Nature Nanotechnology-期刊论坛，投稿经验-MedSci.cn

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095374, encodeId=74f010953e442, content=回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=140, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=71734776539, createdName=MS54455111222, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095373, encodeId=49d010953e39b, content=如何回复期刊编辑的意见？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856764, encodeId=b94d856e64e9, content=每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=214, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Mon Jan 13 08:58:51 CST 2020, time=2020-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=552195, encodeId=a963552195bb, content=牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, beContent=zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=438, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://cdnapi.center.medsci.cn/medsci/head/2017/08/15/af911bdd940ac5430dfecaae1ba3bfff.jpg, createdBy=75e41936661, createdName=sunliang, createdTime=Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 CST 2018, time=2018-01-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544488, encodeId=5f0154448876, content=谁能预测明年会有多少分?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=422, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=gu_8183, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:15:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836165, encodeId=b07e83616514, content=审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据， , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=250, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Sat Apr 08 11:16:17 CST 2017, time=2017-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=833156, encodeId=cd4683315666, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=217, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1c2c5414088, createdName=ms4160399524644389, createdTime=Wed Aug 17 17:32:30 CST 2016, time=2016-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513448, encodeId=a570513448fc, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。 两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=562, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=dfa045429, createdName=zhengyuanyi, createdTime=Sun Jul 12 23:32:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827022, encodeId=675382e022d4, content=极慢也极难 31.多 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=230, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dee5413979, createdName=ms4391593229390302, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 09:56:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489700, encodeId=ff94489e00d1, content=一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=708, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=905855843, createdName=longkelonni8595, createdTime=Wed Jul 18 16:07:00 CST 2012, time=2012-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2021-12-28 MS54455111222

回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？

140 1

展开1条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095374, encodeId=74f010953e442, content=回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=140, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=71734776539, createdName=MS54455111222, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095373, encodeId=49d010953e39b, content=如何回复期刊编辑的意见？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856764, encodeId=b94d856e64e9, content=每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=214, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Mon Jan 13 08:58:51 CST 2020, time=2020-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=552195, encodeId=a963552195bb, content=牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, beContent=zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=438, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://cdnapi.center.medsci.cn/medsci/head/2017/08/15/af911bdd940ac5430dfecaae1ba3bfff.jpg, createdBy=75e41936661, createdName=sunliang, createdTime=Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 CST 2018, time=2018-01-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544488, encodeId=5f0154448876, content=谁能预测明年会有多少分?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=422, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=gu_8183, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:15:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836165, encodeId=b07e83616514, content=审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据， , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=250, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Sat Apr 08 11:16:17 CST 2017, time=2017-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=833156, encodeId=cd4683315666, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=217, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1c2c5414088, createdName=ms4160399524644389, createdTime=Wed Aug 17 17:32:30 CST 2016, time=2016-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513448, encodeId=a570513448fc, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。 两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=562, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=dfa045429, createdName=zhengyuanyi, createdTime=Sun Jul 12 23:32:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827022, encodeId=675382e022d4, content=极慢也极难 31.多 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=230, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dee5413979, createdName=ms4391593229390302, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 09:56:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489700, encodeId=ff94489e00d1, content=一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=708, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=905855843, createdName=longkelonni8595, createdTime=Wed Jul 18 16:07:00 CST 2012, time=2012-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2021-12-27 小动量

如何回复期刊编辑的意见？

134 1

展开1条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095374, encodeId=74f010953e442, content=回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=140, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=71734776539, createdName=MS54455111222, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095373, encodeId=49d010953e39b, content=如何回复期刊编辑的意见？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856764, encodeId=b94d856e64e9, content=每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=214, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Mon Jan 13 08:58:51 CST 2020, time=2020-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=552195, encodeId=a963552195bb, content=牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, beContent=zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=438, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://cdnapi.center.medsci.cn/medsci/head/2017/08/15/af911bdd940ac5430dfecaae1ba3bfff.jpg, createdBy=75e41936661, createdName=sunliang, createdTime=Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 CST 2018, time=2018-01-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544488, encodeId=5f0154448876, content=谁能预测明年会有多少分?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=422, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=gu_8183, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:15:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836165, encodeId=b07e83616514, content=审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据， , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=250, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Sat Apr 08 11:16:17 CST 2017, time=2017-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=833156, encodeId=cd4683315666, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=217, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1c2c5414088, createdName=ms4160399524644389, createdTime=Wed Aug 17 17:32:30 CST 2016, time=2016-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513448, encodeId=a570513448fc, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。 两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=562, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=dfa045429, createdName=zhengyuanyi, createdTime=Sun Jul 12 23:32:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827022, encodeId=675382e022d4, content=极慢也极难 31.多 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=230, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dee5413979, createdName=ms4391593229390302, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 09:56:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489700, encodeId=ff94489e00d1, content=一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=708, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=905855843, createdName=longkelonni8595, createdTime=Wed Jul 18 16:07:00 CST 2012, time=2012-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2020-01-13 ms5413142457057855

