PLANT AND SOIL-期刊论坛，投稿经验-MedSci.cn

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2126074, encodeId=ac2c21260e4f8, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 偏重的研究方向：尾矿修复;土壤微生物 经验分享：外审等到天荒地老，不给结果, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=32, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e9cf8606780, createdName=ms2000001580212483, createdTime=Sat Apr 15 14:28:11 CST 2023, time=2023-04-15, status=1, ipAttribution=河北省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861829, encodeId=fbd68618291d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：为啥投稿后一直是new submission,不送审还是想退稿？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Sat Jun 13 14:17:27 CST 2020, time=2020-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=954107, encodeId=fbaa95410eab, content=我想知道状态一直是Reviewers Assigned，已经持续了一个多月了，难道期刊很难找到微生物方向的审稿人么, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ab135477195, createdName=老大aaa, createdTime=Tue Apr 06 08:55:39 CST 2021, time=2021-04-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1083808, encodeId=a59910838085d, content=审稿速度:2.0 偏重的研究方向：土壤微生物 经验分享：一审2个月，返修两个审稿人，一个给小修，一个大修，修改了大概不到一个月返稿； 二审20天，第一个审稿人没有意见建议accept，第二个给了几条小意见，编辑那边给的是修改后接收； 现在在三审阶段，希望好运~~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=51, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=eda66422087, createdName=ms2000000333892660, createdTime=Fri Dec 24 10:10:56 CST 2021, time=2021-12-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1097148, encodeId=4a3f109e148f0, content=我应该使用什么样的事后检验方法？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=55, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1097147, encodeId=c9b2109e14734, content=为什么要进行事后检验？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1080369, encodeId=612c1080369f4, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 偏重的研究方向：植物分子生理 经验分享：投稿后一星期内送审，两个审稿人。一个月意见回来，一个比较正面，给的意见不多；另一个意见也不多，但是比较否定实验处理时间及浓度，编辑给的拒稿鼓励重投，修改完投回去，20天回来，第一个审稿人没意见了，第二个审稿人仍然强调时间和浓度的问题，编辑又拒稿了，还是鼓励重投。准备放弃了。前后耽搁3个月。回到了起点。。。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=45, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=adc85551313, createdName=fnn, createdTime=Wed Dec 15 18:42:32 CST 2021, time=2021-12-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=520841, encodeId=d763520841be, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0 经验分享：一月15号投出，二月二十审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个意见不多，一个给了将近三十条意见，都很专业，补充一点小实验，三月五号修改返回，十五号给意见，小问题，二十号修改回复，二十五号接收，整体感觉很好，审稿人和编辑都很负责，效率很高, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=416, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c8ab1626228, createdName=zhouxinxin, createdTime=Tue Mar 29 11:00:00 CST 2016, time=2016-03-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861737, encodeId=cffb861e3797, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：plso居然划到2区？不如catena（t1）？太外行了，搞笑吧？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Thu Jun 11 11:12:37 CST 2020, time=2020-06-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859827, encodeId=b44385982e6e, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：楼上说灌水的，麻烦你看一下这个杂志的年发文量 总环一年好几千，ps之后区区的400。。。不知道你哪来的灌水结论 ps可以说农林类老牌优质期刊了，降到二区不公平，最起码小类应该在一区 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=121, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=01255414130, createdName=ms3179514010604018, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 22:19:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2023-04-15 ms2000001580212483 来自河北省

审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
偏重的研究方向：尾矿修复;土壤微生物
经验分享：外审等到天荒地老，不给结果

