J APPL ECOL 润色咨询

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY

出版年份：1964 年文章数：4560 投稿命中率： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看

出版周期：Bimonthly 自引率：4.9% 审稿周期： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看

前往期刊查询
期刊讨论 | 中国SCI论文 | 期刊主页 | 投稿经验 | 杂志官网 | 投稿链接 | 作者需知 | PMC链接 | Pubmed全文检索

期刊讨论

  1. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544235, encodeId=61a354423537, content=还是5分多,虽然没有大变化,能稳定在些,也算是中上等, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=220, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=zheyang, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:03:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=832766, encodeId=48af832e668a, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：说说我的经历吧！被拒两次但是主编都鼓励再重投，第一次被associate editor拒稿，第二次外审被其中一个审稿人批得一败涂地拒稿，还好发现是因为自己没说清楚因为期刊字数限制所以简化很多，回应了所有问题还好都答上，最后一次终于补充好所有信息重投再换两个审稿人，辛苦等待两个多月终于被接收，历经6个月，4个审稿人，三个正面回应。编辑确实很负责任，尤其是那个ae一定是处女座的，总怀疑你，最后还需要把数据上传到公共数据库分享给读者，还好最后刊出了，这和国内投稿完全就是两个样，步骤环节太多，细节要求高，英语还得是英式，我自己看都改了二十多遍，科研不好搞啊。。另外这个是q1的杂志，分类仅在ecology中，生态学排名10的边缘，最好自己去中科院的分类里看，至于难度，主编这么说we accept <20% of the manuscripts submitted and thus can only consider those that make a significant international impact in the relevant field. , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=72, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=17e85414121, createdName=ms7933220824164544, createdTime=Wed Jul 13 16:15:01 CST 2016, time=2016-07-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=496295, encodeId=982c496295a8, content=难度较大。投稿之后会有50%的稿件不经过送审，直接被主编剧掉。 <br> <br> 本人一篇模型论文送审三月之后悲剧。 <br> <br> 主编邀请了三个审稿人。两个正面审稿意见，一个强烈反对，质疑ABM在复杂生态系统模拟中的适用性。 <br> <br> 最后主编据稿并建议转投BSE旗下新刊Ecology and Evolution。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=318, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=khaos, createdTime=Thu Jun 13 18:16:00 CST 2013, time=2013-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=493601, encodeId=d3f949360157, content=难度较大，本人有篇送审后，两个审稿人意见都是正面的，还是悲剧，说是novelty 和importance不够, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=394, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=42d876780, createdName=panbiology, createdTime=Thu Jan 24 02:31:00 CST 2013, time=2013-01-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=819045, encodeId=5796819045b0, content=英国刊物，比esa刊物投稿难度可能小一点。有一篇二作的文章投eecological applications，两个编辑一个正面意见，一个重大修改，结果被拒。投这个刊物以后修改一次，录用。但是时间确实比别的刊物时间长。口碑很好的 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=60, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=baad5414143, createdName=ms493637184140865, createdTime=Sat Apr 14 17:00:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=481480, encodeId=17eb481480e3, content=看涨哦，明年会不会再涨？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=395, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=medwu, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 15:51:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2017-07-16 zheyang

    还是5分多,虽然没有大变化,能稳定在些,也算是中上等

    0

  2. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544235, encodeId=61a354423537, content=还是5分多,虽然没有大变化,能稳定在些,也算是中上等, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=220, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=zheyang, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:03:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=832766, encodeId=48af832e668a, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：说说我的经历吧！被拒两次但是主编都鼓励再重投，第一次被associate editor拒稿，第二次外审被其中一个审稿人批得一败涂地拒稿，还好发现是因为自己没说清楚因为期刊字数限制所以简化很多，回应了所有问题还好都答上，最后一次终于补充好所有信息重投再换两个审稿人，辛苦等待两个多月终于被接收，历经6个月，4个审稿人，三个正面回应。编辑确实很负责任，尤其是那个ae一定是处女座的，总怀疑你，最后还需要把数据上传到公共数据库分享给读者，还好最后刊出了，这和国内投稿完全就是两个样，步骤环节太多，细节要求高，英语还得是英式，我自己看都改了二十多遍，科研不好搞啊。。另外这个是q1的杂志，分类仅在ecology中，生态学排名10的边缘，最好自己去中科院的分类里看，至于难度，主编这么说we accept <20% of the manuscripts submitted and thus can only consider those that make a significant international impact in the relevant field. , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=72, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=17e85414121, createdName=ms7933220824164544, createdTime=Wed Jul 13 16:15:01 CST 2016, time=2016-07-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=496295, encodeId=982c496295a8, content=难度较大。投稿之后会有50%的稿件不经过送审，直接被主编剧掉。 <br> <br> 本人一篇模型论文送审三月之后悲剧。 <br> <br> 主编邀请了三个审稿人。两个正面审稿意见，一个强烈反对，质疑ABM在复杂生态系统模拟中的适用性。 <br> <br> 最后主编据稿并建议转投BSE旗下新刊Ecology and Evolution。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=318, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=khaos, createdTime=Thu Jun 13 18:16:00 CST 2013, time=2013-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=493601, encodeId=d3f949360157, content=难度较大，本人有篇送审后，两个审稿人意见都是正面的，还是悲剧，说是novelty 和importance不够, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=394, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=42d876780, createdName=panbiology, createdTime=Thu Jan 24 02:31:00 CST 2013, time=2013-01-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=819045, encodeId=5796819045b0, content=英国刊物，比esa刊物投稿难度可能小一点。有一篇二作的文章投eecological applications，两个编辑一个正面意见，一个重大修改，结果被拒。投这个刊物以后修改一次，录用。但是时间确实比别的刊物时间长。口碑很好的 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=60, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=baad5414143, createdName=ms493637184140865, createdTime=Sat Apr 14 17:00:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=481480, encodeId=17eb481480e3, content=看涨哦，明年会不会再涨？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=395, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=medwu, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 15:51:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2016-07-13 ms7933220824164544

