Environmental Science-Nano-期刊论坛，投稿经验-MedSci.cn

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=572381, encodeId=59825e2381ff, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 经验分享：刚接收一篇文章。第一稿两个审稿人，两个都给了大修，编辑给了个reject and resubmit，要求按照审稿人的意见返修文章再重投，一个月之后重投。5天后in peer review，一个月后第一个审稿人回复了个well version，建议直接接收。第二个审稿人要求补两个实验后接收。补实验花了15天，R2反稿后15天接收。整体来说，这个杂志偏慢，而且每年文章也不多。这是第三次投稿，前一次投稿拖了我3个月之后被拒。最好不要送到伯明翰老师的手里，这个编辑处理比较慢。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=189, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=46cb1936173, createdName=ximengman, createdTime=Tue Jun 18 00:00:00 CST 2019, time=2019-06-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1006333, encodeId=86c31006333da, content=偏重的研究方向：纳米毒理学 经验分享：7.27 submitted，之后几天是with editor office 8.4 with editor，没有分配给我选的编辑，分配给了另外一个也算相关方向的副编辑，今天还是with editor，希望能有好结果，一定再来更新。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=90, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=31e35508433, createdName=babyroqi680, createdTime=Mon Aug 09 14:44:20 CST 2021, time=2021-08-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1225838, encodeId=e05612258381c, content=大佬们有这个期刊的模板要求吗？在官网上找的感觉很是凌乱, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=30dd8199450, createdName=ms2000002122545844, createdTime=Sat Jun 11 16:08:24 CST 2022, time=2022-06-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1106255, encodeId=8f0f110625501, content=模型图是必须的么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=62, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:53 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1106256, encodeId=e6b111062565c, content=模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=56, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:53 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857063, encodeId=b73e85e06348, content=回复15楼，今天又with editor了，变来变去也不知道干啥。这杂志的文章虽然比不上est，但是怎么也比jhm的好, 并且jhm的审稿超级慢的。中科院分区的升级版还把接受率34%的总环列入一区呢，我是不认这升级版的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=109, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Thu Jan 23 12:49:12 CST 2020, time=2020-01-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859737, encodeId=db11859e3700, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：jan/07/2020 submitted april/11/2020 minor revision april/17/2020 revision submitted april/21/2020 accepted 这个文章投到了est 被拒了，根据reviewer的意见重新进行了dft的计算，然后重投的environmental science nano。还好接受了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0a435414069, createdName=ms9690745155970328, createdTime=Thu Apr 23 00:02:52 CST 2020, time=2020-04-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859102, encodeId=56f785910290, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：接21楼，已经accept，谢谢华南理工zhang lin编辑，一直相信目前es nano的质量高于jhm，所以这个稿子之前被拒，建议转投jhm的时候，果断弃了投es nano，祝越办越好，控制稿件数量，继续小而精 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6a615414060, createdName=ms903640464789830, createdTime=Sun Apr 05 08:28:42 CST 2020, time=2020-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858942, encodeId=65e285894231, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：minor revision. 22 march, submitted. 31 march, still in peer review, come on...... , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=142, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Tue Mar 31 13:45:31 CST 2020, time=2020-03-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858640, encodeId=3b96858640bb, content=审稿速度:4.0 经验分享：12月6号投稿，2月18号大修，2.25返回去，3.21接收，从投稿到接收一共3个半月，还算很快的。现在est比较容易送审，但是审稿人都非常严格，实验设计稍有问题就会给毙掉。相反，这个杂志的审稿过程过程真的比est简单多了，基本给了修改返回去就没问题了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Sat Mar 21 18:33:00 CST 2020, time=2020-03-21, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2019-06-18 ximengman

审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：刚接收一篇文章。第一稿两个审稿人，两个都给了大修，编辑给了个reject and resubmit，要求按照审稿人的意见返修文章再重投，一个月之后重投。5天后in peer review，一个月后第一个审稿人回复了个well version，建议直接接收。第二个审稿人要求补两个实验后接收。补实验花了15天，R2反稿后15天接收。整体来说，这个杂志偏慢，而且每年文章也不多。这是第三次投稿，前一次投稿拖了我3个月之后被拒。最好不要送到伯明翰老师的手里，这个编辑处理比较慢。

