不会有人去引用。虽然此刊不强调创新,但是毫无新意,仅仅是重复和模仿别人的工作,是不可能发表的。

    出版面费发文章,这无可非议呀。它是开源期刊嘛,不收作者的,就收读者的。何况他收的钱不多呀。国内刊物不也收嘛,收的也不少呀,经常几千元。国内有些刊物很好,却得不到认可。据我看,有些刊物发的文章,其新意、意义不亚于1-2分的SCI。当然,与plos one上的大部分文章相比,还是有点距离的。

    能投plos one 还是不错的选择。很多专业顶级刊物对中国人就歧视,好不容易有个刊物不歧视中国人啦。还有人说三道四,真不知道这些人是什么心态。爱国乎,崇洋媚外乎,愚蠢乎,自贱乎?我看不透,也说不清。以后不再来这个地方啦。

    0

  6. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499921, encodeId=884e49992121, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。 <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧! <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴. <br> <br> ———————————————————— <br> 你挺狡猾的,要我发PLOS ONE,想把我拉下水,不好意思再批你们啊!我才不跟你们同流合污呢!!我要坚决与你们这种年年发PLOS ONE的人划清界限。在这里批判你们就是最好的行动证明。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=85, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 11:20:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499920, encodeId=cb9849992015, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。 <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧! <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 10:48:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499917, encodeId=c47049991eec, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=93, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 09:12:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499916, encodeId=687d499916b8, content=吃饱了撑得,吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。如果你觉着plos one不好,你就投Science, nature或专业顶级刊物。 <br> 争来争去,有什么用?如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。犯不着争得面红耳赤,却谁也说服不了谁。有时间去做自己的研究吧。 <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=101, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 09:10:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499914, encodeId=d02449991490, content=plos one的创始人考虑到很多开创新的工作反而容易被埋没,就像爱因斯坦的相对论那样。越是开创性的工作,越难以得到认可。为了给类似工作提供发表途径,于是创建plos one。 <br> <br> 既然plos one有引用,就说明其文章还是有价值的,对科学还是有贡献的。如果完完全全垃圾一堆,就不会有人去看,也不会有人去引用。虽然此刊不强调创新,但是毫无新意,仅仅是重复和模仿别人的工作,是不可能发表的。 <br> <br> 出版面费发文章,这无可非议呀。它是开源期刊嘛,不收作者的,就收读者的。何况他收的钱不多呀。国内刊物不也收嘛,收的也不少呀,经常几千元。国内有些刊物很好,却得不到认可。据我看,有些刊物发的文章,其新意、意义不亚于1-2分的SCI。当然,与plos one上的大部分文章相比,还是有点距离的。 <br> <br> 能投plos one 还是不错的选择。很多专业顶级刊物对中国人就歧视,好不容易有个刊物不歧视中国人啦。还有人说三道四,真不知道这些人是什么心态。爱国乎,崇洋媚外乎,愚蠢乎,自贱乎?我看不透,也说不清。以后不再来这个地方啦。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=98, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 06:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499913, encodeId=1532499913c6, content=英国《自然》杂志为了赚*钱,近年出版《Nature Communiacation》,《细胞》出版社出版《Cell Reports》,前几年另一国外出版社出版了《Plos One》,这些以版面费牟*利的杂志,大量收到中国的投稿,它们不代表中国科学的水平有所提高,仅是低水平论文数量增加而已。 <br> <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 06:46:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499912, encodeId=c7fd499912be, content=PLOS ONE Publication Criteria <br> 1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research. <br> (primary翻译过来不知是“原始的"还是"初级的"意思。希望是原始的意思) <br> 2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere. <br> (那个杂志都一样,一女不嫁二夫吗) <br> 3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail. <br> (那个杂志都一样,实验数据不能支持你的结论,肯定不行) <br> 4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data. <br> (同上) <br> 5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English. <br> (用英语写,绝大多数英语国家杂志都这样要求) <br> 6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity. <br> (多数杂志都有这个要求,不奇怪) <br> 7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability. <br> (同上) <br> <br> +++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 整个要求就没提到这个要求这个工作很重要,对科学发展有贡献啊?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 05:15:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499911, encodeId=dc674999115e, content=各位是老师?科研院所的?学生? <br> 要是学生在这里吵几句,就算了,又不涉及利益。 <br> 要是一帮老师或者科研院所的。。。 <br> 把这几页帖子做成图片公布到社会上,看看中国科研人员的素质,让世界知道中国科研的现状,不是因为学术争,而是因为这个!争的你死我活。 <br> 真丢人!!!!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=92, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 02:50:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499908, encodeId=5d7849990808, content=PLOS ONE Publication Criteria <br> 1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research. <br> 2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere. <br> 3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail. <br> 4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data. <br> 5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English. <br> 6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity. <br> 7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability. <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Nov 19 23:50:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499907, encodeId=182f49990e57, content=双方争论相当精彩,建议将争论内容翻译成英文,投PLOS one, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=113, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Nov 19 22:47:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2013-11-20 匿名用户

