ANNALS OF SURGERY-期刊论坛，投稿经验-MedSci.cn

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=514847, encodeId=fd3a51484ea4, content=外科中的Top期刊，的确比较难中，尤其对中国人来说。2015年4.8号投过一篇，5天左右under review，5.30号under review日期再次变了下，好像是又找了个审稿人，6.20号建议转投medicine，拒绝转投后直接变成了拒稿。3个审稿人，一个strongly建议发表（还建议找个统计的人审下），另外一个审稿人没有任何意见（可能是没有同意审稿），第三个审稿人是搞统计的（可能是后来找的那个），也没有拒的意思，还附上了他的文献。 注：一审周期顺利的话估计8周左右，如果有人拒审的话可能要增加2周；5.30和6.20都是周六，说明编辑周末也在干活。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=620, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=e25f57702, createdName=hypo2012, createdTime=Thu Aug 27 10:04:00 CST 2015, time=2015-08-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513033, encodeId=4aa3513033b9, content=审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:5.0 经验分享：非常难，一点差错都不允许。如果是为了修回意见，还不如投相关专业杂志就行了，周期没那么长, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=454, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=43cc82737, createdName=invincible13, createdTime=Sat Jun 27 12:25:00 CST 2015, time=2015-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507710, encodeId=e64f50e71028, content=不知道letter好发吗, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=497, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 19 05:37:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507649, encodeId=f53950e64908, content=这杂志，如果reviewer或者editor和你不熟，基本没戏，干脆别投。世界最顶级的杂志已经不是单纯靠文章质量来决定了。我相信杂志社那里压的稿件肯定有一大堆和你文章质量不相上下的。除非你的文章是里程碑, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=467, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Mon Nov 17 10:44:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=506684, encodeId=631150668438, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：近期投过一篇，临床研究，内容很有新意。审稿一个月多回来，感觉审稿人好烂，有点不专业。两个人都没提啥意见，都是一小段二三句话，大意是第一个审稿人：尽管文章内容很有趣、设计严谨，但研究结果可以预料；第二个：论文设计执行得很好，但所用方法超常规、有疑点，故结论值得怀疑。 其实本人采用的研究方法是参考了lancet oncol近期发表的一篇论文，碰上ann surg审稿竟然一个说结果已经预料到，一个说结果值得怀疑。没有任何其他意见，主编拒稿。这是我投稿到现在最无耻，也是最不服的审稿意见。真的怀疑审稿人是否专业，要么ann surg请其他专业的人审的？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=414, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Oct 10 12:47:00 CST 2014, time=2014-10-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=502222, encodeId=1b1f502222c5, content=时隔一年，再次投稿，Under Review一个月，今天变成Decision in Process,祈求保佑...., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=487, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=dengery, createdTime=Tue Apr 08 11:04:00 CST 2014, time=2014-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=495681, encodeId=a42949568109, content=审了8个多月，最后悲剧，竟然只有一个专家的意见，而且说实话审得并不好，意见难以接受..., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=559, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sat May 11 20:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-05-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=493434, encodeId=58ad49343427, content=我的一片letter审了1月，修改后决定是否录用等了15个月，最后接收发表了。 我的论著审了半年多杳无音讯..., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=541, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sun Jan 13 17:02:00 CST 2013, time=2013-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=490054, encodeId=f62b49005452, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：投过去了，通过了初审，结果外审了一个半月被拒稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=489, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=cb7155033, createdName=wangjue200011, createdTime=Tue Aug 14 22:08:00 CST 2012, time=2012-08-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=488889, encodeId=06d448888924, content=级别太高，还是不投吧, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=592, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jun 12 17:20:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-12, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2015-08-27 hypo2012

外科中的Top期刊，的确比较难中，尤其对中国人来说。2015年4.8号投过一篇，5天左右under review，5.30号under review日期再次变了下，好像是又找了个审稿人，6.20号建议转投medicine，拒绝转投后直接变成了拒稿。3个审稿人，一个strongly建议发表（还建议找个统计的人审下），另外一个审稿人没有任何意见（可能是没有同意审稿），第三个审稿人是搞统计的（可能是后来找的那个），也没有拒的意思，还附上了他的文献。
注：一审周期顺利的话估计8周左右，如果有人拒审的话可能要增加2周；5.30和6.20都是周六，说明编辑周末也在干活。