32 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2126074, encodeId=ac2c21260e4f8, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 偏重的研究方向：尾矿修复;土壤微生物 经验分享：外审等到天荒地老，不给结果, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=32, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e9cf8606780, createdName=ms2000001580212483, createdTime=Sat Apr 15 14:28:11 CST 2023, time=2023-04-15, status=1, ipAttribution=河北省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861829, encodeId=fbd68618291d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：为啥投稿后一直是new submission,不送审还是想退稿？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Sat Jun 13 14:17:27 CST 2020, time=2020-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=954107, encodeId=fbaa95410eab, content=我想知道状态一直是Reviewers Assigned，已经持续了一个多月了，难道期刊很难找到微生物方向的审稿人么, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ab135477195, createdName=老大aaa, createdTime=Tue Apr 06 08:55:39 CST 2021, time=2021-04-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1083808, encodeId=a59910838085d, content=审稿速度:2.0 偏重的研究方向：土壤微生物 经验分享：一审2个月，返修两个审稿人，一个给小修，一个大修，修改了大概不到一个月返稿； 二审20天，第一个审稿人没有意见建议accept，第二个给了几条小意见，编辑那边给的是修改后接收； 现在在三审阶段，希望好运~~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=51, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=eda66422087, createdName=ms2000000333892660, createdTime=Fri Dec 24 10:10:56 CST 2021, time=2021-12-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1097148, encodeId=4a3f109e148f0, content=我应该使用什么样的事后检验方法？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=55, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1097147, encodeId=c9b2109e14734, content=为什么要进行事后检验？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1080369, encodeId=612c1080369f4, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 偏重的研究方向：植物分子生理 经验分享：投稿后一星期内送审，两个审稿人。一个月意见回来，一个比较正面，给的意见不多；另一个意见也不多，但是比较否定实验处理时间及浓度，编辑给的拒稿鼓励重投，修改完投回去，20天回来，第一个审稿人没意见了，第二个审稿人仍然强调时间和浓度的问题，编辑又拒稿了，还是鼓励重投。准备放弃了。前后耽搁3个月。回到了起点。。。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=45, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=adc85551313, createdName=fnn, createdTime=Wed Dec 15 18:42:32 CST 2021, time=2021-12-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=520841, encodeId=d763520841be, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0 经验分享：一月15号投出，二月二十审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个意见不多，一个给了将近三十条意见，都很专业，补充一点小实验，三月五号修改返回，十五号给意见，小问题，二十号修改回复，二十五号接收，整体感觉很好，审稿人和编辑都很负责，效率很高, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=416, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c8ab1626228, createdName=zhouxinxin, createdTime=Tue Mar 29 11:00:00 CST 2016, time=2016-03-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861737, encodeId=cffb861e3797, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：plso居然划到2区？不如catena（t1）？太外行了，搞笑吧？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Thu Jun 11 11:12:37 CST 2020, time=2020-06-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859827, encodeId=b44385982e6e, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：楼上说灌水的，麻烦你看一下这个杂志的年发文量 总环一年好几千，ps之后区区的400。。。不知道你哪来的灌水结论 ps可以说农林类老牌优质期刊了，降到二区不公平，最起码小类应该在一区 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=121, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=01255414130, createdName=ms3179514010604018, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 22:19:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2020-06-13 ms5413142457057855

审稿速度:1.0
经验分享：为啥投稿后一直是new submission,不送审还是想退稿？

108 1

展开1条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2126074, encodeId=ac2c21260e4f8, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 偏重的研究方向：尾矿修复;土壤微生物 经验分享：外审等到天荒地老，不给结果, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=32, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e9cf8606780, createdName=ms2000001580212483, createdTime=Sat Apr 15 14:28:11 CST 2023, time=2023-04-15, status=1, ipAttribution=河北省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861829, encodeId=fbd68618291d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：为啥投稿后一直是new submission,不送审还是想退稿？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Sat Jun 13 14:17:27 CST 2020, time=2020-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=954107, encodeId=fbaa95410eab, content=我想知道状态一直是Reviewers Assigned，已经持续了一个多月了，难道期刊很难找到微生物方向的审稿人么, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ab135477195, createdName=老大aaa, createdTime=Tue Apr 06 08:55:39 CST 2021, time=2021-04-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1083808, encodeId=a59910838085d, content=审稿速度:2.0 偏重的研究方向：土壤微生物 经验分享：一审2个月，返修两个审稿人，一个给小修，一个大修，修改了大概不到一个月返稿； 二审20天，第一个审稿人没有意见建议accept，第二个给了几条小意见，编辑那边给的是修改后接收； 现在在三审阶段，希望好运~~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=51, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=eda66422087, createdName=ms2000000333892660, createdTime=Fri Dec 24 10:10:56 CST 2021, time=2021-12-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1097148, encodeId=4a3f109e148f0, content=我应该使用什么样的事后检验方法？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=55, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1097147, encodeId=c9b2109e14734, content=为什么要进行事后检验？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1080369, encodeId=612c1080369f4, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 偏重的研究方向：植物分子生理 经验分享：投稿后一星期内送审，两个审稿人。一个月意见回来，一个比较正面，给的意见不多；另一个意见也不多，但是比较否定实验处理时间及浓度，编辑给的拒稿鼓励重投，修改完投回去，20天回来，第一个审稿人没意见了，第二个审稿人仍然强调时间和浓度的问题，编辑又拒稿了，还是鼓励重投。准备放弃了。前后耽搁3个月。回到了起点。。。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=45, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=adc85551313, createdName=fnn, createdTime=Wed Dec 15 18:42:32 CST 2021, time=2021-12-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=520841, encodeId=d763520841be, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0 经验分享：一月15号投出，二月二十审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个意见不多，一个给了将近三十条意见，都很专业，补充一点小实验，三月五号修改返回，十五号给意见，小问题，二十号修改回复，二十五号接收，整体感觉很好，审稿人和编辑都很负责，效率很高, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=416, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c8ab1626228, createdName=zhouxinxin, createdTime=Tue Mar 29 11:00:00 CST 2016, time=2016-03-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861737, encodeId=cffb861e3797, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：plso居然划到2区？不如catena（t1）？太外行了，搞笑吧？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Thu Jun 11 11:12:37 CST 2020, time=2020-06-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859827, encodeId=b44385982e6e, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：楼上说灌水的，麻烦你看一下这个杂志的年发文量 总环一年好几千，ps之后区区的400。。。不知道你哪来的灌水结论 ps可以说农林类老牌优质期刊了，降到二区不公平，最起码小类应该在一区 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=121, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=01255414130, createdName=ms3179514010604018, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 22:19:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2021-04-06 老大aaa