189 2

展开2条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=572381, encodeId=59825e2381ff, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 经验分享：刚接收一篇文章。第一稿两个审稿人，两个都给了大修，编辑给了个reject and resubmit，要求按照审稿人的意见返修文章再重投，一个月之后重投。5天后in peer review，一个月后第一个审稿人回复了个well version，建议直接接收。第二个审稿人要求补两个实验后接收。补实验花了15天，R2反稿后15天接收。整体来说，这个杂志偏慢，而且每年文章也不多。这是第三次投稿，前一次投稿拖了我3个月之后被拒。最好不要送到伯明翰老师的手里，这个编辑处理比较慢。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=189, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=46cb1936173, createdName=ximengman, createdTime=Tue Jun 18 00:00:00 CST 2019, time=2019-06-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1006333, encodeId=86c31006333da, content=偏重的研究方向：纳米毒理学 经验分享：7.27 submitted，之后几天是with editor office 8.4 with editor，没有分配给我选的编辑，分配给了另外一个也算相关方向的副编辑，今天还是with editor，希望能有好结果，一定再来更新。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=90, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=31e35508433, createdName=babyroqi680, createdTime=Mon Aug 09 14:44:20 CST 2021, time=2021-08-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1225838, encodeId=e05612258381c, content=大佬们有这个期刊的模板要求吗？在官网上找的感觉很是凌乱, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=30dd8199450, createdName=ms2000002122545844, createdTime=Sat Jun 11 16:08:24 CST 2022, time=2022-06-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1106255, encodeId=8f0f110625501, content=模型图是必须的么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=62, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:53 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1106256, encodeId=e6b111062565c, content=模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=56, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:53 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857063, encodeId=b73e85e06348, content=回复15楼，今天又with editor了，变来变去也不知道干啥。这杂志的文章虽然比不上est，但是怎么也比jhm的好, 并且jhm的审稿超级慢的。中科院分区的升级版还把接受率34%的总环列入一区呢，我是不认这升级版的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=109, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Thu Jan 23 12:49:12 CST 2020, time=2020-01-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859737, encodeId=db11859e3700, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：jan/07/2020 submitted april/11/2020 minor revision april/17/2020 revision submitted april/21/2020 accepted 这个文章投到了est 被拒了，根据reviewer的意见重新进行了dft的计算，然后重投的environmental science nano。还好接受了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0a435414069, createdName=ms9690745155970328, createdTime=Thu Apr 23 00:02:52 CST 2020, time=2020-04-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859102, encodeId=56f785910290, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：接21楼，已经accept，谢谢华南理工zhang lin编辑，一直相信目前es nano的质量高于jhm，所以这个稿子之前被拒，建议转投jhm的时候，果断弃了投es nano，祝越办越好，控制稿件数量，继续小而精 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6a615414060, createdName=ms903640464789830, createdTime=Sun Apr 05 08:28:42 CST 2020, time=2020-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858942, encodeId=65e285894231, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：minor revision. 22 march, submitted. 31 march, still in peer review, come on...... , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=142, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Tue Mar 31 13:45:31 CST 2020, time=2020-03-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858640, encodeId=3b96858640bb, content=审稿速度:4.0 经验分享：12月6号投稿，2月18号大修，2.25返回去，3.21接收，从投稿到接收一共3个半月，还算很快的。现在est比较容易送审，但是审稿人都非常严格，实验设计稍有问题就会给毙掉。相反，这个杂志的审稿过程过程真的比est简单多了，基本给了修改返回去就没问题了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Sat Mar 21 18:33:00 CST 2020, time=2020-03-21, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2021-08-09 babyroqi680

偏重的研究方向：纳米毒理学
经验分享：7.27 submitted，之后几天是with editor office
8.4 with editor，没有分配给我选的编辑，分配给了另外一个也算相关方向的副编辑，今天还是with editor，希望能有好结果，一定再来更新。

