GEOPHYSICS 润色咨询

GEOPHYSICS

出版年份：暂无数据 年文章数：10186 投稿命中率： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看

出版周期：Bimonthly 自引率：30.6% 审稿周期： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看

前往期刊查询
期刊讨论 | 中国SCI论文 | 期刊主页 | 投稿经验 | 杂志官网 | 投稿链接 | 作者需知 | PMC链接 | Pubmed全文检索

期刊讨论

  1. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090890, encodeId=d137109089012, content=讨论中第一段一定要撰写文章的总括么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=116, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20220301/3a52d3952dde49019f1e000bb5c41d1c/0a0eb7959bb14fcd87745f869bee3c33.jpg, createdBy=46f32239729, createdName=Mia, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090889, encodeId=37051090889cf, content=什么叫有深度的讨论/如何加深讨论深度？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=136, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859587, encodeId=71a185958e25, content=可要了命了！！！3月4日提交的文章，3月11日开始由副主编邀请评审专家，到现在1个月以1周了，还是“副主编邀请评审专家状态”，4周时问过一次期刊办公室，说副主编已经向5个评审专家发出邀请，已有一个接受审稿邀请，要等到至少3个同意后审稿状态才会改变。这受疫情影响也得给个痛快话呀！同意审就说同意，不同意就说不同意，快另找人呀！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=187, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ab8c5414018, createdName=ms4355985535640256, createdTime=Sat Apr 18 20:42:48 CST 2020, time=2020-04-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856651, encodeId=02d5856651b6, content=geophysics当之无愧地球物理勘探学老大，就是希望分区可以提一提。中科院分区害死人，连ieee access这种大水刊都可以分到二区也是无奈了。本文录用一片geophysics，经历大修中修最终录用，大修竟然6个审稿人（五个reviewer一个ae），中修随机选了2个审稿人再审，这审稿相当严格了。最近又投了一片，一审大修又是六个审稿人（五个reviewer 一个ae）,意见相当专业，一看就知道是小同行。如此严格的好期刊为啥在中科院是三区呢？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=188, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd975414106, createdName=ms4560175821706816, createdTime=Thu Jan 09 09:11:35 CST 2020, time=2020-01-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845356, encodeId=c1b384535643, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0<br>经验分享：就中科院分区而言，一区二区的哪个期刊能接收勘探方向的投稿？跟planetology， volcanology， iceberg， seismology，climate方向比，真是能气死我们搞勘探的。<br> 好好一个勘探的顶刊被分到3区。今年换了主编，审稿全是盲审了，希望以后能往上提一提分区。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=205, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=375a5413962, createdName=ms3136433039918945, createdTime=Sun Jul 15 20:58:02 CST 2018, time=2018-07-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=843769, encodeId=3cce843e6950, content=录用发表，网上可查，但第一页有个“check for updates”，最郁闷的是web of science查询不到。。。。不晓得何时才能被查到，差不能查到评职称不算，真郁闷！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=209, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Tue Jun 05 22:34:33 CST 2018, time=2018-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842900, encodeId=6fd984290095, content=虽然目前水文增多，但是勘探地球物理领域顶级期刊的位置依旧无可撼动。<br> 审稿人还是相当负责任的。有个审稿人写的意见比我的论文长度都长，真是让我汗颜。<br> 给出的意见还是非常中肯的，按照审稿人的意见修改一般会有比较大的提升。<br> 中科院的分区比较低也没办法，毕竟他们是按照jcr计算的，也不会考虑到更细致的学科分类。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=199, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=54f75414053, createdName=ms4829174089086404, createdTime=Mon May 07 14:48:29 CST 2018, time=2018-05-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840506, encodeId=cf8f84050626, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=202, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c6525413996, createdName=ms1947553951244386, createdTime=Wed Jan 17 11:56:43 CST 2018, time=2018-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840505, encodeId=14c7840505ab, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=184, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Wed Jan 17 11:56:36 CST 2018, time=2018-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=837687, encodeId=754c83e68748, content=投稿周期多久 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=189, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=887f5413968, createdName=ms4822803311816233, createdTime=Fri Aug 04 12:34:42 CST 2017, time=2017-08-04, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2021-12-29 Mia

