JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE PART A-POLYMER CHEMISTRY-期刊论坛，投稿经验-MedSci.cn

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=850623, encodeId=78be850623a6, content=个人觉得这个工作的idea挺好的，可能自己表达和角度不会选，所以，从jmcc,chemistry-an asian journal，一路投到这里的，主要是不想等了，老板也意思是投个三区的算了，大家说这个期刊还挺好，老牌高分子杂志，虽然if近几年降了点，但认可度挺高 20190130 submitted 20190225 minor revision 主要是补了两个小实验，用了一个礼拜，测试估计也墨迹了有一个礼拜，自己因为私事，耽搁了一个礼拜，要是抓紧点，10天就能返回去…… 20190319 revise resubmition，上午9点回回去，当天晚上11点就accept了 20190322 晚上22：25让弄一系列wiley作者services，包含license 之类的 20190329 让correct proof 3.31 正好是周末，一觉睡到10点，起来把proof弄好了，发回去 4.1号，对方给回复邮件，意思收到correction proof。 4.2号，挂网上还是挺速度的……建议大家投稿…… ph.d tae-lim choi is very nice！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=769c5414093, createdName=ms6597719114830456, createdTime=Wed Apr 03 10:42:28 CST 2019, time=2019-04-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844755, encodeId=f88e844e5538, content=20180427 underconsideration 20180601 major revision 20170608 resubmition 20170612 accept prof. bert meijer is very nice！ 高分子老牌了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=96, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Sun Jul 01 08:14:56 CST 2018, time=2018-07-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840791, encodeId=595f840e9123, content=必须为编辑点赞，一个月内出结果，编辑亲自参与审稿。第一次被拒后给编辑写了封申诉信，然后编辑在圣诞节期间又找了审稿人仲裁，然后让重投，重投后直接接收。老牌高分子杂志，如此敬业的编辑值得尊重！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=136, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b4ea5413978, createdName=ms1565774270860268, createdTime=Thu Feb 01 14:34:20 CST 2018, time=2018-02-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=538946, encodeId=e9e353894659, content=过去不错的，现在这么跌下去，很吓人。明年想再回到3分水平，也许真心太难。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=356, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=med_wu, createdTime=Tue Jul 18 18:23:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836953, encodeId=084e836953a5, content=20170306 underconsideration 20170525 major revision 20170608 resubmition 20170612 accept prof. bert meijer is very nice！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1a365413975, createdName=ms3041982178615389, createdTime=Tue Jun 13 20:53:18 CST 2017, time=2017-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=835235, encodeId=605f835235fd, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0 经验分享：博士期间第一篇文章，自认为有创新性，内容测试全面，文章质量很高。投了macromolecule， polymer期刊没中，然后选择这个期刊，审稿人给了很多有价值的修改意见，修改后接收。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=4a595414065, createdName=ms6437770273944149, createdTime=Tue Jan 10 13:07:42 CST 2017, time=2017-01-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=831423, encodeId=4356831423ce, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：高分子里很不错的期刊，一个月的审稿周期就返回修改意见，大修，花一个月修改后返修，两天后直接接收，效率很高，建议大家投递 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=120, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=747c5414139, createdName=ms8486473624116251, createdTime=Thu Dec 24 13:27:47 CST 2015, time=2015-12-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=498494, encodeId=77cd4984949d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：2013年5月30 投稿 6月14日 major revision 7月30日补充实验，投修改稿 8月15日 accept 编辑选了 Meijer, E.W. 第一篇是 Percec, Virgil 编辑的效率确实是很高，没到3周就接到修改意见，但这个期刊一般只给一次修改的机会，所以应认真按审稿人的意见补充相关内容（In order to avoid an "unending story" we generally reject manuscripts when referees recommend "Major Alterations" for the second time, even if the referees themselves do not recommend a rejection.） 觉得编辑和审稿人非常注重创新，没有这一点基本拒稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=511, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sun Aug 18 14:05:00 CST 2013, time=2013-08-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=825965, encodeId=c40f825965b6, content=参考虫友的点评，选择了效率极高的编辑karen wooley。wooley女士非常nice，两个审稿人、意见都是小修，修改后当天接收。感觉只要结构新颖、表征数据全面+生物学实验比较好中。 5月2日投稿、5月3日分配评审、5月5日under review、5月20日返回意见小修、5月29日修返当天接收。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=98, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dc95414078, createdName=ms9285292773773234, createdTime=Sat Jun 01 10:07:00 CST 2013, time=2013-06-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=824571, encodeId=91178245e1ef, content=跟acs和rsc的相关期刊比起来，jps-a的处理速度非常慢。如果能有acs或者rsc的类似期刊可以选择的话，个人建议尽量不要往这个期刊投稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Mon Mar 18 23:11:00 CST 2013, time=2013-03-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2019-04-03 ms6597719114830456

个人觉得这个工作的idea挺好的，可能自己表达和角度不会选，所以，从jmcc,chemistry-an asian journal，一路投到这里的，主要是不想等了，老板也意思是投个三区的算了，大家说这个期刊还挺好，老牌高分子杂志，虽然if近几年降了点，但认可度挺高
20190130 submitted
20190225 minor revision 主要是补了两个小实验，用了一个礼拜，测试估计也墨迹了有一个礼拜，自己因为私事，耽搁了一个礼拜，要是抓紧点，10天就能返回去……
20190319 revise resubmition，上午9点回回去，当天晚上11点就accept了
20190322 晚上22：25让弄一系列wiley作者services，包含license 之类的
20190329 让correct proof
3.31 正好是周末，一觉睡到10点，起来把proof弄好了，发回去
4.1号，对方给回复邮件，意思收到correction proof。
4.2号，挂网上还是挺速度的……建议大家投稿……
ph.d tae-lim choi is very nice！