90 1

展开1条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=572381, encodeId=59825e2381ff, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 经验分享：刚接收一篇文章。第一稿两个审稿人，两个都给了大修，编辑给了个reject and resubmit，要求按照审稿人的意见返修文章再重投，一个月之后重投。5天后in peer review，一个月后第一个审稿人回复了个well version，建议直接接收。第二个审稿人要求补两个实验后接收。补实验花了15天，R2反稿后15天接收。整体来说，这个杂志偏慢，而且每年文章也不多。这是第三次投稿，前一次投稿拖了我3个月之后被拒。最好不要送到伯明翰老师的手里，这个编辑处理比较慢。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=189, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=46cb1936173, createdName=ximengman, createdTime=Tue Jun 18 00:00:00 CST 2019, time=2019-06-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1006333, encodeId=86c31006333da, content=偏重的研究方向：纳米毒理学 经验分享：7.27 submitted，之后几天是with editor office 8.4 with editor，没有分配给我选的编辑，分配给了另外一个也算相关方向的副编辑，今天还是with editor，希望能有好结果，一定再来更新。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=90, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=31e35508433, createdName=babyroqi680, createdTime=Mon Aug 09 14:44:20 CST 2021, time=2021-08-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1225838, encodeId=e05612258381c, content=大佬们有这个期刊的模板要求吗？在官网上找的感觉很是凌乱, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=30dd8199450, createdName=ms2000002122545844, createdTime=Sat Jun 11 16:08:24 CST 2022, time=2022-06-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1106255, encodeId=8f0f110625501, content=模型图是必须的么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=62, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:53 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1106256, encodeId=e6b111062565c, content=模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=56, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:53 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857063, encodeId=b73e85e06348, content=回复15楼，今天又with editor了，变来变去也不知道干啥。这杂志的文章虽然比不上est，但是怎么也比jhm的好, 并且jhm的审稿超级慢的。中科院分区的升级版还把接受率34%的总环列入一区呢，我是不认这升级版的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=109, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Thu Jan 23 12:49:12 CST 2020, time=2020-01-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859737, encodeId=db11859e3700, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：jan/07/2020 submitted april/11/2020 minor revision april/17/2020 revision submitted april/21/2020 accepted 这个文章投到了est 被拒了，根据reviewer的意见重新进行了dft的计算，然后重投的environmental science nano。还好接受了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0a435414069, createdName=ms9690745155970328, createdTime=Thu Apr 23 00:02:52 CST 2020, time=2020-04-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859102, encodeId=56f785910290, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：接21楼，已经accept，谢谢华南理工zhang lin编辑，一直相信目前es nano的质量高于jhm，所以这个稿子之前被拒，建议转投jhm的时候，果断弃了投es nano，祝越办越好，控制稿件数量，继续小而精 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6a615414060, createdName=ms903640464789830, createdTime=Sun Apr 05 08:28:42 CST 2020, time=2020-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858942, encodeId=65e285894231, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：minor revision. 22 march, submitted. 31 march, still in peer review, come on...... , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=142, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Tue Mar 31 13:45:31 CST 2020, time=2020-03-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858640, encodeId=3b96858640bb, content=审稿速度:4.0 经验分享：12月6号投稿，2月18号大修，2.25返回去，3.21接收，从投稿到接收一共3个半月，还算很快的。现在est比较容易送审，但是审稿人都非常严格，实验设计稍有问题就会给毙掉。相反，这个杂志的审稿过程过程真的比est简单多了，基本给了修改返回去就没问题了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Sat Mar 21 18:33:00 CST 2020, time=2020-03-21, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2022-06-11 ms2000002122545844

大佬们有这个期刊的模板要求吗？在官网上找的感觉很是凌乱

58 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=572381, encodeId=59825e2381ff, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 经验分享：刚接收一篇文章。第一稿两个审稿人，两个都给了大修，编辑给了个reject and resubmit，要求按照审稿人的意见返修文章再重投，一个月之后重投。5天后in peer review，一个月后第一个审稿人回复了个well version，建议直接接收。第二个审稿人要求补两个实验后接收。补实验花了15天，R2反稿后15天接收。整体来说，这个杂志偏慢，而且每年文章也不多。这是第三次投稿，前一次投稿拖了我3个月之后被拒。最好不要送到伯明翰老师的手里，这个编辑处理比较慢。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=189, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=46cb1936173, createdName=ximengman, createdTime=Tue Jun 18 00:00:00 CST 2019, time=2019-06-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1006333, encodeId=86c31006333da, content=偏重的研究方向：纳米毒理学 经验分享：7.27 submitted，之后几天是with editor office 8.4 with editor，没有分配给我选的编辑，分配给了另外一个也算相关方向的副编辑，今天还是with editor，希望能有好结果，一定再来更新。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=90, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=31e35508433, createdName=babyroqi680, createdTime=Mon Aug 09 14:44:20 CST 2021, time=2021-08-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1225838, encodeId=e05612258381c, content=大佬们有这个期刊的模板要求吗？在官网上找的感觉很是凌乱, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=30dd8199450, createdName=ms2000002122545844, createdTime=Sat Jun 11 16:08:24 CST 2022, time=2022-06-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1106255, encodeId=8f0f110625501, content=模型图是必须的么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=62, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:53 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1106256, encodeId=e6b111062565c, content=模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=56, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:53 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857063, encodeId=b73e85e06348, content=回复15楼，今天又with editor了，变来变去也不知道干啥。这杂志的文章虽然比不上est，但是怎么也比jhm的好, 并且jhm的审稿超级慢的。中科院分区的升级版还把接受率34%的总环列入一区呢，我是不认这升级版的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=109, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Thu Jan 23 12:49:12 CST 2020, time=2020-01-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859737, encodeId=db11859e3700, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：jan/07/2020 submitted april/11/2020 minor revision april/17/2020 revision submitted april/21/2020 accepted 这个文章投到了est 被拒了，根据reviewer的意见重新进行了dft的计算，然后重投的environmental science nano。还好接受了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0a435414069, createdName=ms9690745155970328, createdTime=Thu Apr 23 00:02:52 CST 2020, time=2020-04-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859102, encodeId=56f785910290, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：接21楼，已经accept，谢谢华南理工zhang lin编辑，一直相信目前es nano的质量高于jhm，所以这个稿子之前被拒，建议转投jhm的时候，果断弃了投es nano，祝越办越好，控制稿件数量，继续小而精 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6a615414060, createdName=ms903640464789830, createdTime=Sun Apr 05 08:28:42 CST 2020, time=2020-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858942, encodeId=65e285894231, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：minor revision. 22 march, submitted. 31 march, still in peer review, come on...... , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=142, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Tue Mar 31 13:45:31 CST 2020, time=2020-03-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858640, encodeId=3b96858640bb, content=审稿速度:4.0 经验分享：12月6号投稿，2月18号大修，2.25返回去，3.21接收，从投稿到接收一共3个半月，还算很快的。现在est比较容易送审，但是审稿人都非常严格，实验设计稍有问题就会给毙掉。相反，这个杂志的审稿过程过程真的比est简单多了，基本给了修改返回去就没问题了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Sat Mar 21 18:33:00 CST 2020, time=2020-03-21, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2021-12-28 msSSSSSD