我想知道状态一直是Reviewers Assigned，已经持续了一个多月了，难道期刊很难找到微生物方向的审稿人么

59 1

展开1条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2126074, encodeId=ac2c21260e4f8, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 偏重的研究方向：尾矿修复;土壤微生物 经验分享：外审等到天荒地老，不给结果, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=32, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e9cf8606780, createdName=ms2000001580212483, createdTime=Sat Apr 15 14:28:11 CST 2023, time=2023-04-15, status=1, ipAttribution=河北省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861829, encodeId=fbd68618291d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：为啥投稿后一直是new submission,不送审还是想退稿？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Sat Jun 13 14:17:27 CST 2020, time=2020-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=954107, encodeId=fbaa95410eab, content=我想知道状态一直是Reviewers Assigned，已经持续了一个多月了，难道期刊很难找到微生物方向的审稿人么, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ab135477195, createdName=老大aaa, createdTime=Tue Apr 06 08:55:39 CST 2021, time=2021-04-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1083808, encodeId=a59910838085d, content=审稿速度:2.0 偏重的研究方向：土壤微生物 经验分享：一审2个月，返修两个审稿人，一个给小修，一个大修，修改了大概不到一个月返稿； 二审20天，第一个审稿人没有意见建议accept，第二个给了几条小意见，编辑那边给的是修改后接收； 现在在三审阶段，希望好运~~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=51, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=eda66422087, createdName=ms2000000333892660, createdTime=Fri Dec 24 10:10:56 CST 2021, time=2021-12-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1097148, encodeId=4a3f109e148f0, content=我应该使用什么样的事后检验方法？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=55, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1097147, encodeId=c9b2109e14734, content=为什么要进行事后检验？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1080369, encodeId=612c1080369f4, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 偏重的研究方向：植物分子生理 经验分享：投稿后一星期内送审，两个审稿人。一个月意见回来，一个比较正面，给的意见不多；另一个意见也不多，但是比较否定实验处理时间及浓度，编辑给的拒稿鼓励重投，修改完投回去，20天回来，第一个审稿人没意见了，第二个审稿人仍然强调时间和浓度的问题，编辑又拒稿了，还是鼓励重投。准备放弃了。前后耽搁3个月。回到了起点。。。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=45, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=adc85551313, createdName=fnn, createdTime=Wed Dec 15 18:42:32 CST 2021, time=2021-12-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=520841, encodeId=d763520841be, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0 经验分享：一月15号投出，二月二十审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个意见不多，一个给了将近三十条意见，都很专业，补充一点小实验，三月五号修改返回，十五号给意见，小问题，二十号修改回复，二十五号接收，整体感觉很好，审稿人和编辑都很负责，效率很高, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=416, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c8ab1626228, createdName=zhouxinxin, createdTime=Tue Mar 29 11:00:00 CST 2016, time=2016-03-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861737, encodeId=cffb861e3797, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：plso居然划到2区？不如catena（t1）？太外行了，搞笑吧？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Thu Jun 11 11:12:37 CST 2020, time=2020-06-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859827, encodeId=b44385982e6e, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：楼上说灌水的，麻烦你看一下这个杂志的年发文量 总环一年好几千，ps之后区区的400。。。不知道你哪来的灌水结论 ps可以说农林类老牌优质期刊了，降到二区不公平，最起码小类应该在一区 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=121, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=01255414130, createdName=ms3179514010604018, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 22:19:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2021-12-24 ms2000000333892660

