J ELECTRON IMAGING 润色咨询

JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC IMAGING

出版年份：1992 年文章数：2657 投稿命中率： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看

出版周期：Quarterly 自引率：22.6% 审稿周期： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看

前往期刊查询
期刊讨论 | 中国SCI论文 | 期刊主页 | 投稿经验 | 杂志官网 | 投稿链接 | 作者需知 | PMC链接 | Pubmed全文检索

期刊讨论

  1. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=828683, encodeId=4084828683fb, content=审稿比较快，不到3个月出结果。跟楼下的感觉相似，审稿人不负责，2个审稿人，一个当天回复“”文章质量差，评估方法不能充分说明算法的优点“，我真的想问问这个审稿人你到底看不看目标跟踪的论文，我已经用最新的评估方法了，还给出了两个；另一个审稿人也是奇葩，显示对我的论文思路进行了肯定，然后举出一个cvpr的会议说人家做的比我更好，我看了一遍那个文章，除了基础模型跟我的相似，其他的他用的人工智能算法，而我的思路是用数学的方法加速迭代计算，两者根本没有可比性。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=24, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=43375414153, createdName=ms4270311197517729, createdTime=Tue Oct 15 12:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-10-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827043, encodeId=8eb082e0436e, content=审稿的速度较快！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=23, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=66f85414103, createdName=ms8762254248151793, createdTime=Thu Jul 25 11:05:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827029, encodeId=c77182e02957, content=投了一篇，大修，然后就是三次小修。ae比较较真，提各种问题和需要改进的地方，不过说得都很在理，也可以逼自己不断去思考，感谢！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=26, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=01255414130, createdName=ms3179514010604018, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 14:55:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=820164, encodeId=483b820164c0, content=2012年1月初投的稿件。4月9号份给的修改意见，要求大修；5月9号投出修改稿件，7月27号返回第二次审稿意见，要求小修发表；8月21号最终接收。 整个过程花费近8个月的时间！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c09a5414026, createdName=ms4662714744603927, createdTime=Fri Jun 22 16:53:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=817706, encodeId=fe9781e70677, content=一个相对来说，比较低档次的scie期刊<br> 每期差不多10多篇文章，一年出4期<br> 两个reviewer，之前也当过他们的reviewer，编辑要求差不多是1个月给意见<br> 所以相对来说，这个期刊还是比较快的 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=54f75414053, createdName=ms4829174089086404, createdTime=Thu Jan 12 00:17:00 CST 2012, time=2012-01-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=817299, encodeId=3a2e81e299db, content=我2010年10月投稿，12月返修，3月初接收，4月见刊。<br> 但是我师弟2011年4月投稿，至今已经7个多月，还在评审中。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=32, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2bf45414128, createdName=ms1706975392724364, createdTime=Thu Dec 08 17:51:00 CST 2011, time=2011-12-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=816890, encodeId=6a8181689065, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享：低级别的期刊，入门用 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a4765414076, createdName=ms1875852553058278, createdTime=Thu Nov 10 15:45:00 CST 2011, time=2011-11-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814898, encodeId=d110814898b7, content=2010 if:0.506 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 08:43:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2013-10-15 ms4270311197517729

    审稿比较快，不到3个月出结果。跟楼下的感觉相似，审稿人不负责，2个审稿人，一个当天回复“”文章质量差，评估方法不能充分说明算法的优点“，我真的想问问这个审稿人你到底看不看目标跟踪的论文，我已经用最新的评估方法了，还给出了两个；另一个审稿人也是奇葩，显示对我的论文思路进行了肯定，然后举出一个cvpr的会议说人家做的比我更好，我看了一遍那个文章，除了基础模型跟我的相似，其他的他用的人工智能算法，而我的思路是用数学的方法加速迭代计算，两者根本没有可比性。