620 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=514847, encodeId=fd3a51484ea4, content=外科中的Top期刊，的确比较难中，尤其对中国人来说。2015年4.8号投过一篇，5天左右under review，5.30号under review日期再次变了下，好像是又找了个审稿人，6.20号建议转投medicine，拒绝转投后直接变成了拒稿。3个审稿人，一个strongly建议发表（还建议找个统计的人审下），另外一个审稿人没有任何意见（可能是没有同意审稿），第三个审稿人是搞统计的（可能是后来找的那个），也没有拒的意思，还附上了他的文献。 注：一审周期顺利的话估计8周左右，如果有人拒审的话可能要增加2周；5.30和6.20都是周六，说明编辑周末也在干活。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=620, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=e25f57702, createdName=hypo2012, createdTime=Thu Aug 27 10:04:00 CST 2015, time=2015-08-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513033, encodeId=4aa3513033b9, content=审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:5.0 经验分享：非常难，一点差错都不允许。如果是为了修回意见，还不如投相关专业杂志就行了，周期没那么长, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=454, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=43cc82737, createdName=invincible13, createdTime=Sat Jun 27 12:25:00 CST 2015, time=2015-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507710, encodeId=e64f50e71028, content=不知道letter好发吗, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=497, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 19 05:37:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507649, encodeId=f53950e64908, content=这杂志，如果reviewer或者editor和你不熟，基本没戏，干脆别投。世界最顶级的杂志已经不是单纯靠文章质量来决定了。我相信杂志社那里压的稿件肯定有一大堆和你文章质量不相上下的。除非你的文章是里程碑, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=467, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Mon Nov 17 10:44:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=506684, encodeId=631150668438, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：近期投过一篇，临床研究，内容很有新意。审稿一个月多回来，感觉审稿人好烂，有点不专业。两个人都没提啥意见，都是一小段二三句话，大意是第一个审稿人：尽管文章内容很有趣、设计严谨，但研究结果可以预料；第二个：论文设计执行得很好，但所用方法超常规、有疑点，故结论值得怀疑。 其实本人采用的研究方法是参考了lancet oncol近期发表的一篇论文，碰上ann surg审稿竟然一个说结果已经预料到，一个说结果值得怀疑。没有任何其他意见，主编拒稿。这是我投稿到现在最无耻，也是最不服的审稿意见。真的怀疑审稿人是否专业，要么ann surg请其他专业的人审的？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=414, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Oct 10 12:47:00 CST 2014, time=2014-10-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=502222, encodeId=1b1f502222c5, content=时隔一年，再次投稿，Under Review一个月，今天变成Decision in Process,祈求保佑...., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=487, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=dengery, createdTime=Tue Apr 08 11:04:00 CST 2014, time=2014-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=495681, encodeId=a42949568109, content=审了8个多月，最后悲剧，竟然只有一个专家的意见，而且说实话审得并不好，意见难以接受..., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=559, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sat May 11 20:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-05-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=493434, encodeId=58ad49343427, content=我的一片letter审了1月，修改后决定是否录用等了15个月，最后接收发表了。 我的论著审了半年多杳无音讯..., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=541, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sun Jan 13 17:02:00 CST 2013, time=2013-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=490054, encodeId=f62b49005452, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：投过去了，通过了初审，结果外审了一个半月被拒稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=489, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=cb7155033, createdName=wangjue200011, createdTime=Tue Aug 14 22:08:00 CST 2012, time=2012-08-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=488889, encodeId=06d448888924, content=级别太高，还是不投吧, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=592, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jun 12 17:20:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-12, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2015-06-27 invincible13

审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:5.0
经验分享：非常难，一点差错都不允许。如果是为了修回意见，还不如投相关专业杂志就行了，周期没那么长