    讨论中第一段一定要撰写文章的总括么？

    1

    展开1条回复
  2. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090890, encodeId=d137109089012, content=讨论中第一段一定要撰写文章的总括么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=116, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20220301/3a52d3952dde49019f1e000bb5c41d1c/0a0eb7959bb14fcd87745f869bee3c33.jpg, createdBy=46f32239729, createdName=Mia, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090889, encodeId=37051090889cf, content=什么叫有深度的讨论/如何加深讨论深度？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=136, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859587, encodeId=71a185958e25, content=可要了命了！！！3月4日提交的文章，3月11日开始由副主编邀请评审专家，到现在1个月以1周了，还是“副主编邀请评审专家状态”，4周时问过一次期刊办公室，说副主编已经向5个评审专家发出邀请，已有一个接受审稿邀请，要等到至少3个同意后审稿状态才会改变。这受疫情影响也得给个痛快话呀！同意审就说同意，不同意就说不同意，快另找人呀！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=187, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ab8c5414018, createdName=ms4355985535640256, createdTime=Sat Apr 18 20:42:48 CST 2020, time=2020-04-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856651, encodeId=02d5856651b6, content=geophysics当之无愧地球物理勘探学老大，就是希望分区可以提一提。中科院分区害死人，连ieee access这种大水刊都可以分到二区也是无奈了。本文录用一片geophysics，经历大修中修最终录用，大修竟然6个审稿人（五个reviewer一个ae），中修随机选了2个审稿人再审，这审稿相当严格了。最近又投了一片，一审大修又是六个审稿人（五个reviewer 一个ae）,意见相当专业，一看就知道是小同行。如此严格的好期刊为啥在中科院是三区呢？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=188, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd975414106, createdName=ms4560175821706816, createdTime=Thu Jan 09 09:11:35 CST 2020, time=2020-01-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845356, encodeId=c1b384535643, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0<br>经验分享：就中科院分区而言，一区二区的哪个期刊能接收勘探方向的投稿？跟planetology， volcanology， iceberg， seismology，climate方向比，真是能气死我们搞勘探的。<br> 好好一个勘探的顶刊被分到3区。今年换了主编，审稿全是盲审了，希望以后能往上提一提分区。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=205, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=375a5413962, createdName=ms3136433039918945, createdTime=Sun Jul 15 20:58:02 CST 2018, time=2018-07-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=843769, encodeId=3cce843e6950, content=录用发表，网上可查，但第一页有个“check for updates”，最郁闷的是web of science查询不到。。。。不晓得何时才能被查到，差不能查到评职称不算，真郁闷！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=209, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Tue Jun 05 22:34:33 CST 2018, time=2018-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842900, encodeId=6fd984290095, content=虽然目前水文增多，但是勘探地球物理领域顶级期刊的位置依旧无可撼动。<br> 审稿人还是相当负责任的。有个审稿人写的意见比我的论文长度都长，真是让我汗颜。<br> 给出的意见还是非常中肯的，按照审稿人的意见修改一般会有比较大的提升。<br> 中科院的分区比较低也没办法，毕竟他们是按照jcr计算的，也不会考虑到更细致的学科分类。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=199, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=54f75414053, createdName=ms4829174089086404, createdTime=Mon May 07 14:48:29 CST 2018, time=2018-05-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840506, encodeId=cf8f84050626, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=202, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c6525413996, createdName=ms1947553951244386, createdTime=Wed Jan 17 11:56:43 CST 2018, time=2018-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840505, encodeId=14c7840505ab, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=184, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Wed Jan 17 11:56:36 CST 2018, time=2018-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=837687, encodeId=754c83e68748, content=投稿周期多久 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=189, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=887f5413968, createdName=ms4822803311816233, createdTime=Fri Aug 04 12:34:42 CST 2017, time=2017-08-04, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2021-12-27 学医的彭于晏

    什么叫有深度的讨论/如何加深讨论深度？

    1

    展开1条回复
  3. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090890, encodeId=d137109089012, content=讨论中第一段一定要撰写文章的总括么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=116, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20220301/3a52d3952dde49019f1e000bb5c41d1c/0a0eb7959bb14fcd87745f869bee3c33.jpg, createdBy=46f32239729, createdName=Mia, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090889, encodeId=37051090889cf, content=什么叫有深度的讨论/如何加深讨论深度？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=136, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859587, encodeId=71a185958e25, content=可要了命了！！！3月4日提交的文章，3月11日开始由副主编邀请评审专家，到现在1个月以1周了，还是“副主编邀请评审专家状态”，4周时问过一次期刊办公室，说副主编已经向5个评审专家发出邀请，已有一个接受审稿邀请，要等到至少3个同意后审稿状态才会改变。这受疫情影响也得给个痛快话呀！同意审就说同意，不同意就说不同意，快另找人呀！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=187, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ab8c5414018, createdName=ms4355985535640256, createdTime=Sat Apr 18 20:42:48 CST 2020, time=2020-04-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856651, encodeId=02d5856651b6, content=geophysics当之无愧地球物理勘探学老大，就是希望分区可以提一提。中科院分区害死人，连ieee access这种大水刊都可以分到二区也是无奈了。本文录用一片geophysics，经历大修中修最终录用，大修竟然6个审稿人（五个reviewer一个ae），中修随机选了2个审稿人再审，这审稿相当严格了。最近又投了一片，一审大修又是六个审稿人（五个reviewer 一个ae）,意见相当专业，一看就知道是小同行。如此严格的好期刊为啥在中科院是三区呢？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=188, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd975414106, createdName=ms4560175821706816, createdTime=Thu Jan 09 09:11:35 CST 2020, time=2020-01-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845356, encodeId=c1b384535643, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0<br>经验分享：就中科院分区而言，一区二区的哪个期刊能接收勘探方向的投稿？跟planetology， volcanology， iceberg， seismology，climate方向比，真是能气死我们搞勘探的。<br> 好好一个勘探的顶刊被分到3区。今年换了主编，审稿全是盲审了，希望以后能往上提一提分区。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=205, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=375a5413962, createdName=ms3136433039918945, createdTime=Sun Jul 15 20:58:02 CST 2018, time=2018-07-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=843769, encodeId=3cce843e6950, content=录用发表，网上可查，但第一页有个“check for updates”，最郁闷的是web of science查询不到。。。。不晓得何时才能被查到，差不能查到评职称不算，真郁闷！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=209, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Tue Jun 05 22:34:33 CST 2018, time=2018-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842900, encodeId=6fd984290095, content=虽然目前水文增多，但是勘探地球物理领域顶级期刊的位置依旧无可撼动。<br> 审稿人还是相当负责任的。有个审稿人写的意见比我的论文长度都长，真是让我汗颜。<br> 给出的意见还是非常中肯的，按照审稿人的意见修改一般会有比较大的提升。<br> 中科院的分区比较低也没办法，毕竟他们是按照jcr计算的，也不会考虑到更细致的学科分类。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=199, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=54f75414053, createdName=ms4829174089086404, createdTime=Mon May 07 14:48:29 CST 2018, time=2018-05-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840506, encodeId=cf8f84050626, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=202, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c6525413996, createdName=ms1947553951244386, createdTime=Wed Jan 17 11:56:43 CST 2018, time=2018-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840505, encodeId=14c7840505ab, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=184, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Wed Jan 17 11:56:36 CST 2018, time=2018-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=837687, encodeId=754c83e68748, content=投稿周期多久 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=189, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=887f5413968, createdName=ms4822803311816233, createdTime=Fri Aug 04 12:34:42 CST 2017, time=2017-08-04, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-04-18 ms4355985535640256

