SCI BULL 润色咨询

Science Bulletin

出版年份：暂无数据 年文章数：846 投稿命中率： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看

出版周期：Semimonthly 自引率：11.5% 审稿周期： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看

前往期刊查询
期刊讨论 | 中国SCI论文 | 期刊主页 | 投稿经验 | 杂志官网 | 投稿链接 | 作者需知 | PMC链接 | Pubmed全文检索

期刊讨论

  1. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861984, encodeId=5469861984f8, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：中过隔壁的nc，没中过这个期刊。。<br> 客观的说nc是比较水，以后应该不会选择投nc了<br> sci bull 作为国产期刊的领头羊，未来发展不可限量！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=101, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Tue Jun 16 17:39:33 CST 2020, time=2020-06-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861567, encodeId=88a886156e02, content=pnas真的那么牛逼的话，就不应该允许关系户的存在 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cc565414142, createdName=ms2631524123839591, createdTime=Mon Jun 08 08:39:41 CST 2020, time=2020-06-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861539, encodeId=37eb86153962, content=查的很清楚，现在还是contribute submission 和 direct submission分开的。如果说公然开后门都能洗，那真是厉害，在下对你的价值观深感敬佩，只能敬而远之，无法再继续交流。至于sci bull是否有隐形的后门，不想揣测，因为即使nature及其子刊，投稿也是十分看关系，所以揣测也没意义。但是pnas是公然公开的，这就很可怕的，就像把支持犯罪写在法律中，简直不要脸皮。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=79, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Sun Jun 07 09:27:44 CST 2020, time=2020-06-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861533, encodeId=d330861533dc, content=最起码pnas直投文章上面会有标记<br> science bull的后门有标记吗？<br> 2014年10月院士推荐投稿就已经取消 自己去查 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Sun Jun 07 08:54:29 CST 2020, time=2020-06-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861465, encodeId=c0bc861465da, content=楼下睁着眼睛说瞎话，pnas官网上contributed submission赫然在目，竟然说取消了？pnas这就是公然的给大佬走后门。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=567b5413997, createdName=ms7446073747655445, createdTime=Fri Jun 05 09:12:43 CST 2020, time=2020-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861460, encodeId=6d1c86146028, content=楼下你难道不知道pnas这个院士直投已经取消了吗？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Fri Jun 05 06:55:37 CST 2020, time=2020-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861450, encodeId=660586145082, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：pnas不也是美国大佬的游戏，美国科学院院士contribute的文章，几乎100%录用，不知楼下的键盘侠们为何如此吹嘘pnas。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=2, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3de05414115, createdName=ms313574960747337, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 20:31:07 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861432, encodeId=87c9861432e0, content=国内大佬的游戏而已，很难和pnas和子刊相比 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=93, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 17:08:50 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861400, encodeId=880c86140086, content=哈哈哈哈 国内的垃圾期刊都是要多少多少分 <br> 就这种心态做什么期刊 不如去做生意<br> 经典的期刊低分的很多 jbc才四分多 估计能完虐未来15分的这个垃圾期刊 <br> 如果想分数坐火箭其实很容易 参看以下bone research就行了<br> 不过这个期刊花钱买了一批shuijun海吹还是做了功课的 只不过水平太差<br> 劝国内科研圈要点脸 中科院够不要脸了 下面的期刊自重吧 自己看看你们发的垃圾文章 plos one 你比得上吗？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=47, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 09:09:08 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861359, encodeId=d75f86135964, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：评论里很多人对这个期刊持否认态度，但不管怎样强化国产刊物的趋势是变不了的了。sci bull编辑部的目标是5年内把if做到15，然后逐渐扩容，并明确了期刊发展目标是对标pnas。2019年实时if超过9.7了，最终可能会到9.8，2020年实时if已经3.8，和nc及sa相差不远，20年的最终if有望突破11，未来发展,会越来越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=80, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5f3f5413986, createdName=ms7242751882637620, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 14:48:21 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-06-16 ms5413142457057855

    审稿速度:1.0
    经验分享：中过隔壁的nc，没中过这个期刊。。
    客观的说nc是比较水，以后应该不会选择投nc了
    sci bull 作为国产期刊的领头羊，未来发展不可限量！