454 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=514847, encodeId=fd3a51484ea4, content=外科中的Top期刊，的确比较难中，尤其对中国人来说。2015年4.8号投过一篇，5天左右under review，5.30号under review日期再次变了下，好像是又找了个审稿人，6.20号建议转投medicine，拒绝转投后直接变成了拒稿。3个审稿人，一个strongly建议发表（还建议找个统计的人审下），另外一个审稿人没有任何意见（可能是没有同意审稿），第三个审稿人是搞统计的（可能是后来找的那个），也没有拒的意思，还附上了他的文献。 注：一审周期顺利的话估计8周左右，如果有人拒审的话可能要增加2周；5.30和6.20都是周六，说明编辑周末也在干活。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=620, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=e25f57702, createdName=hypo2012, createdTime=Thu Aug 27 10:04:00 CST 2015, time=2015-08-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513033, encodeId=4aa3513033b9, content=审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:5.0 经验分享：非常难，一点差错都不允许。如果是为了修回意见，还不如投相关专业杂志就行了，周期没那么长, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=454, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=43cc82737, createdName=invincible13, createdTime=Sat Jun 27 12:25:00 CST 2015, time=2015-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507710, encodeId=e64f50e71028, content=不知道letter好发吗, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=497, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 19 05:37:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507649, encodeId=f53950e64908, content=这杂志，如果reviewer或者editor和你不熟，基本没戏，干脆别投。世界最顶级的杂志已经不是单纯靠文章质量来决定了。我相信杂志社那里压的稿件肯定有一大堆和你文章质量不相上下的。除非你的文章是里程碑, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=467, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Mon Nov 17 10:44:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=506684, encodeId=631150668438, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：近期投过一篇，临床研究，内容很有新意。审稿一个月多回来，感觉审稿人好烂，有点不专业。两个人都没提啥意见，都是一小段二三句话，大意是第一个审稿人：尽管文章内容很有趣、设计严谨，但研究结果可以预料；第二个：论文设计执行得很好，但所用方法超常规、有疑点，故结论值得怀疑。 其实本人采用的研究方法是参考了lancet oncol近期发表的一篇论文，碰上ann surg审稿竟然一个说结果已经预料到，一个说结果值得怀疑。没有任何其他意见，主编拒稿。这是我投稿到现在最无耻，也是最不服的审稿意见。真的怀疑审稿人是否专业，要么ann surg请其他专业的人审的？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=414, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Oct 10 12:47:00 CST 2014, time=2014-10-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=502222, encodeId=1b1f502222c5, content=时隔一年，再次投稿，Under Review一个月，今天变成Decision in Process,祈求保佑...., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=487, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=dengery, createdTime=Tue Apr 08 11:04:00 CST 2014, time=2014-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=495681, encodeId=a42949568109, content=审了8个多月，最后悲剧，竟然只有一个专家的意见，而且说实话审得并不好，意见难以接受..., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=559, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sat May 11 20:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-05-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=493434, encodeId=58ad49343427, content=我的一片letter审了1月，修改后决定是否录用等了15个月，最后接收发表了。 我的论著审了半年多杳无音讯..., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=541, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sun Jan 13 17:02:00 CST 2013, time=2013-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=490054, encodeId=f62b49005452, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：投过去了，通过了初审，结果外审了一个半月被拒稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=489, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=cb7155033, createdName=wangjue200011, createdTime=Tue Aug 14 22:08:00 CST 2012, time=2012-08-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=488889, encodeId=06d448888924, content=级别太高，还是不投吧, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=592, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jun 12 17:20:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-12, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2014-11-19 匿名用户

不知道letter好发吗

497 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=514847, encodeId=fd3a51484ea4, content=外科中的Top期刊，的确比较难中，尤其对中国人来说。2015年4.8号投过一篇，5天左右under review，5.30号under review日期再次变了下，好像是又找了个审稿人，6.20号建议转投medicine，拒绝转投后直接变成了拒稿。3个审稿人，一个strongly建议发表（还建议找个统计的人审下），另外一个审稿人没有任何意见（可能是没有同意审稿），第三个审稿人是搞统计的（可能是后来找的那个），也没有拒的意思，还附上了他的文献。 注：一审周期顺利的话估计8周左右，如果有人拒审的话可能要增加2周；5.30和6.20都是周六，说明编辑周末也在干活。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=620, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=e25f57702, createdName=hypo2012, createdTime=Thu Aug 27 10:04:00 CST 2015, time=2015-08-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513033, encodeId=4aa3513033b9, content=审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:5.0 经验分享：非常难，一点差错都不允许。如果是为了修回意见，还不如投相关专业杂志就行了，周期没那么长, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=454, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=43cc82737, createdName=invincible13, createdTime=Sat Jun 27 12:25:00 CST 2015, time=2015-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507710, encodeId=e64f50e71028, content=不知道letter好发吗, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=497, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 19 05:37:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507649, encodeId=f53950e64908, content=这杂志，如果reviewer或者editor和你不熟，基本没戏，干脆别投。世界最顶级的杂志已经不是单纯靠文章质量来决定了。我相信杂志社那里压的稿件肯定有一大堆和你文章质量不相上下的。除非你的文章是里程碑, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=467, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Mon Nov 17 10:44:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=506684, encodeId=631150668438, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：近期投过一篇，临床研究，内容很有新意。审稿一个月多回来，感觉审稿人好烂，有点不专业。两个人都没提啥意见，都是一小段二三句话，大意是第一个审稿人：尽管文章内容很有趣、设计严谨，但研究结果可以预料；第二个：论文设计执行得很好，但所用方法超常规、有疑点，故结论值得怀疑。 其实本人采用的研究方法是参考了lancet oncol近期发表的一篇论文，碰上ann surg审稿竟然一个说结果已经预料到，一个说结果值得怀疑。没有任何其他意见，主编拒稿。这是我投稿到现在最无耻，也是最不服的审稿意见。真的怀疑审稿人是否专业，要么ann surg请其他专业的人审的？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=414, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Oct 10 12:47:00 CST 2014, time=2014-10-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=502222, encodeId=1b1f502222c5, content=时隔一年，再次投稿，Under Review一个月，今天变成Decision in Process,祈求保佑...., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=487, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=dengery, createdTime=Tue Apr 08 11:04:00 CST 2014, time=2014-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=495681, encodeId=a42949568109, content=审了8个多月，最后悲剧，竟然只有一个专家的意见，而且说实话审得并不好，意见难以接受..., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=559, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sat May 11 20:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-05-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=493434, encodeId=58ad49343427, content=我的一片letter审了1月，修改后决定是否录用等了15个月，最后接收发表了。 我的论著审了半年多杳无音讯..., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=541, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sun Jan 13 17:02:00 CST 2013, time=2013-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=490054, encodeId=f62b49005452, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：投过去了，通过了初审，结果外审了一个半月被拒稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=489, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=cb7155033, createdName=wangjue200011, createdTime=Tue Aug 14 22:08:00 CST 2012, time=2012-08-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=488889, encodeId=06d448888924, content=级别太高，还是不投吧, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=592, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jun 12 17:20:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-12, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2014-11-17 匿名用户

