JAIDS-J ACQ IMM DEF 润色咨询

JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES

出版年份:1999 年文章数:3762 投稿命中率: 开通期刊会员,数据随心看

出版周期:Monthly 自引率:9.3% 审稿周期: 开通期刊会员,数据随心看

前往期刊查询

期刊讨论

  1. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099515, encodeId=99db109951505, content=长篇幅讨论是否展示作者对课题的思考?审稿人对MS印象好?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=46, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099516, encodeId=5616109951614, content=IF是什么?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487753, encodeId=a02048e75336, content=是一个霸道的杂志,只根据一个不负责任的审稿人的意见,就直接拒稿,具体情况是: <br> 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章,以合作者为主,然后我们用这篇文章的序列,以及其他人文章的序列,重新做了进化分析,发现一些新结果,接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容,只因为用了接受文章的序列,竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 <br> 气愤之下,写了rebuttal,同时附上我们接受文章的pdf,以及目前投稿文章,一遍editor和审稿人做比较是否我们涉嫌重复发表,过了大概6天,editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=417, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:45:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487752, encodeId=dada48e7520d, content=是一个霸道无耻的杂志,只根据一个没有不负责任的审稿人的意见,就直接拒稿,具体情况是: <br> 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章,以合作者为主,然后我们用这篇文章的序列,以及其他人文章的序列,重新做了进化分析,发现一些新结果,接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容,只因为用了接受文章的序列,竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 <br> 气愤之下,写了rebuttal,过了大概6天,editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=441, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:42:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471287, encodeId=cbe34e128768, content=太难了,投5次拒5次, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=355, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 16:51:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471280, encodeId=351c4e128090, content=投过一回,蛮慢都没过编辑那关就退回来了说没达到那杂志水准,估计中国的文章不是很感冒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=526, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=昏, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 10:30:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2021-12-28 桑晒麦拉

    长篇幅讨论是否展示作者对课题的思考?审稿人对MS印象好?

    1

    展开1条回复
  2. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099515, encodeId=99db109951505, content=长篇幅讨论是否展示作者对课题的思考?审稿人对MS印象好?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=46, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099516, encodeId=5616109951614, content=IF是什么?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487753, encodeId=a02048e75336, content=是一个霸道的杂志,只根据一个不负责任的审稿人的意见,就直接拒稿,具体情况是: <br> 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章,以合作者为主,然后我们用这篇文章的序列,以及其他人文章的序列,重新做了进化分析,发现一些新结果,接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容,只因为用了接受文章的序列,竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 <br> 气愤之下,写了rebuttal,同时附上我们接受文章的pdf,以及目前投稿文章,一遍editor和审稿人做比较是否我们涉嫌重复发表,过了大概6天,editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=417, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:45:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487752, encodeId=dada48e7520d, content=是一个霸道无耻的杂志,只根据一个没有不负责任的审稿人的意见,就直接拒稿,具体情况是: <br> 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章,以合作者为主,然后我们用这篇文章的序列,以及其他人文章的序列,重新做了进化分析,发现一些新结果,接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容,只因为用了接受文章的序列,竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 <br> 气愤之下,写了rebuttal,过了大概6天,editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=441, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:42:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471287, encodeId=cbe34e128768, content=太难了,投5次拒5次, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=355, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 16:51:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471280, encodeId=351c4e128090, content=投过一回,蛮慢都没过编辑那关就退回来了说没达到那杂志水准,估计中国的文章不是很感冒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=526, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=昏, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 10:30:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2021-12-27 小动量

    IF是什么?

    1

    展开1条回复
  3. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099515, encodeId=99db109951505, content=长篇幅讨论是否展示作者对课题的思考?审稿人对MS印象好?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=46, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099516, encodeId=5616109951614, content=IF是什么?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487753, encodeId=a02048e75336, content=是一个霸道的杂志,只根据一个不负责任的审稿人的意见,就直接拒稿,具体情况是: <br> 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章,以合作者为主,然后我们用这篇文章的序列,以及其他人文章的序列,重新做了进化分析,发现一些新结果,接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容,只因为用了接受文章的序列,竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 <br> 气愤之下,写了rebuttal,同时附上我们接受文章的pdf,以及目前投稿文章,一遍editor和审稿人做比较是否我们涉嫌重复发表,过了大概6天,editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=417, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:45:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487752, encodeId=dada48e7520d, content=是一个霸道无耻的杂志,只根据一个没有不负责任的审稿人的意见,就直接拒稿,具体情况是: <br> 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章,以合作者为主,然后我们用这篇文章的序列,以及其他人文章的序列,重新做了进化分析,发现一些新结果,接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容,只因为用了接受文章的序列,竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 <br> 气愤之下,写了rebuttal,过了大概6天,editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=441, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:42:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471287, encodeId=cbe34e128768, content=太难了,投5次拒5次, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=355, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 16:51:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471280, encodeId=351c4e128090, content=投过一回,蛮慢都没过编辑那关就退回来了说没达到那杂志水准,估计中国的文章不是很感冒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=526, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=昏, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 10:30:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2012-04-05 匿名用户

    是一个霸道的杂志,只根据一个不负责任的审稿人的意见,就直接拒稿,具体情况是:
    之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章,以合作者为主,然后我们用这篇文章的序列,以及其他人文章的序列,重新做了进化分析,发现一些新结果,接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容,只因为用了接受文章的序列,竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。
    气愤之下,写了rebuttal,同时附上我们接受文章的pdf,以及目前投稿文章,一遍editor和审稿人做比较是否我们涉嫌重复发表,过了大概6天,editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。

