第一次投稿jbb，速度超快。1天内送审，2周返回结果，小修。十天后修改返回，隔天就正式accept。日本编辑真是神速啊。审稿人提的意见也都不错，投稿时格式审查比较严格，来回退修好几次。

40 0

审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:25.0
经验分享：直接拒了。创新性要求高

402 0

审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:5.0
经验分享：不错的杂志，它提供了良好的审查意见，虽然被拒绝。

58 0

审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：我8月初投稿，稿件编号接近300，说明这个杂志投稿人数真的不算多，很多每年100多篇发稿量的杂志在这个时间段稿件编号一般超过500了。此外，这本杂志审稿极快，投稿次日进入审稿阶段，返回审稿信息时正好距投稿20天。推荐此杂志。

466 0

审稿速度:2.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：哎！说出来都是泪啊！现在的学校都要发SCI才能毕业（我们这学校的小硕士容易吗？），好不容易自己发了一篇SCI+外加三篇核心文章+专利（以授权）+国际先进鉴定+等等，连个院里面国家奖学金都没上。泪啊！这一切容易吗！ 好了，痛苦的过去苦不堪言，谈点能帮助莘莘学子们关心的内容吧。
研二上学期做实验+查阅相关外文文献，下学期进行英文的编写。文章14.03开始编写，14.06完成。期间导师帮我修改了N遍，都是伤心的往事，不多说了。7月4号正式投出，8月10号返回来大修。本来只是试水（有了退稿意见在修改的那种心态），尽然要大修，好吧！带着痛苦的审稿人意见（一共两个审稿人：第一个完全OK，第二个比较认真，说没有创新点，内容也要大修），这也说明了这个杂志对创新性的要求很高。下面是审稿人的原话：Reviewer #1: The work presented in the manuscript would be suitable for publication in JOBB. However, the manuscript needs further improvement before it can be considered for publication.
Reviewer #2: Overall, this manuscript constitutes a straightforward study to investigate the effect of oxygen supply on Monascus pigments and citrinin production in submerged fermentation. The results of this paper do not clearly indicate any relationship between oxygen supply and productivity of Monascus pigments and citrinin. Moreover, there are several complicated figures that are difficult to follow and have not been properly discussed and explained. This work is not particularly novel and not a new research area. The authors should extend their discussion on this subject in order to fully exploit the strength of this work and to characterize the fermentation system. Additional suggestions are offered for the authors'
文章大修从8月11号开始一直持续到9月5号，返回去后内心有点小激动，虽然知道自己第一次投没什么把握，但是大家都知道的，心里还是盼望着可以上的。终于耐心的等待后9月28号邮箱收到消息了，当时很激动都不敢看，眯眼一瞧minor revision，我靠，人品什么时候这么好了。第一个审稿人完全没问题，还是第二个审稿人问题多多的。
Reviewer #2: After major revision of this manuscript, that the authors present an interesting contribution to develop the effect of oxygen supply on Monascus pigments and citrinin production in submerged fermentation seems good enough to warrant publication. Fortunately, this work is particularly novel and some results are sufficiently interesting to warrant publication after major revision of this manuscript. However, some of expressions and grammars in the manuscript were not appropriate, and it is more or less difficult to follow. Authors have to re-write this manuscript and present results in a more coherent/presentable format before acceptance. Additional suggestions are offered for the authors' consideration.
没办法，走到这一步不容易啊。只好耐住性子慢慢磨啦！注意，一定要严格按照审稿人的意见来，否则就会挂的。文章最后10月4号投出去，国庆没休息（看出来我有多激动了吧！），日本的杂质，他们肯定不休息（没有小日本，说不定国庆还能更早些呢）。最后就是等待消息了。不巧，有个小问题没发现（归编辑审查了，只能说小日本太细心了）。Reviewer #2: After the major revision of this manuscript, the manuscript seems very good enough to warrant publication. It will be acceptable for publication after the little minor revision as following
10月14号修改，最后20号寄出，最后大家都知道的（不过也有点惊讶，真是太快了）22号晚上得到邮件accept。
开心啊！第一篇SCI经历种种不顺，大修，小修加小修，还是接收了。在这我希望能给你点帮助，相信自己，耐住性子，你的文章终会accept。

410 0

送审前格式要求特别严，参考文献格式要严格按照要求改，不能引用学位论文。三次格式不过关就会被拒。

380 0

一审时间：28天 我大修一个月 返给编辑后28天接受，还是很不错的杂志。 这是我的处女作！！！！！！！！！！！

417 0

审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：外审期间似乎换了一次审稿人 初审一个月左右返回审稿意见要求大修 主要是一些地方文章中写的不够清楚 按编辑和审稿人要求花了近一个月时间仔细修改后 半个月左右接受

381 0

paper state:
received at editorial office: 17-dec-2012
article revised: 6-feb-2013
article accepted for publication: 18-feb-2013
expected dispatch of proofs: 8-mar-2013
--------------------------------------------

48 0

审稿速度:1.0 | 投稿命中率:50.0
经验分享：Paper state:
Received at Editorial Office: 17-DEC-2012
Article revised: 6-FEB-2013
Article accepted for publication: 18-FEB-2013
Expected dispatch of proofs: 8-MAR-2013
--------------------------------------------
这篇文章几经周折啊
还好，终于被嫁出去了
两个审稿人都比较认真
免费期刊
祝好运

493 0