这杂志，如果reviewer或者editor和你不熟，基本没戏，干脆别投。世界最顶级的杂志已经不是单纯靠文章质量来决定了。我相信杂志社那里压的稿件肯定有一大堆和你文章质量不相上下的。除非你的文章是里程碑

467 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=514847, encodeId=fd3a51484ea4, content=外科中的Top期刊，的确比较难中，尤其对中国人来说。2015年4.8号投过一篇，5天左右under review，5.30号under review日期再次变了下，好像是又找了个审稿人，6.20号建议转投medicine，拒绝转投后直接变成了拒稿。3个审稿人，一个strongly建议发表（还建议找个统计的人审下），另外一个审稿人没有任何意见（可能是没有同意审稿），第三个审稿人是搞统计的（可能是后来找的那个），也没有拒的意思，还附上了他的文献。 注：一审周期顺利的话估计8周左右，如果有人拒审的话可能要增加2周；5.30和6.20都是周六，说明编辑周末也在干活。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=620, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=e25f57702, createdName=hypo2012, createdTime=Thu Aug 27 10:04:00 CST 2015, time=2015-08-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513033, encodeId=4aa3513033b9, content=审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:5.0 经验分享：非常难，一点差错都不允许。如果是为了修回意见，还不如投相关专业杂志就行了，周期没那么长, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=454, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=43cc82737, createdName=invincible13, createdTime=Sat Jun 27 12:25:00 CST 2015, time=2015-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507710, encodeId=e64f50e71028, content=不知道letter好发吗, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=497, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 19 05:37:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507649, encodeId=f53950e64908, content=这杂志，如果reviewer或者editor和你不熟，基本没戏，干脆别投。世界最顶级的杂志已经不是单纯靠文章质量来决定了。我相信杂志社那里压的稿件肯定有一大堆和你文章质量不相上下的。除非你的文章是里程碑, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=467, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Mon Nov 17 10:44:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=506684, encodeId=631150668438, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：近期投过一篇，临床研究，内容很有新意。审稿一个月多回来，感觉审稿人好烂，有点不专业。两个人都没提啥意见，都是一小段二三句话，大意是第一个审稿人：尽管文章内容很有趣、设计严谨，但研究结果可以预料；第二个：论文设计执行得很好，但所用方法超常规、有疑点，故结论值得怀疑。 其实本人采用的研究方法是参考了lancet oncol近期发表的一篇论文，碰上ann surg审稿竟然一个说结果已经预料到，一个说结果值得怀疑。没有任何其他意见，主编拒稿。这是我投稿到现在最无耻，也是最不服的审稿意见。真的怀疑审稿人是否专业，要么ann surg请其他专业的人审的？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=414, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Oct 10 12:47:00 CST 2014, time=2014-10-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=502222, encodeId=1b1f502222c5, content=时隔一年，再次投稿，Under Review一个月，今天变成Decision in Process,祈求保佑...., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=487, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=dengery, createdTime=Tue Apr 08 11:04:00 CST 2014, time=2014-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=495681, encodeId=a42949568109, content=审了8个多月，最后悲剧，竟然只有一个专家的意见，而且说实话审得并不好，意见难以接受..., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=559, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sat May 11 20:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-05-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=493434, encodeId=58ad49343427, content=我的一片letter审了1月，修改后决定是否录用等了15个月，最后接收发表了。 我的论著审了半年多杳无音讯..., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=541, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sun Jan 13 17:02:00 CST 2013, time=2013-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=490054, encodeId=f62b49005452, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：投过去了，通过了初审，结果外审了一个半月被拒稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=489, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=cb7155033, createdName=wangjue200011, createdTime=Tue Aug 14 22:08:00 CST 2012, time=2012-08-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=488889, encodeId=06d448888924, content=级别太高，还是不投吧, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=592, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jun 12 17:20:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-12, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2014-10-10 匿名用户

审稿速度:2.0
经验分享：近期投过一篇，临床研究，内容很有新意。审稿一个月多回来，感觉审稿人好烂，有点不专业。两个人都没提啥意见，都是一小段二三句话，大意是第一个审稿人：尽管文章内容很有趣、设计严谨，但研究结果可以预料；第二个：论文设计执行得很好，但所用方法超常规、有疑点，故结论值得怀疑。

