ARCH DERMATOL RES 润色咨询

ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH

出版年份：暂无数据 年文章数：1744 投稿命中率： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看

出版周期：Monthly 自引率：4.1% 审稿周期： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看

前往期刊查询
期刊讨论 | 中国SCI论文 | 期刊主页 | 投稿经验 | 杂志官网 | 投稿链接 | 作者需知 | PMC链接 | Pubmed全文检索

期刊讨论

  1. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489082, encodeId=0d13489082c8, content=本杂志不错， 尤其是审稿人的意见很有水平， 很严谨，很Nice， 投稿3篇 接受2篇。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=448, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sat Jun 23 17:41:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=473976, encodeId=13744e397662, content=建议别投了 德国人的作风太严谨, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=518, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=cell, createdTime=Sun Feb 27 16:53:00 CST 2011, time=2011-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=472157, encodeId=23f34e2157f6, content=我的心在等待！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=522, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=ARD, createdTime=Sun Oct 17 19:44:00 CST 2010, time=2010-10-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=469426, encodeId=28924694264b, content=这个reviewer是个SB!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=553, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=XX, createdTime=Tue Nov 10 16:01:00 CST 2009, time=2009-11-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=469419, encodeId=8f7646941948, content=毫不容易有意见了，结果被拒了，这个reviewer简直疯了！一连串问题，都问疯了，而且不少问题很无理。下面是其中一小段： <br> Two candidate genes were sequenced to identify SNPs. Why was it necessary to sequence if those are known SNPs? How many individuals were sequenced and why this number? How were they chosen? Which parts of the genes were sequenced, the whole genes? Which percentage was covered? The authors state that the 5 SNPs in IL-20 gene are tagging SNPs. How do they know? Do they correspond to tagging SNPs from the HapMap data? This is not mentioned in the manuscript. Why was the case control cohort only tested for putative tagging SNPs of one candidate gene and for only a single SNP of the other gene?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=458, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=Derm, createdTime=Sun Nov 08 22:10:00 CST 2009, time=2009-11-08, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2012-06-23 匿名用户

    本杂志不错， 尤其是审稿人的意见很有水平， 很严谨，很Nice， 投稿3篇 接受2篇。

    0

  2. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489082, encodeId=0d13489082c8, content=本杂志不错， 尤其是审稿人的意见很有水平， 很严谨，很Nice， 投稿3篇 接受2篇。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=448, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sat Jun 23 17:41:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=473976, encodeId=13744e397662, content=建议别投了 德国人的作风太严谨, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=518, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=cell, createdTime=Sun Feb 27 16:53:00 CST 2011, time=2011-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=472157, encodeId=23f34e2157f6, content=我的心在等待！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=522, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=ARD, createdTime=Sun Oct 17 19:44:00 CST 2010, time=2010-10-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=469426, encodeId=28924694264b, content=这个reviewer是个SB!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=553, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=XX, createdTime=Tue Nov 10 16:01:00 CST 2009, time=2009-11-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=469419, encodeId=8f7646941948, content=毫不容易有意见了，结果被拒了，这个reviewer简直疯了！一连串问题，都问疯了，而且不少问题很无理。下面是其中一小段： <br> Two candidate genes were sequenced to identify SNPs. Why was it necessary to sequence if those are known SNPs? How many individuals were sequenced and why this number? How were they chosen? Which parts of the genes were sequenced, the whole genes? Which percentage was covered? The authors state that the 5 SNPs in IL-20 gene are tagging SNPs. How do they know? Do they correspond to tagging SNPs from the HapMap data? This is not mentioned in the manuscript. Why was the case control cohort only tested for putative tagging SNPs of one candidate gene and for only a single SNP of the other gene?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=458, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=Derm, createdTime=Sun Nov 08 22:10:00 CST 2009, time=2009-11-08, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2011-02-27 cell

    建议别投了 德国人的作风太严谨

    0

  3. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489082, encodeId=0d13489082c8, content=本杂志不错， 尤其是审稿人的意见很有水平， 很严谨，很Nice， 投稿3篇 接受2篇。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=448, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sat Jun 23 17:41:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=473976, encodeId=13744e397662, content=建议别投了 德国人的作风太严谨, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=518, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=cell, createdTime=Sun Feb 27 16:53:00 CST 2011, time=2011-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=472157, encodeId=23f34e2157f6, content=我的心在等待！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=522, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=ARD, createdTime=Sun Oct 17 19:44:00 CST 2010, time=2010-10-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=469426, encodeId=28924694264b, content=这个reviewer是个SB!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=553, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=XX, createdTime=Tue Nov 10 16:01:00 CST 2009, time=2009-11-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=469419, encodeId=8f7646941948, content=毫不容易有意见了，结果被拒了，这个reviewer简直疯了！一连串问题，都问疯了，而且不少问题很无理。下面是其中一小段： <br> Two candidate genes were sequenced to identify SNPs. Why was it necessary to sequence if those are known SNPs? How many individuals were sequenced and why this number? How were they chosen? Which parts of the genes were sequenced, the whole genes? Which percentage was covered? The authors state that the 5 SNPs in IL-20 gene are tagging SNPs. How do they know? Do they correspond to tagging SNPs from the HapMap data? This is not mentioned in the manuscript. Why was the case control cohort only tested for putative tagging SNPs of one candidate gene and for only a single SNP of the other gene?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=458, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=Derm, createdTime=Sun Nov 08 22:10:00 CST 2009, time=2009-11-08, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2010-10-17 ARD