    审稿速度:1.0
    经验分享：说说我的经历吧！被拒两次但是主编都鼓励再重投，第一次被associate editor拒稿，第二次外审被其中一个审稿人批得一败涂地拒稿，还好发现是因为自己没说清楚因为期刊字数限制所以简化很多，回应了所有问题还好都答上，最后一次终于补充好所有信息重投再换两个审稿人，辛苦等待两个多月终于被接收，历经6个月，4个审稿人，三个正面回应。编辑确实很负责任，尤其是那个ae一定是处女座的，总怀疑你，最后还需要把数据上传到公共数据库分享给读者，还好最后刊出了，这和国内投稿完全就是两个样，步骤环节太多，细节要求高，英语还得是英式，我自己看都改了二十多遍，科研不好搞啊。。另外这个是q1的杂志，分类仅在ecology中，生态学排名10的边缘，最好自己去中科院的分类里看，至于难度，主编这么说we accept <20% of the manuscripts submitted and thus can only consider those that make a significant international impact in the relevant field.

    0

  3. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544235, encodeId=61a354423537, content=还是5分多,虽然没有大变化,能稳定在些,也算是中上等, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=220, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=zheyang, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:03:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=832766, encodeId=48af832e668a, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：说说我的经历吧！被拒两次但是主编都鼓励再重投，第一次被associate editor拒稿，第二次外审被其中一个审稿人批得一败涂地拒稿，还好发现是因为自己没说清楚因为期刊字数限制所以简化很多，回应了所有问题还好都答上，最后一次终于补充好所有信息重投再换两个审稿人，辛苦等待两个多月终于被接收，历经6个月，4个审稿人，三个正面回应。编辑确实很负责任，尤其是那个ae一定是处女座的，总怀疑你，最后还需要把数据上传到公共数据库分享给读者，还好最后刊出了，这和国内投稿完全就是两个样，步骤环节太多，细节要求高，英语还得是英式，我自己看都改了二十多遍，科研不好搞啊。。另外这个是q1的杂志，分类仅在ecology中，生态学排名10的边缘，最好自己去中科院的分类里看，至于难度，主编这么说we accept <20% of the manuscripts submitted and thus can only consider those that make a significant international impact in the relevant field. , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=72, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=17e85414121, createdName=ms7933220824164544, createdTime=Wed Jul 13 16:15:01 CST 2016, time=2016-07-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=496295, encodeId=982c496295a8, content=难度较大。投稿之后会有50%的稿件不经过送审，直接被主编剧掉。 <br> <br> 本人一篇模型论文送审三月之后悲剧。 <br> <br> 主编邀请了三个审稿人。两个正面审稿意见，一个强烈反对，质疑ABM在复杂生态系统模拟中的适用性。 <br> <br> 最后主编据稿并建议转投BSE旗下新刊Ecology and Evolution。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=318, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=khaos, createdTime=Thu Jun 13 18:16:00 CST 2013, time=2013-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=493601, encodeId=d3f949360157, content=难度较大，本人有篇送审后，两个审稿人意见都是正面的，还是悲剧，说是novelty 和importance不够, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=394, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=42d876780, createdName=panbiology, createdTime=Thu Jan 24 02:31:00 CST 2013, time=2013-01-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=819045, encodeId=5796819045b0, content=英国刊物，比esa刊物投稿难度可能小一点。有一篇二作的文章投eecological applications，两个编辑一个正面意见，一个重大修改，结果被拒。投这个刊物以后修改一次，录用。但是时间确实比别的刊物时间长。口碑很好的 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=60, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=baad5414143, createdName=ms493637184140865, createdTime=Sat Apr 14 17:00:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=481480, encodeId=17eb481480e3, content=看涨哦，明年会不会再涨？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=395, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=medwu, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 15:51:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2013-06-13 khaos

