评论了期刊 2017-04-05

medical science monitor

这个杂志快速通道容易获得吗?我想快速通道!!

评论了期刊 2017-03-12

audiology and neuro-otology

201611004 Revision 0 The effect of ...
Submitted: 08/11/2016 Current Status: Under Review 四个月了

评论了期刊 2017-02-24

medical science monitor

2017-02-24 - Sent for production 多久proof?

评论了期刊 2017-02-16

audiology and neuro-otology

Manuscripts Currently Under Consideration (1 manuscript)
201611004 Revision 0 The effect ...
Submitted: 08/11/2016 Current Status: Under Review
已经三个多月了,发信问也不回,该如何是好????

评论了期刊 2017-02-15

medical science monitor

审稿速度:1|投稿命中率:75
偏重的研究方向:耳鼻喉;影像;
经验分享:请问,大牛们,这个杂志近期不会有被提出SCI的风险吧?

评论了期刊 2017-02-14

medical science monitor

返修回去之后第二天接受了,请教大侠,如何支付!

评论了期刊 2017-01-31

medical science monitor

After authors corrections 之后还要送审吧?

评论了期刊 2017-01-25

medical science monitor

请问,major corrections之后接受的几率高吗?Express Pathway Reviewer Disapproval (major corrections)

评论了期刊 2017-01-23

medical science monitor

Express Pathway Reviewer Disapproval (major corrections)
Dear Dr
Due to extensive manuscript corrections needed, the reviewers of Medical Science Monitor have disapproved your manuscript #903173 titled "The xxx morphology" for Express Pathway processing. The manuscript will be processed by the Standard Pathway. The Standard processing fee of 1900.00 USD will apply. Please see reviewer remarks provided below in this message. Please make the requested corrections as soon as possible to avoid further publication delay.


Below, please find our reviewers' remarks regarding your manuscript. Please make the appropriate changes and upload your revised document (and revised/renamed figures, if necessary) when they are ready. Be sure to highlight the changes you have made in your documents and include a summary of the changes, as well as any responses to the reviewers' comments.

Reviewer nr. 98753064_111916

Material and Methods
The reseach design is not very clearly presented.
In the page no 2, raws 72, 73, 74 and page no 3 raws 104-105 the information is repeating.

Results
In the results the analysis date are not very clearly exposed.
The study has two major objectives which in results are not very systematic exposed.
The datas from the tables are also repeating in the text.


General comments to the Authors
The study is not having a briefly and systematic presentation.
The study need a revison in which the authors will correct this things.

Sincerely,
Editorial Office
Medical Science Monitor

大侠们,这个稿子还游戏王吗?进入标准处理后的时间估计会多久?我着急发 哭哭哭

评论了期刊 2017-01-16

SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY

这个杂志好不好发?有没有投过这个杂志的?速度如何?

评论了期刊 2017-01-14

medical science monitor

哪位大侠知道 received a new status: Review pending 状态会持续多久?

评论了期刊 2017-01-06

medical science monitor

我从Web of sicence 上检索到了。是SCI

评论了期刊 2017-01-06

medical science monitor

Medical Science Monitor是不是傻SCI?

评论了期刊 2017-01-06

medical science monitor

这个杂志90%的文章都来自于大陆的吗?全是中国人啊

评论了期刊 2016-12-17

acta oto-laryngologica

Acta Oto-Laryngologica 每年发文章207篇,科室投稿数量已经到700了。接受了有那么高吗?

共180条页码: 12/12页15条/页