2012ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 冠状动脉血运重建术应用标准更新

2012-01-31 美国心脏病学会基金会 J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Feb 28;59(9):857-81. Epub 2012 Jan 30.

中文标题:

2012ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 冠状动脉血运重建术应用标准更新

英文标题:

2012ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization Focused Update

发布日期:

2012-01-31

简要介绍:

The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF),Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions,Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the American Associa-tion for Thoracic Surgery, along with key specialty andsubspecialty societies, conducted an update of the appropri-ate use criteria (AUC) for coronary revascularization fre-quently considered. In the initial document, 180 clinical scenarios were developed to mimic patient presentations encountered in everyday practice and included information on symptom status, extent of medical therapy, risk level as assessed by noninvasive testing, and coronary anatomy. Thisupdate provides a reassessment of clinical scenarios the writing group felt to be affected by significant changes in the medical literature or gaps from prior criteria. The method-ology used in this update is similar to the initial document,and the definition of appropriateness was unchanged. The technical panel scored the clinical scenarios on a scale of 1 to 9.Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization is considered appropriate and likely to improve patients’ health outcomes or survival. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate revascularization isconsidered inappropriate and unlikely to improve health outcomes or survival. Scores in the mid-range (4 to 6) indicate a clinical scenario for which the likelihood that coronary revascularization will improve health outcomes or survival is uncertain.In general, as seen with the prior AUC, the use of coronary revascularization for patients with acute coronary syndromes and combinations of significant symptoms and/or ischemia is appropriate. In contrast, revascularization of asymptomatic patients or patients with low-risk findings on noninvasive testing and minimal medical therapy are viewed less favorably. The technical panel felt that based on recent studies, coronary artery bypass grafting remains an appropriate method of revascularization for patients with high burden of coronary artery disease (CAD). Additionally, percutaneous coronary intervention may have a role in revascularization of patients with high burden of CAD. Theprimary objective of the appropriate use criteria is to improve physician decision making and patient education regarding expected benefits from revascularization and to guide future research.

下载附件:

(需要扣积分10分)

版权声明:
本网站所有注明来源:“梅斯医学”或“MedSci”或“MedSci原创”的文字、图片和音视频资料,版权均属于梅斯医学所有。非经授权,任何媒体、网站或个人不得转载,否则将追究法律责任。取得书面授权转载时,须注明“来源:梅斯医学”。其它来源的文章系转载文章,本网所有转载文章系出于传递更多信息之目的,转载内容不代表本站立场。不希望被转载的媒体或个人可与我们联系,我们将立即进行删除处理。
在此留言

相关指南

2012AHA 性行为和心血管疾病:美国心脏病协会科学声明

美国心脏病学会基金会(ACCF,American College of Cardiology Foundation) · 2012-01-19

2012AHA急救医学科学声明:心肺复苏术提高院外心搏骤停生存率紧急处理说明

美国心脏病学会基金会(ACCF,American College of Cardiology Foundation) · 2012-01-09

2011ACCF/AHA/ESC/WHF 对心肌梗死分型和心血管死亡危险的通用定义

美国心脏病学会基金会(ACCF,American College of Cardiology Foundation) · 2011-12-23

2012AHA 心脏病和中风统计报告

美国心脏病学会基金会(ACCF,American College of Cardiology Foundation) · 2011-12-15

2012ACCF/AHA/ACR/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM/SVN 周围血管动脉粥样硬化的定义和关键数据

美国心脏病学会基金会(ACCF,American College of Cardiology Foundation) · 2011-12-05