审稿速度:2.0
偏重的研究方向：土壤微生物
经验分享：一审2个月，返修两个审稿人，一个给小修，一个大修，修改了大概不到一个月返稿；
二审20天，第一个审稿人没有意见建议accept，第二个给了几条小意见，编辑那边给的是修改后接收；
现在在三审阶段，希望好运~~

51 1

展开1条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2126074, encodeId=ac2c21260e4f8, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 偏重的研究方向：尾矿修复;土壤微生物 经验分享：外审等到天荒地老，不给结果, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=32, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e9cf8606780, createdName=ms2000001580212483, createdTime=Sat Apr 15 14:28:11 CST 2023, time=2023-04-15, status=1, ipAttribution=河北省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861829, encodeId=fbd68618291d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：为啥投稿后一直是new submission,不送审还是想退稿？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Sat Jun 13 14:17:27 CST 2020, time=2020-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=954107, encodeId=fbaa95410eab, content=我想知道状态一直是Reviewers Assigned，已经持续了一个多月了，难道期刊很难找到微生物方向的审稿人么, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ab135477195, createdName=老大aaa, createdTime=Tue Apr 06 08:55:39 CST 2021, time=2021-04-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1083808, encodeId=a59910838085d, content=审稿速度:2.0 偏重的研究方向：土壤微生物 经验分享：一审2个月，返修两个审稿人，一个给小修，一个大修，修改了大概不到一个月返稿； 二审20天，第一个审稿人没有意见建议accept，第二个给了几条小意见，编辑那边给的是修改后接收； 现在在三审阶段，希望好运~~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=51, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=eda66422087, createdName=ms2000000333892660, createdTime=Fri Dec 24 10:10:56 CST 2021, time=2021-12-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1097148, encodeId=4a3f109e148f0, content=我应该使用什么样的事后检验方法？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=55, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1097147, encodeId=c9b2109e14734, content=为什么要进行事后检验？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1080369, encodeId=612c1080369f4, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 偏重的研究方向：植物分子生理 经验分享：投稿后一星期内送审，两个审稿人。一个月意见回来，一个比较正面，给的意见不多；另一个意见也不多，但是比较否定实验处理时间及浓度，编辑给的拒稿鼓励重投，修改完投回去，20天回来，第一个审稿人没意见了，第二个审稿人仍然强调时间和浓度的问题，编辑又拒稿了，还是鼓励重投。准备放弃了。前后耽搁3个月。回到了起点。。。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=45, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=adc85551313, createdName=fnn, createdTime=Wed Dec 15 18:42:32 CST 2021, time=2021-12-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=520841, encodeId=d763520841be, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0 经验分享：一月15号投出，二月二十审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个意见不多，一个给了将近三十条意见，都很专业，补充一点小实验，三月五号修改返回，十五号给意见，小问题，二十号修改回复，二十五号接收，整体感觉很好，审稿人和编辑都很负责，效率很高, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=416, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c8ab1626228, createdName=zhouxinxin, createdTime=Tue Mar 29 11:00:00 CST 2016, time=2016-03-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861737, encodeId=cffb861e3797, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：plso居然划到2区？不如catena（t1）？太外行了，搞笑吧？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Thu Jun 11 11:12:37 CST 2020, time=2020-06-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859827, encodeId=b44385982e6e, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：楼上说灌水的，麻烦你看一下这个杂志的年发文量 总环一年好几千，ps之后区区的400。。。不知道你哪来的灌水结论 ps可以说农林类老牌优质期刊了，降到二区不公平，最起码小类应该在一区 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=121, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=01255414130, createdName=ms3179514010604018, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 22:19:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2021-12-28 桑晒麦拉

