NANO LETT 润色咨询

NANO LETTERS

出版年份:2001 年文章数:15542 投稿命中率: 开通期刊会员,数据随心看

出版周期:Biweekly 自引率:5.5% 审稿周期: 开通期刊会员,数据随心看

前往期刊查询

期刊讨论

  1. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2170435, encodeId=9c3c21e04350a, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:无, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=15, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ab18525462, createdName=ms3000001952065863, createdTime=Thu Nov 23 09:41:35 CST 2023, time=2023-11-23, status=1, ipAttribution=天津), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1098826, encodeId=adea109882659, content=两个IF相当的期刊,如何选择要投哪个?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=66, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1098825, encodeId=45f010988259f, content=老牌期刊和新出版期刊是否都要选一些?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=56, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1078188, encodeId=1d3110e8188eb, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享:并没有大家所传的关系户情况,我们课题组也没有什么关系,文章主是需要有一定的机理在里面,解决某些科学问题,不能是简单的换材料做性能。审稿人有三个,每个人给出的意见和建议都很合理也很中肯,但确实提出的科学问题很多一个审稿人大概会有6~9个问题,确实要认认真真获得大量证据去证明你的观点和工作机制。期刊里的文章确实专业性比较高,需要有一定的学科背景才能完全看懂,这也可能是引用率比较低的原因,但留下来的文章都是有扎实的理论提出,解决了一定的科学问题的,为相关领域基础理论发展都做了一定的推进,并不是简单的跟热潮拼性能,希望期刊可以越来越好, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e03b6392163, createdName=ms1000001662811804, createdTime=Wed Dec 08 20:05:05 CST 2021, time=2021-12-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860149, encodeId=f4d686014979, content=效率非常高,3月11号投稿,3月20号开始审稿,4月13号返回审稿意见,一个小修一个建议直接发表,小修后4月22号接收并发表。<br> 文章是测量方法,更偏重机理和推导。之前被acs nano编辑拒稿,因为编辑认为这篇文章技术性太强 (too technical),但是别的方面都挺好。所以个人认为nano letters相比acs nano可能确实更喜欢偏机理一些。希望nano letters越来越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=141, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=323c5413977, createdName=ms1145759477415829, createdTime=Sun May 03 22:46:22 CST 2020, time=2020-05-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857866, encodeId=8ac385e8669e, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:75楼看不上acs nano啊,话说acs nano的文章质量现在比nl强一个档了啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=122, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ff9d5414052, createdName=ms7780612574685936, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 22:08:03 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857865, encodeId=3f9e85e865a6, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了。<br> 75楼别指望了,亲身经历,哈哈 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=116, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 21:56:01 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857864, encodeId=a9b185e86415, content=审稿速度:5.0<br>经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e9a95414072, createdName=ms9430612511402566, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 21:49:59 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856509, encodeId=b0138565096d, content=nanolett 当年认可度高于am, 口碑和jacs、prl 不相上下。近年来由于收稿偏物理,圈子现象严重,影响力下降明显,几乎沦落到和acs nano差不多的水平,着实可惜。<br> 不知道是不是acs 或是两位大佬主编想要做出改变,今年居然更换了主编,从新任主编发表的编辑社论来看,将要做出以下改变:<br> 1)只支持letters 类型稿件,字数不能超过3000,图不能超过5个,否则拒稿修改再投或转投acs nano<br> 2) 副主编团队似乎要做出大的更改,增强地域性,调整期刊收稿范围<br> 3) 主编亲自把关后再送给副主编定夺,意味着主编这一关就会拒掉一部分稿件<br> 4) 增加viewpoint 类型的观点文章,仅限邀请形式且仅有一页版面,主要面向领域大牛<br> 总体来说,个人感觉nano letters这是准备要打破圈子,重振雄风。个人比较喜欢这个期刊,希望其越办越好。<br> 主编社论链接: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05084 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Mon Jan 06 05:40:42 CST 2020, time=2020-01-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855575, encodeId=a9268555e581, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:2019年10月24日 投稿,并分配编辑。<br> 2019年12月04日 暂无消息,估计可能是因为感恩节推迟了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=4ce15414064, createdName=ms4608271349787965, createdTime=Fri Dec 06 01:06:11 CST 2019, time=2019-12-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2023-11-23 ms3000001952065863 来自天津