    0

  2. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=828683, encodeId=4084828683fb, content=审稿比较快，不到3个月出结果。跟楼下的感觉相似，审稿人不负责，2个审稿人，一个当天回复“”文章质量差，评估方法不能充分说明算法的优点“，我真的想问问这个审稿人你到底看不看目标跟踪的论文，我已经用最新的评估方法了，还给出了两个；另一个审稿人也是奇葩，显示对我的论文思路进行了肯定，然后举出一个cvpr的会议说人家做的比我更好，我看了一遍那个文章，除了基础模型跟我的相似，其他的他用的人工智能算法，而我的思路是用数学的方法加速迭代计算，两者根本没有可比性。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=24, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=43375414153, createdName=ms4270311197517729, createdTime=Tue Oct 15 12:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-10-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827043, encodeId=8eb082e0436e, content=审稿的速度较快！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=23, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=66f85414103, createdName=ms8762254248151793, createdTime=Thu Jul 25 11:05:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827029, encodeId=c77182e02957, content=投了一篇，大修，然后就是三次小修。ae比较较真，提各种问题和需要改进的地方，不过说得都很在理，也可以逼自己不断去思考，感谢！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=26, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=01255414130, createdName=ms3179514010604018, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 14:55:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=820164, encodeId=483b820164c0, content=2012年1月初投的稿件。4月9号份给的修改意见，要求大修；5月9号投出修改稿件，7月27号返回第二次审稿意见，要求小修发表；8月21号最终接收。 整个过程花费近8个月的时间！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c09a5414026, createdName=ms4662714744603927, createdTime=Fri Jun 22 16:53:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=817706, encodeId=fe9781e70677, content=一个相对来说，比较低档次的scie期刊<br> 每期差不多10多篇文章，一年出4期<br> 两个reviewer，之前也当过他们的reviewer，编辑要求差不多是1个月给意见<br> 所以相对来说，这个期刊还是比较快的 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=54f75414053, createdName=ms4829174089086404, createdTime=Thu Jan 12 00:17:00 CST 2012, time=2012-01-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=817299, encodeId=3a2e81e299db, content=我2010年10月投稿，12月返修，3月初接收，4月见刊。<br> 但是我师弟2011年4月投稿，至今已经7个多月，还在评审中。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=32, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2bf45414128, createdName=ms1706975392724364, createdTime=Thu Dec 08 17:51:00 CST 2011, time=2011-12-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=816890, encodeId=6a8181689065, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享：低级别的期刊，入门用 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a4765414076, createdName=ms1875852553058278, createdTime=Thu Nov 10 15:45:00 CST 2011, time=2011-11-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814898, encodeId=d110814898b7, content=2010 if:0.506 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 08:43:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2013-07-25 ms8762254248151793

    审稿的速度较快！

    0

  3. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=828683, encodeId=4084828683fb, content=审稿比较快，不到3个月出结果。跟楼下的感觉相似，审稿人不负责，2个审稿人，一个当天回复“”文章质量差，评估方法不能充分说明算法的优点“，我真的想问问这个审稿人你到底看不看目标跟踪的论文，我已经用最新的评估方法了，还给出了两个；另一个审稿人也是奇葩，显示对我的论文思路进行了肯定，然后举出一个cvpr的会议说人家做的比我更好，我看了一遍那个文章，除了基础模型跟我的相似，其他的他用的人工智能算法，而我的思路是用数学的方法加速迭代计算，两者根本没有可比性。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=24, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=43375414153, createdName=ms4270311197517729, createdTime=Tue Oct 15 12:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-10-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827043, encodeId=8eb082e0436e, content=审稿的速度较快！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=23, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=66f85414103, createdName=ms8762254248151793, createdTime=Thu Jul 25 11:05:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827029, encodeId=c77182e02957, content=投了一篇，大修，然后就是三次小修。ae比较较真，提各种问题和需要改进的地方，不过说得都很在理，也可以逼自己不断去思考，感谢！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=26, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=01255414130, createdName=ms3179514010604018, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 14:55:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=820164, encodeId=483b820164c0, content=2012年1月初投的稿件。4月9号份给的修改意见，要求大修；5月9号投出修改稿件，7月27号返回第二次审稿意见，要求小修发表；8月21号最终接收。 整个过程花费近8个月的时间！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c09a5414026, createdName=ms4662714744603927, createdTime=Fri Jun 22 16:53:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=817706, encodeId=fe9781e70677, content=一个相对来说，比较低档次的scie期刊<br> 每期差不多10多篇文章，一年出4期<br> 两个reviewer，之前也当过他们的reviewer，编辑要求差不多是1个月给意见<br> 所以相对来说，这个期刊还是比较快的 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=54f75414053, createdName=ms4829174089086404, createdTime=Thu Jan 12 00:17:00 CST 2012, time=2012-01-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=817299, encodeId=3a2e81e299db, content=我2010年10月投稿，12月返修，3月初接收，4月见刊。<br> 但是我师弟2011年4月投稿，至今已经7个多月，还在评审中。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=32, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2bf45414128, createdName=ms1706975392724364, createdTime=Thu Dec 08 17:51:00 CST 2011, time=2011-12-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=816890, encodeId=6a8181689065, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享：低级别的期刊，入门用 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a4765414076, createdName=ms1875852553058278, createdTime=Thu Nov 10 15:45:00 CST 2011, time=2011-11-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814898, encodeId=d110814898b7, content=2010 if:0.506 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 08:43:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2013-07-24 ms3179514010604018