    0

  2. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861984, encodeId=5469861984f8, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：中过隔壁的nc，没中过这个期刊。。<br> 客观的说nc是比较水，以后应该不会选择投nc了<br> sci bull 作为国产期刊的领头羊，未来发展不可限量！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=101, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Tue Jun 16 17:39:33 CST 2020, time=2020-06-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861567, encodeId=88a886156e02, content=pnas真的那么牛逼的话，就不应该允许关系户的存在 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cc565414142, createdName=ms2631524123839591, createdTime=Mon Jun 08 08:39:41 CST 2020, time=2020-06-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861539, encodeId=37eb86153962, content=查的很清楚，现在还是contribute submission 和 direct submission分开的。如果说公然开后门都能洗，那真是厉害，在下对你的价值观深感敬佩，只能敬而远之，无法再继续交流。至于sci bull是否有隐形的后门，不想揣测，因为即使nature及其子刊，投稿也是十分看关系，所以揣测也没意义。但是pnas是公然公开的，这就很可怕的，就像把支持犯罪写在法律中，简直不要脸皮。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=79, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Sun Jun 07 09:27:44 CST 2020, time=2020-06-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861533, encodeId=d330861533dc, content=最起码pnas直投文章上面会有标记<br> science bull的后门有标记吗？<br> 2014年10月院士推荐投稿就已经取消 自己去查 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Sun Jun 07 08:54:29 CST 2020, time=2020-06-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861465, encodeId=c0bc861465da, content=楼下睁着眼睛说瞎话，pnas官网上contributed submission赫然在目，竟然说取消了？pnas这就是公然的给大佬走后门。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=567b5413997, createdName=ms7446073747655445, createdTime=Fri Jun 05 09:12:43 CST 2020, time=2020-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861460, encodeId=6d1c86146028, content=楼下你难道不知道pnas这个院士直投已经取消了吗？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Fri Jun 05 06:55:37 CST 2020, time=2020-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861450, encodeId=660586145082, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：pnas不也是美国大佬的游戏，美国科学院院士contribute的文章，几乎100%录用，不知楼下的键盘侠们为何如此吹嘘pnas。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=2, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3de05414115, createdName=ms313574960747337, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 20:31:07 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861432, encodeId=87c9861432e0, content=国内大佬的游戏而已，很难和pnas和子刊相比 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=93, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 17:08:50 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861400, encodeId=880c86140086, content=哈哈哈哈 国内的垃圾期刊都是要多少多少分 <br> 就这种心态做什么期刊 不如去做生意<br> 经典的期刊低分的很多 jbc才四分多 估计能完虐未来15分的这个垃圾期刊 <br> 如果想分数坐火箭其实很容易 参看以下bone research就行了<br> 不过这个期刊花钱买了一批shuijun海吹还是做了功课的 只不过水平太差<br> 劝国内科研圈要点脸 中科院够不要脸了 下面的期刊自重吧 自己看看你们发的垃圾文章 plos one 你比得上吗？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=47, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 09:09:08 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861359, encodeId=d75f86135964, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：评论里很多人对这个期刊持否认态度，但不管怎样强化国产刊物的趋势是变不了的了。sci bull编辑部的目标是5年内把if做到15，然后逐渐扩容，并明确了期刊发展目标是对标pnas。2019年实时if超过9.7了，最终可能会到9.8，2020年实时if已经3.8，和nc及sa相差不远，20年的最终if有望突破11，未来发展,会越来越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=80, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5f3f5413986, createdName=ms7242751882637620, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 14:48:21 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-06-08 ms2631524123839591