    审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
    经验分享:无

    0

  2. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2170435, encodeId=9c3c21e04350a, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:无, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=15, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ab18525462, createdName=ms3000001952065863, createdTime=Thu Nov 23 09:41:35 CST 2023, time=2023-11-23, status=1, ipAttribution=天津), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1098826, encodeId=adea109882659, content=两个IF相当的期刊,如何选择要投哪个?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=66, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1098825, encodeId=45f010988259f, content=老牌期刊和新出版期刊是否都要选一些?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=56, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1078188, encodeId=1d3110e8188eb, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享:并没有大家所传的关系户情况,我们课题组也没有什么关系,文章主是需要有一定的机理在里面,解决某些科学问题,不能是简单的换材料做性能。审稿人有三个,每个人给出的意见和建议都很合理也很中肯,但确实提出的科学问题很多一个审稿人大概会有6~9个问题,确实要认认真真获得大量证据去证明你的观点和工作机制。期刊里的文章确实专业性比较高,需要有一定的学科背景才能完全看懂,这也可能是引用率比较低的原因,但留下来的文章都是有扎实的理论提出,解决了一定的科学问题的,为相关领域基础理论发展都做了一定的推进,并不是简单的跟热潮拼性能,希望期刊可以越来越好, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e03b6392163, createdName=ms1000001662811804, createdTime=Wed Dec 08 20:05:05 CST 2021, time=2021-12-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860149, encodeId=f4d686014979, content=效率非常高,3月11号投稿,3月20号开始审稿,4月13号返回审稿意见,一个小修一个建议直接发表,小修后4月22号接收并发表。<br> 文章是测量方法,更偏重机理和推导。之前被acs nano编辑拒稿,因为编辑认为这篇文章技术性太强 (too technical),但是别的方面都挺好。所以个人认为nano letters相比acs nano可能确实更喜欢偏机理一些。希望nano letters越来越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=141, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=323c5413977, createdName=ms1145759477415829, createdTime=Sun May 03 22:46:22 CST 2020, time=2020-05-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857866, encodeId=8ac385e8669e, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:75楼看不上acs nano啊,话说acs nano的文章质量现在比nl强一个档了啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=122, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ff9d5414052, createdName=ms7780612574685936, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 22:08:03 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857865, encodeId=3f9e85e865a6, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了。<br> 75楼别指望了,亲身经历,哈哈 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=116, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 21:56:01 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857864, encodeId=a9b185e86415, content=审稿速度:5.0<br>经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e9a95414072, createdName=ms9430612511402566, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 21:49:59 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856509, encodeId=b0138565096d, content=nanolett 当年认可度高于am, 口碑和jacs、prl 不相上下。近年来由于收稿偏物理,圈子现象严重,影响力下降明显,几乎沦落到和acs nano差不多的水平,着实可惜。<br> 不知道是不是acs 或是两位大佬主编想要做出改变,今年居然更换了主编,从新任主编发表的编辑社论来看,将要做出以下改变:<br> 1)只支持letters 类型稿件,字数不能超过3000,图不能超过5个,否则拒稿修改再投或转投acs nano<br> 2) 副主编团队似乎要做出大的更改,增强地域性,调整期刊收稿范围<br> 3) 主编亲自把关后再送给副主编定夺,意味着主编这一关就会拒掉一部分稿件<br> 4) 增加viewpoint 类型的观点文章,仅限邀请形式且仅有一页版面,主要面向领域大牛<br> 总体来说,个人感觉nano letters这是准备要打破圈子,重振雄风。个人比较喜欢这个期刊,希望其越办越好。<br> 主编社论链接: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05084 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Mon Jan 06 05:40:42 CST 2020, time=2020-01-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855575, encodeId=a9268555e581, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:2019年10月24日 投稿,并分配编辑。<br> 2019年12月04日 暂无消息,估计可能是因为感恩节推迟了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=4ce15414064, createdName=ms4608271349787965, createdTime=Fri Dec 06 01:06:11 CST 2019, time=2019-12-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2021-12-29 学医的彭于晏

    两个IF相当的期刊,如何选择要投哪个?

    1

    展开1条回复
  3. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2170435, encodeId=9c3c21e04350a, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:无, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=15, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ab18525462, createdName=ms3000001952065863, createdTime=Thu Nov 23 09:41:35 CST 2023, time=2023-11-23, status=1, ipAttribution=天津), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1098826, encodeId=adea109882659, content=两个IF相当的期刊,如何选择要投哪个?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=66, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1098825, encodeId=45f010988259f, content=老牌期刊和新出版期刊是否都要选一些?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=56, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1078188, encodeId=1d3110e8188eb, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享:并没有大家所传的关系户情况,我们课题组也没有什么关系,文章主是需要有一定的机理在里面,解决某些科学问题,不能是简单的换材料做性能。审稿人有三个,每个人给出的意见和建议都很合理也很中肯,但确实提出的科学问题很多一个审稿人大概会有6~9个问题,确实要认认真真获得大量证据去证明你的观点和工作机制。期刊里的文章确实专业性比较高,需要有一定的学科背景才能完全看懂,这也可能是引用率比较低的原因,但留下来的文章都是有扎实的理论提出,解决了一定的科学问题的,为相关领域基础理论发展都做了一定的推进,并不是简单的跟热潮拼性能,希望期刊可以越来越好, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e03b6392163, createdName=ms1000001662811804, createdTime=Wed Dec 08 20:05:05 CST 2021, time=2021-12-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860149, encodeId=f4d686014979, content=效率非常高,3月11号投稿,3月20号开始审稿,4月13号返回审稿意见,一个小修一个建议直接发表,小修后4月22号接收并发表。<br> 文章是测量方法,更偏重机理和推导。之前被acs nano编辑拒稿,因为编辑认为这篇文章技术性太强 (too technical),但是别的方面都挺好。所以个人认为nano letters相比acs nano可能确实更喜欢偏机理一些。希望nano letters越来越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=141, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=323c5413977, createdName=ms1145759477415829, createdTime=Sun May 03 22:46:22 CST 2020, time=2020-05-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857866, encodeId=8ac385e8669e, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:75楼看不上acs nano啊,话说acs nano的文章质量现在比nl强一个档了啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=122, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ff9d5414052, createdName=ms7780612574685936, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 22:08:03 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857865, encodeId=3f9e85e865a6, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了。<br> 75楼别指望了,亲身经历,哈哈 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=116, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 21:56:01 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857864, encodeId=a9b185e86415, content=审稿速度:5.0<br>经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e9a95414072, createdName=ms9430612511402566, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 21:49:59 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856509, encodeId=b0138565096d, content=nanolett 当年认可度高于am, 口碑和jacs、prl 不相上下。近年来由于收稿偏物理,圈子现象严重,影响力下降明显,几乎沦落到和acs nano差不多的水平,着实可惜。<br> 不知道是不是acs 或是两位大佬主编想要做出改变,今年居然更换了主编,从新任主编发表的编辑社论来看,将要做出以下改变:<br> 1)只支持letters 类型稿件,字数不能超过3000,图不能超过5个,否则拒稿修改再投或转投acs nano<br> 2) 副主编团队似乎要做出大的更改,增强地域性,调整期刊收稿范围<br> 3) 主编亲自把关后再送给副主编定夺,意味着主编这一关就会拒掉一部分稿件<br> 4) 增加viewpoint 类型的观点文章,仅限邀请形式且仅有一页版面,主要面向领域大牛<br> 总体来说,个人感觉nano letters这是准备要打破圈子,重振雄风。个人比较喜欢这个期刊,希望其越办越好。<br> 主编社论链接: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05084 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Mon Jan 06 05:40:42 CST 2020, time=2020-01-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855575, encodeId=a9268555e581, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:2019年10月24日 投稿,并分配编辑。<br> 2019年12月04日 暂无消息,估计可能是因为感恩节推迟了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=4ce15414064, createdName=ms4608271349787965, createdTime=Fri Dec 06 01:06:11 CST 2019, time=2019-12-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2021-12-27 msSSSSSD