每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了

214 1

展开1条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095374, encodeId=74f010953e442, content=回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=140, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=71734776539, createdName=MS54455111222, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095373, encodeId=49d010953e39b, content=如何回复期刊编辑的意见？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856764, encodeId=b94d856e64e9, content=每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=214, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Mon Jan 13 08:58:51 CST 2020, time=2020-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=552195, encodeId=a963552195bb, content=牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, beContent=zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=438, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://cdnapi.center.medsci.cn/medsci/head/2017/08/15/af911bdd940ac5430dfecaae1ba3bfff.jpg, createdBy=75e41936661, createdName=sunliang, createdTime=Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 CST 2018, time=2018-01-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544488, encodeId=5f0154448876, content=谁能预测明年会有多少分?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=422, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=gu_8183, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:15:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836165, encodeId=b07e83616514, content=审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据， , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=250, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Sat Apr 08 11:16:17 CST 2017, time=2017-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=833156, encodeId=cd4683315666, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=217, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1c2c5414088, createdName=ms4160399524644389, createdTime=Wed Aug 17 17:32:30 CST 2016, time=2016-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513448, encodeId=a570513448fc, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。 两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=562, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=dfa045429, createdName=zhengyuanyi, createdTime=Sun Jul 12 23:32:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827022, encodeId=675382e022d4, content=极慢也极难 31.多 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=230, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dee5413979, createdName=ms4391593229390302, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 09:56:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489700, encodeId=ff94489e00d1, content=一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=708, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=905855843, createdName=longkelonni8595, createdTime=Wed Jul 18 16:07:00 CST 2012, time=2012-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2018-01-31 sunliang

牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表:
第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒.
两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!

zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒.
两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!

438 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095374, encodeId=74f010953e442, content=回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=140, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=71734776539, createdName=MS54455111222, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095373, encodeId=49d010953e39b, content=如何回复期刊编辑的意见？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856764, encodeId=b94d856e64e9, content=每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=214, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Mon Jan 13 08:58:51 CST 2020, time=2020-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=552195, encodeId=a963552195bb, content=牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, beContent=zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=438, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://cdnapi.center.medsci.cn/medsci/head/2017/08/15/af911bdd940ac5430dfecaae1ba3bfff.jpg, createdBy=75e41936661, createdName=sunliang, createdTime=Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 CST 2018, time=2018-01-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544488, encodeId=5f0154448876, content=谁能预测明年会有多少分?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=422, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=gu_8183, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:15:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836165, encodeId=b07e83616514, content=审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据， , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=250, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Sat Apr 08 11:16:17 CST 2017, time=2017-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=833156, encodeId=cd4683315666, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=217, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1c2c5414088, createdName=ms4160399524644389, createdTime=Wed Aug 17 17:32:30 CST 2016, time=2016-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513448, encodeId=a570513448fc, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。 两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=562, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=dfa045429, createdName=zhengyuanyi, createdTime=Sun Jul 12 23:32:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827022, encodeId=675382e022d4, content=极慢也极难 31.多 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=230, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dee5413979, createdName=ms4391593229390302, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 09:56:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489700, encodeId=ff94489e00d1, content=一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=708, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=905855843, createdName=longkelonni8595, createdTime=Wed Jul 18 16:07:00 CST 2012, time=2012-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2017-07-16 gu_8183

谁能预测明年会有多少分?