    英国《自然》杂志为了赚*钱,近年出版《Nature Communiacation》,《细胞》出版社出版《Cell Reports》,前几年另一国外出版社出版了《Plos One》,这些以版面费牟*利的杂志,大量收到中国的投稿,它们不代表中国科学的水平有所提高,仅是低水平论文数量增加而已。

    0

  7. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499921, encodeId=884e49992121, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。 <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧! <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴. <br> <br> ———————————————————— <br> 你挺狡猾的,要我发PLOS ONE,想把我拉下水,不好意思再批你们啊!我才不跟你们同流合污呢!!我要坚决与你们这种年年发PLOS ONE的人划清界限。在这里批判你们就是最好的行动证明。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=85, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 11:20:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499920, encodeId=cb9849992015, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。 <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧! <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 10:48:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499917, encodeId=c47049991eec, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=93, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 09:12:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499916, encodeId=687d499916b8, content=吃饱了撑得,吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。如果你觉着plos one不好,你就投Science, nature或专业顶级刊物。 <br> 争来争去,有什么用?如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。犯不着争得面红耳赤,却谁也说服不了谁。有时间去做自己的研究吧。 <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=101, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 09:10:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499914, encodeId=d02449991490, content=plos one的创始人考虑到很多开创新的工作反而容易被埋没,就像爱因斯坦的相对论那样。越是开创性的工作,越难以得到认可。为了给类似工作提供发表途径,于是创建plos one。 <br> <br> 既然plos one有引用,就说明其文章还是有价值的,对科学还是有贡献的。如果完完全全垃圾一堆,就不会有人去看,也不会有人去引用。虽然此刊不强调创新,但是毫无新意,仅仅是重复和模仿别人的工作,是不可能发表的。 <br> <br> 出版面费发文章,这无可非议呀。它是开源期刊嘛,不收作者的,就收读者的。何况他收的钱不多呀。国内刊物不也收嘛,收的也不少呀,经常几千元。国内有些刊物很好,却得不到认可。据我看,有些刊物发的文章,其新意、意义不亚于1-2分的SCI。当然,与plos one上的大部分文章相比,还是有点距离的。 <br> <br> 能投plos one 还是不错的选择。很多专业顶级刊物对中国人就歧视,好不容易有个刊物不歧视中国人啦。还有人说三道四,真不知道这些人是什么心态。爱国乎,崇洋媚外乎,愚蠢乎,自贱乎?我看不透,也说不清。以后不再来这个地方啦。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=98, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 06:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499913, encodeId=1532499913c6, content=英国《自然》杂志为了赚*钱,近年出版《Nature Communiacation》,《细胞》出版社出版《Cell Reports》,前几年另一国外出版社出版了《Plos One》,这些以版面费牟*利的杂志,大量收到中国的投稿,它们不代表中国科学的水平有所提高,仅是低水平论文数量增加而已。 <br> <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 06:46:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499912, encodeId=c7fd499912be, content=PLOS ONE Publication Criteria <br> 1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research. <br> (primary翻译过来不知是“原始的"还是"初级的"意思。希望是原始的意思) <br> 2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere. <br> (那个杂志都一样,一女不嫁二夫吗) <br> 3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail. <br> (那个杂志都一样,实验数据不能支持你的结论,肯定不行) <br> 4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data. <br> (同上) <br> 5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English. <br> (用英语写,绝大多数英语国家杂志都这样要求) <br> 6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity. <br> (多数杂志都有这个要求,不奇怪) <br> 7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability. <br> (同上) <br> <br> +++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 整个要求就没提到这个要求这个工作很重要,对科学发展有贡献啊?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 05:15:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499911, encodeId=dc674999115e, content=各位是老师?科研院所的?学生? <br> 要是学生在这里吵几句,就算了,又不涉及利益。 <br> 要是一帮老师或者科研院所的。。。 <br> 把这几页帖子做成图片公布到社会上,看看中国科研人员的素质,让世界知道中国科研的现状,不是因为学术争,而是因为这个!争的你死我活。 <br> 真丢人!!!!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=92, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 02:50:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499908, encodeId=5d7849990808, content=PLOS ONE Publication Criteria <br> 1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research. <br> 2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere. <br> 3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail. <br> 4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data. <br> 5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English. <br> 6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity. <br> 7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability. <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Nov 19 23:50:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499907, encodeId=182f49990e57, content=双方争论相当精彩,建议将争论内容翻译成英文,投PLOS one, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=113, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Nov 19 22:47:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2013-11-20 匿名用户