    pnas真的那么牛逼的话，就不应该允许关系户的存在

    0

  3. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861984, encodeId=5469861984f8, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：中过隔壁的nc，没中过这个期刊。。<br> 客观的说nc是比较水，以后应该不会选择投nc了<br> sci bull 作为国产期刊的领头羊，未来发展不可限量！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=101, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Tue Jun 16 17:39:33 CST 2020, time=2020-06-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861567, encodeId=88a886156e02, content=pnas真的那么牛逼的话，就不应该允许关系户的存在 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cc565414142, createdName=ms2631524123839591, createdTime=Mon Jun 08 08:39:41 CST 2020, time=2020-06-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861539, encodeId=37eb86153962, content=查的很清楚，现在还是contribute submission 和 direct submission分开的。如果说公然开后门都能洗，那真是厉害，在下对你的价值观深感敬佩，只能敬而远之，无法再继续交流。至于sci bull是否有隐形的后门，不想揣测，因为即使nature及其子刊，投稿也是十分看关系，所以揣测也没意义。但是pnas是公然公开的，这就很可怕的，就像把支持犯罪写在法律中，简直不要脸皮。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=79, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Sun Jun 07 09:27:44 CST 2020, time=2020-06-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861533, encodeId=d330861533dc, content=最起码pnas直投文章上面会有标记<br> science bull的后门有标记吗？<br> 2014年10月院士推荐投稿就已经取消 自己去查 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Sun Jun 07 08:54:29 CST 2020, time=2020-06-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861465, encodeId=c0bc861465da, content=楼下睁着眼睛说瞎话，pnas官网上contributed submission赫然在目，竟然说取消了？pnas这就是公然的给大佬走后门。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=567b5413997, createdName=ms7446073747655445, createdTime=Fri Jun 05 09:12:43 CST 2020, time=2020-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861460, encodeId=6d1c86146028, content=楼下你难道不知道pnas这个院士直投已经取消了吗？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Fri Jun 05 06:55:37 CST 2020, time=2020-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861450, encodeId=660586145082, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：pnas不也是美国大佬的游戏，美国科学院院士contribute的文章，几乎100%录用，不知楼下的键盘侠们为何如此吹嘘pnas。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=2, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3de05414115, createdName=ms313574960747337, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 20:31:07 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861432, encodeId=87c9861432e0, content=国内大佬的游戏而已，很难和pnas和子刊相比 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=93, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 17:08:50 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861400, encodeId=880c86140086, content=哈哈哈哈 国内的垃圾期刊都是要多少多少分 <br> 就这种心态做什么期刊 不如去做生意<br> 经典的期刊低分的很多 jbc才四分多 估计能完虐未来15分的这个垃圾期刊 <br> 如果想分数坐火箭其实很容易 参看以下bone research就行了<br> 不过这个期刊花钱买了一批shuijun海吹还是做了功课的 只不过水平太差<br> 劝国内科研圈要点脸 中科院够不要脸了 下面的期刊自重吧 自己看看你们发的垃圾文章 plos one 你比得上吗？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=47, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 09:09:08 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861359, encodeId=d75f86135964, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：评论里很多人对这个期刊持否认态度，但不管怎样强化国产刊物的趋势是变不了的了。sci bull编辑部的目标是5年内把if做到15，然后逐渐扩容，并明确了期刊发展目标是对标pnas。2019年实时if超过9.7了，最终可能会到9.8，2020年实时if已经3.8，和nc及sa相差不远，20年的最终if有望突破11，未来发展,会越来越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=80, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5f3f5413986, createdName=ms7242751882637620, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 14:48:21 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-06-07 ms622773450447966

    查的很清楚，现在还是contribute submission 和 direct submission分开的。如果说公然开后门都能洗，那真是厉害，在下对你的价值观深感敬佩，只能敬而远之，无法再继续交流。至于sci bull是否有隐形的后门，不想揣测，因为即使nature及其子刊，投稿也是十分看关系，所以揣测也没意义。但是pnas是公然公开的，这就很可怕的，就像把支持犯罪写在法律中，简直不要脸皮。