我应该使用什么样的事后检验方法？

55 1

展开1条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2126074, encodeId=ac2c21260e4f8, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 偏重的研究方向：尾矿修复;土壤微生物 经验分享：外审等到天荒地老，不给结果, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=32, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e9cf8606780, createdName=ms2000001580212483, createdTime=Sat Apr 15 14:28:11 CST 2023, time=2023-04-15, status=1, ipAttribution=河北省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861829, encodeId=fbd68618291d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：为啥投稿后一直是new submission,不送审还是想退稿？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Sat Jun 13 14:17:27 CST 2020, time=2020-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=954107, encodeId=fbaa95410eab, content=我想知道状态一直是Reviewers Assigned，已经持续了一个多月了，难道期刊很难找到微生物方向的审稿人么, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ab135477195, createdName=老大aaa, createdTime=Tue Apr 06 08:55:39 CST 2021, time=2021-04-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1083808, encodeId=a59910838085d, content=审稿速度:2.0 偏重的研究方向：土壤微生物 经验分享：一审2个月，返修两个审稿人，一个给小修，一个大修，修改了大概不到一个月返稿； 二审20天，第一个审稿人没有意见建议accept，第二个给了几条小意见，编辑那边给的是修改后接收； 现在在三审阶段，希望好运~~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=51, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=eda66422087, createdName=ms2000000333892660, createdTime=Fri Dec 24 10:10:56 CST 2021, time=2021-12-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1097148, encodeId=4a3f109e148f0, content=我应该使用什么样的事后检验方法？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=55, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1097147, encodeId=c9b2109e14734, content=为什么要进行事后检验？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1080369, encodeId=612c1080369f4, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 偏重的研究方向：植物分子生理 经验分享：投稿后一星期内送审，两个审稿人。一个月意见回来，一个比较正面，给的意见不多；另一个意见也不多，但是比较否定实验处理时间及浓度，编辑给的拒稿鼓励重投，修改完投回去，20天回来，第一个审稿人没意见了，第二个审稿人仍然强调时间和浓度的问题，编辑又拒稿了，还是鼓励重投。准备放弃了。前后耽搁3个月。回到了起点。。。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=45, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=adc85551313, createdName=fnn, createdTime=Wed Dec 15 18:42:32 CST 2021, time=2021-12-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=520841, encodeId=d763520841be, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0 经验分享：一月15号投出，二月二十审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个意见不多，一个给了将近三十条意见，都很专业，补充一点小实验，三月五号修改返回，十五号给意见，小问题，二十号修改回复，二十五号接收，整体感觉很好，审稿人和编辑都很负责，效率很高, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=416, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c8ab1626228, createdName=zhouxinxin, createdTime=Tue Mar 29 11:00:00 CST 2016, time=2016-03-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861737, encodeId=cffb861e3797, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：plso居然划到2区？不如catena（t1）？太外行了，搞笑吧？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Thu Jun 11 11:12:37 CST 2020, time=2020-06-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859827, encodeId=b44385982e6e, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：楼上说灌水的，麻烦你看一下这个杂志的年发文量 总环一年好几千，ps之后区区的400。。。不知道你哪来的灌水结论 ps可以说农林类老牌优质期刊了，降到二区不公平，最起码小类应该在一区 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=121, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=01255414130, createdName=ms3179514010604018, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 22:19:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2021-12-28 学医的彭于晏