    PLOS ONE Publication Criteria
    1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research.
    (primary翻译过来不知是“原始的"还是"初级的"意思。希望是原始的意思)
    2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere.
    (那个杂志都一样,一女不嫁二夫吗)
    3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail.
    (那个杂志都一样,实验数据不能支持你的结论,肯定不行)
    4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data.
    (同上)
    5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English.
    (用英语写,绝大多数英语国家杂志都这样要求)
    6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity.
    (多数杂志都有这个要求,不奇怪)
    7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability.
    (同上)

    +++++++++++++++++++++
    整个要求就没提到这个要求这个工作很重要,对科学发展有贡献啊?

    0

  8. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499921, encodeId=884e49992121, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。 <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧! <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴. <br> <br> ———————————————————— <br> 你挺狡猾的,要我发PLOS ONE,想把我拉下水,不好意思再批你们啊!我才不跟你们同流合污呢!!我要坚决与你们这种年年发PLOS ONE的人划清界限。在这里批判你们就是最好的行动证明。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=85, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 11:20:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499920, encodeId=cb9849992015, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。 <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧! <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 10:48:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499917, encodeId=c47049991eec, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=93, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 09:12:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499916, encodeId=687d499916b8, content=吃饱了撑得,吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。如果你觉着plos one不好,你就投Science, nature或专业顶级刊物。 <br> 争来争去,有什么用?如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。犯不着争得面红耳赤,却谁也说服不了谁。有时间去做自己的研究吧。 <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=101, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 09:10:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499914, encodeId=d02449991490, content=plos one的创始人考虑到很多开创新的工作反而容易被埋没,就像爱因斯坦的相对论那样。越是开创性的工作,越难以得到认可。为了给类似工作提供发表途径,于是创建plos one。 <br> <br> 既然plos one有引用,就说明其文章还是有价值的,对科学还是有贡献的。如果完完全全垃圾一堆,就不会有人去看,也不会有人去引用。虽然此刊不强调创新,但是毫无新意,仅仅是重复和模仿别人的工作,是不可能发表的。 <br> <br> 出版面费发文章,这无可非议呀。它是开源期刊嘛,不收作者的,就收读者的。何况他收的钱不多呀。国内刊物不也收嘛,收的也不少呀,经常几千元。国内有些刊物很好,却得不到认可。据我看,有些刊物发的文章,其新意、意义不亚于1-2分的SCI。当然,与plos one上的大部分文章相比,还是有点距离的。 <br> <br> 能投plos one 还是不错的选择。很多专业顶级刊物对中国人就歧视,好不容易有个刊物不歧视中国人啦。还有人说三道四,真不知道这些人是什么心态。爱国乎,崇洋媚外乎,愚蠢乎,自贱乎?我看不透,也说不清。以后不再来这个地方啦。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=98, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 06:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499913, encodeId=1532499913c6, content=英国《自然》杂志为了赚*钱,近年出版《Nature Communiacation》,《细胞》出版社出版《Cell Reports》,前几年另一国外出版社出版了《Plos One》,这些以版面费牟*利的杂志,大量收到中国的投稿,它们不代表中国科学的水平有所提高,仅是低水平论文数量增加而已。 <br> <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 06:46:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499912, encodeId=c7fd499912be, content=PLOS ONE Publication Criteria <br> 1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research. <br> (primary翻译过来不知是“原始的"还是"初级的"意思。希望是原始的意思) <br> 2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere. <br> (那个杂志都一样,一女不嫁二夫吗) <br> 3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail. <br> (那个杂志都一样,实验数据不能支持你的结论,肯定不行) <br> 4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data. <br> (同上) <br> 5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English. <br> (用英语写,绝大多数英语国家杂志都这样要求) <br> 6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity. <br> (多数杂志都有这个要求,不奇怪) <br> 7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability. <br> (同上) <br> <br> +++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 整个要求就没提到这个要求这个工作很重要,对科学发展有贡献啊?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 05:15:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499911, encodeId=dc674999115e, content=各位是老师?科研院所的?学生? <br> 要是学生在这里吵几句,就算了,又不涉及利益。 <br> 要是一帮老师或者科研院所的。。。 <br> 把这几页帖子做成图片公布到社会上,看看中国科研人员的素质,让世界知道中国科研的现状,不是因为学术争,而是因为这个!争的你死我活。 <br> 真丢人!!!!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=92, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 02:50:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499908, encodeId=5d7849990808, content=PLOS ONE Publication Criteria <br> 1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research. <br> 2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere. <br> 3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail. <br> 4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data. <br> 5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English. <br> 6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity. <br> 7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability. <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Nov 19 23:50:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499907, encodeId=182f49990e57, content=双方争论相当精彩,建议将争论内容翻译成英文,投PLOS one, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=113, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Nov 19 22:47:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2013-11-20 匿名用户

