PEDIATRICS-期刊论坛，投稿经验-MedSci.cn

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=514990, encodeId=7b1551499022, content=投出去1个半月一审结果就回来了，虽然审稿人提出的问题都可以解决，可是编辑还是拒了，理由是他们收的文章太多了，所以必须有所取舍，果然是很难中的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=337, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=34591647475, createdName=guoguoxiaopan, createdTime=Tue Sep 01 17:12:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501986, encodeId=34ea50198655, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：就这一句话，把评审给我positive的意见全给废了！Reviewer input is one of several factors involved in making decisions on papers.Because of space limitations, even papers receiving positive comments from the reviewers are often rejected., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=377, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=ca4f35931, createdName=upwilly, createdTime=Tue Mar 25 11:15:00 CST 2014, time=2014-03-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501932, encodeId=f999501932ae, content=我的第一篇SCI就是投的这个杂志。这个杂志用的投稿系统是Scholar One。对于这个杂志，与其他杂志的稿件状态不太一样，现实比较粗燥：一投完稿，状态就显示为Under Review，其后一直无任何变化。我这篇稿子审了将近2个月，收到的消息是reject。哎，不愧是儿科学领域的Number one啊，很难中的~~~不过审稿人挺负责的，给了满满两页的审稿意见~~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=440, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sat Mar 22 13:37:00 CST 2014, time=2014-03-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=500659, encodeId=275f500659d2, content=投稿命中率:5.0 经验分享：稿件接受率低于10%，很难中，被拒了。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=426, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=d87c51136, createdName=lybstr, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 10:40:00 CST 2014, time=2014-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=481653, encodeId=551a48165308, content=偏重的研究方向：儿科;, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=448, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=PEDIA—doctor, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 16:55:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2015-09-01 guoguoxiaopan

投出去1个半月一审结果就回来了，虽然审稿人提出的问题都可以解决，可是编辑还是拒了，理由是他们收的文章太多了，所以必须有所取舍，果然是很难中的。

337 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=514990, encodeId=7b1551499022, content=投出去1个半月一审结果就回来了，虽然审稿人提出的问题都可以解决，可是编辑还是拒了，理由是他们收的文章太多了，所以必须有所取舍，果然是很难中的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=337, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=34591647475, createdName=guoguoxiaopan, createdTime=Tue Sep 01 17:12:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501986, encodeId=34ea50198655, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：就这一句话，把评审给我positive的意见全给废了！Reviewer input is one of several factors involved in making decisions on papers.Because of space limitations, even papers receiving positive comments from the reviewers are often rejected., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=377, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=ca4f35931, createdName=upwilly, createdTime=Tue Mar 25 11:15:00 CST 2014, time=2014-03-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501932, encodeId=f999501932ae, content=我的第一篇SCI就是投的这个杂志。这个杂志用的投稿系统是Scholar One。对于这个杂志，与其他杂志的稿件状态不太一样，现实比较粗燥：一投完稿，状态就显示为Under Review，其后一直无任何变化。我这篇稿子审了将近2个月，收到的消息是reject。哎，不愧是儿科学领域的Number one啊，很难中的~~~不过审稿人挺负责的，给了满满两页的审稿意见~~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=440, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sat Mar 22 13:37:00 CST 2014, time=2014-03-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=500659, encodeId=275f500659d2, content=投稿命中率:5.0 经验分享：稿件接受率低于10%，很难中，被拒了。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=426, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=d87c51136, createdName=lybstr, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 10:40:00 CST 2014, time=2014-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=481653, encodeId=551a48165308, content=偏重的研究方向：儿科;, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=448, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=PEDIA—doctor, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 16:55:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2014-03-25 upwilly

审稿速度:2.0
经验分享：就这一句话，把评审给我positive的意见全给废了！Reviewer input is one of several factors involved in making decisions on papers.Because of space limitations, even papers receiving positive comments from the reviewers are often rejected.

377 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=514990, encodeId=7b1551499022, content=投出去1个半月一审结果就回来了，虽然审稿人提出的问题都可以解决，可是编辑还是拒了，理由是他们收的文章太多了，所以必须有所取舍，果然是很难中的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=337, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=34591647475, createdName=guoguoxiaopan, createdTime=Tue Sep 01 17:12:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501986, encodeId=34ea50198655, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：就这一句话，把评审给我positive的意见全给废了！Reviewer input is one of several factors involved in making decisions on papers.Because of space limitations, even papers receiving positive comments from the reviewers are often rejected., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=377, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=ca4f35931, createdName=upwilly, createdTime=Tue Mar 25 11:15:00 CST 2014, time=2014-03-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501932, encodeId=f999501932ae, content=我的第一篇SCI就是投的这个杂志。这个杂志用的投稿系统是Scholar One。对于这个杂志，与其他杂志的稿件状态不太一样，现实比较粗燥：一投完稿，状态就显示为Under Review，其后一直无任何变化。我这篇稿子审了将近2个月，收到的消息是reject。哎，不愧是儿科学领域的Number one啊，很难中的~~~不过审稿人挺负责的，给了满满两页的审稿意见~~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=440, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sat Mar 22 13:37:00 CST 2014, time=2014-03-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=500659, encodeId=275f500659d2, content=投稿命中率:5.0 经验分享：稿件接受率低于10%，很难中，被拒了。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=426, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=d87c51136, createdName=lybstr, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 10:40:00 CST 2014, time=2014-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=481653, encodeId=551a48165308, content=偏重的研究方向：儿科;, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=448, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=PEDIA—doctor, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 16:55:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2014-03-22 匿名用户