103 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=850623, encodeId=78be850623a6, content=个人觉得这个工作的idea挺好的，可能自己表达和角度不会选，所以，从jmcc,chemistry-an asian journal，一路投到这里的，主要是不想等了，老板也意思是投个三区的算了，大家说这个期刊还挺好，老牌高分子杂志，虽然if近几年降了点，但认可度挺高 20190130 submitted 20190225 minor revision 主要是补了两个小实验，用了一个礼拜，测试估计也墨迹了有一个礼拜，自己因为私事，耽搁了一个礼拜，要是抓紧点，10天就能返回去…… 20190319 revise resubmition，上午9点回回去，当天晚上11点就accept了 20190322 晚上22：25让弄一系列wiley作者services，包含license 之类的 20190329 让correct proof 3.31 正好是周末，一觉睡到10点，起来把proof弄好了，发回去 4.1号，对方给回复邮件，意思收到correction proof。 4.2号，挂网上还是挺速度的……建议大家投稿…… ph.d tae-lim choi is very nice！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=769c5414093, createdName=ms6597719114830456, createdTime=Wed Apr 03 10:42:28 CST 2019, time=2019-04-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844755, encodeId=f88e844e5538, content=20180427 underconsideration 20180601 major revision 20170608 resubmition 20170612 accept prof. bert meijer is very nice！ 高分子老牌了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=96, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Sun Jul 01 08:14:56 CST 2018, time=2018-07-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840791, encodeId=595f840e9123, content=必须为编辑点赞，一个月内出结果，编辑亲自参与审稿。第一次被拒后给编辑写了封申诉信，然后编辑在圣诞节期间又找了审稿人仲裁，然后让重投，重投后直接接收。老牌高分子杂志，如此敬业的编辑值得尊重！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=136, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b4ea5413978, createdName=ms1565774270860268, createdTime=Thu Feb 01 14:34:20 CST 2018, time=2018-02-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=538946, encodeId=e9e353894659, content=过去不错的，现在这么跌下去，很吓人。明年想再回到3分水平，也许真心太难。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=356, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=med_wu, createdTime=Tue Jul 18 18:23:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836953, encodeId=084e836953a5, content=20170306 underconsideration 20170525 major revision 20170608 resubmition 20170612 accept prof. bert meijer is very nice！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1a365413975, createdName=ms3041982178615389, createdTime=Tue Jun 13 20:53:18 CST 2017, time=2017-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=835235, encodeId=605f835235fd, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0 经验分享：博士期间第一篇文章，自认为有创新性，内容测试全面，文章质量很高。投了macromolecule， polymer期刊没中，然后选择这个期刊，审稿人给了很多有价值的修改意见，修改后接收。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=4a595414065, createdName=ms6437770273944149, createdTime=Tue Jan 10 13:07:42 CST 2017, time=2017-01-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=831423, encodeId=4356831423ce, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：高分子里很不错的期刊，一个月的审稿周期就返回修改意见，大修，花一个月修改后返修，两天后直接接收，效率很高，建议大家投递 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=120, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=747c5414139, createdName=ms8486473624116251, createdTime=Thu Dec 24 13:27:47 CST 2015, time=2015-12-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=498494, encodeId=77cd4984949d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：2013年5月30 投稿 6月14日 major revision 7月30日补充实验，投修改稿 8月15日 accept 编辑选了 Meijer, E.W. 第一篇是 Percec, Virgil 编辑的效率确实是很高，没到3周就接到修改意见，但这个期刊一般只给一次修改的机会，所以应认真按审稿人的意见补充相关内容（In order to avoid an "unending story" we generally reject manuscripts when referees recommend "Major Alterations" for the second time, even if the referees themselves do not recommend a rejection.） 觉得编辑和审稿人非常注重创新，没有这一点基本拒稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=511, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sun Aug 18 14:05:00 CST 2013, time=2013-08-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=825965, encodeId=c40f825965b6, content=参考虫友的点评，选择了效率极高的编辑karen wooley。wooley女士非常nice，两个审稿人、意见都是小修，修改后当天接收。感觉只要结构新颖、表征数据全面+生物学实验比较好中。 5月2日投稿、5月3日分配评审、5月5日under review、5月20日返回意见小修、5月29日修返当天接收。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=98, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dc95414078, createdName=ms9285292773773234, createdTime=Sat Jun 01 10:07:00 CST 2013, time=2013-06-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=824571, encodeId=91178245e1ef, content=跟acs和rsc的相关期刊比起来，jps-a的处理速度非常慢。如果能有acs或者rsc的类似期刊可以选择的话，个人建议尽量不要往这个期刊投稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Mon Mar 18 23:11:00 CST 2013, time=2013-03-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2018-07-01 ms2473638683998620

20180427 underconsideration
20180601 major revision
20170608 resubmition
20170612 accept
prof. bert meijer is very nice！
高分子老牌了