    老牌期刊和新出版期刊是否都要选一些?

    1

    展开1条回复
  4. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2170435, encodeId=9c3c21e04350a, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:无, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=15, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ab18525462, createdName=ms3000001952065863, createdTime=Thu Nov 23 09:41:35 CST 2023, time=2023-11-23, status=1, ipAttribution=天津), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1098826, encodeId=adea109882659, content=两个IF相当的期刊,如何选择要投哪个?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=66, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1098825, encodeId=45f010988259f, content=老牌期刊和新出版期刊是否都要选一些?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=56, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1078188, encodeId=1d3110e8188eb, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享:并没有大家所传的关系户情况,我们课题组也没有什么关系,文章主是需要有一定的机理在里面,解决某些科学问题,不能是简单的换材料做性能。审稿人有三个,每个人给出的意见和建议都很合理也很中肯,但确实提出的科学问题很多一个审稿人大概会有6~9个问题,确实要认认真真获得大量证据去证明你的观点和工作机制。期刊里的文章确实专业性比较高,需要有一定的学科背景才能完全看懂,这也可能是引用率比较低的原因,但留下来的文章都是有扎实的理论提出,解决了一定的科学问题的,为相关领域基础理论发展都做了一定的推进,并不是简单的跟热潮拼性能,希望期刊可以越来越好, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e03b6392163, createdName=ms1000001662811804, createdTime=Wed Dec 08 20:05:05 CST 2021, time=2021-12-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860149, encodeId=f4d686014979, content=效率非常高,3月11号投稿,3月20号开始审稿,4月13号返回审稿意见,一个小修一个建议直接发表,小修后4月22号接收并发表。<br> 文章是测量方法,更偏重机理和推导。之前被acs nano编辑拒稿,因为编辑认为这篇文章技术性太强 (too technical),但是别的方面都挺好。所以个人认为nano letters相比acs nano可能确实更喜欢偏机理一些。希望nano letters越来越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=141, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=323c5413977, createdName=ms1145759477415829, createdTime=Sun May 03 22:46:22 CST 2020, time=2020-05-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857866, encodeId=8ac385e8669e, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:75楼看不上acs nano啊,话说acs nano的文章质量现在比nl强一个档了啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=122, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ff9d5414052, createdName=ms7780612574685936, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 22:08:03 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857865, encodeId=3f9e85e865a6, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了。<br> 75楼别指望了,亲身经历,哈哈 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=116, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 21:56:01 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857864, encodeId=a9b185e86415, content=审稿速度:5.0<br>经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e9a95414072, createdName=ms9430612511402566, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 21:49:59 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856509, encodeId=b0138565096d, content=nanolett 当年认可度高于am, 口碑和jacs、prl 不相上下。近年来由于收稿偏物理,圈子现象严重,影响力下降明显,几乎沦落到和acs nano差不多的水平,着实可惜。<br> 不知道是不是acs 或是两位大佬主编想要做出改变,今年居然更换了主编,从新任主编发表的编辑社论来看,将要做出以下改变:<br> 1)只支持letters 类型稿件,字数不能超过3000,图不能超过5个,否则拒稿修改再投或转投acs nano<br> 2) 副主编团队似乎要做出大的更改,增强地域性,调整期刊收稿范围<br> 3) 主编亲自把关后再送给副主编定夺,意味着主编这一关就会拒掉一部分稿件<br> 4) 增加viewpoint 类型的观点文章,仅限邀请形式且仅有一页版面,主要面向领域大牛<br> 总体来说,个人感觉nano letters这是准备要打破圈子,重振雄风。个人比较喜欢这个期刊,希望其越办越好。<br> 主编社论链接: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05084 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Mon Jan 06 05:40:42 CST 2020, time=2020-01-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855575, encodeId=a9268555e581, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:2019年10月24日 投稿,并分配编辑。<br> 2019年12月04日 暂无消息,估计可能是因为感恩节推迟了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=4ce15414064, createdName=ms4608271349787965, createdTime=Fri Dec 06 01:06:11 CST 2019, time=2019-12-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2021-12-08 ms1000001662811804