    0

  4. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099515, encodeId=99db109951505, content=长篇幅讨论是否展示作者对课题的思考?审稿人对MS印象好?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=46, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099516, encodeId=5616109951614, content=IF是什么?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487753, encodeId=a02048e75336, content=是一个霸道的杂志,只根据一个不负责任的审稿人的意见,就直接拒稿,具体情况是: <br> 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章,以合作者为主,然后我们用这篇文章的序列,以及其他人文章的序列,重新做了进化分析,发现一些新结果,接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容,只因为用了接受文章的序列,竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 <br> 气愤之下,写了rebuttal,同时附上我们接受文章的pdf,以及目前投稿文章,一遍editor和审稿人做比较是否我们涉嫌重复发表,过了大概6天,editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=417, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:45:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487752, encodeId=dada48e7520d, content=是一个霸道无耻的杂志,只根据一个没有不负责任的审稿人的意见,就直接拒稿,具体情况是: <br> 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章,以合作者为主,然后我们用这篇文章的序列,以及其他人文章的序列,重新做了进化分析,发现一些新结果,接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容,只因为用了接受文章的序列,竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 <br> 气愤之下,写了rebuttal,过了大概6天,editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=441, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:42:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471287, encodeId=cbe34e128768, content=太难了,投5次拒5次, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=355, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 16:51:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471280, encodeId=351c4e128090, content=投过一回,蛮慢都没过编辑那关就退回来了说没达到那杂志水准,估计中国的文章不是很感冒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=526, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=昏, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 10:30:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2012-04-05 匿名用户

    是一个霸道无耻的杂志,只根据一个没有不负责任的审稿人的意见,就直接拒稿,具体情况是:
    之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章,以合作者为主,然后我们用这篇文章的序列,以及其他人文章的序列,重新做了进化分析,发现一些新结果,接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容,只因为用了接受文章的序列,竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。
    气愤之下,写了rebuttal,过了大概6天,editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。

    0

  5. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099515, encodeId=99db109951505, content=长篇幅讨论是否展示作者对课题的思考?审稿人对MS印象好?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=46, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099516, encodeId=5616109951614, content=IF是什么?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487753, encodeId=a02048e75336, content=是一个霸道的杂志,只根据一个不负责任的审稿人的意见,就直接拒稿,具体情况是: <br> 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章,以合作者为主,然后我们用这篇文章的序列,以及其他人文章的序列,重新做了进化分析,发现一些新结果,接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容,只因为用了接受文章的序列,竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 <br> 气愤之下,写了rebuttal,同时附上我们接受文章的pdf,以及目前投稿文章,一遍editor和审稿人做比较是否我们涉嫌重复发表,过了大概6天,editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=417, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:45:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487752, encodeId=dada48e7520d, content=是一个霸道无耻的杂志,只根据一个没有不负责任的审稿人的意见,就直接拒稿,具体情况是: <br> 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章,以合作者为主,然后我们用这篇文章的序列,以及其他人文章的序列,重新做了进化分析,发现一些新结果,接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容,只因为用了接受文章的序列,竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 <br> 气愤之下,写了rebuttal,过了大概6天,editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=441, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:42:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471287, encodeId=cbe34e128768, content=太难了,投5次拒5次, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=355, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 16:51:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471280, encodeId=351c4e128090, content=投过一回,蛮慢都没过编辑那关就退回来了说没达到那杂志水准,估计中国的文章不是很感冒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=526, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=昏, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 10:30:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2010-07-06 匿名用户

    太难了,投5次拒5次

    0

  6. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099515, encodeId=99db109951505, content=长篇幅讨论是否展示作者对课题的思考?审稿人对MS印象好?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=46, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1099516, encodeId=5616109951614, content=IF是什么?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=0, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/e664bd00445a497ca6dfc89ec35b9206/0bfbc1258d9f4ec6aba6990cbd76f3e2.jpg, createdBy=e9d85497901, createdName=小动量, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:51 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487753, encodeId=a02048e75336, content=是一个霸道的杂志,只根据一个不负责任的审稿人的意见,就直接拒稿,具体情况是: <br> 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章,以合作者为主,然后我们用这篇文章的序列,以及其他人文章的序列,重新做了进化分析,发现一些新结果,接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容,只因为用了接受文章的序列,竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 <br> 气愤之下,写了rebuttal,同时附上我们接受文章的pdf,以及目前投稿文章,一遍editor和审稿人做比较是否我们涉嫌重复发表,过了大概6天,editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=417, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:45:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=487752, encodeId=dada48e7520d, content=是一个霸道无耻的杂志,只根据一个没有不负责任的审稿人的意见,就直接拒稿,具体情况是: <br> 之前跟合作者接受一篇关于分子流行病学的文章,以合作者为主,然后我们用这篇文章的序列,以及其他人文章的序列,重新做了进化分析,发现一些新结果,接受的和投稿的文章根本就是不同的研究内容,只因为用了接受文章的序列,竟然被审稿人污蔑为重复发表。 <br> 气愤之下,写了rebuttal,过了大概6天,editor尽然说“It is our journal policy that we do not reverse our editorial decision based on honest disagreements”。不知道什么叫做“honest disagreements”。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=441, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Thu Apr 05 19:42:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471287, encodeId=cbe34e128768, content=太难了,投5次拒5次, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=355, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 16:51:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=471280, encodeId=351c4e128090, content=投过一回,蛮慢都没过编辑那关就退回来了说没达到那杂志水准,估计中国的文章不是很感冒, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=526, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=昏, createdTime=Tue Jul 06 10:30:00 CST 2010, time=2010-07-06, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2010-07-06

    投过一回,蛮慢都没过编辑那关就退回来了说没达到那杂志水准,估计中国的文章不是很感冒

    0

共7条页码: 1/1页10条/页
分享您的投稿经验,提升MI经验值,获取更多积分