    可要了命了！！！3月4日提交的文章，3月11日开始由副主编邀请评审专家，到现在1个月以1周了，还是“副主编邀请评审专家状态”，4周时问过一次期刊办公室，说副主编已经向5个评审专家发出邀请，已有一个接受审稿邀请，要等到至少3个同意后审稿状态才会改变。这受疫情影响也得给个痛快话呀！同意审就说同意，不同意就说不同意，快另找人呀！

    0

  4. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090890, encodeId=d137109089012, content=讨论中第一段一定要撰写文章的总括么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=116, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20220301/3a52d3952dde49019f1e000bb5c41d1c/0a0eb7959bb14fcd87745f869bee3c33.jpg, createdBy=46f32239729, createdName=Mia, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090889, encodeId=37051090889cf, content=什么叫有深度的讨论/如何加深讨论深度？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=136, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859587, encodeId=71a185958e25, content=可要了命了！！！3月4日提交的文章，3月11日开始由副主编邀请评审专家，到现在1个月以1周了，还是“副主编邀请评审专家状态”，4周时问过一次期刊办公室，说副主编已经向5个评审专家发出邀请，已有一个接受审稿邀请，要等到至少3个同意后审稿状态才会改变。这受疫情影响也得给个痛快话呀！同意审就说同意，不同意就说不同意，快另找人呀！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=187, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ab8c5414018, createdName=ms4355985535640256, createdTime=Sat Apr 18 20:42:48 CST 2020, time=2020-04-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856651, encodeId=02d5856651b6, content=geophysics当之无愧地球物理勘探学老大，就是希望分区可以提一提。中科院分区害死人，连ieee access这种大水刊都可以分到二区也是无奈了。本文录用一片geophysics，经历大修中修最终录用，大修竟然6个审稿人（五个reviewer一个ae），中修随机选了2个审稿人再审，这审稿相当严格了。最近又投了一片，一审大修又是六个审稿人（五个reviewer 一个ae）,意见相当专业，一看就知道是小同行。如此严格的好期刊为啥在中科院是三区呢？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=188, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd975414106, createdName=ms4560175821706816, createdTime=Thu Jan 09 09:11:35 CST 2020, time=2020-01-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845356, encodeId=c1b384535643, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0<br>经验分享：就中科院分区而言，一区二区的哪个期刊能接收勘探方向的投稿？跟planetology， volcanology， iceberg， seismology，climate方向比，真是能气死我们搞勘探的。<br> 好好一个勘探的顶刊被分到3区。今年换了主编，审稿全是盲审了，希望以后能往上提一提分区。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=205, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=375a5413962, createdName=ms3136433039918945, createdTime=Sun Jul 15 20:58:02 CST 2018, time=2018-07-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=843769, encodeId=3cce843e6950, content=录用发表，网上可查，但第一页有个“check for updates”，最郁闷的是web of science查询不到。。。。不晓得何时才能被查到，差不能查到评职称不算，真郁闷！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=209, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Tue Jun 05 22:34:33 CST 2018, time=2018-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842900, encodeId=6fd984290095, content=虽然目前水文增多，但是勘探地球物理领域顶级期刊的位置依旧无可撼动。<br> 审稿人还是相当负责任的。有个审稿人写的意见比我的论文长度都长，真是让我汗颜。<br> 给出的意见还是非常中肯的，按照审稿人的意见修改一般会有比较大的提升。<br> 中科院的分区比较低也没办法，毕竟他们是按照jcr计算的，也不会考虑到更细致的学科分类。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=199, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=54f75414053, createdName=ms4829174089086404, createdTime=Mon May 07 14:48:29 CST 2018, time=2018-05-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840506, encodeId=cf8f84050626, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=202, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c6525413996, createdName=ms1947553951244386, createdTime=Wed Jan 17 11:56:43 CST 2018, time=2018-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840505, encodeId=14c7840505ab, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=184, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Wed Jan 17 11:56:36 CST 2018, time=2018-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=837687, encodeId=754c83e68748, content=投稿周期多久 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=189, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=887f5413968, createdName=ms4822803311816233, createdTime=Fri Aug 04 12:34:42 CST 2017, time=2017-08-04, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-01-09 ms4560175821706816