    0

  4. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861984, encodeId=5469861984f8, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：中过隔壁的nc，没中过这个期刊。。<br> 客观的说nc是比较水，以后应该不会选择投nc了<br> sci bull 作为国产期刊的领头羊，未来发展不可限量！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=101, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Tue Jun 16 17:39:33 CST 2020, time=2020-06-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861567, encodeId=88a886156e02, content=pnas真的那么牛逼的话，就不应该允许关系户的存在 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cc565414142, createdName=ms2631524123839591, createdTime=Mon Jun 08 08:39:41 CST 2020, time=2020-06-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861539, encodeId=37eb86153962, content=查的很清楚，现在还是contribute submission 和 direct submission分开的。如果说公然开后门都能洗，那真是厉害，在下对你的价值观深感敬佩，只能敬而远之，无法再继续交流。至于sci bull是否有隐形的后门，不想揣测，因为即使nature及其子刊，投稿也是十分看关系，所以揣测也没意义。但是pnas是公然公开的，这就很可怕的，就像把支持犯罪写在法律中，简直不要脸皮。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=79, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Sun Jun 07 09:27:44 CST 2020, time=2020-06-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861533, encodeId=d330861533dc, content=最起码pnas直投文章上面会有标记<br> science bull的后门有标记吗？<br> 2014年10月院士推荐投稿就已经取消 自己去查 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Sun Jun 07 08:54:29 CST 2020, time=2020-06-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861465, encodeId=c0bc861465da, content=楼下睁着眼睛说瞎话，pnas官网上contributed submission赫然在目，竟然说取消了？pnas这就是公然的给大佬走后门。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=567b5413997, createdName=ms7446073747655445, createdTime=Fri Jun 05 09:12:43 CST 2020, time=2020-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861460, encodeId=6d1c86146028, content=楼下你难道不知道pnas这个院士直投已经取消了吗？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Fri Jun 05 06:55:37 CST 2020, time=2020-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861450, encodeId=660586145082, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：pnas不也是美国大佬的游戏，美国科学院院士contribute的文章，几乎100%录用，不知楼下的键盘侠们为何如此吹嘘pnas。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=2, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3de05414115, createdName=ms313574960747337, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 20:31:07 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861432, encodeId=87c9861432e0, content=国内大佬的游戏而已，很难和pnas和子刊相比 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=93, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 17:08:50 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861400, encodeId=880c86140086, content=哈哈哈哈 国内的垃圾期刊都是要多少多少分 <br> 就这种心态做什么期刊 不如去做生意<br> 经典的期刊低分的很多 jbc才四分多 估计能完虐未来15分的这个垃圾期刊 <br> 如果想分数坐火箭其实很容易 参看以下bone research就行了<br> 不过这个期刊花钱买了一批shuijun海吹还是做了功课的 只不过水平太差<br> 劝国内科研圈要点脸 中科院够不要脸了 下面的期刊自重吧 自己看看你们发的垃圾文章 plos one 你比得上吗？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=47, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 09:09:08 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861359, encodeId=d75f86135964, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：评论里很多人对这个期刊持否认态度，但不管怎样强化国产刊物的趋势是变不了的了。sci bull编辑部的目标是5年内把if做到15，然后逐渐扩容，并明确了期刊发展目标是对标pnas。2019年实时if超过9.7了，最终可能会到9.8，2020年实时if已经3.8，和nc及sa相差不远，20年的最终if有望突破11，未来发展,会越来越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=80, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5f3f5413986, createdName=ms7242751882637620, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 14:48:21 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-06-07 ms9325659851846900

