应基于CT灌注结果选择机械性血栓切除预后好

2012-08-21 不详 网络

    于7月末召开的神经介入外科学会年会上公布的一项单中心研究显示,基于CT灌注结果选择进行机械性血栓切除术的卒中患者,即使在传统7~8 h治疗窗后治疗,仍能获得良好功能预后,并且安全性较好。    在这项研究中,南卡罗莱纳医科大学的Jordan Magarik及其同事对该校卒中中心2008~2011年收治的140例卒中患者的病历进行了

    于7月末召开的神经介入外科学会年会上公布的一项单中心研究显示,基于CT灌注结果选择进行机械性血栓切除术的卒中患者,即使在传统7~8 h治疗窗后治疗,仍能获得良好功能预后,并且安全性较好。
    在这项研究中,南卡罗莱纳医科大学的Jordan Magarik及其同事对该校卒中中心2008~2011年收治的140例卒中患者的病历进行了分析。患者的平均年龄为67岁。相关分析数据包括年龄、合用静脉组织纤溶酶原激活剂(TPA)、至治疗的时间、就诊时的国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分、90天改良Rankin评分(mRS)和血管造影再通率。所用的主要动脉内器械为Penumbra System。
    所有140例患者均进行机械性血栓切除术;54例在机械性血栓切除术基础上还接受静脉TPA,86例仅接受机械性血栓切除术。平均NIHSS评分为16.2分,至治疗的时间平均为11.3 h,明显超过机械器械研究中所用的传统的7~8 h时间窗。
    大部分(87%)患者达到部分或完全再通,10%的患者出现颅内出血症状,与既往研究结果一致。38%患者的90天mRS为0~2分,53%为0~3分。死亡率为25%,与既往研究结果一致。
    根据出现症状至治疗的平均时间对患者进行分组后分析发现,7 h时间窗内治疗组mRS 0~2分的患者比例与7 h时间窗后治疗组相应患者比例无显着差异(31% vs. 42%),两组mRS 0~3分的患者比例也无显着差异(49% vs. 55%)。研究者表示,后一组许多患者在出现症状后15 h或18 h才就诊,但获得良好功能预后的患者比例与前组非常相似,这是基于CT灌注结果选择患者的结果。

    By: DOUG BRUNK, Cardiology News Digital Network
    SAN DIEGO – An approach that uses CT perfusion findings to select patients for mechanical thrombectomy resulted in effective, safe treatment of stroke patients beyond the traditional 7- to 8-hour treatment window, results from a single-center study demonstrated.
    "CT perfusion–based patient selection for endovascular therapy enables us to treat patients who would otherwise have not received such therapy based on time criteria," Jordan Magarik said at the annual meeting of the Society of Neurointerventional Surgery. "We have seen improved outcomes over historical controls and improved safety as well. The bottom line is that patient selection is paramount. When patients are selected based solely on CT perfusion imaging, we are finding very similar rates of good functional outcome regardless of when they were treated, whether it’s 8 or 18 hours after symptom onset."
    When the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) in Charleston launched its Comprehensive Stroke Center in 2008, clinicians there devised an alternate method of selecting patients solely based on the CT perfusion findings, regardless of their time from symptom onset. For the current study, Mr. Magarik, who is a medical student at MUSC, and his associates reviewed the records of 140 stroke patients who were treated at the stroke center from 2008 to 2011. The mean age of the patients was 67 years. Data of interest included age, concurrent administration of IV tissue plasminogen activator (TPA), time to treatment, presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, 90-day modified Rankin score (mRS), and angiographic recanalization rates. The primary intra-arterial device used was the Penumbra System.
    All 140 patients underwent mechanical thrombectomy; 54 received IV TPA in addition to mechanical thrombectomy and 86 only underwent mechanical thrombectomy. The mean NIHSS score was 16.2, and the mean time to treatment was 11.3 hours, which is well beyond the traditional 7- to 8-hour time window used in mechanical device trials, said Mr. Magarik.
    The majority of patients (87%) achieved a partial or full recanalization and 10% of patients suffered symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, which is consistent with previous trials.
    More than one-third of patients (38%) achieved a 90-day mRS of 0-2, and 53% achieved a 90-day mRS of 0-3. The mortality rate was 25%, which is consistent with previous trials.
    When the researchers divided patients on the basis of mean time from symptom onset to treatment, they observed no statistically significant differences in the rates of patients with mRS of 0-2 (31% among those treated within a 7-hour window vs. 42% among those treated beyond a 7-hour window) or mRS of 0-3 (49% among those treated within a 7-hour window vs. 55% among those treated beyond a 7-hour window)。
    "Many patients in the later time group are presenting 15 or 18 hours out from symptom onset, yet they are still achieving a very similar rate of good functional outcome," Mr. Magarik said. "We believe this is because they were selected based on their CT perfusion findings."
    Mr. Magarik said that he had no relevant financial disclosures to make.

版权声明:
本网站所有内容来源注明为“梅斯医学”或“MedSci原创”的文字、图片和音视频资料,版权均属于梅斯医学所有。非经授权,任何媒体、网站或个人不得转载,授权转载时须注明来源为“梅斯医学”。其它来源的文章系转载文章,或“梅斯号”自媒体发布的文章,仅系出于传递更多信息之目的,本站仅负责审核内容合规,其内容不代表本站立场,本站不负责内容的准确性和版权。如果存在侵权、或不希望被转载的媒体或个人可与我们联系,我们将立即进行删除处理。
在此留言
评论区 (1)
#插入话题
  1. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=1314238, encodeId=a02e1314238eb, content=<a href='/topic/show?id=585189089f4' target=_blank style='color:#2F92EE;'>#血栓切除#</a>, beContent=null, objectType=article, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=35, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[TopicDto(id=89089, encryptionId=585189089f4, topicName=血栓切除)], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=284b425, createdName=zll0625, createdTime=Thu Aug 23 04:50:00 CST 2012, time=2012-08-23, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

相关资讯

SNIS2012年会:治疗前ASPECTS评分影响卒中预后

圣迭戈——在神经介入外科学会(SNIS)2012年会上公布的START研究的期中分析显示,血管内治疗前计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)图像的Alberta卒中项目早期CT评分(ASPECTS)越高,治疗后的预后越好。 在这项仍在进行中的前瞻性、单组、多中心研究中,丹佛放射影像学会/瑞典医学中心的Donald Frei博士及其来自15个中心的同事在147例采用Penumbra系统进行血管内卒

专家视点:疼痛量表的选择

圣迭戈——梅奥医院神经介入外科的Jeffrey A. Stone博士在美国神经介入外科学会(SNIS)年会上称,在用于评估急性疼痛的众多量表中,最常用的3个是数字评估量表(NRS)、主诉评估量表(VRS)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)。Stone博士介绍说,上述量表的可靠性均已得到验证。由于NRS和VRS使用方便,所以得到多数患者的偏爱。此外,患者还可通过电话或电子日记完成这2个量表的评估。Jeffre

SNIS:大血管卒中患者接受血管内治疗效果更佳

圣迭戈——在神经介入外科学会(SNIS)2012年会上,来自西弗吉尼亚大学的神经介入放射医生Ansaar T. Rai博士报告称,一项单中心试验表明,对于继发于前循环大血管闭塞的急性缺血性卒中患者,接受血管内治疗90天后获得良好结局的几率比接受静脉内(IV)重组组织型纤维蛋白酶原激活剂(rt-PA)治疗高近4倍。 Rai博士说:“将近一半的急性缺血性卒中病例都是因大血管闭塞所致,如果不治疗