96 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=850623, encodeId=78be850623a6, content=个人觉得这个工作的idea挺好的，可能自己表达和角度不会选，所以，从jmcc,chemistry-an asian journal，一路投到这里的，主要是不想等了，老板也意思是投个三区的算了，大家说这个期刊还挺好，老牌高分子杂志，虽然if近几年降了点，但认可度挺高 20190130 submitted 20190225 minor revision 主要是补了两个小实验，用了一个礼拜，测试估计也墨迹了有一个礼拜，自己因为私事，耽搁了一个礼拜，要是抓紧点，10天就能返回去…… 20190319 revise resubmition，上午9点回回去，当天晚上11点就accept了 20190322 晚上22：25让弄一系列wiley作者services，包含license 之类的 20190329 让correct proof 3.31 正好是周末，一觉睡到10点，起来把proof弄好了，发回去 4.1号，对方给回复邮件，意思收到correction proof。 4.2号，挂网上还是挺速度的……建议大家投稿…… ph.d tae-lim choi is very nice！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=769c5414093, createdName=ms6597719114830456, createdTime=Wed Apr 03 10:42:28 CST 2019, time=2019-04-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844755, encodeId=f88e844e5538, content=20180427 underconsideration 20180601 major revision 20170608 resubmition 20170612 accept prof. bert meijer is very nice！ 高分子老牌了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=96, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Sun Jul 01 08:14:56 CST 2018, time=2018-07-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840791, encodeId=595f840e9123, content=必须为编辑点赞，一个月内出结果，编辑亲自参与审稿。第一次被拒后给编辑写了封申诉信，然后编辑在圣诞节期间又找了审稿人仲裁，然后让重投，重投后直接接收。老牌高分子杂志，如此敬业的编辑值得尊重！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=136, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b4ea5413978, createdName=ms1565774270860268, createdTime=Thu Feb 01 14:34:20 CST 2018, time=2018-02-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=538946, encodeId=e9e353894659, content=过去不错的，现在这么跌下去，很吓人。明年想再回到3分水平，也许真心太难。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=356, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=med_wu, createdTime=Tue Jul 18 18:23:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836953, encodeId=084e836953a5, content=20170306 underconsideration 20170525 major revision 20170608 resubmition 20170612 accept prof. bert meijer is very nice！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1a365413975, createdName=ms3041982178615389, createdTime=Tue Jun 13 20:53:18 CST 2017, time=2017-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=835235, encodeId=605f835235fd, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0 经验分享：博士期间第一篇文章，自认为有创新性，内容测试全面，文章质量很高。投了macromolecule， polymer期刊没中，然后选择这个期刊，审稿人给了很多有价值的修改意见，修改后接收。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=4a595414065, createdName=ms6437770273944149, createdTime=Tue Jan 10 13:07:42 CST 2017, time=2017-01-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=831423, encodeId=4356831423ce, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：高分子里很不错的期刊，一个月的审稿周期就返回修改意见，大修，花一个月修改后返修，两天后直接接收，效率很高，建议大家投递 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=120, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=747c5414139, createdName=ms8486473624116251, createdTime=Thu Dec 24 13:27:47 CST 2015, time=2015-12-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=498494, encodeId=77cd4984949d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：2013年5月30 投稿 6月14日 major revision 7月30日补充实验，投修改稿 8月15日 accept 编辑选了 Meijer, E.W. 第一篇是 Percec, Virgil 编辑的效率确实是很高，没到3周就接到修改意见，但这个期刊一般只给一次修改的机会，所以应认真按审稿人的意见补充相关内容（In order to avoid an "unending story" we generally reject manuscripts when referees recommend "Major Alterations" for the second time, even if the referees themselves do not recommend a rejection.） 觉得编辑和审稿人非常注重创新，没有这一点基本拒稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=511, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sun Aug 18 14:05:00 CST 2013, time=2013-08-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=825965, encodeId=c40f825965b6, content=参考虫友的点评，选择了效率极高的编辑karen wooley。wooley女士非常nice，两个审稿人、意见都是小修，修改后当天接收。感觉只要结构新颖、表征数据全面+生物学实验比较好中。 5月2日投稿、5月3日分配评审、5月5日under review、5月20日返回意见小修、5月29日修返当天接收。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=98, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dc95414078, createdName=ms9285292773773234, createdTime=Sat Jun 01 10:07:00 CST 2013, time=2013-06-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=824571, encodeId=91178245e1ef, content=跟acs和rsc的相关期刊比起来，jps-a的处理速度非常慢。如果能有acs或者rsc的类似期刊可以选择的话，个人建议尽量不要往这个期刊投稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Mon Mar 18 23:11:00 CST 2013, time=2013-03-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2018-02-01 ms1565774270860268

必须为编辑点赞，一个月内出结果，编辑亲自参与审稿。第一次被拒后给编辑写了封申诉信，然后编辑在圣诞节期间又找了审稿人仲裁，然后让重投，重投后直接接收。老牌高分子杂志，如此敬业的编辑值得尊重！

136 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=850623, encodeId=78be850623a6, content=个人觉得这个工作的idea挺好的，可能自己表达和角度不会选，所以，从jmcc,chemistry-an asian journal，一路投到这里的，主要是不想等了，老板也意思是投个三区的算了，大家说这个期刊还挺好，老牌高分子杂志，虽然if近几年降了点，但认可度挺高 20190130 submitted 20190225 minor revision 主要是补了两个小实验，用了一个礼拜，测试估计也墨迹了有一个礼拜，自己因为私事，耽搁了一个礼拜，要是抓紧点，10天就能返回去…… 20190319 revise resubmition，上午9点回回去，当天晚上11点就accept了 20190322 晚上22：25让弄一系列wiley作者services，包含license 之类的 20190329 让correct proof 3.31 正好是周末，一觉睡到10点，起来把proof弄好了，发回去 4.1号，对方给回复邮件，意思收到correction proof。 4.2号，挂网上还是挺速度的……建议大家投稿…… ph.d tae-lim choi is very nice！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=769c5414093, createdName=ms6597719114830456, createdTime=Wed Apr 03 10:42:28 CST 2019, time=2019-04-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844755, encodeId=f88e844e5538, content=20180427 underconsideration 20180601 major revision 20170608 resubmition 20170612 accept prof. bert meijer is very nice！ 高分子老牌了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=96, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Sun Jul 01 08:14:56 CST 2018, time=2018-07-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840791, encodeId=595f840e9123, content=必须为编辑点赞，一个月内出结果，编辑亲自参与审稿。第一次被拒后给编辑写了封申诉信，然后编辑在圣诞节期间又找了审稿人仲裁，然后让重投，重投后直接接收。老牌高分子杂志，如此敬业的编辑值得尊重！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=136, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b4ea5413978, createdName=ms1565774270860268, createdTime=Thu Feb 01 14:34:20 CST 2018, time=2018-02-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=538946, encodeId=e9e353894659, content=过去不错的，现在这么跌下去，很吓人。明年想再回到3分水平，也许真心太难。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=356, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=med_wu, createdTime=Tue Jul 18 18:23:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836953, encodeId=084e836953a5, content=20170306 underconsideration 20170525 major revision 20170608 resubmition 20170612 accept prof. bert meijer is very nice！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1a365413975, createdName=ms3041982178615389, createdTime=Tue Jun 13 20:53:18 CST 2017, time=2017-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=835235, encodeId=605f835235fd, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0 经验分享：博士期间第一篇文章，自认为有创新性，内容测试全面，文章质量很高。投了macromolecule， polymer期刊没中，然后选择这个期刊，审稿人给了很多有价值的修改意见，修改后接收。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=4a595414065, createdName=ms6437770273944149, createdTime=Tue Jan 10 13:07:42 CST 2017, time=2017-01-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=831423, encodeId=4356831423ce, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：高分子里很不错的期刊，一个月的审稿周期就返回修改意见，大修，花一个月修改后返修，两天后直接接收，效率很高，建议大家投递 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=120, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=747c5414139, createdName=ms8486473624116251, createdTime=Thu Dec 24 13:27:47 CST 2015, time=2015-12-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=498494, encodeId=77cd4984949d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：2013年5月30 投稿 6月14日 major revision 7月30日补充实验，投修改稿 8月15日 accept 编辑选了 Meijer, E.W. 第一篇是 Percec, Virgil 编辑的效率确实是很高，没到3周就接到修改意见，但这个期刊一般只给一次修改的机会，所以应认真按审稿人的意见补充相关内容（In order to avoid an "unending story" we generally reject manuscripts when referees recommend "Major Alterations" for the second time, even if the referees themselves do not recommend a rejection.） 觉得编辑和审稿人非常注重创新，没有这一点基本拒稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=511, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sun Aug 18 14:05:00 CST 2013, time=2013-08-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=825965, encodeId=c40f825965b6, content=参考虫友的点评，选择了效率极高的编辑karen wooley。wooley女士非常nice，两个审稿人、意见都是小修，修改后当天接收。感觉只要结构新颖、表征数据全面+生物学实验比较好中。 5月2日投稿、5月3日分配评审、5月5日under review、5月20日返回意见小修、5月29日修返当天接收。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=98, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dc95414078, createdName=ms9285292773773234, createdTime=Sat Jun 01 10:07:00 CST 2013, time=2013-06-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=824571, encodeId=91178245e1ef, content=跟acs和rsc的相关期刊比起来，jps-a的处理速度非常慢。如果能有acs或者rsc的类似期刊可以选择的话，个人建议尽量不要往这个期刊投稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Mon Mar 18 23:11:00 CST 2013, time=2013-03-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2017-07-18 med_wu