    geophysics当之无愧地球物理勘探学老大，就是希望分区可以提一提。中科院分区害死人，连ieee access这种大水刊都可以分到二区也是无奈了。本文录用一片geophysics，经历大修中修最终录用，大修竟然6个审稿人（五个reviewer一个ae），中修随机选了2个审稿人再审，这审稿相当严格了。最近又投了一片，一审大修又是六个审稿人（五个reviewer 一个ae）,意见相当专业，一看就知道是小同行。如此严格的好期刊为啥在中科院是三区呢？

    0

  5. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090890, encodeId=d137109089012, content=讨论中第一段一定要撰写文章的总括么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=116, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20220301/3a52d3952dde49019f1e000bb5c41d1c/0a0eb7959bb14fcd87745f869bee3c33.jpg, createdBy=46f32239729, createdName=Mia, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090889, encodeId=37051090889cf, content=什么叫有深度的讨论/如何加深讨论深度？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=136, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859587, encodeId=71a185958e25, content=可要了命了！！！3月4日提交的文章，3月11日开始由副主编邀请评审专家，到现在1个月以1周了，还是“副主编邀请评审专家状态”，4周时问过一次期刊办公室，说副主编已经向5个评审专家发出邀请，已有一个接受审稿邀请，要等到至少3个同意后审稿状态才会改变。这受疫情影响也得给个痛快话呀！同意审就说同意，不同意就说不同意，快另找人呀！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=187, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ab8c5414018, createdName=ms4355985535640256, createdTime=Sat Apr 18 20:42:48 CST 2020, time=2020-04-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856651, encodeId=02d5856651b6, content=geophysics当之无愧地球物理勘探学老大，就是希望分区可以提一提。中科院分区害死人，连ieee access这种大水刊都可以分到二区也是无奈了。本文录用一片geophysics，经历大修中修最终录用，大修竟然6个审稿人（五个reviewer一个ae），中修随机选了2个审稿人再审，这审稿相当严格了。最近又投了一片，一审大修又是六个审稿人（五个reviewer 一个ae）,意见相当专业，一看就知道是小同行。如此严格的好期刊为啥在中科院是三区呢？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=188, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd975414106, createdName=ms4560175821706816, createdTime=Thu Jan 09 09:11:35 CST 2020, time=2020-01-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845356, encodeId=c1b384535643, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0<br>经验分享：就中科院分区而言，一区二区的哪个期刊能接收勘探方向的投稿？跟planetology， volcanology， iceberg， seismology，climate方向比，真是能气死我们搞勘探的。<br> 好好一个勘探的顶刊被分到3区。今年换了主编，审稿全是盲审了，希望以后能往上提一提分区。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=205, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=375a5413962, createdName=ms3136433039918945, createdTime=Sun Jul 15 20:58:02 CST 2018, time=2018-07-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=843769, encodeId=3cce843e6950, content=录用发表，网上可查，但第一页有个“check for updates”，最郁闷的是web of science查询不到。。。。不晓得何时才能被查到，差不能查到评职称不算，真郁闷！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=209, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Tue Jun 05 22:34:33 CST 2018, time=2018-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842900, encodeId=6fd984290095, content=虽然目前水文增多，但是勘探地球物理领域顶级期刊的位置依旧无可撼动。<br> 审稿人还是相当负责任的。有个审稿人写的意见比我的论文长度都长，真是让我汗颜。<br> 给出的意见还是非常中肯的，按照审稿人的意见修改一般会有比较大的提升。<br> 中科院的分区比较低也没办法，毕竟他们是按照jcr计算的，也不会考虑到更细致的学科分类。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=199, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=54f75414053, createdName=ms4829174089086404, createdTime=Mon May 07 14:48:29 CST 2018, time=2018-05-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840506, encodeId=cf8f84050626, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=202, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c6525413996, createdName=ms1947553951244386, createdTime=Wed Jan 17 11:56:43 CST 2018, time=2018-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840505, encodeId=14c7840505ab, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=184, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Wed Jan 17 11:56:36 CST 2018, time=2018-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=837687, encodeId=754c83e68748, content=投稿周期多久 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=189, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=887f5413968, createdName=ms4822803311816233, createdTime=Fri Aug 04 12:34:42 CST 2017, time=2017-08-04, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-07-15 ms3136433039918945