模型图是必须的么？

62 1

展开1条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=572381, encodeId=59825e2381ff, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 经验分享：刚接收一篇文章。第一稿两个审稿人，两个都给了大修，编辑给了个reject and resubmit，要求按照审稿人的意见返修文章再重投，一个月之后重投。5天后in peer review，一个月后第一个审稿人回复了个well version，建议直接接收。第二个审稿人要求补两个实验后接收。补实验花了15天，R2反稿后15天接收。整体来说，这个杂志偏慢，而且每年文章也不多。这是第三次投稿，前一次投稿拖了我3个月之后被拒。最好不要送到伯明翰老师的手里，这个编辑处理比较慢。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=189, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=46cb1936173, createdName=ximengman, createdTime=Tue Jun 18 00:00:00 CST 2019, time=2019-06-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1006333, encodeId=86c31006333da, content=偏重的研究方向：纳米毒理学 经验分享：7.27 submitted，之后几天是with editor office 8.4 with editor，没有分配给我选的编辑，分配给了另外一个也算相关方向的副编辑，今天还是with editor，希望能有好结果，一定再来更新。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=90, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=31e35508433, createdName=babyroqi680, createdTime=Mon Aug 09 14:44:20 CST 2021, time=2021-08-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1225838, encodeId=e05612258381c, content=大佬们有这个期刊的模板要求吗？在官网上找的感觉很是凌乱, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=30dd8199450, createdName=ms2000002122545844, createdTime=Sat Jun 11 16:08:24 CST 2022, time=2022-06-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1106255, encodeId=8f0f110625501, content=模型图是必须的么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=62, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:53 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1106256, encodeId=e6b111062565c, content=模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=56, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:53 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857063, encodeId=b73e85e06348, content=回复15楼，今天又with editor了，变来变去也不知道干啥。这杂志的文章虽然比不上est，但是怎么也比jhm的好, 并且jhm的审稿超级慢的。中科院分区的升级版还把接受率34%的总环列入一区呢，我是不认这升级版的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=109, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Thu Jan 23 12:49:12 CST 2020, time=2020-01-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859737, encodeId=db11859e3700, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：jan/07/2020 submitted april/11/2020 minor revision april/17/2020 revision submitted april/21/2020 accepted 这个文章投到了est 被拒了，根据reviewer的意见重新进行了dft的计算，然后重投的environmental science nano。还好接受了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0a435414069, createdName=ms9690745155970328, createdTime=Thu Apr 23 00:02:52 CST 2020, time=2020-04-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859102, encodeId=56f785910290, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：接21楼，已经accept，谢谢华南理工zhang lin编辑，一直相信目前es nano的质量高于jhm，所以这个稿子之前被拒，建议转投jhm的时候，果断弃了投es nano，祝越办越好，控制稿件数量，继续小而精 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6a615414060, createdName=ms903640464789830, createdTime=Sun Apr 05 08:28:42 CST 2020, time=2020-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858942, encodeId=65e285894231, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：minor revision. 22 march, submitted. 31 march, still in peer review, come on...... , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=142, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Tue Mar 31 13:45:31 CST 2020, time=2020-03-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858640, encodeId=3b96858640bb, content=审稿速度:4.0 经验分享：12月6号投稿，2月18号大修，2.25返回去，3.21接收，从投稿到接收一共3个半月，还算很快的。现在est比较容易送审，但是审稿人都非常严格，实验设计稍有问题就会给毙掉。相反，这个杂志的审稿过程过程真的比est简单多了，基本给了修改返回去就没问题了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Sat Mar 21 18:33:00 CST 2020, time=2020-03-21, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2021-12-27 ms6000000264964247