    难度较大。投稿之后会有50%的稿件不经过送审，直接被主编剧掉。

    本人一篇模型论文送审三月之后悲剧。

    主编邀请了三个审稿人。两个正面审稿意见，一个强烈反对，质疑ABM在复杂生态系统模拟中的适用性。

    最后主编据稿并建议转投BSE旗下新刊Ecology and Evolution。

    0

  4. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544235, encodeId=61a354423537, content=还是5分多,虽然没有大变化,能稳定在些,也算是中上等, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=220, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=zheyang, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:03:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=832766, encodeId=48af832e668a, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：说说我的经历吧！被拒两次但是主编都鼓励再重投，第一次被associate editor拒稿，第二次外审被其中一个审稿人批得一败涂地拒稿，还好发现是因为自己没说清楚因为期刊字数限制所以简化很多，回应了所有问题还好都答上，最后一次终于补充好所有信息重投再换两个审稿人，辛苦等待两个多月终于被接收，历经6个月，4个审稿人，三个正面回应。编辑确实很负责任，尤其是那个ae一定是处女座的，总怀疑你，最后还需要把数据上传到公共数据库分享给读者，还好最后刊出了，这和国内投稿完全就是两个样，步骤环节太多，细节要求高，英语还得是英式，我自己看都改了二十多遍，科研不好搞啊。。另外这个是q1的杂志，分类仅在ecology中，生态学排名10的边缘，最好自己去中科院的分类里看，至于难度，主编这么说we accept <20% of the manuscripts submitted and thus can only consider those that make a significant international impact in the relevant field. , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=72, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=17e85414121, createdName=ms7933220824164544, createdTime=Wed Jul 13 16:15:01 CST 2016, time=2016-07-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=496295, encodeId=982c496295a8, content=难度较大。投稿之后会有50%的稿件不经过送审，直接被主编剧掉。 <br> <br> 本人一篇模型论文送审三月之后悲剧。 <br> <br> 主编邀请了三个审稿人。两个正面审稿意见，一个强烈反对，质疑ABM在复杂生态系统模拟中的适用性。 <br> <br> 最后主编据稿并建议转投BSE旗下新刊Ecology and Evolution。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=318, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=khaos, createdTime=Thu Jun 13 18:16:00 CST 2013, time=2013-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=493601, encodeId=d3f949360157, content=难度较大，本人有篇送审后，两个审稿人意见都是正面的，还是悲剧，说是novelty 和importance不够, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=394, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=42d876780, createdName=panbiology, createdTime=Thu Jan 24 02:31:00 CST 2013, time=2013-01-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=819045, encodeId=5796819045b0, content=英国刊物，比esa刊物投稿难度可能小一点。有一篇二作的文章投eecological applications，两个编辑一个正面意见，一个重大修改，结果被拒。投这个刊物以后修改一次，录用。但是时间确实比别的刊物时间长。口碑很好的 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=60, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=baad5414143, createdName=ms493637184140865, createdTime=Sat Apr 14 17:00:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=481480, encodeId=17eb481480e3, content=看涨哦，明年会不会再涨？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=395, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=medwu, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 15:51:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2013-01-24 panbiology