    审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
    经验分享:并没有大家所传的关系户情况,我们课题组也没有什么关系,文章主是需要有一定的机理在里面,解决某些科学问题,不能是简单的换材料做性能。审稿人有三个,每个人给出的意见和建议都很合理也很中肯,但确实提出的科学问题很多一个审稿人大概会有6~9个问题,确实要认认真真获得大量证据去证明你的观点和工作机制。期刊里的文章确实专业性比较高,需要有一定的学科背景才能完全看懂,这也可能是引用率比较低的原因,但留下来的文章都是有扎实的理论提出,解决了一定的科学问题的,为相关领域基础理论发展都做了一定的推进,并不是简单的跟热潮拼性能,希望期刊可以越来越好

    0

  5. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2170435, encodeId=9c3c21e04350a, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:无, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=15, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ab18525462, createdName=ms3000001952065863, createdTime=Thu Nov 23 09:41:35 CST 2023, time=2023-11-23, status=1, ipAttribution=天津), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1098826, encodeId=adea109882659, content=两个IF相当的期刊,如何选择要投哪个?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=66, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1098825, encodeId=45f010988259f, content=老牌期刊和新出版期刊是否都要选一些?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=56, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1078188, encodeId=1d3110e8188eb, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享:并没有大家所传的关系户情况,我们课题组也没有什么关系,文章主是需要有一定的机理在里面,解决某些科学问题,不能是简单的换材料做性能。审稿人有三个,每个人给出的意见和建议都很合理也很中肯,但确实提出的科学问题很多一个审稿人大概会有6~9个问题,确实要认认真真获得大量证据去证明你的观点和工作机制。期刊里的文章确实专业性比较高,需要有一定的学科背景才能完全看懂,这也可能是引用率比较低的原因,但留下来的文章都是有扎实的理论提出,解决了一定的科学问题的,为相关领域基础理论发展都做了一定的推进,并不是简单的跟热潮拼性能,希望期刊可以越来越好, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e03b6392163, createdName=ms1000001662811804, createdTime=Wed Dec 08 20:05:05 CST 2021, time=2021-12-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860149, encodeId=f4d686014979, content=效率非常高,3月11号投稿,3月20号开始审稿,4月13号返回审稿意见,一个小修一个建议直接发表,小修后4月22号接收并发表。<br> 文章是测量方法,更偏重机理和推导。之前被acs nano编辑拒稿,因为编辑认为这篇文章技术性太强 (too technical),但是别的方面都挺好。所以个人认为nano letters相比acs nano可能确实更喜欢偏机理一些。希望nano letters越来越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=141, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=323c5413977, createdName=ms1145759477415829, createdTime=Sun May 03 22:46:22 CST 2020, time=2020-05-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857866, encodeId=8ac385e8669e, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:75楼看不上acs nano啊,话说acs nano的文章质量现在比nl强一个档了啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=122, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ff9d5414052, createdName=ms7780612574685936, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 22:08:03 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857865, encodeId=3f9e85e865a6, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了。<br> 75楼别指望了,亲身经历,哈哈 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=116, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 21:56:01 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857864, encodeId=a9b185e86415, content=审稿速度:5.0<br>经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e9a95414072, createdName=ms9430612511402566, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 21:49:59 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856509, encodeId=b0138565096d, content=nanolett 当年认可度高于am, 口碑和jacs、prl 不相上下。近年来由于收稿偏物理,圈子现象严重,影响力下降明显,几乎沦落到和acs nano差不多的水平,着实可惜。<br> 不知道是不是acs 或是两位大佬主编想要做出改变,今年居然更换了主编,从新任主编发表的编辑社论来看,将要做出以下改变:<br> 1)只支持letters 类型稿件,字数不能超过3000,图不能超过5个,否则拒稿修改再投或转投acs nano<br> 2) 副主编团队似乎要做出大的更改,增强地域性,调整期刊收稿范围<br> 3) 主编亲自把关后再送给副主编定夺,意味着主编这一关就会拒掉一部分稿件<br> 4) 增加viewpoint 类型的观点文章,仅限邀请形式且仅有一页版面,主要面向领域大牛<br> 总体来说,个人感觉nano letters这是准备要打破圈子,重振雄风。个人比较喜欢这个期刊,希望其越办越好。<br> 主编社论链接: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05084 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Mon Jan 06 05:40:42 CST 2020, time=2020-01-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855575, encodeId=a9268555e581, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:2019年10月24日 投稿,并分配编辑。<br> 2019年12月04日 暂无消息,估计可能是因为感恩节推迟了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=4ce15414064, createdName=ms4608271349787965, createdTime=Fri Dec 06 01:06:11 CST 2019, time=2019-12-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-05-03 ms1145759477415829

    效率非常高,3月11号投稿,3月20号开始审稿,4月13号返回审稿意见,一个小修一个建议直接发表,小修后4月22号接收并发表。
    文章是测量方法,更偏重机理和推导。之前被acs nano编辑拒稿,因为编辑认为这篇文章技术性太强 (too technical),但是别的方面都挺好。所以个人认为nano letters相比acs nano可能确实更喜欢偏机理一些。希望nano letters越来越好。