模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利？

56 1

展开1条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=572381, encodeId=59825e2381ff, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 经验分享：刚接收一篇文章。第一稿两个审稿人，两个都给了大修，编辑给了个reject and resubmit，要求按照审稿人的意见返修文章再重投，一个月之后重投。5天后in peer review，一个月后第一个审稿人回复了个well version，建议直接接收。第二个审稿人要求补两个实验后接收。补实验花了15天，R2反稿后15天接收。整体来说，这个杂志偏慢，而且每年文章也不多。这是第三次投稿，前一次投稿拖了我3个月之后被拒。最好不要送到伯明翰老师的手里，这个编辑处理比较慢。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=189, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=46cb1936173, createdName=ximengman, createdTime=Tue Jun 18 00:00:00 CST 2019, time=2019-06-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1006333, encodeId=86c31006333da, content=偏重的研究方向：纳米毒理学 经验分享：7.27 submitted，之后几天是with editor office 8.4 with editor，没有分配给我选的编辑，分配给了另外一个也算相关方向的副编辑，今天还是with editor，希望能有好结果，一定再来更新。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=90, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=31e35508433, createdName=babyroqi680, createdTime=Mon Aug 09 14:44:20 CST 2021, time=2021-08-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1225838, encodeId=e05612258381c, content=大佬们有这个期刊的模板要求吗？在官网上找的感觉很是凌乱, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=30dd8199450, createdName=ms2000002122545844, createdTime=Sat Jun 11 16:08:24 CST 2022, time=2022-06-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1106255, encodeId=8f0f110625501, content=模型图是必须的么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=62, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:53 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1106256, encodeId=e6b111062565c, content=模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=56, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:53 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857063, encodeId=b73e85e06348, content=回复15楼，今天又with editor了，变来变去也不知道干啥。这杂志的文章虽然比不上est，但是怎么也比jhm的好, 并且jhm的审稿超级慢的。中科院分区的升级版还把接受率34%的总环列入一区呢，我是不认这升级版的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=109, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Thu Jan 23 12:49:12 CST 2020, time=2020-01-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859737, encodeId=db11859e3700, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：jan/07/2020 submitted april/11/2020 minor revision april/17/2020 revision submitted april/21/2020 accepted 这个文章投到了est 被拒了，根据reviewer的意见重新进行了dft的计算，然后重投的environmental science nano。还好接受了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0a435414069, createdName=ms9690745155970328, createdTime=Thu Apr 23 00:02:52 CST 2020, time=2020-04-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859102, encodeId=56f785910290, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：接21楼，已经accept，谢谢华南理工zhang lin编辑，一直相信目前es nano的质量高于jhm，所以这个稿子之前被拒，建议转投jhm的时候，果断弃了投es nano，祝越办越好，控制稿件数量，继续小而精 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6a615414060, createdName=ms903640464789830, createdTime=Sun Apr 05 08:28:42 CST 2020, time=2020-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858942, encodeId=65e285894231, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：minor revision. 22 march, submitted. 31 march, still in peer review, come on...... , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=142, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Tue Mar 31 13:45:31 CST 2020, time=2020-03-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858640, encodeId=3b96858640bb, content=审稿速度:4.0 经验分享：12月6号投稿，2月18号大修，2.25返回去，3.21接收，从投稿到接收一共3个半月，还算很快的。现在est比较容易送审，但是审稿人都非常严格，实验设计稍有问题就会给毙掉。相反，这个杂志的审稿过程过程真的比est简单多了，基本给了修改返回去就没问题了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Sat Mar 21 18:33:00 CST 2020, time=2020-03-21, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2020-01-23 ms5619336576777824

回复15楼，今天又with editor了，变来变去也不知道干啥。这杂志的文章虽然比不上est，但是怎么也比jhm的好, 并且jhm的审稿超级慢的。中科院分区的升级版还把接受率34%的总环列入一区呢，我是不认这升级版的。