为什么要进行事后检验？

58 1

展开1条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2126074, encodeId=ac2c21260e4f8, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 偏重的研究方向：尾矿修复;土壤微生物 经验分享：外审等到天荒地老，不给结果, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=32, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e9cf8606780, createdName=ms2000001580212483, createdTime=Sat Apr 15 14:28:11 CST 2023, time=2023-04-15, status=1, ipAttribution=河北省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861829, encodeId=fbd68618291d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：为啥投稿后一直是new submission,不送审还是想退稿？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Sat Jun 13 14:17:27 CST 2020, time=2020-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=954107, encodeId=fbaa95410eab, content=我想知道状态一直是Reviewers Assigned，已经持续了一个多月了，难道期刊很难找到微生物方向的审稿人么, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ab135477195, createdName=老大aaa, createdTime=Tue Apr 06 08:55:39 CST 2021, time=2021-04-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1083808, encodeId=a59910838085d, content=审稿速度:2.0 偏重的研究方向：土壤微生物 经验分享：一审2个月，返修两个审稿人，一个给小修，一个大修，修改了大概不到一个月返稿； 二审20天，第一个审稿人没有意见建议accept，第二个给了几条小意见，编辑那边给的是修改后接收； 现在在三审阶段，希望好运~~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=51, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=eda66422087, createdName=ms2000000333892660, createdTime=Fri Dec 24 10:10:56 CST 2021, time=2021-12-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1097148, encodeId=4a3f109e148f0, content=我应该使用什么样的事后检验方法？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=55, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1097147, encodeId=c9b2109e14734, content=为什么要进行事后检验？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1080369, encodeId=612c1080369f4, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 偏重的研究方向：植物分子生理 经验分享：投稿后一星期内送审，两个审稿人。一个月意见回来，一个比较正面，给的意见不多；另一个意见也不多，但是比较否定实验处理时间及浓度，编辑给的拒稿鼓励重投，修改完投回去，20天回来，第一个审稿人没意见了，第二个审稿人仍然强调时间和浓度的问题，编辑又拒稿了，还是鼓励重投。准备放弃了。前后耽搁3个月。回到了起点。。。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=45, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=adc85551313, createdName=fnn, createdTime=Wed Dec 15 18:42:32 CST 2021, time=2021-12-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=520841, encodeId=d763520841be, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0 经验分享：一月15号投出，二月二十审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个意见不多，一个给了将近三十条意见，都很专业，补充一点小实验，三月五号修改返回，十五号给意见，小问题，二十号修改回复，二十五号接收，整体感觉很好，审稿人和编辑都很负责，效率很高, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=416, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c8ab1626228, createdName=zhouxinxin, createdTime=Tue Mar 29 11:00:00 CST 2016, time=2016-03-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861737, encodeId=cffb861e3797, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：plso居然划到2区？不如catena（t1）？太外行了，搞笑吧？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Thu Jun 11 11:12:37 CST 2020, time=2020-06-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859827, encodeId=b44385982e6e, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：楼上说灌水的，麻烦你看一下这个杂志的年发文量 总环一年好几千，ps之后区区的400。。。不知道你哪来的灌水结论 ps可以说农林类老牌优质期刊了，降到二区不公平，最起码小类应该在一区 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=121, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=01255414130, createdName=ms3179514010604018, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 22:19:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2021-12-15 fnn

审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
偏重的研究方向：植物分子生理
经验分享：投稿后一星期内送审，两个审稿人。一个月意见回来，一个比较正面，给的意见不多；另一个意见也不多，但是比较否定实验处理时间及浓度，编辑给的拒稿鼓励重投，修改完投回去，20天回来，第一个审稿人没意见了，第二个审稿人仍然强调时间和浓度的问题，编辑又拒稿了，还是鼓励重投。准备放弃了。前后耽搁3个月。回到了起点。。。

45 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2126074, encodeId=ac2c21260e4f8, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 偏重的研究方向：尾矿修复;土壤微生物 经验分享：外审等到天荒地老，不给结果, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=32, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e9cf8606780, createdName=ms2000001580212483, createdTime=Sat Apr 15 14:28:11 CST 2023, time=2023-04-15, status=1, ipAttribution=河北省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861829, encodeId=fbd68618291d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：为啥投稿后一直是new submission,不送审还是想退稿？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Sat Jun 13 14:17:27 CST 2020, time=2020-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=954107, encodeId=fbaa95410eab, content=我想知道状态一直是Reviewers Assigned，已经持续了一个多月了，难道期刊很难找到微生物方向的审稿人么, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ab135477195, createdName=老大aaa, createdTime=Tue Apr 06 08:55:39 CST 2021, time=2021-04-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1083808, encodeId=a59910838085d, content=审稿速度:2.0 偏重的研究方向：土壤微生物 经验分享：一审2个月，返修两个审稿人，一个给小修，一个大修，修改了大概不到一个月返稿； 二审20天，第一个审稿人没有意见建议accept，第二个给了几条小意见，编辑那边给的是修改后接收； 现在在三审阶段，希望好运~~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=51, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=eda66422087, createdName=ms2000000333892660, createdTime=Fri Dec 24 10:10:56 CST 2021, time=2021-12-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1097148, encodeId=4a3f109e148f0, content=我应该使用什么样的事后检验方法？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=55, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1097147, encodeId=c9b2109e14734, content=为什么要进行事后检验？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1080369, encodeId=612c1080369f4, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 偏重的研究方向：植物分子生理 经验分享：投稿后一星期内送审，两个审稿人。一个月意见回来，一个比较正面，给的意见不多；另一个意见也不多，但是比较否定实验处理时间及浓度，编辑给的拒稿鼓励重投，修改完投回去，20天回来，第一个审稿人没意见了，第二个审稿人仍然强调时间和浓度的问题，编辑又拒稿了，还是鼓励重投。准备放弃了。前后耽搁3个月。回到了起点。。。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=45, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=adc85551313, createdName=fnn, createdTime=Wed Dec 15 18:42:32 CST 2021, time=2021-12-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=520841, encodeId=d763520841be, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0 经验分享：一月15号投出，二月二十审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个意见不多，一个给了将近三十条意见，都很专业，补充一点小实验，三月五号修改返回，十五号给意见，小问题，二十号修改回复，二十五号接收，整体感觉很好，审稿人和编辑都很负责，效率很高, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=416, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c8ab1626228, createdName=zhouxinxin, createdTime=Tue Mar 29 11:00:00 CST 2016, time=2016-03-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861737, encodeId=cffb861e3797, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：plso居然划到2区？不如catena（t1）？太外行了，搞笑吧？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Thu Jun 11 11:12:37 CST 2020, time=2020-06-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859827, encodeId=b44385982e6e, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：楼上说灌水的，麻烦你看一下这个杂志的年发文量 总环一年好几千，ps之后区区的400。。。不知道你哪来的灌水结论 ps可以说农林类老牌优质期刊了，降到二区不公平，最起码小类应该在一区 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=121, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=01255414130, createdName=ms3179514010604018, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 22:19:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2016-03-29 zhouxinxin