    投了一篇，大修，然后就是三次小修。ae比较较真，提各种问题和需要改进的地方，不过说得都很在理，也可以逼自己不断去思考，感谢！

    0

  4. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=828683, encodeId=4084828683fb, content=审稿比较快，不到3个月出结果。跟楼下的感觉相似，审稿人不负责，2个审稿人，一个当天回复“”文章质量差，评估方法不能充分说明算法的优点“，我真的想问问这个审稿人你到底看不看目标跟踪的论文，我已经用最新的评估方法了，还给出了两个；另一个审稿人也是奇葩，显示对我的论文思路进行了肯定，然后举出一个cvpr的会议说人家做的比我更好，我看了一遍那个文章，除了基础模型跟我的相似，其他的他用的人工智能算法，而我的思路是用数学的方法加速迭代计算，两者根本没有可比性。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=24, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=43375414153, createdName=ms4270311197517729, createdTime=Tue Oct 15 12:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-10-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827043, encodeId=8eb082e0436e, content=审稿的速度较快！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=23, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=66f85414103, createdName=ms8762254248151793, createdTime=Thu Jul 25 11:05:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827029, encodeId=c77182e02957, content=投了一篇，大修，然后就是三次小修。ae比较较真，提各种问题和需要改进的地方，不过说得都很在理，也可以逼自己不断去思考，感谢！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=26, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=01255414130, createdName=ms3179514010604018, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 14:55:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=820164, encodeId=483b820164c0, content=2012年1月初投的稿件。4月9号份给的修改意见，要求大修；5月9号投出修改稿件，7月27号返回第二次审稿意见，要求小修发表；8月21号最终接收。 整个过程花费近8个月的时间！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c09a5414026, createdName=ms4662714744603927, createdTime=Fri Jun 22 16:53:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=817706, encodeId=fe9781e70677, content=一个相对来说，比较低档次的scie期刊<br> 每期差不多10多篇文章，一年出4期<br> 两个reviewer，之前也当过他们的reviewer，编辑要求差不多是1个月给意见<br> 所以相对来说，这个期刊还是比较快的 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=54f75414053, createdName=ms4829174089086404, createdTime=Thu Jan 12 00:17:00 CST 2012, time=2012-01-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=817299, encodeId=3a2e81e299db, content=我2010年10月投稿，12月返修，3月初接收，4月见刊。<br> 但是我师弟2011年4月投稿，至今已经7个多月，还在评审中。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=32, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2bf45414128, createdName=ms1706975392724364, createdTime=Thu Dec 08 17:51:00 CST 2011, time=2011-12-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=816890, encodeId=6a8181689065, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享：低级别的期刊，入门用 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a4765414076, createdName=ms1875852553058278, createdTime=Thu Nov 10 15:45:00 CST 2011, time=2011-11-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814898, encodeId=d110814898b7, content=2010 if:0.506 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 08:43:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2012-06-22 ms4662714744603927