109 1

展开1条回复

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=572381, encodeId=59825e2381ff, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 经验分享：刚接收一篇文章。第一稿两个审稿人，两个都给了大修，编辑给了个reject and resubmit，要求按照审稿人的意见返修文章再重投，一个月之后重投。5天后in peer review，一个月后第一个审稿人回复了个well version，建议直接接收。第二个审稿人要求补两个实验后接收。补实验花了15天，R2反稿后15天接收。整体来说，这个杂志偏慢，而且每年文章也不多。这是第三次投稿，前一次投稿拖了我3个月之后被拒。最好不要送到伯明翰老师的手里，这个编辑处理比较慢。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=189, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=46cb1936173, createdName=ximengman, createdTime=Tue Jun 18 00:00:00 CST 2019, time=2019-06-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1006333, encodeId=86c31006333da, content=偏重的研究方向：纳米毒理学 经验分享：7.27 submitted，之后几天是with editor office 8.4 with editor，没有分配给我选的编辑，分配给了另外一个也算相关方向的副编辑，今天还是with editor，希望能有好结果，一定再来更新。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=90, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=31e35508433, createdName=babyroqi680, createdTime=Mon Aug 09 14:44:20 CST 2021, time=2021-08-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1225838, encodeId=e05612258381c, content=大佬们有这个期刊的模板要求吗？在官网上找的感觉很是凌乱, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=30dd8199450, createdName=ms2000002122545844, createdTime=Sat Jun 11 16:08:24 CST 2022, time=2022-06-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1106255, encodeId=8f0f110625501, content=模型图是必须的么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=62, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:53 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1106256, encodeId=e6b111062565c, content=模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=56, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:53 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857063, encodeId=b73e85e06348, content=回复15楼，今天又with editor了，变来变去也不知道干啥。这杂志的文章虽然比不上est，但是怎么也比jhm的好, 并且jhm的审稿超级慢的。中科院分区的升级版还把接受率34%的总环列入一区呢，我是不认这升级版的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=109, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Thu Jan 23 12:49:12 CST 2020, time=2020-01-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859737, encodeId=db11859e3700, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：jan/07/2020 submitted april/11/2020 minor revision april/17/2020 revision submitted april/21/2020 accepted 这个文章投到了est 被拒了，根据reviewer的意见重新进行了dft的计算，然后重投的environmental science nano。还好接受了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0a435414069, createdName=ms9690745155970328, createdTime=Thu Apr 23 00:02:52 CST 2020, time=2020-04-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859102, encodeId=56f785910290, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：接21楼，已经accept，谢谢华南理工zhang lin编辑，一直相信目前es nano的质量高于jhm，所以这个稿子之前被拒，建议转投jhm的时候，果断弃了投es nano，祝越办越好，控制稿件数量，继续小而精 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6a615414060, createdName=ms903640464789830, createdTime=Sun Apr 05 08:28:42 CST 2020, time=2020-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858942, encodeId=65e285894231, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：minor revision. 22 march, submitted. 31 march, still in peer review, come on...... , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=142, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Tue Mar 31 13:45:31 CST 2020, time=2020-03-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858640, encodeId=3b96858640bb, content=审稿速度:4.0 经验分享：12月6号投稿，2月18号大修，2.25返回去，3.21接收，从投稿到接收一共3个半月，还算很快的。现在est比较容易送审，但是审稿人都非常严格，实验设计稍有问题就会给毙掉。相反，这个杂志的审稿过程过程真的比est简单多了，基本给了修改返回去就没问题了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Sat Mar 21 18:33:00 CST 2020, time=2020-03-21, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2020-04-23 ms9690745155970328

审稿速度:3.0
经验分享：jan/07/2020 submitted
april/11/2020 minor revision
april/17/2020 revision submitted
april/21/2020 accepted
这个文章投到了est 被拒了，根据reviewer的意见重新进行了dft的计算，然后重投的environmental science nano。还好接受了。

115 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=572381, encodeId=59825e2381ff, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 经验分享：刚接收一篇文章。第一稿两个审稿人，两个都给了大修，编辑给了个reject and resubmit，要求按照审稿人的意见返修文章再重投，一个月之后重投。5天后in peer review，一个月后第一个审稿人回复了个well version，建议直接接收。第二个审稿人要求补两个实验后接收。补实验花了15天，R2反稿后15天接收。整体来说，这个杂志偏慢，而且每年文章也不多。这是第三次投稿，前一次投稿拖了我3个月之后被拒。最好不要送到伯明翰老师的手里，这个编辑处理比较慢。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=189, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=46cb1936173, createdName=ximengman, createdTime=Tue Jun 18 00:00:00 CST 2019, time=2019-06-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1006333, encodeId=86c31006333da, content=偏重的研究方向：纳米毒理学 经验分享：7.27 submitted，之后几天是with editor office 8.4 with editor，没有分配给我选的编辑，分配给了另外一个也算相关方向的副编辑，今天还是with editor，希望能有好结果，一定再来更新。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=90, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=31e35508433, createdName=babyroqi680, createdTime=Mon Aug 09 14:44:20 CST 2021, time=2021-08-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1225838, encodeId=e05612258381c, content=大佬们有这个期刊的模板要求吗？在官网上找的感觉很是凌乱, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=30dd8199450, createdName=ms2000002122545844, createdTime=Sat Jun 11 16:08:24 CST 2022, time=2022-06-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1106255, encodeId=8f0f110625501, content=模型图是必须的么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=62, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:53 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1106256, encodeId=e6b111062565c, content=模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=56, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:53 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857063, encodeId=b73e85e06348, content=回复15楼，今天又with editor了，变来变去也不知道干啥。这杂志的文章虽然比不上est，但是怎么也比jhm的好, 并且jhm的审稿超级慢的。中科院分区的升级版还把接受率34%的总环列入一区呢，我是不认这升级版的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=109, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Thu Jan 23 12:49:12 CST 2020, time=2020-01-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859737, encodeId=db11859e3700, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：jan/07/2020 submitted april/11/2020 minor revision april/17/2020 revision submitted april/21/2020 accepted 这个文章投到了est 被拒了，根据reviewer的意见重新进行了dft的计算，然后重投的environmental science nano。还好接受了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0a435414069, createdName=ms9690745155970328, createdTime=Thu Apr 23 00:02:52 CST 2020, time=2020-04-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859102, encodeId=56f785910290, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：接21楼，已经accept，谢谢华南理工zhang lin编辑，一直相信目前es nano的质量高于jhm，所以这个稿子之前被拒，建议转投jhm的时候，果断弃了投es nano，祝越办越好，控制稿件数量，继续小而精 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6a615414060, createdName=ms903640464789830, createdTime=Sun Apr 05 08:28:42 CST 2020, time=2020-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858942, encodeId=65e285894231, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：minor revision. 22 march, submitted. 31 march, still in peer review, come on...... , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=142, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Tue Mar 31 13:45:31 CST 2020, time=2020-03-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858640, encodeId=3b96858640bb, content=审稿速度:4.0 经验分享：12月6号投稿，2月18号大修，2.25返回去，3.21接收，从投稿到接收一共3个半月，还算很快的。现在est比较容易送审，但是审稿人都非常严格，实验设计稍有问题就会给毙掉。相反，这个杂志的审稿过程过程真的比est简单多了，基本给了修改返回去就没问题了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Sat Mar 21 18:33:00 CST 2020, time=2020-03-21, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2020-04-05 ms903640464789830