    0

  6. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2170435, encodeId=9c3c21e04350a, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:无, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=15, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ab18525462, createdName=ms3000001952065863, createdTime=Thu Nov 23 09:41:35 CST 2023, time=2023-11-23, status=1, ipAttribution=天津), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1098826, encodeId=adea109882659, content=两个IF相当的期刊,如何选择要投哪个?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=66, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1098825, encodeId=45f010988259f, content=老牌期刊和新出版期刊是否都要选一些?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=56, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1078188, encodeId=1d3110e8188eb, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享:并没有大家所传的关系户情况,我们课题组也没有什么关系,文章主是需要有一定的机理在里面,解决某些科学问题,不能是简单的换材料做性能。审稿人有三个,每个人给出的意见和建议都很合理也很中肯,但确实提出的科学问题很多一个审稿人大概会有6~9个问题,确实要认认真真获得大量证据去证明你的观点和工作机制。期刊里的文章确实专业性比较高,需要有一定的学科背景才能完全看懂,这也可能是引用率比较低的原因,但留下来的文章都是有扎实的理论提出,解决了一定的科学问题的,为相关领域基础理论发展都做了一定的推进,并不是简单的跟热潮拼性能,希望期刊可以越来越好, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e03b6392163, createdName=ms1000001662811804, createdTime=Wed Dec 08 20:05:05 CST 2021, time=2021-12-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860149, encodeId=f4d686014979, content=效率非常高,3月11号投稿,3月20号开始审稿,4月13号返回审稿意见,一个小修一个建议直接发表,小修后4月22号接收并发表。<br> 文章是测量方法,更偏重机理和推导。之前被acs nano编辑拒稿,因为编辑认为这篇文章技术性太强 (too technical),但是别的方面都挺好。所以个人认为nano letters相比acs nano可能确实更喜欢偏机理一些。希望nano letters越来越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=141, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=323c5413977, createdName=ms1145759477415829, createdTime=Sun May 03 22:46:22 CST 2020, time=2020-05-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857866, encodeId=8ac385e8669e, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:75楼看不上acs nano啊,话说acs nano的文章质量现在比nl强一个档了啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=122, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ff9d5414052, createdName=ms7780612574685936, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 22:08:03 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857865, encodeId=3f9e85e865a6, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了。<br> 75楼别指望了,亲身经历,哈哈 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=116, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 21:56:01 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857864, encodeId=a9b185e86415, content=审稿速度:5.0<br>经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e9a95414072, createdName=ms9430612511402566, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 21:49:59 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856509, encodeId=b0138565096d, content=nanolett 当年认可度高于am, 口碑和jacs、prl 不相上下。近年来由于收稿偏物理,圈子现象严重,影响力下降明显,几乎沦落到和acs nano差不多的水平,着实可惜。<br> 不知道是不是acs 或是两位大佬主编想要做出改变,今年居然更换了主编,从新任主编发表的编辑社论来看,将要做出以下改变:<br> 1)只支持letters 类型稿件,字数不能超过3000,图不能超过5个,否则拒稿修改再投或转投acs nano<br> 2) 副主编团队似乎要做出大的更改,增强地域性,调整期刊收稿范围<br> 3) 主编亲自把关后再送给副主编定夺,意味着主编这一关就会拒掉一部分稿件<br> 4) 增加viewpoint 类型的观点文章,仅限邀请形式且仅有一页版面,主要面向领域大牛<br> 总体来说,个人感觉nano letters这是准备要打破圈子,重振雄风。个人比较喜欢这个期刊,希望其越办越好。<br> 主编社论链接: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05084 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Mon Jan 06 05:40:42 CST 2020, time=2020-01-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855575, encodeId=a9268555e581, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:2019年10月24日 投稿,并分配编辑。<br> 2019年12月04日 暂无消息,估计可能是因为感恩节推迟了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=4ce15414064, createdName=ms4608271349787965, createdTime=Fri Dec 06 01:06:11 CST 2019, time=2019-12-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-02-27 ms7780612574685936