其实本人采用的研究方法是参考了lancet oncol近期发表的一篇论文，碰上ann surg审稿竟然一个说结果已经预料到，一个说结果值得怀疑。没有任何其他意见，主编拒稿。这是我投稿到现在最无耻，也是最不服的审稿意见。真的怀疑审稿人是否专业，要么ann surg请其他专业的人审的？

414 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=514847, encodeId=fd3a51484ea4, content=外科中的Top期刊，的确比较难中，尤其对中国人来说。2015年4.8号投过一篇，5天左右under review，5.30号under review日期再次变了下，好像是又找了个审稿人，6.20号建议转投medicine，拒绝转投后直接变成了拒稿。3个审稿人，一个strongly建议发表（还建议找个统计的人审下），另外一个审稿人没有任何意见（可能是没有同意审稿），第三个审稿人是搞统计的（可能是后来找的那个），也没有拒的意思，还附上了他的文献。 注：一审周期顺利的话估计8周左右，如果有人拒审的话可能要增加2周；5.30和6.20都是周六，说明编辑周末也在干活。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=620, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=e25f57702, createdName=hypo2012, createdTime=Thu Aug 27 10:04:00 CST 2015, time=2015-08-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513033, encodeId=4aa3513033b9, content=审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:5.0 经验分享：非常难，一点差错都不允许。如果是为了修回意见，还不如投相关专业杂志就行了，周期没那么长, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=454, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=43cc82737, createdName=invincible13, createdTime=Sat Jun 27 12:25:00 CST 2015, time=2015-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507710, encodeId=e64f50e71028, content=不知道letter好发吗, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=497, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 19 05:37:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507649, encodeId=f53950e64908, content=这杂志，如果reviewer或者editor和你不熟，基本没戏，干脆别投。世界最顶级的杂志已经不是单纯靠文章质量来决定了。我相信杂志社那里压的稿件肯定有一大堆和你文章质量不相上下的。除非你的文章是里程碑, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=467, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Mon Nov 17 10:44:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=506684, encodeId=631150668438, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：近期投过一篇，临床研究，内容很有新意。审稿一个月多回来，感觉审稿人好烂，有点不专业。两个人都没提啥意见，都是一小段二三句话，大意是第一个审稿人：尽管文章内容很有趣、设计严谨，但研究结果可以预料；第二个：论文设计执行得很好，但所用方法超常规、有疑点，故结论值得怀疑。 其实本人采用的研究方法是参考了lancet oncol近期发表的一篇论文，碰上ann surg审稿竟然一个说结果已经预料到，一个说结果值得怀疑。没有任何其他意见，主编拒稿。这是我投稿到现在最无耻，也是最不服的审稿意见。真的怀疑审稿人是否专业，要么ann surg请其他专业的人审的？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=414, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Oct 10 12:47:00 CST 2014, time=2014-10-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=502222, encodeId=1b1f502222c5, content=时隔一年，再次投稿，Under Review一个月，今天变成Decision in Process,祈求保佑...., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=487, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=dengery, createdTime=Tue Apr 08 11:04:00 CST 2014, time=2014-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=495681, encodeId=a42949568109, content=审了8个多月，最后悲剧，竟然只有一个专家的意见，而且说实话审得并不好，意见难以接受..., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=559, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sat May 11 20:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-05-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=493434, encodeId=58ad49343427, content=我的一片letter审了1月，修改后决定是否录用等了15个月，最后接收发表了。 我的论著审了半年多杳无音讯..., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=541, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sun Jan 13 17:02:00 CST 2013, time=2013-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=490054, encodeId=f62b49005452, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：投过去了，通过了初审，结果外审了一个半月被拒稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=489, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=cb7155033, createdName=wangjue200011, createdTime=Tue Aug 14 22:08:00 CST 2012, time=2012-08-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=488889, encodeId=06d448888924, content=级别太高，还是不投吧, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=592, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jun 12 17:20:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-12, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2014-04-08 dengery

时隔一年，再次投稿，Under Review一个月，今天变成Decision in Process,祈求保佑....