    难度较大，本人有篇送审后，两个审稿人意见都是正面的，还是悲剧，说是novelty 和importance不够

    0

  5. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544235, encodeId=61a354423537, content=还是5分多,虽然没有大变化,能稳定在些,也算是中上等, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=220, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=zheyang, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:03:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=832766, encodeId=48af832e668a, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：说说我的经历吧！被拒两次但是主编都鼓励再重投，第一次被associate editor拒稿，第二次外审被其中一个审稿人批得一败涂地拒稿，还好发现是因为自己没说清楚因为期刊字数限制所以简化很多，回应了所有问题还好都答上，最后一次终于补充好所有信息重投再换两个审稿人，辛苦等待两个多月终于被接收，历经6个月，4个审稿人，三个正面回应。编辑确实很负责任，尤其是那个ae一定是处女座的，总怀疑你，最后还需要把数据上传到公共数据库分享给读者，还好最后刊出了，这和国内投稿完全就是两个样，步骤环节太多，细节要求高，英语还得是英式，我自己看都改了二十多遍，科研不好搞啊。。另外这个是q1的杂志，分类仅在ecology中，生态学排名10的边缘，最好自己去中科院的分类里看，至于难度，主编这么说we accept <20% of the manuscripts submitted and thus can only consider those that make a significant international impact in the relevant field. , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=72, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=17e85414121, createdName=ms7933220824164544, createdTime=Wed Jul 13 16:15:01 CST 2016, time=2016-07-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=496295, encodeId=982c496295a8, content=难度较大。投稿之后会有50%的稿件不经过送审，直接被主编剧掉。 <br> <br> 本人一篇模型论文送审三月之后悲剧。 <br> <br> 主编邀请了三个审稿人。两个正面审稿意见，一个强烈反对，质疑ABM在复杂生态系统模拟中的适用性。 <br> <br> 最后主编据稿并建议转投BSE旗下新刊Ecology and Evolution。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=318, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=khaos, createdTime=Thu Jun 13 18:16:00 CST 2013, time=2013-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=493601, encodeId=d3f949360157, content=难度较大，本人有篇送审后，两个审稿人意见都是正面的，还是悲剧，说是novelty 和importance不够, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=394, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=42d876780, createdName=panbiology, createdTime=Thu Jan 24 02:31:00 CST 2013, time=2013-01-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=819045, encodeId=5796819045b0, content=英国刊物，比esa刊物投稿难度可能小一点。有一篇二作的文章投eecological applications，两个编辑一个正面意见，一个重大修改，结果被拒。投这个刊物以后修改一次，录用。但是时间确实比别的刊物时间长。口碑很好的 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=60, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=baad5414143, createdName=ms493637184140865, createdTime=Sat Apr 14 17:00:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=481480, encodeId=17eb481480e3, content=看涨哦，明年会不会再涨？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=395, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=medwu, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 15:51:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2012-04-14 ms493637184140865

    英国刊物，比esa刊物投稿难度可能小一点。有一篇二作的文章投eecological applications，两个编辑一个正面意见，一个重大修改，结果被拒。投这个刊物以后修改一次，录用。但是时间确实比别的刊物时间长。口碑很好的

    0

  6. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=544235, encodeId=61a354423537, content=还是5分多,虽然没有大变化,能稳定在些,也算是中上等, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=220, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=zheyang, createdTime=Sun Jul 16 19:03:00 CST 2017, time=2017-07-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=832766, encodeId=48af832e668a, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：说说我的经历吧！被拒两次但是主编都鼓励再重投，第一次被associate editor拒稿，第二次外审被其中一个审稿人批得一败涂地拒稿，还好发现是因为自己没说清楚因为期刊字数限制所以简化很多，回应了所有问题还好都答上，最后一次终于补充好所有信息重投再换两个审稿人，辛苦等待两个多月终于被接收，历经6个月，4个审稿人，三个正面回应。编辑确实很负责任，尤其是那个ae一定是处女座的，总怀疑你，最后还需要把数据上传到公共数据库分享给读者，还好最后刊出了，这和国内投稿完全就是两个样，步骤环节太多，细节要求高，英语还得是英式，我自己看都改了二十多遍，科研不好搞啊。。另外这个是q1的杂志，分类仅在ecology中，生态学排名10的边缘，最好自己去中科院的分类里看，至于难度，主编这么说we accept <20% of the manuscripts submitted and thus can only consider those that make a significant international impact in the relevant field. , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=72, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=17e85414121, createdName=ms7933220824164544, createdTime=Wed Jul 13 16:15:01 CST 2016, time=2016-07-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=496295, encodeId=982c496295a8, content=难度较大。投稿之后会有50%的稿件不经过送审，直接被主编剧掉。 <br> <br> 本人一篇模型论文送审三月之后悲剧。 <br> <br> 主编邀请了三个审稿人。两个正面审稿意见，一个强烈反对，质疑ABM在复杂生态系统模拟中的适用性。 <br> <br> 最后主编据稿并建议转投BSE旗下新刊Ecology and Evolution。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=318, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=khaos, createdTime=Thu Jun 13 18:16:00 CST 2013, time=2013-06-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=493601, encodeId=d3f949360157, content=难度较大，本人有篇送审后，两个审稿人意见都是正面的，还是悲剧，说是novelty 和importance不够, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=394, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=42d876780, createdName=panbiology, createdTime=Thu Jan 24 02:31:00 CST 2013, time=2013-01-24, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=819045, encodeId=5796819045b0, content=英国刊物，比esa刊物投稿难度可能小一点。有一篇二作的文章投eecological applications，两个编辑一个正面意见，一个重大修改，结果被拒。投这个刊物以后修改一次，录用。但是时间确实比别的刊物时间长。口碑很好的 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=60, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=baad5414143, createdName=ms493637184140865, createdTime=Sat Apr 14 17:00:00 CST 2012, time=2012-04-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=481480, encodeId=17eb481480e3, content=看涨哦，明年会不会再涨？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=395, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=medwu, createdTime=Wed Jun 29 15:51:00 CST 2011, time=2011-06-29, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2011-06-29 medwu

    看涨哦，明年会不会再涨？

    0

共21条页码: 2/3页10条/页
分享您的投稿经验，提升MI经验值，获取更多积分