    2012年1月初投的稿件。4月9号份给的修改意见，要求大修；5月9号投出修改稿件，7月27号返回第二次审稿意见，要求小修发表；8月21号最终接收。 整个过程花费近8个月的时间！

    0

  5. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=828683, encodeId=4084828683fb, content=审稿比较快，不到3个月出结果。跟楼下的感觉相似，审稿人不负责，2个审稿人，一个当天回复“”文章质量差，评估方法不能充分说明算法的优点“，我真的想问问这个审稿人你到底看不看目标跟踪的论文，我已经用最新的评估方法了，还给出了两个；另一个审稿人也是奇葩，显示对我的论文思路进行了肯定，然后举出一个cvpr的会议说人家做的比我更好，我看了一遍那个文章，除了基础模型跟我的相似，其他的他用的人工智能算法，而我的思路是用数学的方法加速迭代计算，两者根本没有可比性。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=24, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=43375414153, createdName=ms4270311197517729, createdTime=Tue Oct 15 12:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-10-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827043, encodeId=8eb082e0436e, content=审稿的速度较快！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=23, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=66f85414103, createdName=ms8762254248151793, createdTime=Thu Jul 25 11:05:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827029, encodeId=c77182e02957, content=投了一篇，大修，然后就是三次小修。ae比较较真，提各种问题和需要改进的地方，不过说得都很在理，也可以逼自己不断去思考，感谢！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=26, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=01255414130, createdName=ms3179514010604018, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 14:55:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=820164, encodeId=483b820164c0, content=2012年1月初投的稿件。4月9号份给的修改意见，要求大修；5月9号投出修改稿件，7月27号返回第二次审稿意见，要求小修发表；8月21号最终接收。 整个过程花费近8个月的时间！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c09a5414026, createdName=ms4662714744603927, createdTime=Fri Jun 22 16:53:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=817706, encodeId=fe9781e70677, content=一个相对来说，比较低档次的scie期刊<br> 每期差不多10多篇文章，一年出4期<br> 两个reviewer，之前也当过他们的reviewer，编辑要求差不多是1个月给意见<br> 所以相对来说，这个期刊还是比较快的 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=54f75414053, createdName=ms4829174089086404, createdTime=Thu Jan 12 00:17:00 CST 2012, time=2012-01-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=817299, encodeId=3a2e81e299db, content=我2010年10月投稿，12月返修，3月初接收，4月见刊。<br> 但是我师弟2011年4月投稿，至今已经7个多月，还在评审中。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=32, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2bf45414128, createdName=ms1706975392724364, createdTime=Thu Dec 08 17:51:00 CST 2011, time=2011-12-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=816890, encodeId=6a8181689065, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享：低级别的期刊，入门用 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a4765414076, createdName=ms1875852553058278, createdTime=Thu Nov 10 15:45:00 CST 2011, time=2011-11-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814898, encodeId=d110814898b7, content=2010 if:0.506 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 08:43:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2012-01-12 ms4829174089086404

    一个相对来说，比较低档次的scie期刊
    每期差不多10多篇文章，一年出4期
    两个reviewer，之前也当过他们的reviewer，编辑要求差不多是1个月给意见
    所以相对来说，这个期刊还是比较快的