    审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0
    经验分享：就中科院分区而言，一区二区的哪个期刊能接收勘探方向的投稿？跟planetology， volcanology， iceberg， seismology，climate方向比，真是能气死我们搞勘探的。
    好好一个勘探的顶刊被分到3区。今年换了主编，审稿全是盲审了，希望以后能往上提一提分区。

    0

  6. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090890, encodeId=d137109089012, content=讨论中第一段一定要撰写文章的总括么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=116, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20220301/3a52d3952dde49019f1e000bb5c41d1c/0a0eb7959bb14fcd87745f869bee3c33.jpg, createdBy=46f32239729, createdName=Mia, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090889, encodeId=37051090889cf, content=什么叫有深度的讨论/如何加深讨论深度？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=136, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859587, encodeId=71a185958e25, content=可要了命了！！！3月4日提交的文章，3月11日开始由副主编邀请评审专家，到现在1个月以1周了，还是“副主编邀请评审专家状态”，4周时问过一次期刊办公室，说副主编已经向5个评审专家发出邀请，已有一个接受审稿邀请，要等到至少3个同意后审稿状态才会改变。这受疫情影响也得给个痛快话呀！同意审就说同意，不同意就说不同意，快另找人呀！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=187, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ab8c5414018, createdName=ms4355985535640256, createdTime=Sat Apr 18 20:42:48 CST 2020, time=2020-04-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856651, encodeId=02d5856651b6, content=geophysics当之无愧地球物理勘探学老大，就是希望分区可以提一提。中科院分区害死人，连ieee access这种大水刊都可以分到二区也是无奈了。本文录用一片geophysics，经历大修中修最终录用，大修竟然6个审稿人（五个reviewer一个ae），中修随机选了2个审稿人再审，这审稿相当严格了。最近又投了一片，一审大修又是六个审稿人（五个reviewer 一个ae）,意见相当专业，一看就知道是小同行。如此严格的好期刊为啥在中科院是三区呢？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=188, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd975414106, createdName=ms4560175821706816, createdTime=Thu Jan 09 09:11:35 CST 2020, time=2020-01-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845356, encodeId=c1b384535643, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0<br>经验分享：就中科院分区而言，一区二区的哪个期刊能接收勘探方向的投稿？跟planetology， volcanology， iceberg， seismology，climate方向比，真是能气死我们搞勘探的。<br> 好好一个勘探的顶刊被分到3区。今年换了主编，审稿全是盲审了，希望以后能往上提一提分区。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=205, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=375a5413962, createdName=ms3136433039918945, createdTime=Sun Jul 15 20:58:02 CST 2018, time=2018-07-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=843769, encodeId=3cce843e6950, content=录用发表，网上可查，但第一页有个“check for updates”，最郁闷的是web of science查询不到。。。。不晓得何时才能被查到，差不能查到评职称不算，真郁闷！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=209, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Tue Jun 05 22:34:33 CST 2018, time=2018-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842900, encodeId=6fd984290095, content=虽然目前水文增多，但是勘探地球物理领域顶级期刊的位置依旧无可撼动。<br> 审稿人还是相当负责任的。有个审稿人写的意见比我的论文长度都长，真是让我汗颜。<br> 给出的意见还是非常中肯的，按照审稿人的意见修改一般会有比较大的提升。<br> 中科院的分区比较低也没办法，毕竟他们是按照jcr计算的，也不会考虑到更细致的学科分类。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=199, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=54f75414053, createdName=ms4829174089086404, createdTime=Mon May 07 14:48:29 CST 2018, time=2018-05-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840506, encodeId=cf8f84050626, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=202, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c6525413996, createdName=ms1947553951244386, createdTime=Wed Jan 17 11:56:43 CST 2018, time=2018-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840505, encodeId=14c7840505ab, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=184, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Wed Jan 17 11:56:36 CST 2018, time=2018-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=837687, encodeId=754c83e68748, content=投稿周期多久 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=189, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=887f5413968, createdName=ms4822803311816233, createdTime=Fri Aug 04 12:34:42 CST 2017, time=2017-08-04, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-06-05 ms6459520362745523

    录用发表，网上可查，但第一页有个“check for updates”，最郁闷的是web of science查询不到。。。。不晓得何时才能被查到，差不能查到评职称不算，真郁闷！