过去不错的，现在这么跌下去，很吓人。明年想再回到3分水平，也许真心太难。

356 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=850623, encodeId=78be850623a6, content=个人觉得这个工作的idea挺好的，可能自己表达和角度不会选，所以，从jmcc,chemistry-an asian journal，一路投到这里的，主要是不想等了，老板也意思是投个三区的算了，大家说这个期刊还挺好，老牌高分子杂志，虽然if近几年降了点，但认可度挺高 20190130 submitted 20190225 minor revision 主要是补了两个小实验，用了一个礼拜，测试估计也墨迹了有一个礼拜，自己因为私事，耽搁了一个礼拜，要是抓紧点，10天就能返回去…… 20190319 revise resubmition，上午9点回回去，当天晚上11点就accept了 20190322 晚上22：25让弄一系列wiley作者services，包含license 之类的 20190329 让correct proof 3.31 正好是周末，一觉睡到10点，起来把proof弄好了，发回去 4.1号，对方给回复邮件，意思收到correction proof。 4.2号，挂网上还是挺速度的……建议大家投稿…… ph.d tae-lim choi is very nice！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=769c5414093, createdName=ms6597719114830456, createdTime=Wed Apr 03 10:42:28 CST 2019, time=2019-04-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844755, encodeId=f88e844e5538, content=20180427 underconsideration 20180601 major revision 20170608 resubmition 20170612 accept prof. bert meijer is very nice！ 高分子老牌了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=96, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Sun Jul 01 08:14:56 CST 2018, time=2018-07-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840791, encodeId=595f840e9123, content=必须为编辑点赞，一个月内出结果，编辑亲自参与审稿。第一次被拒后给编辑写了封申诉信，然后编辑在圣诞节期间又找了审稿人仲裁，然后让重投，重投后直接接收。老牌高分子杂志，如此敬业的编辑值得尊重！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=136, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b4ea5413978, createdName=ms1565774270860268, createdTime=Thu Feb 01 14:34:20 CST 2018, time=2018-02-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=538946, encodeId=e9e353894659, content=过去不错的，现在这么跌下去，很吓人。明年想再回到3分水平，也许真心太难。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=356, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=med_wu, createdTime=Tue Jul 18 18:23:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836953, encodeId=084e836953a5, content=20170306 underconsideration 20170525 major revision 20170608 resubmition 20170612 accept prof. bert meijer is very nice！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1a365413975, createdName=ms3041982178615389, createdTime=Tue Jun 13 20:53:18 CST 2017, time=2017-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=835235, encodeId=605f835235fd, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0 经验分享：博士期间第一篇文章，自认为有创新性，内容测试全面，文章质量很高。投了macromolecule， polymer期刊没中，然后选择这个期刊，审稿人给了很多有价值的修改意见，修改后接收。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=4a595414065, createdName=ms6437770273944149, createdTime=Tue Jan 10 13:07:42 CST 2017, time=2017-01-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=831423, encodeId=4356831423ce, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：高分子里很不错的期刊，一个月的审稿周期就返回修改意见，大修，花一个月修改后返修，两天后直接接收，效率很高，建议大家投递 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=120, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=747c5414139, createdName=ms8486473624116251, createdTime=Thu Dec 24 13:27:47 CST 2015, time=2015-12-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=498494, encodeId=77cd4984949d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：2013年5月30 投稿 6月14日 major revision 7月30日补充实验，投修改稿 8月15日 accept 编辑选了 Meijer, E.W. 第一篇是 Percec, Virgil 编辑的效率确实是很高，没到3周就接到修改意见，但这个期刊一般只给一次修改的机会，所以应认真按审稿人的意见补充相关内容（In order to avoid an "unending story" we generally reject manuscripts when referees recommend "Major Alterations" for the second time, even if the referees themselves do not recommend a rejection.） 觉得编辑和审稿人非常注重创新，没有这一点基本拒稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=511, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sun Aug 18 14:05:00 CST 2013, time=2013-08-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=825965, encodeId=c40f825965b6, content=参考虫友的点评，选择了效率极高的编辑karen wooley。wooley女士非常nice，两个审稿人、意见都是小修，修改后当天接收。感觉只要结构新颖、表征数据全面+生物学实验比较好中。 5月2日投稿、5月3日分配评审、5月5日under review、5月20日返回意见小修、5月29日修返当天接收。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=98, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dc95414078, createdName=ms9285292773773234, createdTime=Sat Jun 01 10:07:00 CST 2013, time=2013-06-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=824571, encodeId=91178245e1ef, content=跟acs和rsc的相关期刊比起来，jps-a的处理速度非常慢。如果能有acs或者rsc的类似期刊可以选择的话，个人建议尽量不要往这个期刊投稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Mon Mar 18 23:11:00 CST 2013, time=2013-03-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2017-06-13 ms3041982178615389

20170306 underconsideration
20170525 major revision
20170608 resubmition
20170612 accept
prof. bert meijer is very nice！