    审稿速度:1.0
    经验分享:75楼看不上acs nano啊,话说acs nano的文章质量现在比nl强一个档了啊

    0

  7. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2170435, encodeId=9c3c21e04350a, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:无, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=15, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ab18525462, createdName=ms3000001952065863, createdTime=Thu Nov 23 09:41:35 CST 2023, time=2023-11-23, status=1, ipAttribution=天津), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1098826, encodeId=adea109882659, content=两个IF相当的期刊,如何选择要投哪个?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=66, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1098825, encodeId=45f010988259f, content=老牌期刊和新出版期刊是否都要选一些?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=56, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1078188, encodeId=1d3110e8188eb, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享:并没有大家所传的关系户情况,我们课题组也没有什么关系,文章主是需要有一定的机理在里面,解决某些科学问题,不能是简单的换材料做性能。审稿人有三个,每个人给出的意见和建议都很合理也很中肯,但确实提出的科学问题很多一个审稿人大概会有6~9个问题,确实要认认真真获得大量证据去证明你的观点和工作机制。期刊里的文章确实专业性比较高,需要有一定的学科背景才能完全看懂,这也可能是引用率比较低的原因,但留下来的文章都是有扎实的理论提出,解决了一定的科学问题的,为相关领域基础理论发展都做了一定的推进,并不是简单的跟热潮拼性能,希望期刊可以越来越好, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e03b6392163, createdName=ms1000001662811804, createdTime=Wed Dec 08 20:05:05 CST 2021, time=2021-12-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860149, encodeId=f4d686014979, content=效率非常高,3月11号投稿,3月20号开始审稿,4月13号返回审稿意见,一个小修一个建议直接发表,小修后4月22号接收并发表。<br> 文章是测量方法,更偏重机理和推导。之前被acs nano编辑拒稿,因为编辑认为这篇文章技术性太强 (too technical),但是别的方面都挺好。所以个人认为nano letters相比acs nano可能确实更喜欢偏机理一些。希望nano letters越来越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=141, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=323c5413977, createdName=ms1145759477415829, createdTime=Sun May 03 22:46:22 CST 2020, time=2020-05-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857866, encodeId=8ac385e8669e, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:75楼看不上acs nano啊,话说acs nano的文章质量现在比nl强一个档了啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=122, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ff9d5414052, createdName=ms7780612574685936, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 22:08:03 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857865, encodeId=3f9e85e865a6, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了。<br> 75楼别指望了,亲身经历,哈哈 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=116, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 21:56:01 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857864, encodeId=a9b185e86415, content=审稿速度:5.0<br>经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e9a95414072, createdName=ms9430612511402566, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 21:49:59 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856509, encodeId=b0138565096d, content=nanolett 当年认可度高于am, 口碑和jacs、prl 不相上下。近年来由于收稿偏物理,圈子现象严重,影响力下降明显,几乎沦落到和acs nano差不多的水平,着实可惜。<br> 不知道是不是acs 或是两位大佬主编想要做出改变,今年居然更换了主编,从新任主编发表的编辑社论来看,将要做出以下改变:<br> 1)只支持letters 类型稿件,字数不能超过3000,图不能超过5个,否则拒稿修改再投或转投acs nano<br> 2) 副主编团队似乎要做出大的更改,增强地域性,调整期刊收稿范围<br> 3) 主编亲自把关后再送给副主编定夺,意味着主编这一关就会拒掉一部分稿件<br> 4) 增加viewpoint 类型的观点文章,仅限邀请形式且仅有一页版面,主要面向领域大牛<br> 总体来说,个人感觉nano letters这是准备要打破圈子,重振雄风。个人比较喜欢这个期刊,希望其越办越好。<br> 主编社论链接: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05084 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Mon Jan 06 05:40:42 CST 2020, time=2020-01-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855575, encodeId=a9268555e581, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:2019年10月24日 投稿,并分配编辑。<br> 2019年12月04日 暂无消息,估计可能是因为感恩节推迟了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=4ce15414064, createdName=ms4608271349787965, createdTime=Fri Dec 06 01:06:11 CST 2019, time=2019-12-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-02-27 ms658988217505615

    审稿速度:1.0
    经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了。
    75楼别指望了,亲身经历,哈哈

    0

  8. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2170435, encodeId=9c3c21e04350a, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:无, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=15, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ab18525462, createdName=ms3000001952065863, createdTime=Thu Nov 23 09:41:35 CST 2023, time=2023-11-23, status=1, ipAttribution=天津), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1098826, encodeId=adea109882659, content=两个IF相当的期刊,如何选择要投哪个?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=66, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1098825, encodeId=45f010988259f, content=老牌期刊和新出版期刊是否都要选一些?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=56, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1078188, encodeId=1d3110e8188eb, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享:并没有大家所传的关系户情况,我们课题组也没有什么关系,文章主是需要有一定的机理在里面,解决某些科学问题,不能是简单的换材料做性能。审稿人有三个,每个人给出的意见和建议都很合理也很中肯,但确实提出的科学问题很多一个审稿人大概会有6~9个问题,确实要认认真真获得大量证据去证明你的观点和工作机制。期刊里的文章确实专业性比较高,需要有一定的学科背景才能完全看懂,这也可能是引用率比较低的原因,但留下来的文章都是有扎实的理论提出,解决了一定的科学问题的,为相关领域基础理论发展都做了一定的推进,并不是简单的跟热潮拼性能,希望期刊可以越来越好, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e03b6392163, createdName=ms1000001662811804, createdTime=Wed Dec 08 20:05:05 CST 2021, time=2021-12-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860149, encodeId=f4d686014979, content=效率非常高,3月11号投稿,3月20号开始审稿,4月13号返回审稿意见,一个小修一个建议直接发表,小修后4月22号接收并发表。<br> 文章是测量方法,更偏重机理和推导。之前被acs nano编辑拒稿,因为编辑认为这篇文章技术性太强 (too technical),但是别的方面都挺好。所以个人认为nano letters相比acs nano可能确实更喜欢偏机理一些。希望nano letters越来越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=141, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=323c5413977, createdName=ms1145759477415829, createdTime=Sun May 03 22:46:22 CST 2020, time=2020-05-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857866, encodeId=8ac385e8669e, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:75楼看不上acs nano啊,话说acs nano的文章质量现在比nl强一个档了啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=122, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ff9d5414052, createdName=ms7780612574685936, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 22:08:03 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857865, encodeId=3f9e85e865a6, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了。<br> 75楼别指望了,亲身经历,哈哈 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=116, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 21:56:01 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857864, encodeId=a9b185e86415, content=审稿速度:5.0<br>经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e9a95414072, createdName=ms9430612511402566, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 21:49:59 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856509, encodeId=b0138565096d, content=nanolett 当年认可度高于am, 口碑和jacs、prl 不相上下。近年来由于收稿偏物理,圈子现象严重,影响力下降明显,几乎沦落到和acs nano差不多的水平,着实可惜。<br> 不知道是不是acs 或是两位大佬主编想要做出改变,今年居然更换了主编,从新任主编发表的编辑社论来看,将要做出以下改变:<br> 1)只支持letters 类型稿件,字数不能超过3000,图不能超过5个,否则拒稿修改再投或转投acs nano<br> 2) 副主编团队似乎要做出大的更改,增强地域性,调整期刊收稿范围<br> 3) 主编亲自把关后再送给副主编定夺,意味着主编这一关就会拒掉一部分稿件<br> 4) 增加viewpoint 类型的观点文章,仅限邀请形式且仅有一页版面,主要面向领域大牛<br> 总体来说,个人感觉nano letters这是准备要打破圈子,重振雄风。个人比较喜欢这个期刊,希望其越办越好。<br> 主编社论链接: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05084 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Mon Jan 06 05:40:42 CST 2020, time=2020-01-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855575, encodeId=a9268555e581, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:2019年10月24日 投稿,并分配编辑。<br> 2019年12月04日 暂无消息,估计可能是因为感恩节推迟了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=4ce15414064, createdName=ms4608271349787965, createdTime=Fri Dec 06 01:06:11 CST 2019, time=2019-12-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-02-27 ms9430612511402566