487 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=514847, encodeId=fd3a51484ea4, content=外科中的Top期刊，的确比较难中，尤其对中国人来说。2015年4.8号投过一篇，5天左右under review，5.30号under review日期再次变了下，好像是又找了个审稿人，6.20号建议转投medicine，拒绝转投后直接变成了拒稿。3个审稿人，一个strongly建议发表（还建议找个统计的人审下），另外一个审稿人没有任何意见（可能是没有同意审稿），第三个审稿人是搞统计的（可能是后来找的那个），也没有拒的意思，还附上了他的文献。 注：一审周期顺利的话估计8周左右，如果有人拒审的话可能要增加2周；5.30和6.20都是周六，说明编辑周末也在干活。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=620, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=e25f57702, createdName=hypo2012, createdTime=Thu Aug 27 10:04:00 CST 2015, time=2015-08-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513033, encodeId=4aa3513033b9, content=审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:5.0 经验分享：非常难，一点差错都不允许。如果是为了修回意见，还不如投相关专业杂志就行了，周期没那么长, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=454, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=43cc82737, createdName=invincible13, createdTime=Sat Jun 27 12:25:00 CST 2015, time=2015-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507710, encodeId=e64f50e71028, content=不知道letter好发吗, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=497, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 19 05:37:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507649, encodeId=f53950e64908, content=这杂志，如果reviewer或者editor和你不熟，基本没戏，干脆别投。世界最顶级的杂志已经不是单纯靠文章质量来决定了。我相信杂志社那里压的稿件肯定有一大堆和你文章质量不相上下的。除非你的文章是里程碑, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=467, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Mon Nov 17 10:44:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=506684, encodeId=631150668438, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：近期投过一篇，临床研究，内容很有新意。审稿一个月多回来，感觉审稿人好烂，有点不专业。两个人都没提啥意见，都是一小段二三句话，大意是第一个审稿人：尽管文章内容很有趣、设计严谨，但研究结果可以预料；第二个：论文设计执行得很好，但所用方法超常规、有疑点，故结论值得怀疑。 其实本人采用的研究方法是参考了lancet oncol近期发表的一篇论文，碰上ann surg审稿竟然一个说结果已经预料到，一个说结果值得怀疑。没有任何其他意见，主编拒稿。这是我投稿到现在最无耻，也是最不服的审稿意见。真的怀疑审稿人是否专业，要么ann surg请其他专业的人审的？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=414, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Oct 10 12:47:00 CST 2014, time=2014-10-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=502222, encodeId=1b1f502222c5, content=时隔一年，再次投稿，Under Review一个月，今天变成Decision in Process,祈求保佑...., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=487, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=dengery, createdTime=Tue Apr 08 11:04:00 CST 2014, time=2014-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=495681, encodeId=a42949568109, content=审了8个多月，最后悲剧，竟然只有一个专家的意见，而且说实话审得并不好，意见难以接受..., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=559, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sat May 11 20:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-05-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=493434, encodeId=58ad49343427, content=我的一片letter审了1月，修改后决定是否录用等了15个月，最后接收发表了。 我的论著审了半年多杳无音讯..., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=541, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sun Jan 13 17:02:00 CST 2013, time=2013-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=490054, encodeId=f62b49005452, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：投过去了，通过了初审，结果外审了一个半月被拒稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=489, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=cb7155033, createdName=wangjue200011, createdTime=Tue Aug 14 22:08:00 CST 2012, time=2012-08-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=488889, encodeId=06d448888924, content=级别太高，还是不投吧, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=592, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jun 12 17:20:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-12, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2013-05-11 匿名用户

审了8个多月，最后悲剧，竟然只有一个专家的意见，而且说实话审得并不好，意见难以接受...

559 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=514847, encodeId=fd3a51484ea4, content=外科中的Top期刊，的确比较难中，尤其对中国人来说。2015年4.8号投过一篇，5天左右under review，5.30号under review日期再次变了下，好像是又找了个审稿人，6.20号建议转投medicine，拒绝转投后直接变成了拒稿。3个审稿人，一个strongly建议发表（还建议找个统计的人审下），另外一个审稿人没有任何意见（可能是没有同意审稿），第三个审稿人是搞统计的（可能是后来找的那个），也没有拒的意思，还附上了他的文献。 注：一审周期顺利的话估计8周左右，如果有人拒审的话可能要增加2周；5.30和6.20都是周六，说明编辑周末也在干活。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=620, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=e25f57702, createdName=hypo2012, createdTime=Thu Aug 27 10:04:00 CST 2015, time=2015-08-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513033, encodeId=4aa3513033b9, content=审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:5.0 经验分享：非常难，一点差错都不允许。如果是为了修回意见，还不如投相关专业杂志就行了，周期没那么长, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=454, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=43cc82737, createdName=invincible13, createdTime=Sat Jun 27 12:25:00 CST 2015, time=2015-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507710, encodeId=e64f50e71028, content=不知道letter好发吗, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=497, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 19 05:37:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507649, encodeId=f53950e64908, content=这杂志，如果reviewer或者editor和你不熟，基本没戏，干脆别投。世界最顶级的杂志已经不是单纯靠文章质量来决定了。我相信杂志社那里压的稿件肯定有一大堆和你文章质量不相上下的。除非你的文章是里程碑, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=467, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Mon Nov 17 10:44:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=506684, encodeId=631150668438, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：近期投过一篇，临床研究，内容很有新意。审稿一个月多回来，感觉审稿人好烂，有点不专业。两个人都没提啥意见，都是一小段二三句话，大意是第一个审稿人：尽管文章内容很有趣、设计严谨，但研究结果可以预料；第二个：论文设计执行得很好，但所用方法超常规、有疑点，故结论值得怀疑。 其实本人采用的研究方法是参考了lancet oncol近期发表的一篇论文，碰上ann surg审稿竟然一个说结果已经预料到，一个说结果值得怀疑。没有任何其他意见，主编拒稿。这是我投稿到现在最无耻，也是最不服的审稿意见。真的怀疑审稿人是否专业，要么ann surg请其他专业的人审的？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=414, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Oct 10 12:47:00 CST 2014, time=2014-10-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=502222, encodeId=1b1f502222c5, content=时隔一年，再次投稿，Under Review一个月，今天变成Decision in Process,祈求保佑...., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=487, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=dengery, createdTime=Tue Apr 08 11:04:00 CST 2014, time=2014-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=495681, encodeId=a42949568109, content=审了8个多月，最后悲剧，竟然只有一个专家的意见，而且说实话审得并不好，意见难以接受..., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=559, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sat May 11 20:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-05-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=493434, encodeId=58ad49343427, content=我的一片letter审了1月，修改后决定是否录用等了15个月，最后接收发表了。 我的论著审了半年多杳无音讯..., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=541, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sun Jan 13 17:02:00 CST 2013, time=2013-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=490054, encodeId=f62b49005452, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：投过去了，通过了初审，结果外审了一个半月被拒稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=489, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=cb7155033, createdName=wangjue200011, createdTime=Tue Aug 14 22:08:00 CST 2012, time=2012-08-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=488889, encodeId=06d448888924, content=级别太高，还是不投吧, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=592, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jun 12 17:20:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-12, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2013-01-13 匿名用户