107 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=850623, encodeId=78be850623a6, content=个人觉得这个工作的idea挺好的，可能自己表达和角度不会选，所以，从jmcc,chemistry-an asian journal，一路投到这里的，主要是不想等了，老板也意思是投个三区的算了，大家说这个期刊还挺好，老牌高分子杂志，虽然if近几年降了点，但认可度挺高 20190130 submitted 20190225 minor revision 主要是补了两个小实验，用了一个礼拜，测试估计也墨迹了有一个礼拜，自己因为私事，耽搁了一个礼拜，要是抓紧点，10天就能返回去…… 20190319 revise resubmition，上午9点回回去，当天晚上11点就accept了 20190322 晚上22：25让弄一系列wiley作者services，包含license 之类的 20190329 让correct proof 3.31 正好是周末，一觉睡到10点，起来把proof弄好了，发回去 4.1号，对方给回复邮件，意思收到correction proof。 4.2号，挂网上还是挺速度的……建议大家投稿…… ph.d tae-lim choi is very nice！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=769c5414093, createdName=ms6597719114830456, createdTime=Wed Apr 03 10:42:28 CST 2019, time=2019-04-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844755, encodeId=f88e844e5538, content=20180427 underconsideration 20180601 major revision 20170608 resubmition 20170612 accept prof. bert meijer is very nice！ 高分子老牌了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=96, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Sun Jul 01 08:14:56 CST 2018, time=2018-07-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840791, encodeId=595f840e9123, content=必须为编辑点赞，一个月内出结果，编辑亲自参与审稿。第一次被拒后给编辑写了封申诉信，然后编辑在圣诞节期间又找了审稿人仲裁，然后让重投，重投后直接接收。老牌高分子杂志，如此敬业的编辑值得尊重！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=136, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b4ea5413978, createdName=ms1565774270860268, createdTime=Thu Feb 01 14:34:20 CST 2018, time=2018-02-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=538946, encodeId=e9e353894659, content=过去不错的，现在这么跌下去，很吓人。明年想再回到3分水平，也许真心太难。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=356, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=med_wu, createdTime=Tue Jul 18 18:23:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836953, encodeId=084e836953a5, content=20170306 underconsideration 20170525 major revision 20170608 resubmition 20170612 accept prof. bert meijer is very nice！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1a365413975, createdName=ms3041982178615389, createdTime=Tue Jun 13 20:53:18 CST 2017, time=2017-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=835235, encodeId=605f835235fd, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0 经验分享：博士期间第一篇文章，自认为有创新性，内容测试全面，文章质量很高。投了macromolecule， polymer期刊没中，然后选择这个期刊，审稿人给了很多有价值的修改意见，修改后接收。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=4a595414065, createdName=ms6437770273944149, createdTime=Tue Jan 10 13:07:42 CST 2017, time=2017-01-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=831423, encodeId=4356831423ce, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：高分子里很不错的期刊，一个月的审稿周期就返回修改意见，大修，花一个月修改后返修，两天后直接接收，效率很高，建议大家投递 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=120, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=747c5414139, createdName=ms8486473624116251, createdTime=Thu Dec 24 13:27:47 CST 2015, time=2015-12-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=498494, encodeId=77cd4984949d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：2013年5月30 投稿 6月14日 major revision 7月30日补充实验，投修改稿 8月15日 accept 编辑选了 Meijer, E.W. 第一篇是 Percec, Virgil 编辑的效率确实是很高，没到3周就接到修改意见，但这个期刊一般只给一次修改的机会，所以应认真按审稿人的意见补充相关内容（In order to avoid an "unending story" we generally reject manuscripts when referees recommend "Major Alterations" for the second time, even if the referees themselves do not recommend a rejection.） 觉得编辑和审稿人非常注重创新，没有这一点基本拒稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=511, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sun Aug 18 14:05:00 CST 2013, time=2013-08-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=825965, encodeId=c40f825965b6, content=参考虫友的点评，选择了效率极高的编辑karen wooley。wooley女士非常nice，两个审稿人、意见都是小修，修改后当天接收。感觉只要结构新颖、表征数据全面+生物学实验比较好中。 5月2日投稿、5月3日分配评审、5月5日under review、5月20日返回意见小修、5月29日修返当天接收。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=98, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dc95414078, createdName=ms9285292773773234, createdTime=Sat Jun 01 10:07:00 CST 2013, time=2013-06-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=824571, encodeId=91178245e1ef, content=跟acs和rsc的相关期刊比起来，jps-a的处理速度非常慢。如果能有acs或者rsc的类似期刊可以选择的话，个人建议尽量不要往这个期刊投稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Mon Mar 18 23:11:00 CST 2013, time=2013-03-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2017-01-10 ms6437770273944149

审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0
经验分享：博士期间第一篇文章，自认为有创新性，内容测试全面，文章质量很高。投了macromolecule， polymer期刊没中，然后选择这个期刊，审稿人给了很多有价值的修改意见，修改后接收。