422 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095374, encodeId=74f010953e442, content=回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=140, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=71734776539, createdName=MS54455111222, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095373, encodeId=49d010953e39b, content=如何回复期刊编辑的意见？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856764, encodeId=b94d856e64e9, content=每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=214, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Mon Jan 13 08:58:51 CST 2020, time=2020-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=552195, encodeId=a963552195bb, content=牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, beContent=zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=438, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://cdnapi.center.medsci.cn/medsci/head/2017/08/15/af911bdd940ac5430dfecaae1ba3bfff.jpg, createdBy=75e41936661, createdName=sunliang, createdTime=Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 CST 2018, time=2018-01-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544488, encodeId=5f0154448876, content=谁能预测明年会有多少分?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=422, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=gu_8183, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:15:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836165, encodeId=b07e83616514, content=审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据， , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=250, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Sat Apr 08 11:16:17 CST 2017, time=2017-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=833156, encodeId=cd4683315666, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=217, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1c2c5414088, createdName=ms4160399524644389, createdTime=Wed Aug 17 17:32:30 CST 2016, time=2016-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513448, encodeId=a570513448fc, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。 两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=562, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=dfa045429, createdName=zhengyuanyi, createdTime=Sun Jul 12 23:32:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827022, encodeId=675382e022d4, content=极慢也极难 31.多 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=230, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dee5413979, createdName=ms4391593229390302, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 09:56:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489700, encodeId=ff94489e00d1, content=一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=708, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=905855843, createdName=longkelonni8595, createdTime=Wed Jul 18 16:07:00 CST 2012, time=2012-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2017-04-08 ms6967342940128728

审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据，

250 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095374, encodeId=74f010953e442, content=回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=140, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=71734776539, createdName=MS54455111222, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095373, encodeId=49d010953e39b, content=如何回复期刊编辑的意见？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856764, encodeId=b94d856e64e9, content=每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=214, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Mon Jan 13 08:58:51 CST 2020, time=2020-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=552195, encodeId=a963552195bb, content=牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, beContent=zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=438, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://cdnapi.center.medsci.cn/medsci/head/2017/08/15/af911bdd940ac5430dfecaae1ba3bfff.jpg, createdBy=75e41936661, createdName=sunliang, createdTime=Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 CST 2018, time=2018-01-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544488, encodeId=5f0154448876, content=谁能预测明年会有多少分?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=422, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=gu_8183, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:15:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836165, encodeId=b07e83616514, content=审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据， , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=250, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Sat Apr 08 11:16:17 CST 2017, time=2017-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=833156, encodeId=cd4683315666, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=217, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1c2c5414088, createdName=ms4160399524644389, createdTime=Wed Aug 17 17:32:30 CST 2016, time=2016-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513448, encodeId=a570513448fc, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。 两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=562, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=dfa045429, createdName=zhengyuanyi, createdTime=Sun Jul 12 23:32:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827022, encodeId=675382e022d4, content=极慢也极难 31.多 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=230, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dee5413979, createdName=ms4391593229390302, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 09:56:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489700, encodeId=ff94489e00d1, content=一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=708, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=905855843, createdName=longkelonni8595, createdTime=Wed Jul 18 16:07:00 CST 2012, time=2012-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2016-08-17 ms4160399524644389

审稿速度:3.0
经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！

217 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095374, encodeId=74f010953e442, content=回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=140, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=71734776539, createdName=MS54455111222, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095373, encodeId=49d010953e39b, content=如何回复期刊编辑的意见？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856764, encodeId=b94d856e64e9, content=每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=214, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Mon Jan 13 08:58:51 CST 2020, time=2020-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=552195, encodeId=a963552195bb, content=牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, beContent=zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=438, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://cdnapi.center.medsci.cn/medsci/head/2017/08/15/af911bdd940ac5430dfecaae1ba3bfff.jpg, createdBy=75e41936661, createdName=sunliang, createdTime=Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 CST 2018, time=2018-01-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544488, encodeId=5f0154448876, content=谁能预测明年会有多少分?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=422, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=gu_8183, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:15:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836165, encodeId=b07e83616514, content=审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据， , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=250, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Sat Apr 08 11:16:17 CST 2017, time=2017-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=833156, encodeId=cd4683315666, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=217, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1c2c5414088, createdName=ms4160399524644389, createdTime=Wed Aug 17 17:32:30 CST 2016, time=2016-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513448, encodeId=a570513448fc, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。 两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=562, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=dfa045429, createdName=zhengyuanyi, createdTime=Sun Jul 12 23:32:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827022, encodeId=675382e022d4, content=极慢也极难 31.多 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=230, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dee5413979, createdName=ms4391593229390302, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 09:56:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489700, encodeId=ff94489e00d1, content=一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=708, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=905855843, createdName=longkelonni8595, createdTime=Wed Jul 18 16:07:00 CST 2012, time=2012-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2015-07-12 zhengyuanyi

审稿速度:2.0
经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。
两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！