    最起码pnas直投文章上面会有标记
    science bull的后门有标记吗？
    2014年10月院士推荐投稿就已经取消 自己去查

    0

  5. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861984, encodeId=5469861984f8, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：中过隔壁的nc，没中过这个期刊。。<br> 客观的说nc是比较水，以后应该不会选择投nc了<br> sci bull 作为国产期刊的领头羊，未来发展不可限量！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=101, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Tue Jun 16 17:39:33 CST 2020, time=2020-06-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861567, encodeId=88a886156e02, content=pnas真的那么牛逼的话，就不应该允许关系户的存在 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cc565414142, createdName=ms2631524123839591, createdTime=Mon Jun 08 08:39:41 CST 2020, time=2020-06-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861539, encodeId=37eb86153962, content=查的很清楚，现在还是contribute submission 和 direct submission分开的。如果说公然开后门都能洗，那真是厉害，在下对你的价值观深感敬佩，只能敬而远之，无法再继续交流。至于sci bull是否有隐形的后门，不想揣测，因为即使nature及其子刊，投稿也是十分看关系，所以揣测也没意义。但是pnas是公然公开的，这就很可怕的，就像把支持犯罪写在法律中，简直不要脸皮。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=79, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Sun Jun 07 09:27:44 CST 2020, time=2020-06-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861533, encodeId=d330861533dc, content=最起码pnas直投文章上面会有标记<br> science bull的后门有标记吗？<br> 2014年10月院士推荐投稿就已经取消 自己去查 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Sun Jun 07 08:54:29 CST 2020, time=2020-06-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861465, encodeId=c0bc861465da, content=楼下睁着眼睛说瞎话，pnas官网上contributed submission赫然在目，竟然说取消了？pnas这就是公然的给大佬走后门。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=567b5413997, createdName=ms7446073747655445, createdTime=Fri Jun 05 09:12:43 CST 2020, time=2020-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861460, encodeId=6d1c86146028, content=楼下你难道不知道pnas这个院士直投已经取消了吗？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Fri Jun 05 06:55:37 CST 2020, time=2020-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861450, encodeId=660586145082, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：pnas不也是美国大佬的游戏，美国科学院院士contribute的文章，几乎100%录用，不知楼下的键盘侠们为何如此吹嘘pnas。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=2, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3de05414115, createdName=ms313574960747337, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 20:31:07 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861432, encodeId=87c9861432e0, content=国内大佬的游戏而已，很难和pnas和子刊相比 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=93, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 17:08:50 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861400, encodeId=880c86140086, content=哈哈哈哈 国内的垃圾期刊都是要多少多少分 <br> 就这种心态做什么期刊 不如去做生意<br> 经典的期刊低分的很多 jbc才四分多 估计能完虐未来15分的这个垃圾期刊 <br> 如果想分数坐火箭其实很容易 参看以下bone research就行了<br> 不过这个期刊花钱买了一批shuijun海吹还是做了功课的 只不过水平太差<br> 劝国内科研圈要点脸 中科院够不要脸了 下面的期刊自重吧 自己看看你们发的垃圾文章 plos one 你比得上吗？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=47, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 09:09:08 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861359, encodeId=d75f86135964, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：评论里很多人对这个期刊持否认态度，但不管怎样强化国产刊物的趋势是变不了的了。sci bull编辑部的目标是5年内把if做到15，然后逐渐扩容，并明确了期刊发展目标是对标pnas。2019年实时if超过9.7了，最终可能会到9.8，2020年实时if已经3.8，和nc及sa相差不远，20年的最终if有望突破11，未来发展,会越来越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=80, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5f3f5413986, createdName=ms7242751882637620, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 14:48:21 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-06-05 ms7446073747655445