125 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=850623, encodeId=78be850623a6, content=个人觉得这个工作的idea挺好的，可能自己表达和角度不会选，所以，从jmcc,chemistry-an asian journal，一路投到这里的，主要是不想等了，老板也意思是投个三区的算了，大家说这个期刊还挺好，老牌高分子杂志，虽然if近几年降了点，但认可度挺高 20190130 submitted 20190225 minor revision 主要是补了两个小实验，用了一个礼拜，测试估计也墨迹了有一个礼拜，自己因为私事，耽搁了一个礼拜，要是抓紧点，10天就能返回去…… 20190319 revise resubmition，上午9点回回去，当天晚上11点就accept了 20190322 晚上22：25让弄一系列wiley作者services，包含license 之类的 20190329 让correct proof 3.31 正好是周末，一觉睡到10点，起来把proof弄好了，发回去 4.1号，对方给回复邮件，意思收到correction proof。 4.2号，挂网上还是挺速度的……建议大家投稿…… ph.d tae-lim choi is very nice！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=769c5414093, createdName=ms6597719114830456, createdTime=Wed Apr 03 10:42:28 CST 2019, time=2019-04-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844755, encodeId=f88e844e5538, content=20180427 underconsideration 20180601 major revision 20170608 resubmition 20170612 accept prof. bert meijer is very nice！ 高分子老牌了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=96, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Sun Jul 01 08:14:56 CST 2018, time=2018-07-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840791, encodeId=595f840e9123, content=必须为编辑点赞，一个月内出结果，编辑亲自参与审稿。第一次被拒后给编辑写了封申诉信，然后编辑在圣诞节期间又找了审稿人仲裁，然后让重投，重投后直接接收。老牌高分子杂志，如此敬业的编辑值得尊重！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=136, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b4ea5413978, createdName=ms1565774270860268, createdTime=Thu Feb 01 14:34:20 CST 2018, time=2018-02-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=538946, encodeId=e9e353894659, content=过去不错的，现在这么跌下去，很吓人。明年想再回到3分水平，也许真心太难。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=356, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=med_wu, createdTime=Tue Jul 18 18:23:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836953, encodeId=084e836953a5, content=20170306 underconsideration 20170525 major revision 20170608 resubmition 20170612 accept prof. bert meijer is very nice！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1a365413975, createdName=ms3041982178615389, createdTime=Tue Jun 13 20:53:18 CST 2017, time=2017-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=835235, encodeId=605f835235fd, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0 经验分享：博士期间第一篇文章，自认为有创新性，内容测试全面，文章质量很高。投了macromolecule， polymer期刊没中，然后选择这个期刊，审稿人给了很多有价值的修改意见，修改后接收。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=4a595414065, createdName=ms6437770273944149, createdTime=Tue Jan 10 13:07:42 CST 2017, time=2017-01-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=831423, encodeId=4356831423ce, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：高分子里很不错的期刊，一个月的审稿周期就返回修改意见，大修，花一个月修改后返修，两天后直接接收，效率很高，建议大家投递 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=120, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=747c5414139, createdName=ms8486473624116251, createdTime=Thu Dec 24 13:27:47 CST 2015, time=2015-12-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=498494, encodeId=77cd4984949d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：2013年5月30 投稿 6月14日 major revision 7月30日补充实验，投修改稿 8月15日 accept 编辑选了 Meijer, E.W. 第一篇是 Percec, Virgil 编辑的效率确实是很高，没到3周就接到修改意见，但这个期刊一般只给一次修改的机会，所以应认真按审稿人的意见补充相关内容（In order to avoid an "unending story" we generally reject manuscripts when referees recommend "Major Alterations" for the second time, even if the referees themselves do not recommend a rejection.） 觉得编辑和审稿人非常注重创新，没有这一点基本拒稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=511, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sun Aug 18 14:05:00 CST 2013, time=2013-08-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=825965, encodeId=c40f825965b6, content=参考虫友的点评，选择了效率极高的编辑karen wooley。wooley女士非常nice，两个审稿人、意见都是小修，修改后当天接收。感觉只要结构新颖、表征数据全面+生物学实验比较好中。 5月2日投稿、5月3日分配评审、5月5日under review、5月20日返回意见小修、5月29日修返当天接收。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=98, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dc95414078, createdName=ms9285292773773234, createdTime=Sat Jun 01 10:07:00 CST 2013, time=2013-06-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=824571, encodeId=91178245e1ef, content=跟acs和rsc的相关期刊比起来，jps-a的处理速度非常慢。如果能有acs或者rsc的类似期刊可以选择的话，个人建议尽量不要往这个期刊投稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Mon Mar 18 23:11:00 CST 2013, time=2013-03-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2015-12-24 ms8486473624116251

审稿速度:1.0
经验分享：高分子里很不错的期刊，一个月的审稿周期就返回修改意见，大修，花一个月修改后返修，两天后直接接收，效率很高，建议大家投递

120 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=850623, encodeId=78be850623a6, content=个人觉得这个工作的idea挺好的，可能自己表达和角度不会选，所以，从jmcc,chemistry-an asian journal，一路投到这里的，主要是不想等了，老板也意思是投个三区的算了，大家说这个期刊还挺好，老牌高分子杂志，虽然if近几年降了点，但认可度挺高 20190130 submitted 20190225 minor revision 主要是补了两个小实验，用了一个礼拜，测试估计也墨迹了有一个礼拜，自己因为私事，耽搁了一个礼拜，要是抓紧点，10天就能返回去…… 20190319 revise resubmition，上午9点回回去，当天晚上11点就accept了 20190322 晚上22：25让弄一系列wiley作者services，包含license 之类的 20190329 让correct proof 3.31 正好是周末，一觉睡到10点，起来把proof弄好了，发回去 4.1号，对方给回复邮件，意思收到correction proof。 4.2号，挂网上还是挺速度的……建议大家投稿…… ph.d tae-lim choi is very nice！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=769c5414093, createdName=ms6597719114830456, createdTime=Wed Apr 03 10:42:28 CST 2019, time=2019-04-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844755, encodeId=f88e844e5538, content=20180427 underconsideration 20180601 major revision 20170608 resubmition 20170612 accept prof. bert meijer is very nice！ 高分子老牌了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=96, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Sun Jul 01 08:14:56 CST 2018, time=2018-07-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840791, encodeId=595f840e9123, content=必须为编辑点赞，一个月内出结果，编辑亲自参与审稿。第一次被拒后给编辑写了封申诉信，然后编辑在圣诞节期间又找了审稿人仲裁，然后让重投，重投后直接接收。老牌高分子杂志，如此敬业的编辑值得尊重！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=136, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b4ea5413978, createdName=ms1565774270860268, createdTime=Thu Feb 01 14:34:20 CST 2018, time=2018-02-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=538946, encodeId=e9e353894659, content=过去不错的，现在这么跌下去，很吓人。明年想再回到3分水平，也许真心太难。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=356, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=med_wu, createdTime=Tue Jul 18 18:23:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836953, encodeId=084e836953a5, content=20170306 underconsideration 20170525 major revision 20170608 resubmition 20170612 accept prof. bert meijer is very nice！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1a365413975, createdName=ms3041982178615389, createdTime=Tue Jun 13 20:53:18 CST 2017, time=2017-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=835235, encodeId=605f835235fd, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0 经验分享：博士期间第一篇文章，自认为有创新性，内容测试全面，文章质量很高。投了macromolecule， polymer期刊没中，然后选择这个期刊，审稿人给了很多有价值的修改意见，修改后接收。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=4a595414065, createdName=ms6437770273944149, createdTime=Tue Jan 10 13:07:42 CST 2017, time=2017-01-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=831423, encodeId=4356831423ce, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：高分子里很不错的期刊，一个月的审稿周期就返回修改意见，大修，花一个月修改后返修，两天后直接接收，效率很高，建议大家投递 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=120, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=747c5414139, createdName=ms8486473624116251, createdTime=Thu Dec 24 13:27:47 CST 2015, time=2015-12-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=498494, encodeId=77cd4984949d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：2013年5月30 投稿 6月14日 major revision 7月30日补充实验，投修改稿 8月15日 accept 编辑选了 Meijer, E.W. 第一篇是 Percec, Virgil 编辑的效率确实是很高，没到3周就接到修改意见，但这个期刊一般只给一次修改的机会，所以应认真按审稿人的意见补充相关内容（In order to avoid an "unending story" we generally reject manuscripts when referees recommend "Major Alterations" for the second time, even if the referees themselves do not recommend a rejection.） 觉得编辑和审稿人非常注重创新，没有这一点基本拒稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=511, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sun Aug 18 14:05:00 CST 2013, time=2013-08-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=825965, encodeId=c40f825965b6, content=参考虫友的点评，选择了效率极高的编辑karen wooley。wooley女士非常nice，两个审稿人、意见都是小修，修改后当天接收。感觉只要结构新颖、表征数据全面+生物学实验比较好中。 5月2日投稿、5月3日分配评审、5月5日under review、5月20日返回意见小修、5月29日修返当天接收。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=98, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dc95414078, createdName=ms9285292773773234, createdTime=Sat Jun 01 10:07:00 CST 2013, time=2013-06-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=824571, encodeId=91178245e1ef, content=跟acs和rsc的相关期刊比起来，jps-a的处理速度非常慢。如果能有acs或者rsc的类似期刊可以选择的话，个人建议尽量不要往这个期刊投稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Mon Mar 18 23:11:00 CST 2013, time=2013-03-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2013-08-18 匿名用户