    各位是老师?科研院所的?学生?
    要是学生在这里吵几句,就算了,又不涉及利益。
    要是一帮老师或者科研院所的。。。
    把这几页帖子做成图片公布到社会上,看看中国科研人员的素质,让世界知道中国科研的现状,不是因为学术争,而是因为这个!争的你死我活。
    真丢人!!!!

    0

  9. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499921, encodeId=884e49992121, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。 <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧! <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴. <br> <br> ———————————————————— <br> 你挺狡猾的,要我发PLOS ONE,想把我拉下水,不好意思再批你们啊!我才不跟你们同流合污呢!!我要坚决与你们这种年年发PLOS ONE的人划清界限。在这里批判你们就是最好的行动证明。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=85, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 11:20:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499920, encodeId=cb9849992015, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。 <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧! <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 10:48:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499917, encodeId=c47049991eec, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=93, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 09:12:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499916, encodeId=687d499916b8, content=吃饱了撑得,吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。如果你觉着plos one不好,你就投Science, nature或专业顶级刊物。 <br> 争来争去,有什么用?如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。犯不着争得面红耳赤,却谁也说服不了谁。有时间去做自己的研究吧。 <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=101, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 09:10:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499914, encodeId=d02449991490, content=plos one的创始人考虑到很多开创新的工作反而容易被埋没,就像爱因斯坦的相对论那样。越是开创性的工作,越难以得到认可。为了给类似工作提供发表途径,于是创建plos one。 <br> <br> 既然plos one有引用,就说明其文章还是有价值的,对科学还是有贡献的。如果完完全全垃圾一堆,就不会有人去看,也不会有人去引用。虽然此刊不强调创新,但是毫无新意,仅仅是重复和模仿别人的工作,是不可能发表的。 <br> <br> 出版面费发文章,这无可非议呀。它是开源期刊嘛,不收作者的,就收读者的。何况他收的钱不多呀。国内刊物不也收嘛,收的也不少呀,经常几千元。国内有些刊物很好,却得不到认可。据我看,有些刊物发的文章,其新意、意义不亚于1-2分的SCI。当然,与plos one上的大部分文章相比,还是有点距离的。 <br> <br> 能投plos one 还是不错的选择。很多专业顶级刊物对中国人就歧视,好不容易有个刊物不歧视中国人啦。还有人说三道四,真不知道这些人是什么心态。爱国乎,崇洋媚外乎,愚蠢乎,自贱乎?我看不透,也说不清。以后不再来这个地方啦。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=98, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 06:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499913, encodeId=1532499913c6, content=英国《自然》杂志为了赚*钱,近年出版《Nature Communiacation》,《细胞》出版社出版《Cell Reports》,前几年另一国外出版社出版了《Plos One》,这些以版面费牟*利的杂志,大量收到中国的投稿,它们不代表中国科学的水平有所提高,仅是低水平论文数量增加而已。 <br> <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 06:46:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499912, encodeId=c7fd499912be, content=PLOS ONE Publication Criteria <br> 1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research. <br> (primary翻译过来不知是“原始的"还是"初级的"意思。希望是原始的意思) <br> 2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere. <br> (那个杂志都一样,一女不嫁二夫吗) <br> 3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail. <br> (那个杂志都一样,实验数据不能支持你的结论,肯定不行) <br> 4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data. <br> (同上) <br> 5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English. <br> (用英语写,绝大多数英语国家杂志都这样要求) <br> 6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity. <br> (多数杂志都有这个要求,不奇怪) <br> 7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability. <br> (同上) <br> <br> +++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 整个要求就没提到这个要求这个工作很重要,对科学发展有贡献啊?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 05:15:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499911, encodeId=dc674999115e, content=各位是老师?科研院所的?学生? <br> 要是学生在这里吵几句,就算了,又不涉及利益。 <br> 要是一帮老师或者科研院所的。。。 <br> 把这几页帖子做成图片公布到社会上,看看中国科研人员的素质,让世界知道中国科研的现状,不是因为学术争,而是因为这个!争的你死我活。 <br> 真丢人!!!!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=92, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 02:50:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499908, encodeId=5d7849990808, content=PLOS ONE Publication Criteria <br> 1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research. <br> 2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere. <br> 3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail. <br> 4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data. <br> 5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English. <br> 6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity. <br> 7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability. <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Nov 19 23:50:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499907, encodeId=182f49990e57, content=双方争论相当精彩,建议将争论内容翻译成英文,投PLOS one, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=113, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Nov 19 22:47:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2013-11-19 匿名用户

    PLOS ONE Publication Criteria
    1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research.
    2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere.
    3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail.
    4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data.
    5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English.
    6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity.
    7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability.