我的第一篇SCI就是投的这个杂志。这个杂志用的投稿系统是Scholar One。对于这个杂志，与其他杂志的稿件状态不太一样，现实比较粗燥：一投完稿，状态就显示为Under Review，其后一直无任何变化。我这篇稿子审了将近2个月，收到的消息是reject。哎，不愧是儿科学领域的Number one啊，很难中的~~~不过审稿人挺负责的，给了满满两页的审稿意见~~

440 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=514990, encodeId=7b1551499022, content=投出去1个半月一审结果就回来了，虽然审稿人提出的问题都可以解决，可是编辑还是拒了，理由是他们收的文章太多了，所以必须有所取舍，果然是很难中的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=337, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=34591647475, createdName=guoguoxiaopan, createdTime=Tue Sep 01 17:12:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501986, encodeId=34ea50198655, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：就这一句话，把评审给我positive的意见全给废了！Reviewer input is one of several factors involved in making decisions on papers.Because of space limitations, even papers receiving positive comments from the reviewers are often rejected., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=377, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=ca4f35931, createdName=upwilly, createdTime=Tue Mar 25 11:15:00 CST 2014, time=2014-03-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501932, encodeId=f999501932ae, content=我的第一篇SCI就是投的这个杂志。这个杂志用的投稿系统是Scholar One。对于这个杂志，与其他杂志的稿件状态不太一样，现实比较粗燥：一投完稿，状态就显示为Under Review，其后一直无任何变化。我这篇稿子审了将近2个月，收到的消息是reject。哎，不愧是儿科学领域的Number one啊，很难中的~~~不过审稿人挺负责的，给了满满两页的审稿意见~~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=440, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sat Mar 22 13:37:00 CST 2014, time=2014-03-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=500659, encodeId=275f500659d2, content=投稿命中率:5.0 经验分享：稿件接受率低于10%，很难中，被拒了。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=426, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=d87c51136, createdName=lybstr, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 10:40:00 CST 2014, time=2014-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=481653, encodeId=551a48165308, content=偏重的研究方向：儿科;, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=448, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=PEDIA—doctor, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 16:55:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2014-01-15 lybstr

投稿命中率:5.0
经验分享：稿件接受率低于10%，很难中，被拒了。

426 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=514990, encodeId=7b1551499022, content=投出去1个半月一审结果就回来了，虽然审稿人提出的问题都可以解决，可是编辑还是拒了，理由是他们收的文章太多了，所以必须有所取舍，果然是很难中的。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=337, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=34591647475, createdName=guoguoxiaopan, createdTime=Tue Sep 01 17:12:00 CST 2015, time=2015-09-01, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501986, encodeId=34ea50198655, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：就这一句话，把评审给我positive的意见全给废了！Reviewer input is one of several factors involved in making decisions on papers.Because of space limitations, even papers receiving positive comments from the reviewers are often rejected., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=377, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=ca4f35931, createdName=upwilly, createdTime=Tue Mar 25 11:15:00 CST 2014, time=2014-03-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=501932, encodeId=f999501932ae, content=我的第一篇SCI就是投的这个杂志。这个杂志用的投稿系统是Scholar One。对于这个杂志，与其他杂志的稿件状态不太一样，现实比较粗燥：一投完稿，状态就显示为Under Review，其后一直无任何变化。我这篇稿子审了将近2个月，收到的消息是reject。哎，不愧是儿科学领域的Number one啊，很难中的~~~不过审稿人挺负责的，给了满满两页的审稿意见~~, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=440, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sat Mar 22 13:37:00 CST 2014, time=2014-03-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=500659, encodeId=275f500659d2, content=投稿命中率:5.0 经验分享：稿件接受率低于10%，很难中，被拒了。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=426, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=d87c51136, createdName=lybstr, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 10:40:00 CST 2014, time=2014-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=481653, encodeId=551a48165308, content=偏重的研究方向：儿科;, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=448, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=PEDIA—doctor, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 16:55:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2011-06-29 PEDIA—doctor

偏重的研究方向：儿科;

448 0

内科

外科

专科科室

热点

按科室浏览

临床工具

科研工具

其他工具

科研数智化

真实世界研究解决方案

数字化学术传播解决方案

其它

期刊讨论

科室

工具

服务