    审稿速度:5.0
    经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了

    0

  9. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2170435, encodeId=9c3c21e04350a, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:无, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=15, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ab18525462, createdName=ms3000001952065863, createdTime=Thu Nov 23 09:41:35 CST 2023, time=2023-11-23, status=1, ipAttribution=天津), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1098826, encodeId=adea109882659, content=两个IF相当的期刊,如何选择要投哪个?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=66, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1098825, encodeId=45f010988259f, content=老牌期刊和新出版期刊是否都要选一些?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=56, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1078188, encodeId=1d3110e8188eb, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享:并没有大家所传的关系户情况,我们课题组也没有什么关系,文章主是需要有一定的机理在里面,解决某些科学问题,不能是简单的换材料做性能。审稿人有三个,每个人给出的意见和建议都很合理也很中肯,但确实提出的科学问题很多一个审稿人大概会有6~9个问题,确实要认认真真获得大量证据去证明你的观点和工作机制。期刊里的文章确实专业性比较高,需要有一定的学科背景才能完全看懂,这也可能是引用率比较低的原因,但留下来的文章都是有扎实的理论提出,解决了一定的科学问题的,为相关领域基础理论发展都做了一定的推进,并不是简单的跟热潮拼性能,希望期刊可以越来越好, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e03b6392163, createdName=ms1000001662811804, createdTime=Wed Dec 08 20:05:05 CST 2021, time=2021-12-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860149, encodeId=f4d686014979, content=效率非常高,3月11号投稿,3月20号开始审稿,4月13号返回审稿意见,一个小修一个建议直接发表,小修后4月22号接收并发表。<br> 文章是测量方法,更偏重机理和推导。之前被acs nano编辑拒稿,因为编辑认为这篇文章技术性太强 (too technical),但是别的方面都挺好。所以个人认为nano letters相比acs nano可能确实更喜欢偏机理一些。希望nano letters越来越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=141, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=323c5413977, createdName=ms1145759477415829, createdTime=Sun May 03 22:46:22 CST 2020, time=2020-05-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857866, encodeId=8ac385e8669e, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:75楼看不上acs nano啊,话说acs nano的文章质量现在比nl强一个档了啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=122, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ff9d5414052, createdName=ms7780612574685936, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 22:08:03 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857865, encodeId=3f9e85e865a6, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了。<br> 75楼别指望了,亲身经历,哈哈 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=116, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 21:56:01 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857864, encodeId=a9b185e86415, content=审稿速度:5.0<br>经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e9a95414072, createdName=ms9430612511402566, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 21:49:59 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856509, encodeId=b0138565096d, content=nanolett 当年认可度高于am, 口碑和jacs、prl 不相上下。近年来由于收稿偏物理,圈子现象严重,影响力下降明显,几乎沦落到和acs nano差不多的水平,着实可惜。<br> 不知道是不是acs 或是两位大佬主编想要做出改变,今年居然更换了主编,从新任主编发表的编辑社论来看,将要做出以下改变:<br> 1)只支持letters 类型稿件,字数不能超过3000,图不能超过5个,否则拒稿修改再投或转投acs nano<br> 2) 副主编团队似乎要做出大的更改,增强地域性,调整期刊收稿范围<br> 3) 主编亲自把关后再送给副主编定夺,意味着主编这一关就会拒掉一部分稿件<br> 4) 增加viewpoint 类型的观点文章,仅限邀请形式且仅有一页版面,主要面向领域大牛<br> 总体来说,个人感觉nano letters这是准备要打破圈子,重振雄风。个人比较喜欢这个期刊,希望其越办越好。<br> 主编社论链接: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05084 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Mon Jan 06 05:40:42 CST 2020, time=2020-01-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855575, encodeId=a9268555e581, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:2019年10月24日 投稿,并分配编辑。<br> 2019年12月04日 暂无消息,估计可能是因为感恩节推迟了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=4ce15414064, createdName=ms4608271349787965, createdTime=Fri Dec 06 01:06:11 CST 2019, time=2019-12-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-01-06 ms5251117139357251