审稿速度:1.0
经验分享：2013年5月30 投稿
6月14日 major revision
7月30日补充实验，投修改稿
8月15日 accept
编辑选了 Meijer, E.W. 第一篇是 Percec, Virgil
编辑的效率确实是很高，没到3周就接到修改意见，但这个期刊一般只给一次修改的机会，所以应认真按审稿人的意见补充相关内容（In order to avoid an "unending story" we generally reject manuscripts when referees recommend "Major Alterations" for the second time, even if the referees themselves do not recommend a rejection.）
觉得编辑和审稿人非常注重创新，没有这一点基本拒稿。

511 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=850623, encodeId=78be850623a6, content=个人觉得这个工作的idea挺好的，可能自己表达和角度不会选，所以，从jmcc,chemistry-an asian journal，一路投到这里的，主要是不想等了，老板也意思是投个三区的算了，大家说这个期刊还挺好，老牌高分子杂志，虽然if近几年降了点，但认可度挺高 20190130 submitted 20190225 minor revision 主要是补了两个小实验，用了一个礼拜，测试估计也墨迹了有一个礼拜，自己因为私事，耽搁了一个礼拜，要是抓紧点，10天就能返回去…… 20190319 revise resubmition，上午9点回回去，当天晚上11点就accept了 20190322 晚上22：25让弄一系列wiley作者services，包含license 之类的 20190329 让correct proof 3.31 正好是周末，一觉睡到10点，起来把proof弄好了，发回去 4.1号，对方给回复邮件，意思收到correction proof。 4.2号，挂网上还是挺速度的……建议大家投稿…… ph.d tae-lim choi is very nice！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=769c5414093, createdName=ms6597719114830456, createdTime=Wed Apr 03 10:42:28 CST 2019, time=2019-04-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844755, encodeId=f88e844e5538, content=20180427 underconsideration 20180601 major revision 20170608 resubmition 20170612 accept prof. bert meijer is very nice！ 高分子老牌了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=96, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Sun Jul 01 08:14:56 CST 2018, time=2018-07-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840791, encodeId=595f840e9123, content=必须为编辑点赞，一个月内出结果，编辑亲自参与审稿。第一次被拒后给编辑写了封申诉信，然后编辑在圣诞节期间又找了审稿人仲裁，然后让重投，重投后直接接收。老牌高分子杂志，如此敬业的编辑值得尊重！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=136, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b4ea5413978, createdName=ms1565774270860268, createdTime=Thu Feb 01 14:34:20 CST 2018, time=2018-02-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=538946, encodeId=e9e353894659, content=过去不错的，现在这么跌下去，很吓人。明年想再回到3分水平，也许真心太难。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=356, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=med_wu, createdTime=Tue Jul 18 18:23:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836953, encodeId=084e836953a5, content=20170306 underconsideration 20170525 major revision 20170608 resubmition 20170612 accept prof. bert meijer is very nice！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1a365413975, createdName=ms3041982178615389, createdTime=Tue Jun 13 20:53:18 CST 2017, time=2017-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=835235, encodeId=605f835235fd, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0 经验分享：博士期间第一篇文章，自认为有创新性，内容测试全面，文章质量很高。投了macromolecule， polymer期刊没中，然后选择这个期刊，审稿人给了很多有价值的修改意见，修改后接收。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=4a595414065, createdName=ms6437770273944149, createdTime=Tue Jan 10 13:07:42 CST 2017, time=2017-01-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=831423, encodeId=4356831423ce, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：高分子里很不错的期刊，一个月的审稿周期就返回修改意见，大修，花一个月修改后返修，两天后直接接收，效率很高，建议大家投递 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=120, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=747c5414139, createdName=ms8486473624116251, createdTime=Thu Dec 24 13:27:47 CST 2015, time=2015-12-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=498494, encodeId=77cd4984949d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：2013年5月30 投稿 6月14日 major revision 7月30日补充实验，投修改稿 8月15日 accept 编辑选了 Meijer, E.W. 第一篇是 Percec, Virgil 编辑的效率确实是很高，没到3周就接到修改意见，但这个期刊一般只给一次修改的机会，所以应认真按审稿人的意见补充相关内容（In order to avoid an "unending story" we generally reject manuscripts when referees recommend "Major Alterations" for the second time, even if the referees themselves do not recommend a rejection.） 觉得编辑和审稿人非常注重创新，没有这一点基本拒稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=511, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sun Aug 18 14:05:00 CST 2013, time=2013-08-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=825965, encodeId=c40f825965b6, content=参考虫友的点评，选择了效率极高的编辑karen wooley。wooley女士非常nice，两个审稿人、意见都是小修，修改后当天接收。感觉只要结构新颖、表征数据全面+生物学实验比较好中。 5月2日投稿、5月3日分配评审、5月5日under review、5月20日返回意见小修、5月29日修返当天接收。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=98, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dc95414078, createdName=ms9285292773773234, createdTime=Sat Jun 01 10:07:00 CST 2013, time=2013-06-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=824571, encodeId=91178245e1ef, content=跟acs和rsc的相关期刊比起来，jps-a的处理速度非常慢。如果能有acs或者rsc的类似期刊可以选择的话，个人建议尽量不要往这个期刊投稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Mon Mar 18 23:11:00 CST 2013, time=2013-03-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2013-06-01 ms9285292773773234