    0

  10. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499921, encodeId=884e49992121, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。 <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧! <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴. <br> <br> ———————————————————— <br> 你挺狡猾的,要我发PLOS ONE,想把我拉下水,不好意思再批你们啊!我才不跟你们同流合污呢!!我要坚决与你们这种年年发PLOS ONE的人划清界限。在这里批判你们就是最好的行动证明。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=85, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 11:20:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499920, encodeId=cb9849992015, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。 <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 废话,没人反对,又怎么会被镇压或者踢去呢!盗&窃,抢*劫,强¥奸,卖%淫,通&奸等等丑陋现象,国家社会都在全力反对并严厉镇压,怎么几千年来没有消失?有需求就有市场,某些人这么热衷发PLOS ONE就是它无意中迎合了中国的SCI盲目热的市场。这也是PLOS ONE发文量年年剧增的重要原因之一吧! <br> +++++++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 睁着眼睛说瞎话!你反对得就蛮坚决嘛!有真才实学就不要讲废话,发表几篇PLOS one论文或者更好的文出来,否则就闭嘴., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 10:48:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499917, encodeId=c47049991eec, content=吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。 <br> 如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=93, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 09:12:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499916, encodeId=687d499916b8, content=吃饱了撑得,吃不到葡萄说葡萄酸。如果你觉着plos one不好,你就投Science, nature或专业顶级刊物。 <br> 争来争去,有什么用?如果plos one不行,自然会被镇压或提出SCI库的。犯不着争得面红耳赤,却谁也说服不了谁。有时间去做自己的研究吧。 <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=101, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 09:10:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499914, encodeId=d02449991490, content=plos one的创始人考虑到很多开创新的工作反而容易被埋没,就像爱因斯坦的相对论那样。越是开创性的工作,越难以得到认可。为了给类似工作提供发表途径,于是创建plos one。 <br> <br> 既然plos one有引用,就说明其文章还是有价值的,对科学还是有贡献的。如果完完全全垃圾一堆,就不会有人去看,也不会有人去引用。虽然此刊不强调创新,但是毫无新意,仅仅是重复和模仿别人的工作,是不可能发表的。 <br> <br> 出版面费发文章,这无可非议呀。它是开源期刊嘛,不收作者的,就收读者的。何况他收的钱不多呀。国内刊物不也收嘛,收的也不少呀,经常几千元。国内有些刊物很好,却得不到认可。据我看,有些刊物发的文章,其新意、意义不亚于1-2分的SCI。当然,与plos one上的大部分文章相比,还是有点距离的。 <br> <br> 能投plos one 还是不错的选择。很多专业顶级刊物对中国人就歧视,好不容易有个刊物不歧视中国人啦。还有人说三道四,真不知道这些人是什么心态。爱国乎,崇洋媚外乎,愚蠢乎,自贱乎?我看不透,也说不清。以后不再来这个地方啦。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=98, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 06:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499913, encodeId=1532499913c6, content=英国《自然》杂志为了赚*钱,近年出版《Nature Communiacation》,《细胞》出版社出版《Cell Reports》,前几年另一国外出版社出版了《Plos One》,这些以版面费牟*利的杂志,大量收到中国的投稿,它们不代表中国科学的水平有所提高,仅是低水平论文数量增加而已。 <br> <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 06:46:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499912, encodeId=c7fd499912be, content=PLOS ONE Publication Criteria <br> 1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research. <br> (primary翻译过来不知是“原始的"还是"初级的"意思。希望是原始的意思) <br> 2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere. <br> (那个杂志都一样,一女不嫁二夫吗) <br> 3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail. <br> (那个杂志都一样,实验数据不能支持你的结论,肯定不行) <br> 4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data. <br> (同上) <br> 5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English. <br> (用英语写,绝大多数英语国家杂志都这样要求) <br> 6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity. <br> (多数杂志都有这个要求,不奇怪) <br> 7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability. <br> (同上) <br> <br> +++++++++++++++++++++ <br> 整个要求就没提到这个要求这个工作很重要,对科学发展有贡献啊?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 05:15:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499911, encodeId=dc674999115e, content=各位是老师?科研院所的?学生? <br> 要是学生在这里吵几句,就算了,又不涉及利益。 <br> 要是一帮老师或者科研院所的。。。 <br> 把这几页帖子做成图片公布到社会上,看看中国科研人员的素质,让世界知道中国科研的现状,不是因为学术争,而是因为这个!争的你死我活。 <br> 真丢人!!!!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=92, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 20 02:50:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-20, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499908, encodeId=5d7849990808, content=PLOS ONE Publication Criteria <br> 1.The study presents the results of primary scientific research. <br> 2.Results reported have not been published elsewhere. <br> 3.Experiments, statistics, and other analyses are performed to a high technical standard and are described in sufficient detail. <br> 4.Conclusions are presented in an appropriate fashion and are supported by the data. <br> 5.The article is presented in an intelligible fashion and is written in standard English. <br> 6.The research meets all applicable standards for the ethics of experimentation and research integrity. <br> 7.The article adheres to appropriate reporting guidelines and community standards for data availability. <br> , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=105, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Nov 19 23:50:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=499907, encodeId=182f49990e57, content=双方争论相当精彩,建议将争论内容翻译成英文,投PLOS one, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=113, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Nov 19 22:47:00 CST 2013, time=2013-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2013-11-19 匿名用户

    双方争论相当精彩,建议将争论内容翻译成英文,投PLOS one

    0

共500条页码: 50/50页10条/页
分享您的投稿经验,提升MI经验值,获取更多积分