    楼下睁着眼睛说瞎话，pnas官网上contributed submission赫然在目，竟然说取消了？pnas这就是公然的给大佬走后门。

    0

  6. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861984, encodeId=5469861984f8, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：中过隔壁的nc，没中过这个期刊。。<br> 客观的说nc是比较水，以后应该不会选择投nc了<br> sci bull 作为国产期刊的领头羊，未来发展不可限量！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=101, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Tue Jun 16 17:39:33 CST 2020, time=2020-06-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861567, encodeId=88a886156e02, content=pnas真的那么牛逼的话，就不应该允许关系户的存在 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cc565414142, createdName=ms2631524123839591, createdTime=Mon Jun 08 08:39:41 CST 2020, time=2020-06-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861539, encodeId=37eb86153962, content=查的很清楚，现在还是contribute submission 和 direct submission分开的。如果说公然开后门都能洗，那真是厉害，在下对你的价值观深感敬佩，只能敬而远之，无法再继续交流。至于sci bull是否有隐形的后门，不想揣测，因为即使nature及其子刊，投稿也是十分看关系，所以揣测也没意义。但是pnas是公然公开的，这就很可怕的，就像把支持犯罪写在法律中，简直不要脸皮。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=79, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Sun Jun 07 09:27:44 CST 2020, time=2020-06-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861533, encodeId=d330861533dc, content=最起码pnas直投文章上面会有标记<br> science bull的后门有标记吗？<br> 2014年10月院士推荐投稿就已经取消 自己去查 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Sun Jun 07 08:54:29 CST 2020, time=2020-06-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861465, encodeId=c0bc861465da, content=楼下睁着眼睛说瞎话，pnas官网上contributed submission赫然在目，竟然说取消了？pnas这就是公然的给大佬走后门。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=567b5413997, createdName=ms7446073747655445, createdTime=Fri Jun 05 09:12:43 CST 2020, time=2020-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861460, encodeId=6d1c86146028, content=楼下你难道不知道pnas这个院士直投已经取消了吗？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Fri Jun 05 06:55:37 CST 2020, time=2020-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861450, encodeId=660586145082, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：pnas不也是美国大佬的游戏，美国科学院院士contribute的文章，几乎100%录用，不知楼下的键盘侠们为何如此吹嘘pnas。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=2, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3de05414115, createdName=ms313574960747337, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 20:31:07 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861432, encodeId=87c9861432e0, content=国内大佬的游戏而已，很难和pnas和子刊相比 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=93, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 17:08:50 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861400, encodeId=880c86140086, content=哈哈哈哈 国内的垃圾期刊都是要多少多少分 <br> 就这种心态做什么期刊 不如去做生意<br> 经典的期刊低分的很多 jbc才四分多 估计能完虐未来15分的这个垃圾期刊 <br> 如果想分数坐火箭其实很容易 参看以下bone research就行了<br> 不过这个期刊花钱买了一批shuijun海吹还是做了功课的 只不过水平太差<br> 劝国内科研圈要点脸 中科院够不要脸了 下面的期刊自重吧 自己看看你们发的垃圾文章 plos one 你比得上吗？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=47, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 09:09:08 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861359, encodeId=d75f86135964, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：评论里很多人对这个期刊持否认态度，但不管怎样强化国产刊物的趋势是变不了的了。sci bull编辑部的目标是5年内把if做到15，然后逐渐扩容，并明确了期刊发展目标是对标pnas。2019年实时if超过9.7了，最终可能会到9.8，2020年实时if已经3.8，和nc及sa相差不远，20年的最终if有望突破11，未来发展,会越来越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=80, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5f3f5413986, createdName=ms7242751882637620, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 14:48:21 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-06-05 ms2983094698733738