参考虫友的点评，选择了效率极高的编辑karen wooley。wooley女士非常nice，两个审稿人、意见都是小修，修改后当天接收。感觉只要结构新颖、表征数据全面+生物学实验比较好中。
5月2日投稿、5月3日分配评审、5月5日under review、5月20日返回意见小修、5月29日修返当天接收。

98 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=850623, encodeId=78be850623a6, content=个人觉得这个工作的idea挺好的，可能自己表达和角度不会选，所以，从jmcc,chemistry-an asian journal，一路投到这里的，主要是不想等了，老板也意思是投个三区的算了，大家说这个期刊还挺好，老牌高分子杂志，虽然if近几年降了点，但认可度挺高 20190130 submitted 20190225 minor revision 主要是补了两个小实验，用了一个礼拜，测试估计也墨迹了有一个礼拜，自己因为私事，耽搁了一个礼拜，要是抓紧点，10天就能返回去…… 20190319 revise resubmition，上午9点回回去，当天晚上11点就accept了 20190322 晚上22：25让弄一系列wiley作者services，包含license 之类的 20190329 让correct proof 3.31 正好是周末，一觉睡到10点，起来把proof弄好了，发回去 4.1号，对方给回复邮件，意思收到correction proof。 4.2号，挂网上还是挺速度的……建议大家投稿…… ph.d tae-lim choi is very nice！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=769c5414093, createdName=ms6597719114830456, createdTime=Wed Apr 03 10:42:28 CST 2019, time=2019-04-03, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=844755, encodeId=f88e844e5538, content=20180427 underconsideration 20180601 major revision 20170608 resubmition 20170612 accept prof. bert meijer is very nice！ 高分子老牌了 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=96, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Sun Jul 01 08:14:56 CST 2018, time=2018-07-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840791, encodeId=595f840e9123, content=必须为编辑点赞，一个月内出结果，编辑亲自参与审稿。第一次被拒后给编辑写了封申诉信，然后编辑在圣诞节期间又找了审稿人仲裁，然后让重投，重投后直接接收。老牌高分子杂志，如此敬业的编辑值得尊重！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=136, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=b4ea5413978, createdName=ms1565774270860268, createdTime=Thu Feb 01 14:34:20 CST 2018, time=2018-02-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=538946, encodeId=e9e353894659, content=过去不错的，现在这么跌下去，很吓人。明年想再回到3分水平，也许真心太难。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=356, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=med_wu, createdTime=Tue Jul 18 18:23:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=836953, encodeId=084e836953a5, content=20170306 underconsideration 20170525 major revision 20170608 resubmition 20170612 accept prof. bert meijer is very nice！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=107, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=1a365413975, createdName=ms3041982178615389, createdTime=Tue Jun 13 20:53:18 CST 2017, time=2017-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=835235, encodeId=605f835235fd, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0 经验分享：博士期间第一篇文章，自认为有创新性，内容测试全面，文章质量很高。投了macromolecule， polymer期刊没中，然后选择这个期刊，审稿人给了很多有价值的修改意见，修改后接收。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=125, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=4a595414065, createdName=ms6437770273944149, createdTime=Tue Jan 10 13:07:42 CST 2017, time=2017-01-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=831423, encodeId=4356831423ce, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：高分子里很不错的期刊，一个月的审稿周期就返回修改意见，大修，花一个月修改后返修，两天后直接接收，效率很高，建议大家投递 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=120, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=747c5414139, createdName=ms8486473624116251, createdTime=Thu Dec 24 13:27:47 CST 2015, time=2015-12-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=498494, encodeId=77cd4984949d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：2013年5月30 投稿 6月14日 major revision 7月30日补充实验，投修改稿 8月15日 accept 编辑选了 Meijer, E.W. 第一篇是 Percec, Virgil 编辑的效率确实是很高，没到3周就接到修改意见，但这个期刊一般只给一次修改的机会，所以应认真按审稿人的意见补充相关内容（In order to avoid an "unending story" we generally reject manuscripts when referees recommend "Major Alterations" for the second time, even if the referees themselves do not recommend a rejection.） 觉得编辑和审稿人非常注重创新，没有这一点基本拒稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=511, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sun Aug 18 14:05:00 CST 2013, time=2013-08-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=825965, encodeId=c40f825965b6, content=参考虫友的点评，选择了效率极高的编辑karen wooley。wooley女士非常nice，两个审稿人、意见都是小修，修改后当天接收。感觉只要结构新颖、表征数据全面+生物学实验比较好中。 5月2日投稿、5月3日分配评审、5月5日under review、5月20日返回意见小修、5月29日修返当天接收。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=98, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0dc95414078, createdName=ms9285292773773234, createdTime=Sat Jun 01 10:07:00 CST 2013, time=2013-06-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=824571, encodeId=91178245e1ef, content=跟acs和rsc的相关期刊比起来，jps-a的处理速度非常慢。如果能有acs或者rsc的类似期刊可以选择的话，个人建议尽量不要往这个期刊投稿。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5b875414050, createdName=ms9669734295150018, createdTime=Mon Mar 18 23:11:00 CST 2013, time=2013-03-18, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2013-03-18 ms9669734295150018

跟acs和rsc的相关期刊比起来，jps-a的处理速度非常慢。如果能有acs或者rsc的类似期刊可以选择的话，个人建议尽量不要往这个期刊投稿。

87 0

内科

外科

专科科室

热点

按科室浏览

临床工具

科研工具

其他工具

科研数智化

真实世界研究解决方案

数字化学术传播解决方案

其它

期刊讨论

科室

工具

服务