    0

  7. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090890, encodeId=d137109089012, content=讨论中第一段一定要撰写文章的总括么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=116, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20220301/3a52d3952dde49019f1e000bb5c41d1c/0a0eb7959bb14fcd87745f869bee3c33.jpg, createdBy=46f32239729, createdName=Mia, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090889, encodeId=37051090889cf, content=什么叫有深度的讨论/如何加深讨论深度？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=136, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859587, encodeId=71a185958e25, content=可要了命了！！！3月4日提交的文章，3月11日开始由副主编邀请评审专家，到现在1个月以1周了，还是“副主编邀请评审专家状态”，4周时问过一次期刊办公室，说副主编已经向5个评审专家发出邀请，已有一个接受审稿邀请，要等到至少3个同意后审稿状态才会改变。这受疫情影响也得给个痛快话呀！同意审就说同意，不同意就说不同意，快另找人呀！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=187, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ab8c5414018, createdName=ms4355985535640256, createdTime=Sat Apr 18 20:42:48 CST 2020, time=2020-04-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856651, encodeId=02d5856651b6, content=geophysics当之无愧地球物理勘探学老大，就是希望分区可以提一提。中科院分区害死人，连ieee access这种大水刊都可以分到二区也是无奈了。本文录用一片geophysics，经历大修中修最终录用，大修竟然6个审稿人（五个reviewer一个ae），中修随机选了2个审稿人再审，这审稿相当严格了。最近又投了一片，一审大修又是六个审稿人（五个reviewer 一个ae）,意见相当专业，一看就知道是小同行。如此严格的好期刊为啥在中科院是三区呢？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=188, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd975414106, createdName=ms4560175821706816, createdTime=Thu Jan 09 09:11:35 CST 2020, time=2020-01-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845356, encodeId=c1b384535643, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0<br>经验分享：就中科院分区而言，一区二区的哪个期刊能接收勘探方向的投稿？跟planetology， volcanology， iceberg， seismology，climate方向比，真是能气死我们搞勘探的。<br> 好好一个勘探的顶刊被分到3区。今年换了主编，审稿全是盲审了，希望以后能往上提一提分区。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=205, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=375a5413962, createdName=ms3136433039918945, createdTime=Sun Jul 15 20:58:02 CST 2018, time=2018-07-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=843769, encodeId=3cce843e6950, content=录用发表，网上可查，但第一页有个“check for updates”，最郁闷的是web of science查询不到。。。。不晓得何时才能被查到，差不能查到评职称不算，真郁闷！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=209, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Tue Jun 05 22:34:33 CST 2018, time=2018-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842900, encodeId=6fd984290095, content=虽然目前水文增多，但是勘探地球物理领域顶级期刊的位置依旧无可撼动。<br> 审稿人还是相当负责任的。有个审稿人写的意见比我的论文长度都长，真是让我汗颜。<br> 给出的意见还是非常中肯的，按照审稿人的意见修改一般会有比较大的提升。<br> 中科院的分区比较低也没办法，毕竟他们是按照jcr计算的，也不会考虑到更细致的学科分类。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=199, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=54f75414053, createdName=ms4829174089086404, createdTime=Mon May 07 14:48:29 CST 2018, time=2018-05-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840506, encodeId=cf8f84050626, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=202, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c6525413996, createdName=ms1947553951244386, createdTime=Wed Jan 17 11:56:43 CST 2018, time=2018-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840505, encodeId=14c7840505ab, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=184, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Wed Jan 17 11:56:36 CST 2018, time=2018-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=837687, encodeId=754c83e68748, content=投稿周期多久 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=189, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=887f5413968, createdName=ms4822803311816233, createdTime=Fri Aug 04 12:34:42 CST 2017, time=2017-08-04, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-05-07 ms4829174089086404

    虽然目前水文增多，但是勘探地球物理领域顶级期刊的位置依旧无可撼动。
    审稿人还是相当负责任的。有个审稿人写的意见比我的论文长度都长，真是让我汗颜。
    给出的意见还是非常中肯的，按照审稿人的意见修改一般会有比较大的提升。
    中科院的分区比较低也没办法，毕竟他们是按照jcr计算的，也不会考虑到更细致的学科分类。