    nanolett 当年认可度高于am, 口碑和jacs、prl 不相上下。近年来由于收稿偏物理,圈子现象严重,影响力下降明显,几乎沦落到和acs nano差不多的水平,着实可惜。
    不知道是不是acs 或是两位大佬主编想要做出改变,今年居然更换了主编,从新任主编发表的编辑社论来看,将要做出以下改变:
    1)只支持letters 类型稿件,字数不能超过3000,图不能超过5个,否则拒稿修改再投或转投acs nano
    2) 副主编团队似乎要做出大的更改,增强地域性,调整期刊收稿范围
    3) 主编亲自把关后再送给副主编定夺,意味着主编这一关就会拒掉一部分稿件
    4) 增加viewpoint 类型的观点文章,仅限邀请形式且仅有一页版面,主要面向领域大牛
    总体来说,个人感觉nano letters这是准备要打破圈子,重振雄风。个人比较喜欢这个期刊,希望其越办越好。
    主编社论链接: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05084

    0

  10. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2170435, encodeId=9c3c21e04350a, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享:无, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=15, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2ab18525462, createdName=ms3000001952065863, createdTime=Thu Nov 23 09:41:35 CST 2023, time=2023-11-23, status=1, ipAttribution=天津), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1098826, encodeId=adea109882659, content=两个IF相当的期刊,如何选择要投哪个?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=66, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1098825, encodeId=45f010988259f, content=老牌期刊和新出版期刊是否都要选一些?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=56, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1078188, encodeId=1d3110e8188eb, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享:并没有大家所传的关系户情况,我们课题组也没有什么关系,文章主是需要有一定的机理在里面,解决某些科学问题,不能是简单的换材料做性能。审稿人有三个,每个人给出的意见和建议都很合理也很中肯,但确实提出的科学问题很多一个审稿人大概会有6~9个问题,确实要认认真真获得大量证据去证明你的观点和工作机制。期刊里的文章确实专业性比较高,需要有一定的学科背景才能完全看懂,这也可能是引用率比较低的原因,但留下来的文章都是有扎实的理论提出,解决了一定的科学问题的,为相关领域基础理论发展都做了一定的推进,并不是简单的跟热潮拼性能,希望期刊可以越来越好, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e03b6392163, createdName=ms1000001662811804, createdTime=Wed Dec 08 20:05:05 CST 2021, time=2021-12-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=860149, encodeId=f4d686014979, content=效率非常高,3月11号投稿,3月20号开始审稿,4月13号返回审稿意见,一个小修一个建议直接发表,小修后4月22号接收并发表。<br> 文章是测量方法,更偏重机理和推导。之前被acs nano编辑拒稿,因为编辑认为这篇文章技术性太强 (too technical),但是别的方面都挺好。所以个人认为nano letters相比acs nano可能确实更喜欢偏机理一些。希望nano letters越来越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=141, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=323c5413977, createdName=ms1145759477415829, createdTime=Sun May 03 22:46:22 CST 2020, time=2020-05-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857866, encodeId=8ac385e8669e, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:75楼看不上acs nano啊,话说acs nano的文章质量现在比nl强一个档了啊 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=122, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ff9d5414052, createdName=ms7780612574685936, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 22:08:03 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857865, encodeId=3f9e85e865a6, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了。<br> 75楼别指望了,亲身经历,哈哈 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=116, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=9ad75414098, createdName=ms658988217505615, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 21:56:01 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857864, encodeId=a9b185e86415, content=审稿速度:5.0<br>经验分享:nl关系户期刊,换主编还是一个样,没有实质性改变的,慢慢沦为**期刊了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e9a95414072, createdName=ms9430612511402566, createdTime=Thu Feb 27 21:49:59 CST 2020, time=2020-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856509, encodeId=b0138565096d, content=nanolett 当年认可度高于am, 口碑和jacs、prl 不相上下。近年来由于收稿偏物理,圈子现象严重,影响力下降明显,几乎沦落到和acs nano差不多的水平,着实可惜。<br> 不知道是不是acs 或是两位大佬主编想要做出改变,今年居然更换了主编,从新任主编发表的编辑社论来看,将要做出以下改变:<br> 1)只支持letters 类型稿件,字数不能超过3000,图不能超过5个,否则拒稿修改再投或转投acs nano<br> 2) 副主编团队似乎要做出大的更改,增强地域性,调整期刊收稿范围<br> 3) 主编亲自把关后再送给副主编定夺,意味着主编这一关就会拒掉一部分稿件<br> 4) 增加viewpoint 类型的观点文章,仅限邀请形式且仅有一页版面,主要面向领域大牛<br> 总体来说,个人感觉nano letters这是准备要打破圈子,重振雄风。个人比较喜欢这个期刊,希望其越办越好。<br> 主编社论链接: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05084 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Mon Jan 06 05:40:42 CST 2020, time=2020-01-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=855575, encodeId=a9268555e581, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享:2019年10月24日 投稿,并分配编辑。<br> 2019年12月04日 暂无消息,估计可能是因为感恩节推迟了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=4ce15414064, createdName=ms4608271349787965, createdTime=Fri Dec 06 01:06:11 CST 2019, time=2019-12-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2019-12-06 ms4608271349787965

    审稿速度:2.0
    经验分享:2019年10月24日 投稿,并分配编辑。
    2019年12月04日 暂无消息,估计可能是因为感恩节推迟了。

    0

共68条页码: 1/7页10条/页
分享您的投稿经验,提升MI经验值,获取更多积分