审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：一月15号投出，二月二十审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个意见不多，一个给了将近三十条意见，都很专业，补充一点小实验，三月五号修改返回，十五号给意见，小问题，二十号修改回复，二十五号接收，整体感觉很好，审稿人和编辑都很负责，效率很高

416 2

展开2条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2126074, encodeId=ac2c21260e4f8, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 偏重的研究方向：尾矿修复;土壤微生物 经验分享：外审等到天荒地老，不给结果, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=32, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e9cf8606780, createdName=ms2000001580212483, createdTime=Sat Apr 15 14:28:11 CST 2023, time=2023-04-15, status=1, ipAttribution=河北省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861829, encodeId=fbd68618291d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：为啥投稿后一直是new submission,不送审还是想退稿？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Sat Jun 13 14:17:27 CST 2020, time=2020-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=954107, encodeId=fbaa95410eab, content=我想知道状态一直是Reviewers Assigned，已经持续了一个多月了，难道期刊很难找到微生物方向的审稿人么, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ab135477195, createdName=老大aaa, createdTime=Tue Apr 06 08:55:39 CST 2021, time=2021-04-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1083808, encodeId=a59910838085d, content=审稿速度:2.0 偏重的研究方向：土壤微生物 经验分享：一审2个月，返修两个审稿人，一个给小修，一个大修，修改了大概不到一个月返稿； 二审20天，第一个审稿人没有意见建议accept，第二个给了几条小意见，编辑那边给的是修改后接收； 现在在三审阶段，希望好运~~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=51, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=eda66422087, createdName=ms2000000333892660, createdTime=Fri Dec 24 10:10:56 CST 2021, time=2021-12-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1097148, encodeId=4a3f109e148f0, content=我应该使用什么样的事后检验方法？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=55, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1097147, encodeId=c9b2109e14734, content=为什么要进行事后检验？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1080369, encodeId=612c1080369f4, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 偏重的研究方向：植物分子生理 经验分享：投稿后一星期内送审，两个审稿人。一个月意见回来，一个比较正面，给的意见不多；另一个意见也不多，但是比较否定实验处理时间及浓度，编辑给的拒稿鼓励重投，修改完投回去，20天回来，第一个审稿人没意见了，第二个审稿人仍然强调时间和浓度的问题，编辑又拒稿了，还是鼓励重投。准备放弃了。前后耽搁3个月。回到了起点。。。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=45, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=adc85551313, createdName=fnn, createdTime=Wed Dec 15 18:42:32 CST 2021, time=2021-12-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=520841, encodeId=d763520841be, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0 经验分享：一月15号投出，二月二十审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个意见不多，一个给了将近三十条意见，都很专业，补充一点小实验，三月五号修改返回，十五号给意见，小问题，二十号修改回复，二十五号接收，整体感觉很好，审稿人和编辑都很负责，效率很高, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=416, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c8ab1626228, createdName=zhouxinxin, createdTime=Tue Mar 29 11:00:00 CST 2016, time=2016-03-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861737, encodeId=cffb861e3797, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：plso居然划到2区？不如catena（t1）？太外行了，搞笑吧？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Thu Jun 11 11:12:37 CST 2020, time=2020-06-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859827, encodeId=b44385982e6e, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：楼上说灌水的，麻烦你看一下这个杂志的年发文量 总环一年好几千，ps之后区区的400。。。不知道你哪来的灌水结论 ps可以说农林类老牌优质期刊了，降到二区不公平，最起码小类应该在一区 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=121, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=01255414130, createdName=ms3179514010604018, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 22:19:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2020-06-11 ms9325659851846900