    0

  6. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=828683, encodeId=4084828683fb, content=审稿比较快，不到3个月出结果。跟楼下的感觉相似，审稿人不负责，2个审稿人，一个当天回复“”文章质量差，评估方法不能充分说明算法的优点“，我真的想问问这个审稿人你到底看不看目标跟踪的论文，我已经用最新的评估方法了，还给出了两个；另一个审稿人也是奇葩，显示对我的论文思路进行了肯定，然后举出一个cvpr的会议说人家做的比我更好，我看了一遍那个文章，除了基础模型跟我的相似，其他的他用的人工智能算法，而我的思路是用数学的方法加速迭代计算，两者根本没有可比性。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=24, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=43375414153, createdName=ms4270311197517729, createdTime=Tue Oct 15 12:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-10-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827043, encodeId=8eb082e0436e, content=审稿的速度较快！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=23, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=66f85414103, createdName=ms8762254248151793, createdTime=Thu Jul 25 11:05:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827029, encodeId=c77182e02957, content=投了一篇，大修，然后就是三次小修。ae比较较真，提各种问题和需要改进的地方，不过说得都很在理，也可以逼自己不断去思考，感谢！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=26, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=01255414130, createdName=ms3179514010604018, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 14:55:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=820164, encodeId=483b820164c0, content=2012年1月初投的稿件。4月9号份给的修改意见，要求大修；5月9号投出修改稿件，7月27号返回第二次审稿意见，要求小修发表；8月21号最终接收。 整个过程花费近8个月的时间！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c09a5414026, createdName=ms4662714744603927, createdTime=Fri Jun 22 16:53:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=817706, encodeId=fe9781e70677, content=一个相对来说，比较低档次的scie期刊<br> 每期差不多10多篇文章，一年出4期<br> 两个reviewer，之前也当过他们的reviewer，编辑要求差不多是1个月给意见<br> 所以相对来说，这个期刊还是比较快的 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=54f75414053, createdName=ms4829174089086404, createdTime=Thu Jan 12 00:17:00 CST 2012, time=2012-01-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=817299, encodeId=3a2e81e299db, content=我2010年10月投稿，12月返修，3月初接收，4月见刊。<br> 但是我师弟2011年4月投稿，至今已经7个多月，还在评审中。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=32, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2bf45414128, createdName=ms1706975392724364, createdTime=Thu Dec 08 17:51:00 CST 2011, time=2011-12-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=816890, encodeId=6a8181689065, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享：低级别的期刊，入门用 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a4765414076, createdName=ms1875852553058278, createdTime=Thu Nov 10 15:45:00 CST 2011, time=2011-11-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814898, encodeId=d110814898b7, content=2010 if:0.506 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 08:43:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2011-12-08 ms1706975392724364

    我2010年10月投稿，12月返修，3月初接收，4月见刊。
    但是我师弟2011年4月投稿，至今已经7个多月，还在评审中。

    0

  7. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=828683, encodeId=4084828683fb, content=审稿比较快，不到3个月出结果。跟楼下的感觉相似，审稿人不负责，2个审稿人，一个当天回复“”文章质量差，评估方法不能充分说明算法的优点“，我真的想问问这个审稿人你到底看不看目标跟踪的论文，我已经用最新的评估方法了，还给出了两个；另一个审稿人也是奇葩，显示对我的论文思路进行了肯定，然后举出一个cvpr的会议说人家做的比我更好，我看了一遍那个文章，除了基础模型跟我的相似，其他的他用的人工智能算法，而我的思路是用数学的方法加速迭代计算，两者根本没有可比性。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=24, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=43375414153, createdName=ms4270311197517729, createdTime=Tue Oct 15 12:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-10-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827043, encodeId=8eb082e0436e, content=审稿的速度较快！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=23, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=66f85414103, createdName=ms8762254248151793, createdTime=Thu Jul 25 11:05:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827029, encodeId=c77182e02957, content=投了一篇，大修，然后就是三次小修。ae比较较真，提各种问题和需要改进的地方，不过说得都很在理，也可以逼自己不断去思考，感谢！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=26, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=01255414130, createdName=ms3179514010604018, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 14:55:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=820164, encodeId=483b820164c0, content=2012年1月初投的稿件。4月9号份给的修改意见，要求大修；5月9号投出修改稿件，7月27号返回第二次审稿意见，要求小修发表；8月21号最终接收。 整个过程花费近8个月的时间！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c09a5414026, createdName=ms4662714744603927, createdTime=Fri Jun 22 16:53:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=817706, encodeId=fe9781e70677, content=一个相对来说，比较低档次的scie期刊<br> 每期差不多10多篇文章，一年出4期<br> 两个reviewer，之前也当过他们的reviewer，编辑要求差不多是1个月给意见<br> 所以相对来说，这个期刊还是比较快的 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=54f75414053, createdName=ms4829174089086404, createdTime=Thu Jan 12 00:17:00 CST 2012, time=2012-01-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=817299, encodeId=3a2e81e299db, content=我2010年10月投稿，12月返修，3月初接收，4月见刊。<br> 但是我师弟2011年4月投稿，至今已经7个多月，还在评审中。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=32, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2bf45414128, createdName=ms1706975392724364, createdTime=Thu Dec 08 17:51:00 CST 2011, time=2011-12-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=816890, encodeId=6a8181689065, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享：低级别的期刊，入门用 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a4765414076, createdName=ms1875852553058278, createdTime=Thu Nov 10 15:45:00 CST 2011, time=2011-11-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814898, encodeId=d110814898b7, content=2010 if:0.506 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 08:43:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2011-11-10 ms1875852553058278