    0

  8. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090890, encodeId=d137109089012, content=讨论中第一段一定要撰写文章的总括么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=116, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20220301/3a52d3952dde49019f1e000bb5c41d1c/0a0eb7959bb14fcd87745f869bee3c33.jpg, createdBy=46f32239729, createdName=Mia, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090889, encodeId=37051090889cf, content=什么叫有深度的讨论/如何加深讨论深度？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=136, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859587, encodeId=71a185958e25, content=可要了命了！！！3月4日提交的文章，3月11日开始由副主编邀请评审专家，到现在1个月以1周了，还是“副主编邀请评审专家状态”，4周时问过一次期刊办公室，说副主编已经向5个评审专家发出邀请，已有一个接受审稿邀请，要等到至少3个同意后审稿状态才会改变。这受疫情影响也得给个痛快话呀！同意审就说同意，不同意就说不同意，快另找人呀！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=187, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ab8c5414018, createdName=ms4355985535640256, createdTime=Sat Apr 18 20:42:48 CST 2020, time=2020-04-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856651, encodeId=02d5856651b6, content=geophysics当之无愧地球物理勘探学老大，就是希望分区可以提一提。中科院分区害死人，连ieee access这种大水刊都可以分到二区也是无奈了。本文录用一片geophysics，经历大修中修最终录用，大修竟然6个审稿人（五个reviewer一个ae），中修随机选了2个审稿人再审，这审稿相当严格了。最近又投了一片，一审大修又是六个审稿人（五个reviewer 一个ae）,意见相当专业，一看就知道是小同行。如此严格的好期刊为啥在中科院是三区呢？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=188, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd975414106, createdName=ms4560175821706816, createdTime=Thu Jan 09 09:11:35 CST 2020, time=2020-01-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845356, encodeId=c1b384535643, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0<br>经验分享：就中科院分区而言，一区二区的哪个期刊能接收勘探方向的投稿？跟planetology， volcanology， iceberg， seismology，climate方向比，真是能气死我们搞勘探的。<br> 好好一个勘探的顶刊被分到3区。今年换了主编，审稿全是盲审了，希望以后能往上提一提分区。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=205, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=375a5413962, createdName=ms3136433039918945, createdTime=Sun Jul 15 20:58:02 CST 2018, time=2018-07-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=843769, encodeId=3cce843e6950, content=录用发表，网上可查，但第一页有个“check for updates”，最郁闷的是web of science查询不到。。。。不晓得何时才能被查到，差不能查到评职称不算，真郁闷！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=209, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Tue Jun 05 22:34:33 CST 2018, time=2018-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842900, encodeId=6fd984290095, content=虽然目前水文增多，但是勘探地球物理领域顶级期刊的位置依旧无可撼动。<br> 审稿人还是相当负责任的。有个审稿人写的意见比我的论文长度都长，真是让我汗颜。<br> 给出的意见还是非常中肯的，按照审稿人的意见修改一般会有比较大的提升。<br> 中科院的分区比较低也没办法，毕竟他们是按照jcr计算的，也不会考虑到更细致的学科分类。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=199, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=54f75414053, createdName=ms4829174089086404, createdTime=Mon May 07 14:48:29 CST 2018, time=2018-05-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840506, encodeId=cf8f84050626, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=202, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c6525413996, createdName=ms1947553951244386, createdTime=Wed Jan 17 11:56:43 CST 2018, time=2018-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840505, encodeId=14c7840505ab, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=184, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Wed Jan 17 11:56:36 CST 2018, time=2018-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=837687, encodeId=754c83e68748, content=投稿周期多久 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=189, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=887f5413968, createdName=ms4822803311816233, createdTime=Fri Aug 04 12:34:42 CST 2017, time=2017-08-04, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-01-17 ms1947553951244386

    审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
    经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。

    0

  9. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090890, encodeId=d137109089012, content=讨论中第一段一定要撰写文章的总括么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=116, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20220301/3a52d3952dde49019f1e000bb5c41d1c/0a0eb7959bb14fcd87745f869bee3c33.jpg, createdBy=46f32239729, createdName=Mia, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090889, encodeId=37051090889cf, content=什么叫有深度的讨论/如何加深讨论深度？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=136, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859587, encodeId=71a185958e25, content=可要了命了！！！3月4日提交的文章，3月11日开始由副主编邀请评审专家，到现在1个月以1周了，还是“副主编邀请评审专家状态”，4周时问过一次期刊办公室，说副主编已经向5个评审专家发出邀请，已有一个接受审稿邀请，要等到至少3个同意后审稿状态才会改变。这受疫情影响也得给个痛快话呀！同意审就说同意，不同意就说不同意，快另找人呀！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=187, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ab8c5414018, createdName=ms4355985535640256, createdTime=Sat Apr 18 20:42:48 CST 2020, time=2020-04-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856651, encodeId=02d5856651b6, content=geophysics当之无愧地球物理勘探学老大，就是希望分区可以提一提。中科院分区害死人，连ieee access这种大水刊都可以分到二区也是无奈了。本文录用一片geophysics，经历大修中修最终录用，大修竟然6个审稿人（五个reviewer一个ae），中修随机选了2个审稿人再审，这审稿相当严格了。最近又投了一片，一审大修又是六个审稿人（五个reviewer 一个ae）,意见相当专业，一看就知道是小同行。如此严格的好期刊为啥在中科院是三区呢？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=188, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd975414106, createdName=ms4560175821706816, createdTime=Thu Jan 09 09:11:35 CST 2020, time=2020-01-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845356, encodeId=c1b384535643, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0<br>经验分享：就中科院分区而言，一区二区的哪个期刊能接收勘探方向的投稿？跟planetology， volcanology， iceberg， seismology，climate方向比，真是能气死我们搞勘探的。<br> 好好一个勘探的顶刊被分到3区。今年换了主编，审稿全是盲审了，希望以后能往上提一提分区。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=205, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=375a5413962, createdName=ms3136433039918945, createdTime=Sun Jul 15 20:58:02 CST 2018, time=2018-07-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=843769, encodeId=3cce843e6950, content=录用发表，网上可查，但第一页有个“check for updates”，最郁闷的是web of science查询不到。。。。不晓得何时才能被查到，差不能查到评职称不算，真郁闷！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=209, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Tue Jun 05 22:34:33 CST 2018, time=2018-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842900, encodeId=6fd984290095, content=虽然目前水文增多，但是勘探地球物理领域顶级期刊的位置依旧无可撼动。<br> 审稿人还是相当负责任的。有个审稿人写的意见比我的论文长度都长，真是让我汗颜。<br> 给出的意见还是非常中肯的，按照审稿人的意见修改一般会有比较大的提升。<br> 中科院的分区比较低也没办法，毕竟他们是按照jcr计算的，也不会考虑到更细致的学科分类。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=199, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=54f75414053, createdName=ms4829174089086404, createdTime=Mon May 07 14:48:29 CST 2018, time=2018-05-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840506, encodeId=cf8f84050626, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=202, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c6525413996, createdName=ms1947553951244386, createdTime=Wed Jan 17 11:56:43 CST 2018, time=2018-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840505, encodeId=14c7840505ab, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=184, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Wed Jan 17 11:56:36 CST 2018, time=2018-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=837687, encodeId=754c83e68748, content=投稿周期多久 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=189, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=887f5413968, createdName=ms4822803311816233, createdTime=Fri Aug 04 12:34:42 CST 2017, time=2017-08-04, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-01-17 ms9325659851846900