审稿速度:1.0
经验分享：plso居然划到2区？不如catena（t1）？太外行了，搞笑吧？

103 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=2126074, encodeId=ac2c21260e4f8, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 偏重的研究方向：尾矿修复;土壤微生物 经验分享：外审等到天荒地老，不给结果, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=32, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e9cf8606780, createdName=ms2000001580212483, createdTime=Sat Apr 15 14:28:11 CST 2023, time=2023-04-15, status=1, ipAttribution=河北省), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861829, encodeId=fbd68618291d, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：为啥投稿后一直是new submission,不送审还是想退稿？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Sat Jun 13 14:17:27 CST 2020, time=2020-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=954107, encodeId=fbaa95410eab, content=我想知道状态一直是Reviewers Assigned，已经持续了一个多月了，难道期刊很难找到微生物方向的审稿人么, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ab135477195, createdName=老大aaa, createdTime=Tue Apr 06 08:55:39 CST 2021, time=2021-04-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1083808, encodeId=a59910838085d, content=审稿速度:2.0 偏重的研究方向：土壤微生物 经验分享：一审2个月，返修两个审稿人，一个给小修，一个大修，修改了大概不到一个月返稿； 二审20天，第一个审稿人没有意见建议accept，第二个给了几条小意见，编辑那边给的是修改后接收； 现在在三审阶段，希望好运~~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=51, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=eda66422087, createdName=ms2000000333892660, createdTime=Fri Dec 24 10:10:56 CST 2021, time=2021-12-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1097148, encodeId=4a3f109e148f0, content=我应该使用什么样的事后检验方法？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=55, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210512/72cbdf927f7647bd84938927488b4795/94fe7f0fd8274d94807c5f3458f0c4e2.jpg, createdBy=9cd75497899, createdName=桑晒麦拉, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1097147, encodeId=c9b2109e14734, content=为什么要进行事后检验？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:50 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1080369, encodeId=612c1080369f4, content=审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 偏重的研究方向：植物分子生理 经验分享：投稿后一星期内送审，两个审稿人。一个月意见回来，一个比较正面，给的意见不多；另一个意见也不多，但是比较否定实验处理时间及浓度，编辑给的拒稿鼓励重投，修改完投回去，20天回来，第一个审稿人没意见了，第二个审稿人仍然强调时间和浓度的问题，编辑又拒稿了，还是鼓励重投。准备放弃了。前后耽搁3个月。回到了起点。。。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=45, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=adc85551313, createdName=fnn, createdTime=Wed Dec 15 18:42:32 CST 2021, time=2021-12-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=520841, encodeId=d763520841be, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0 经验分享：一月15号投出，二月二十审稿意见回来，两个审稿人，一个意见不多，一个给了将近三十条意见，都很专业，补充一点小实验，三月五号修改返回，十五号给意见，小问题，二十号修改回复，二十五号接收，整体感觉很好，审稿人和编辑都很负责，效率很高, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=416, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c8ab1626228, createdName=zhouxinxin, createdTime=Tue Mar 29 11:00:00 CST 2016, time=2016-03-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861737, encodeId=cffb861e3797, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：plso居然划到2区？不如catena（t1）？太外行了，搞笑吧？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Thu Jun 11 11:12:37 CST 2020, time=2020-06-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859827, encodeId=b44385982e6e, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：楼上说灌水的，麻烦你看一下这个杂志的年发文量 总环一年好几千，ps之后区区的400。。。不知道你哪来的灌水结论 ps可以说农林类老牌优质期刊了，降到二区不公平，最起码小类应该在一区 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=121, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=01255414130, createdName=ms3179514010604018, createdTime=Fri Apr 24 22:19:28 CST 2020, time=2020-04-24, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2020-04-24 ms3179514010604018

审稿速度:3.0
经验分享：楼上说灌水的，麻烦你看一下这个杂志的年发文量
总环一年好几千，ps之后区区的400。。。不知道你哪来的灌水结论
ps可以说农林类老牌优质期刊了，降到二区不公平，最起码小类应该在一区

121 0

内科

外科

专科科室

热点

按科室浏览

临床工具

科研工具

其他工具

科研数智化

真实世界研究解决方案

数字化学术传播解决方案

其它

期刊讨论

科室

工具

服务