    审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
    经验分享：低级别的期刊，入门用

    0

  8. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=828683, encodeId=4084828683fb, content=审稿比较快，不到3个月出结果。跟楼下的感觉相似，审稿人不负责，2个审稿人，一个当天回复“”文章质量差，评估方法不能充分说明算法的优点“，我真的想问问这个审稿人你到底看不看目标跟踪的论文，我已经用最新的评估方法了，还给出了两个；另一个审稿人也是奇葩，显示对我的论文思路进行了肯定，然后举出一个cvpr的会议说人家做的比我更好，我看了一遍那个文章，除了基础模型跟我的相似，其他的他用的人工智能算法，而我的思路是用数学的方法加速迭代计算，两者根本没有可比性。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=24, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=43375414153, createdName=ms4270311197517729, createdTime=Tue Oct 15 12:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-10-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827043, encodeId=8eb082e0436e, content=审稿的速度较快！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=23, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=66f85414103, createdName=ms8762254248151793, createdTime=Thu Jul 25 11:05:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=827029, encodeId=c77182e02957, content=投了一篇，大修，然后就是三次小修。ae比较较真，提各种问题和需要改进的地方，不过说得都很在理，也可以逼自己不断去思考，感谢！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=26, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=01255414130, createdName=ms3179514010604018, createdTime=Wed Jul 24 14:55:00 CST 2013, time=2013-07-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=820164, encodeId=483b820164c0, content=2012年1月初投的稿件。4月9号份给的修改意见，要求大修；5月9号投出修改稿件，7月27号返回第二次审稿意见，要求小修发表；8月21号最终接收。 整个过程花费近8个月的时间！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=c09a5414026, createdName=ms4662714744603927, createdTime=Fri Jun 22 16:53:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-22, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=817706, encodeId=fe9781e70677, content=一个相对来说，比较低档次的scie期刊<br> 每期差不多10多篇文章，一年出4期<br> 两个reviewer，之前也当过他们的reviewer，编辑要求差不多是1个月给意见<br> 所以相对来说，这个期刊还是比较快的 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=54f75414053, createdName=ms4829174089086404, createdTime=Thu Jan 12 00:17:00 CST 2012, time=2012-01-12, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=817299, encodeId=3a2e81e299db, content=我2010年10月投稿，12月返修，3月初接收，4月见刊。<br> 但是我师弟2011年4月投稿，至今已经7个多月，还在评审中。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=32, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=2bf45414128, createdName=ms1706975392724364, createdTime=Thu Dec 08 17:51:00 CST 2011, time=2011-12-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=816890, encodeId=6a8181689065, content=审稿速度:3.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0<br>经验分享：低级别的期刊，入门用 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=34, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a4765414076, createdName=ms1875852553058278, createdTime=Thu Nov 10 15:45:00 CST 2011, time=2011-11-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=814898, encodeId=d110814898b7, content=2010 if:0.506 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 08:43:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2011-06-29 ms5251117139357251

    2010 if:0.506

    0

共46条页码: 4/5页10条/页
分享您的投稿经验，提升MI经验值，获取更多积分