我的一片letter审了1月，修改后决定是否录用等了15个月，最后接收发表了。
我的论著审了半年多杳无音讯...

541 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=514847, encodeId=fd3a51484ea4, content=外科中的Top期刊，的确比较难中，尤其对中国人来说。2015年4.8号投过一篇，5天左右under review，5.30号under review日期再次变了下，好像是又找了个审稿人，6.20号建议转投medicine，拒绝转投后直接变成了拒稿。3个审稿人，一个strongly建议发表（还建议找个统计的人审下），另外一个审稿人没有任何意见（可能是没有同意审稿），第三个审稿人是搞统计的（可能是后来找的那个），也没有拒的意思，还附上了他的文献。 注：一审周期顺利的话估计8周左右，如果有人拒审的话可能要增加2周；5.30和6.20都是周六，说明编辑周末也在干活。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=620, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=e25f57702, createdName=hypo2012, createdTime=Thu Aug 27 10:04:00 CST 2015, time=2015-08-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513033, encodeId=4aa3513033b9, content=审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:5.0 经验分享：非常难，一点差错都不允许。如果是为了修回意见，还不如投相关专业杂志就行了，周期没那么长, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=454, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=43cc82737, createdName=invincible13, createdTime=Sat Jun 27 12:25:00 CST 2015, time=2015-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507710, encodeId=e64f50e71028, content=不知道letter好发吗, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=497, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 19 05:37:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507649, encodeId=f53950e64908, content=这杂志，如果reviewer或者editor和你不熟，基本没戏，干脆别投。世界最顶级的杂志已经不是单纯靠文章质量来决定了。我相信杂志社那里压的稿件肯定有一大堆和你文章质量不相上下的。除非你的文章是里程碑, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=467, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Mon Nov 17 10:44:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=506684, encodeId=631150668438, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：近期投过一篇，临床研究，内容很有新意。审稿一个月多回来，感觉审稿人好烂，有点不专业。两个人都没提啥意见，都是一小段二三句话，大意是第一个审稿人：尽管文章内容很有趣、设计严谨，但研究结果可以预料；第二个：论文设计执行得很好，但所用方法超常规、有疑点，故结论值得怀疑。 其实本人采用的研究方法是参考了lancet oncol近期发表的一篇论文，碰上ann surg审稿竟然一个说结果已经预料到，一个说结果值得怀疑。没有任何其他意见，主编拒稿。这是我投稿到现在最无耻，也是最不服的审稿意见。真的怀疑审稿人是否专业，要么ann surg请其他专业的人审的？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=414, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Oct 10 12:47:00 CST 2014, time=2014-10-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=502222, encodeId=1b1f502222c5, content=时隔一年，再次投稿，Under Review一个月，今天变成Decision in Process,祈求保佑...., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=487, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=dengery, createdTime=Tue Apr 08 11:04:00 CST 2014, time=2014-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=495681, encodeId=a42949568109, content=审了8个多月，最后悲剧，竟然只有一个专家的意见，而且说实话审得并不好，意见难以接受..., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=559, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sat May 11 20:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-05-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=493434, encodeId=58ad49343427, content=我的一片letter审了1月，修改后决定是否录用等了15个月，最后接收发表了。 我的论著审了半年多杳无音讯..., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=541, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sun Jan 13 17:02:00 CST 2013, time=2013-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=490054, encodeId=f62b49005452, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：投过去了，通过了初审，结果外审了一个半月被拒稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=489, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=cb7155033, createdName=wangjue200011, createdTime=Tue Aug 14 22:08:00 CST 2012, time=2012-08-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=488889, encodeId=06d448888924, content=级别太高，还是不投吧, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=592, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jun 12 17:20:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-12, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2012-08-14 wangjue200011