562 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095374, encodeId=74f010953e442, content=回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=140, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=71734776539, createdName=MS54455111222, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095373, encodeId=49d010953e39b, content=如何回复期刊编辑的意见？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856764, encodeId=b94d856e64e9, content=每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=214, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Mon Jan 13 08:58:51 CST 2020, time=2020-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=552195, encodeId=a963552195bb, content=牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, beContent=zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=438, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://cdnapi.center.medsci.cn/medsci/head/2017/08/15/af911bdd940ac5430dfecaae1ba3bfff.jpg, createdBy=75e41936661, createdName=sunliang, createdTime=Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 CST 2018, time=2018-01-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544488, encodeId=5f0154448876, content=谁能预测明年会有多少分?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=422, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=gu_8183, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:15:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836165, encodeId=b07e83616514, content=审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据， , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=250, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Sat Apr 08 11:16:17 CST 2017, time=2017-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=833156, encodeId=cd4683315666, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=217, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1c2c5414088, createdName=ms4160399524644389, createdTime=Wed Aug 17 17:32:30 CST 2016, time=2016-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513448, encodeId=a570513448fc, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。 两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=562, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=dfa045429, createdName=zhengyuanyi, createdTime=Sun Jul 12 23:32:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827022, encodeId=675382e022d4, content=极慢也极难 31.多 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=230, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dee5413979, createdName=ms4391593229390302, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 09:56:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489700, encodeId=ff94489e00d1, content=一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=708, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=905855843, createdName=longkelonni8595, createdTime=Wed Jul 18 16:07:00 CST 2012, time=2012-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2013-07-24 ms4391593229390302

极慢也极难 31.多

230 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095374, encodeId=74f010953e442, content=回复评审的意见和期刊编辑的意见有什么不同？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=140, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=71734776539, createdName=MS54455111222, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1095373, encodeId=49d010953e39b, content=如何回复期刊编辑的意见？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=134, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856764, encodeId=b94d856e64e9, content=每次审稿大约2-3个月回复，经历第一次2个月审稿给了修改，修改了约4个月回稿被拒，argue后重新送审，100天多一点回复，又给了修改，修改了4周，终于接受了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=214, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Mon Jan 13 08:58:51 CST 2020, time=2020-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=552195, encodeId=a963552195bb, content=牛逼啊.文章可否发私信瞅瞅?zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, beContent=zhengyuanyi 2015-07-12 23:32:00 发表: 第一次投稿.送审.2个月后被拒. 两位评审.都认可文章的创新性.但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷.应该选用另一材料.但是.我们在实验前.恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料.我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当.于是.进行了申诉.申诉后再次送审.已三个月了.还未收到审稿意见.忐忑啊!, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=438, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://cdnapi.center.medsci.cn/medsci/head/2017/08/15/af911bdd940ac5430dfecaae1ba3bfff.jpg, createdBy=75e41936661, createdName=sunliang, createdTime=Wed Jan 31 00:00:00 CST 2018, time=2018-01-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544488, encodeId=5f0154448876, content=谁能预测明年会有多少分?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=422, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=gu_8183, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:15:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836165, encodeId=b07e83616514, content=审稿很快，编辑要求高，审稿人要求高，做的东西要前沿有创新，图片要求精美，语言要干练，分析要深入，估计审稿人是本领域的大牛，直接给了3个非常刁钻难以解决的问题，没理会，直接按我们本来的意愿进行反驳，有理有据， , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=250, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Sat Apr 08 11:16:17 CST 2017, time=2017-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=833156, encodeId=cd4683315666, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=217, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1c2c5414088, createdName=ms4160399524644389, createdTime=Wed Aug 17 17:32:30 CST 2016, time=2016-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513448, encodeId=a570513448fc, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：第一次投稿，送审，2个月后被拒。 两位评审，都认可文章的创新性，但第一位评审意见认为所选材料有缺陷，应该选用另一材料。但是，我们在实验前，恰好对他所建议的材料进行过仔细的分析比较而最终选择了另外一种材料。我们有充分的依据认为他的意见不一定恰当。于是，进行了申诉。申诉后再次送审，已三个月了，还未收到审稿意见。忐忑啊！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=562, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=dfa045429, createdName=zhengyuanyi, createdTime=Sun Jul 12 23:32:00 CST 2015, time=2015-07-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827022, encodeId=675382e022d4, content=极慢也极难 31.多 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=230, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dee5413979, createdName=ms4391593229390302, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 09:56:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489700, encodeId=ff94489e00d1, content=一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=708, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=905855843, createdName=longkelonni8595, createdTime=Wed Jul 18 16:07:00 CST 2012, time=2012-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2012-07-18 longkelonni8595

一篇文章，从投稿到接收差不多一年半的样子。着急毕业的就不要考虑啦~

708 0

内科

外科

专科科室

热点

按科室浏览

临床工具

科研工具

其他工具

科研数智化

真实世界研究解决方案

数字化学术传播解决方案

其它

期刊讨论

科室

工具

服务