    楼下你难道不知道pnas这个院士直投已经取消了吗？

    0

  7. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861984, encodeId=5469861984f8, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：中过隔壁的nc，没中过这个期刊。。<br> 客观的说nc是比较水，以后应该不会选择投nc了<br> sci bull 作为国产期刊的领头羊，未来发展不可限量！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=101, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Tue Jun 16 17:39:33 CST 2020, time=2020-06-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861567, encodeId=88a886156e02, content=pnas真的那么牛逼的话，就不应该允许关系户的存在 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cc565414142, createdName=ms2631524123839591, createdTime=Mon Jun 08 08:39:41 CST 2020, time=2020-06-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861539, encodeId=37eb86153962, content=查的很清楚，现在还是contribute submission 和 direct submission分开的。如果说公然开后门都能洗，那真是厉害，在下对你的价值观深感敬佩，只能敬而远之，无法再继续交流。至于sci bull是否有隐形的后门，不想揣测，因为即使nature及其子刊，投稿也是十分看关系，所以揣测也没意义。但是pnas是公然公开的，这就很可怕的，就像把支持犯罪写在法律中，简直不要脸皮。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=79, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Sun Jun 07 09:27:44 CST 2020, time=2020-06-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861533, encodeId=d330861533dc, content=最起码pnas直投文章上面会有标记<br> science bull的后门有标记吗？<br> 2014年10月院士推荐投稿就已经取消 自己去查 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Sun Jun 07 08:54:29 CST 2020, time=2020-06-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861465, encodeId=c0bc861465da, content=楼下睁着眼睛说瞎话，pnas官网上contributed submission赫然在目，竟然说取消了？pnas这就是公然的给大佬走后门。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=567b5413997, createdName=ms7446073747655445, createdTime=Fri Jun 05 09:12:43 CST 2020, time=2020-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861460, encodeId=6d1c86146028, content=楼下你难道不知道pnas这个院士直投已经取消了吗？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Fri Jun 05 06:55:37 CST 2020, time=2020-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861450, encodeId=660586145082, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：pnas不也是美国大佬的游戏，美国科学院院士contribute的文章，几乎100%录用，不知楼下的键盘侠们为何如此吹嘘pnas。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=2, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3de05414115, createdName=ms313574960747337, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 20:31:07 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861432, encodeId=87c9861432e0, content=国内大佬的游戏而已，很难和pnas和子刊相比 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=93, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 17:08:50 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861400, encodeId=880c86140086, content=哈哈哈哈 国内的垃圾期刊都是要多少多少分 <br> 就这种心态做什么期刊 不如去做生意<br> 经典的期刊低分的很多 jbc才四分多 估计能完虐未来15分的这个垃圾期刊 <br> 如果想分数坐火箭其实很容易 参看以下bone research就行了<br> 不过这个期刊花钱买了一批shuijun海吹还是做了功课的 只不过水平太差<br> 劝国内科研圈要点脸 中科院够不要脸了 下面的期刊自重吧 自己看看你们发的垃圾文章 plos one 你比得上吗？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=47, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 09:09:08 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861359, encodeId=d75f86135964, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：评论里很多人对这个期刊持否认态度，但不管怎样强化国产刊物的趋势是变不了的了。sci bull编辑部的目标是5年内把if做到15，然后逐渐扩容，并明确了期刊发展目标是对标pnas。2019年实时if超过9.7了，最终可能会到9.8，2020年实时if已经3.8，和nc及sa相差不远，20年的最终if有望突破11，未来发展,会越来越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=80, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5f3f5413986, createdName=ms7242751882637620, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 14:48:21 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-06-04 ms313574960747337

    审稿速度:2.0
    经验分享：pnas不也是美国大佬的游戏，美国科学院院士contribute的文章，几乎100%录用，不知楼下的键盘侠们为何如此吹嘘pnas。

    0

  8. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861984, encodeId=5469861984f8, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：中过隔壁的nc，没中过这个期刊。。<br> 客观的说nc是比较水，以后应该不会选择投nc了<br> sci bull 作为国产期刊的领头羊，未来发展不可限量！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=101, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Tue Jun 16 17:39:33 CST 2020, time=2020-06-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861567, encodeId=88a886156e02, content=pnas真的那么牛逼的话，就不应该允许关系户的存在 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cc565414142, createdName=ms2631524123839591, createdTime=Mon Jun 08 08:39:41 CST 2020, time=2020-06-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861539, encodeId=37eb86153962, content=查的很清楚，现在还是contribute submission 和 direct submission分开的。如果说公然开后门都能洗，那真是厉害，在下对你的价值观深感敬佩，只能敬而远之，无法再继续交流。至于sci bull是否有隐形的后门，不想揣测，因为即使nature及其子刊，投稿也是十分看关系，所以揣测也没意义。但是pnas是公然公开的，这就很可怕的，就像把支持犯罪写在法律中，简直不要脸皮。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=79, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Sun Jun 07 09:27:44 CST 2020, time=2020-06-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861533, encodeId=d330861533dc, content=最起码pnas直投文章上面会有标记<br> science bull的后门有标记吗？<br> 2014年10月院士推荐投稿就已经取消 自己去查 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Sun Jun 07 08:54:29 CST 2020, time=2020-06-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861465, encodeId=c0bc861465da, content=楼下睁着眼睛说瞎话，pnas官网上contributed submission赫然在目，竟然说取消了？pnas这就是公然的给大佬走后门。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=567b5413997, createdName=ms7446073747655445, createdTime=Fri Jun 05 09:12:43 CST 2020, time=2020-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861460, encodeId=6d1c86146028, content=楼下你难道不知道pnas这个院士直投已经取消了吗？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Fri Jun 05 06:55:37 CST 2020, time=2020-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861450, encodeId=660586145082, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：pnas不也是美国大佬的游戏，美国科学院院士contribute的文章，几乎100%录用，不知楼下的键盘侠们为何如此吹嘘pnas。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=2, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3de05414115, createdName=ms313574960747337, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 20:31:07 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861432, encodeId=87c9861432e0, content=国内大佬的游戏而已，很难和pnas和子刊相比 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=93, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 17:08:50 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861400, encodeId=880c86140086, content=哈哈哈哈 国内的垃圾期刊都是要多少多少分 <br> 就这种心态做什么期刊 不如去做生意<br> 经典的期刊低分的很多 jbc才四分多 估计能完虐未来15分的这个垃圾期刊 <br> 如果想分数坐火箭其实很容易 参看以下bone research就行了<br> 不过这个期刊花钱买了一批shuijun海吹还是做了功课的 只不过水平太差<br> 劝国内科研圈要点脸 中科院够不要脸了 下面的期刊自重吧 自己看看你们发的垃圾文章 plos one 你比得上吗？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=47, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 09:09:08 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861359, encodeId=d75f86135964, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：评论里很多人对这个期刊持否认态度，但不管怎样强化国产刊物的趋势是变不了的了。sci bull编辑部的目标是5年内把if做到15，然后逐渐扩容，并明确了期刊发展目标是对标pnas。2019年实时if超过9.7了，最终可能会到9.8，2020年实时if已经3.8，和nc及sa相差不远，20年的最终if有望突破11，未来发展,会越来越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=80, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5f3f5413986, createdName=ms7242751882637620, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 14:48:21 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-06-04 ms2983094698733738