审稿速度:2.0
经验分享：投过去了，通过了初审，结果外审了一个半月被拒稿。

489 0

[GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=514847, encodeId=fd3a51484ea4, content=外科中的Top期刊，的确比较难中，尤其对中国人来说。2015年4.8号投过一篇，5天左右under review，5.30号under review日期再次变了下，好像是又找了个审稿人，6.20号建议转投medicine，拒绝转投后直接变成了拒稿。3个审稿人，一个strongly建议发表（还建议找个统计的人审下），另外一个审稿人没有任何意见（可能是没有同意审稿），第三个审稿人是搞统计的（可能是后来找的那个），也没有拒的意思，还附上了他的文献。 注：一审周期顺利的话估计8周左右，如果有人拒审的话可能要增加2周；5.30和6.20都是周六，说明编辑周末也在干活。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=620, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=e25f57702, createdName=hypo2012, createdTime=Thu Aug 27 10:04:00 CST 2015, time=2015-08-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=513033, encodeId=4aa3513033b9, content=审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:5.0 经验分享：非常难，一点差错都不允许。如果是为了修回意见，还不如投相关专业杂志就行了，周期没那么长, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=454, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=, createdBy=43cc82737, createdName=invincible13, createdTime=Sat Jun 27 12:25:00 CST 2015, time=2015-06-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507710, encodeId=e64f50e71028, content=不知道letter好发吗, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=497, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Wed Nov 19 05:37:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=507649, encodeId=f53950e64908, content=这杂志，如果reviewer或者editor和你不熟，基本没戏，干脆别投。世界最顶级的杂志已经不是单纯靠文章质量来决定了。我相信杂志社那里压的稿件肯定有一大堆和你文章质量不相上下的。除非你的文章是里程碑, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=467, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Mon Nov 17 10:44:00 CST 2014, time=2014-11-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=506684, encodeId=631150668438, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：近期投过一篇，临床研究，内容很有新意。审稿一个月多回来，感觉审稿人好烂，有点不专业。两个人都没提啥意见，都是一小段二三句话，大意是第一个审稿人：尽管文章内容很有趣、设计严谨，但研究结果可以预料；第二个：论文设计执行得很好，但所用方法超常规、有疑点，故结论值得怀疑。 其实本人采用的研究方法是参考了lancet oncol近期发表的一篇论文，碰上ann surg审稿竟然一个说结果已经预料到，一个说结果值得怀疑。没有任何其他意见，主编拒稿。这是我投稿到现在最无耻，也是最不服的审稿意见。真的怀疑审稿人是否专业，要么ann surg请其他专业的人审的？, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=414, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Fri Oct 10 12:47:00 CST 2014, time=2014-10-10, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=502222, encodeId=1b1f502222c5, content=时隔一年，再次投稿，Under Review一个月，今天变成Decision in Process,祈求保佑...., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=487, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=dengery, createdTime=Tue Apr 08 11:04:00 CST 2014, time=2014-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=495681, encodeId=a42949568109, content=审了8个多月，最后悲剧，竟然只有一个专家的意见，而且说实话审得并不好，意见难以接受..., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=559, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sat May 11 20:57:00 CST 2013, time=2013-05-11, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=493434, encodeId=58ad49343427, content=我的一片letter审了1月，修改后决定是否录用等了15个月，最后接收发表了。 我的论著审了半年多杳无音讯..., beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=541, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Sun Jan 13 17:02:00 CST 2013, time=2013-01-13, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=490054, encodeId=f62b49005452, content=审稿速度:2.0 经验分享：投过去了，通过了初审，结果外审了一个半月被拒稿。, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=489, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=/v1.0.0/img/user_icon.png, createdBy=cb7155033, createdName=wangjue200011, createdTime=Tue Aug 14 22:08:00 CST 2012, time=2012-08-14, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=488889, encodeId=06d448888924, content=级别太高，还是不投吧, beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=592, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f0620, createdName=, createdTime=Tue Jun 12 17:20:00 CST 2012, time=2012-06-12, status=1, ipAttribution=)]

2012-06-12 匿名用户

级别太高，还是不投吧

592 0

内科

外科

专科科室

热点

按科室浏览

临床工具

科研工具

其他工具

科研数智化

真实世界研究解决方案

数字化学术传播解决方案

其它

期刊讨论

科室

工具

服务