    审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
    经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。

    0

  10. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090890, encodeId=d137109089012, content=讨论中第一段一定要撰写文章的总括么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=116, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20220301/3a52d3952dde49019f1e000bb5c41d1c/0a0eb7959bb14fcd87745f869bee3c33.jpg, createdBy=46f32239729, createdName=Mia, createdTime=Wed Dec 29 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1090889, encodeId=37051090889cf, content=什么叫有深度的讨论/如何加深讨论深度？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=136, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=81a55564862, createdName=学医的彭于晏, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:48 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859587, encodeId=71a185958e25, content=可要了命了！！！3月4日提交的文章，3月11日开始由副主编邀请评审专家，到现在1个月以1周了，还是“副主编邀请评审专家状态”，4周时问过一次期刊办公室，说副主编已经向5个评审专家发出邀请，已有一个接受审稿邀请，要等到至少3个同意后审稿状态才会改变。这受疫情影响也得给个痛快话呀！同意审就说同意，不同意就说不同意，快另找人呀！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=187, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ab8c5414018, createdName=ms4355985535640256, createdTime=Sat Apr 18 20:42:48 CST 2020, time=2020-04-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856651, encodeId=02d5856651b6, content=geophysics当之无愧地球物理勘探学老大，就是希望分区可以提一提。中科院分区害死人，连ieee access这种大水刊都可以分到二区也是无奈了。本文录用一片geophysics，经历大修中修最终录用，大修竟然6个审稿人（五个reviewer一个ae），中修随机选了2个审稿人再审，这审稿相当严格了。最近又投了一片，一审大修又是六个审稿人（五个reviewer 一个ae）,意见相当专业，一看就知道是小同行。如此严格的好期刊为啥在中科院是三区呢？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=188, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cd975414106, createdName=ms4560175821706816, createdTime=Thu Jan 09 09:11:35 CST 2020, time=2020-01-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845356, encodeId=c1b384535643, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0<br>经验分享：就中科院分区而言，一区二区的哪个期刊能接收勘探方向的投稿？跟planetology， volcanology， iceberg， seismology，climate方向比，真是能气死我们搞勘探的。<br> 好好一个勘探的顶刊被分到3区。今年换了主编，审稿全是盲审了，希望以后能往上提一提分区。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=205, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=375a5413962, createdName=ms3136433039918945, createdTime=Sun Jul 15 20:58:02 CST 2018, time=2018-07-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=843769, encodeId=3cce843e6950, content=录用发表，网上可查，但第一页有个“check for updates”，最郁闷的是web of science查询不到。。。。不晓得何时才能被查到，差不能查到评职称不算，真郁闷！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=209, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Tue Jun 05 22:34:33 CST 2018, time=2018-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842900, encodeId=6fd984290095, content=虽然目前水文增多，但是勘探地球物理领域顶级期刊的位置依旧无可撼动。<br> 审稿人还是相当负责任的。有个审稿人写的意见比我的论文长度都长，真是让我汗颜。<br> 给出的意见还是非常中肯的，按照审稿人的意见修改一般会有比较大的提升。<br> 中科院的分区比较低也没办法，毕竟他们是按照jcr计算的，也不会考虑到更细致的学科分类。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=199, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=54f75414053, createdName=ms4829174089086404, createdTime=Mon May 07 14:48:29 CST 2018, time=2018-05-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840506, encodeId=cf8f84050626, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=202, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c6525413996, createdName=ms1947553951244386, createdTime=Wed Jan 17 11:56:43 CST 2018, time=2018-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840505, encodeId=14c7840505ab, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0<br>经验分享：中科院的分区是有问题的，好好的一个期刊，让这些被利益驱动的中国人给弄坏了，国内有些期刊很水，却能评到2区，也是没谁了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=184, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Wed Jan 17 11:56:36 CST 2018, time=2018-01-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=837687, encodeId=754c83e68748, content=投稿周期多久 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=189, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=887f5413968, createdName=ms4822803311816233, createdTime=Fri Aug 04 12:34:42 CST 2017, time=2017-08-04, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2017-08-04 ms4822803311816233

    投稿周期多久

    0

共19条页码: 1/2页10条/页
分享您的投稿经验，提升MI经验值，获取更多积分