    我的心在等待！

    0

  4. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489082, encodeId=0d13489082c8, content=本杂志不错， 尤其是审稿人的意见很有水平， 很严谨，很Nice， 投稿3篇 接受2篇。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=448, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sat Jun 23 17:41:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=473976, encodeId=13744e397662, content=建议别投了 德国人的作风太严谨, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=518, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=cell, createdTime=Sun Feb 27 16:53:00 CST 2011, time=2011-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=472157, encodeId=23f34e2157f6, content=我的心在等待！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=522, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=ARD, createdTime=Sun Oct 17 19:44:00 CST 2010, time=2010-10-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=469426, encodeId=28924694264b, content=这个reviewer是个SB!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=553, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=XX, createdTime=Tue Nov 10 16:01:00 CST 2009, time=2009-11-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=469419, encodeId=8f7646941948, content=毫不容易有意见了，结果被拒了，这个reviewer简直疯了！一连串问题，都问疯了，而且不少问题很无理。下面是其中一小段： <br> Two candidate genes were sequenced to identify SNPs. Why was it necessary to sequence if those are known SNPs? How many individuals were sequenced and why this number? How were they chosen? Which parts of the genes were sequenced, the whole genes? Which percentage was covered? The authors state that the 5 SNPs in IL-20 gene are tagging SNPs. How do they know? Do they correspond to tagging SNPs from the HapMap data? This is not mentioned in the manuscript. Why was the case control cohort only tested for putative tagging SNPs of one candidate gene and for only a single SNP of the other gene?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=458, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=Derm, createdTime=Sun Nov 08 22:10:00 CST 2009, time=2009-11-08, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2009-11-10 XX

    这个reviewer是个SB!

    0

  5. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=489082, encodeId=0d13489082c8, content=本杂志不错， 尤其是审稿人的意见很有水平， 很严谨，很Nice， 投稿3篇 接受2篇。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=448, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sat Jun 23 17:41:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=473976, encodeId=13744e397662, content=建议别投了 德国人的作风太严谨, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=518, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=cell, createdTime=Sun Feb 27 16:53:00 CST 2011, time=2011-02-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=472157, encodeId=23f34e2157f6, content=我的心在等待！, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=522, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=ARD, createdTime=Sun Oct 17 19:44:00 CST 2010, time=2010-10-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=469426, encodeId=28924694264b, content=这个reviewer是个SB!, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=553, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=XX, createdTime=Tue Nov 10 16:01:00 CST 2009, time=2009-11-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=469419, encodeId=8f7646941948, content=毫不容易有意见了，结果被拒了，这个reviewer简直疯了！一连串问题，都问疯了，而且不少问题很无理。下面是其中一小段： <br> Two candidate genes were sequenced to identify SNPs. Why was it necessary to sequence if those are known SNPs? How many individuals were sequenced and why this number? How were they chosen? Which parts of the genes were sequenced, the whole genes? Which percentage was covered? The authors state that the 5 SNPs in IL-20 gene are tagging SNPs. How do they know? Do they correspond to tagging SNPs from the HapMap data? This is not mentioned in the manuscript. Why was the case control cohort only tested for putative tagging SNPs of one candidate gene and for only a single SNP of the other gene?, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=458, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=Derm, createdTime=Sun Nov 08 22:10:00 CST 2009, time=2009-11-08, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2009-11-08 Derm

    毫不容易有意见了，结果被拒了，这个reviewer简直疯了！一连串问题，都问疯了，而且不少问题很无理。下面是其中一小段：
    Two candidate genes were sequenced to identify SNPs. Why was it necessary to sequence if those are known SNPs? How many individuals were sequenced and why this number? How were they chosen? Which parts of the genes were sequenced, the whole genes? Which percentage was covered? The authors state that the 5 SNPs in IL-20 gene are tagging SNPs. How do they know? Do they correspond to tagging SNPs from the HapMap data? This is not mentioned in the manuscript. Why was the case control cohort only tested for putative tagging SNPs of one candidate gene and for only a single SNP of the other gene?

    0

共21条页码: 2/3页10条/页
分享您的投稿经验，提升MI经验值，获取更多积分