审稿速度:1.0
经验分享：接21楼，已经accept，谢谢华南理工zhang lin编辑，一直相信目前es nano的质量高于jhm，所以这个稿子之前被拒，建议转投jhm的时候，果断弃了投es nano，祝越办越好，控制稿件数量，继续小而精

117 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=572381, encodeId=59825e2381ff, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 经验分享：刚接收一篇文章。第一稿两个审稿人，两个都给了大修，编辑给了个reject and resubmit，要求按照审稿人的意见返修文章再重投，一个月之后重投。5天后in peer review，一个月后第一个审稿人回复了个well version，建议直接接收。第二个审稿人要求补两个实验后接收。补实验花了15天，R2反稿后15天接收。整体来说，这个杂志偏慢，而且每年文章也不多。这是第三次投稿，前一次投稿拖了我3个月之后被拒。最好不要送到伯明翰老师的手里，这个编辑处理比较慢。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=189, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=46cb1936173, createdName=ximengman, createdTime=Tue Jun 18 00:00:00 CST 2019, time=2019-06-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1006333, encodeId=86c31006333da, content=偏重的研究方向：纳米毒理学 经验分享：7.27 submitted，之后几天是with editor office 8.4 with editor，没有分配给我选的编辑，分配给了另外一个也算相关方向的副编辑，今天还是with editor，希望能有好结果，一定再来更新。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=90, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=31e35508433, createdName=babyroqi680, createdTime=Mon Aug 09 14:44:20 CST 2021, time=2021-08-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1225838, encodeId=e05612258381c, content=大佬们有这个期刊的模板要求吗？在官网上找的感觉很是凌乱, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=30dd8199450, createdName=ms2000002122545844, createdTime=Sat Jun 11 16:08:24 CST 2022, time=2022-06-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1106255, encodeId=8f0f110625501, content=模型图是必须的么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=62, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:53 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1106256, encodeId=e6b111062565c, content=模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=56, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:53 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857063, encodeId=b73e85e06348, content=回复15楼，今天又with editor了，变来变去也不知道干啥。这杂志的文章虽然比不上est，但是怎么也比jhm的好, 并且jhm的审稿超级慢的。中科院分区的升级版还把接受率34%的总环列入一区呢，我是不认这升级版的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=109, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Thu Jan 23 12:49:12 CST 2020, time=2020-01-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859737, encodeId=db11859e3700, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：jan/07/2020 submitted april/11/2020 minor revision april/17/2020 revision submitted april/21/2020 accepted 这个文章投到了est 被拒了，根据reviewer的意见重新进行了dft的计算，然后重投的environmental science nano。还好接受了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0a435414069, createdName=ms9690745155970328, createdTime=Thu Apr 23 00:02:52 CST 2020, time=2020-04-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859102, encodeId=56f785910290, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：接21楼，已经accept，谢谢华南理工zhang lin编辑，一直相信目前es nano的质量高于jhm，所以这个稿子之前被拒，建议转投jhm的时候，果断弃了投es nano，祝越办越好，控制稿件数量，继续小而精 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6a615414060, createdName=ms903640464789830, createdTime=Sun Apr 05 08:28:42 CST 2020, time=2020-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858942, encodeId=65e285894231, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：minor revision. 22 march, submitted. 31 march, still in peer review, come on...... , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=142, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Tue Mar 31 13:45:31 CST 2020, time=2020-03-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858640, encodeId=3b96858640bb, content=审稿速度:4.0 经验分享：12月6号投稿，2月18号大修，2.25返回去，3.21接收，从投稿到接收一共3个半月，还算很快的。现在est比较容易送审，但是审稿人都非常严格，实验设计稍有问题就会给毙掉。相反，这个杂志的审稿过程过程真的比est简单多了，基本给了修改返回去就没问题了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Sat Mar 21 18:33:00 CST 2020, time=2020-03-21, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2020-03-31 ms6459520362745523

审稿速度:1.0
经验分享：minor revision. 22 march, submitted. 31 march, still in peer review, come on......

142 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=572381, encodeId=59825e2381ff, content=审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0 经验分享：刚接收一篇文章。第一稿两个审稿人，两个都给了大修，编辑给了个reject and resubmit，要求按照审稿人的意见返修文章再重投，一个月之后重投。5天后in peer review，一个月后第一个审稿人回复了个well version，建议直接接收。第二个审稿人要求补两个实验后接收。补实验花了15天，R2反稿后15天接收。整体来说，这个杂志偏慢，而且每年文章也不多。这是第三次投稿，前一次投稿拖了我3个月之后被拒。最好不要送到伯明翰老师的手里，这个编辑处理比较慢。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=189, replyNumber=2, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=46cb1936173, createdName=ximengman, createdTime=Tue Jun 18 00:00:00 CST 2019, time=2019-06-18, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1006333, encodeId=86c31006333da, content=偏重的研究方向：纳米毒理学 经验分享：7.27 submitted，之后几天是with editor office 8.4 with editor，没有分配给我选的编辑，分配给了另外一个也算相关方向的副编辑，今天还是with editor，希望能有好结果，一定再来更新。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=90, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=31e35508433, createdName=babyroqi680, createdTime=Mon Aug 09 14:44:20 CST 2021, time=2021-08-09, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1225838, encodeId=e05612258381c, content=大佬们有这个期刊的模板要求吗？在官网上找的感觉很是凌乱, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=58, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=30dd8199450, createdName=ms2000002122545844, createdTime=Sat Jun 11 16:08:24 CST 2022, time=2022-06-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1106255, encodeId=8f0f110625501, content=模型图是必须的么？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=62, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=https://img.medsci.cn/20210511/ddebdec707734c8390a07bd0c1048717/cc11caf5d607430e9f4ca556fed68ab1.jpg, createdBy=2c4d5497888, createdName=msSSSSSD, createdTime=Tue Dec 28 14:52:53 CST 2021, time=2021-12-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1106256, encodeId=e6b111062565c, content=模型图对审稿人对稿件的态度是有利还是不利？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=56, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=1ff65466529, createdName=ms6000000264964247, createdTime=Mon Dec 27 14:52:53 CST 2021, time=2021-12-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857063, encodeId=b73e85e06348, content=回复15楼，今天又with editor了，变来变去也不知道干啥。这杂志的文章虽然比不上est，但是怎么也比jhm的好, 并且jhm的审稿超级慢的。中科院分区的升级版还把接受率34%的总环列入一区呢，我是不认这升级版的。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=109, replyNumber=1, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8bf35413988, createdName=ms5619336576777824, createdTime=Thu Jan 23 12:49:12 CST 2020, time=2020-01-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859737, encodeId=db11859e3700, content=审稿速度:3.0 经验分享：jan/07/2020 submitted april/11/2020 minor revision april/17/2020 revision submitted april/21/2020 accepted 这个文章投到了est 被拒了，根据reviewer的意见重新进行了dft的计算，然后重投的environmental science nano。还好接受了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=115, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0a435414069, createdName=ms9690745155970328, createdTime=Thu Apr 23 00:02:52 CST 2020, time=2020-04-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=859102, encodeId=56f785910290, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：接21楼，已经accept，谢谢华南理工zhang lin编辑，一直相信目前es nano的质量高于jhm，所以这个稿子之前被拒，建议转投jhm的时候，果断弃了投es nano，祝越办越好，控制稿件数量，继续小而精 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=117, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6a615414060, createdName=ms903640464789830, createdTime=Sun Apr 05 08:28:42 CST 2020, time=2020-04-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858942, encodeId=65e285894231, content=审稿速度:1.0 经验分享：minor revision. 22 march, submitted. 31 march, still in peer review, come on...... , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=142, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=ed005413970, createdName=ms6459520362745523, createdTime=Tue Mar 31 13:45:31 CST 2020, time=2020-03-31, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=858640, encodeId=3b96858640bb, content=审稿速度:4.0 经验分享：12月6号投稿，2月18号大修，2.25返回去，3.21接收，从投稿到接收一共3个半月，还算很快的。现在est比较容易送审，但是审稿人都非常严格，实验设计稍有问题就会给毙掉。相反，这个杂志的审稿过程过程真的比est简单多了，基本给了修改返回去就没问题了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=118, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=608b5414057, createdName=ms7657656453231030, createdTime=Sat Mar 21 18:33:00 CST 2020, time=2020-03-21, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2020-03-21 ms7657656453231030

审稿速度:4.0
经验分享：12月6号投稿，2月18号大修，2.25返回去，3.21接收，从投稿到接收一共3个半月，还算很快的。现在est比较容易送审，但是审稿人都非常严格，实验设计稍有问题就会给毙掉。相反，这个杂志的审稿过程过程真的比est简单多了，基本给了修改返回去就没问题了。

118 0

内科

外科

专科科室

热点

按科室浏览

临床工具

科研工具

其他工具

科研数智化

真实世界研究解决方案

数字化学术传播解决方案

其它

期刊讨论

科室

工具

服务