    国内大佬的游戏而已，很难和pnas和子刊相比

    0

  9. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861984, encodeId=5469861984f8, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：中过隔壁的nc，没中过这个期刊。。<br> 客观的说nc是比较水，以后应该不会选择投nc了<br> sci bull 作为国产期刊的领头羊，未来发展不可限量！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=101, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Tue Jun 16 17:39:33 CST 2020, time=2020-06-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861567, encodeId=88a886156e02, content=pnas真的那么牛逼的话，就不应该允许关系户的存在 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cc565414142, createdName=ms2631524123839591, createdTime=Mon Jun 08 08:39:41 CST 2020, time=2020-06-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861539, encodeId=37eb86153962, content=查的很清楚，现在还是contribute submission 和 direct submission分开的。如果说公然开后门都能洗，那真是厉害，在下对你的价值观深感敬佩，只能敬而远之，无法再继续交流。至于sci bull是否有隐形的后门，不想揣测，因为即使nature及其子刊，投稿也是十分看关系，所以揣测也没意义。但是pnas是公然公开的，这就很可怕的，就像把支持犯罪写在法律中，简直不要脸皮。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=79, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Sun Jun 07 09:27:44 CST 2020, time=2020-06-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861533, encodeId=d330861533dc, content=最起码pnas直投文章上面会有标记<br> science bull的后门有标记吗？<br> 2014年10月院士推荐投稿就已经取消 自己去查 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Sun Jun 07 08:54:29 CST 2020, time=2020-06-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861465, encodeId=c0bc861465da, content=楼下睁着眼睛说瞎话，pnas官网上contributed submission赫然在目，竟然说取消了？pnas这就是公然的给大佬走后门。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=567b5413997, createdName=ms7446073747655445, createdTime=Fri Jun 05 09:12:43 CST 2020, time=2020-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861460, encodeId=6d1c86146028, content=楼下你难道不知道pnas这个院士直投已经取消了吗？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Fri Jun 05 06:55:37 CST 2020, time=2020-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861450, encodeId=660586145082, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：pnas不也是美国大佬的游戏，美国科学院院士contribute的文章，几乎100%录用，不知楼下的键盘侠们为何如此吹嘘pnas。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=2, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3de05414115, createdName=ms313574960747337, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 20:31:07 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861432, encodeId=87c9861432e0, content=国内大佬的游戏而已，很难和pnas和子刊相比 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=93, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 17:08:50 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861400, encodeId=880c86140086, content=哈哈哈哈 国内的垃圾期刊都是要多少多少分 <br> 就这种心态做什么期刊 不如去做生意<br> 经典的期刊低分的很多 jbc才四分多 估计能完虐未来15分的这个垃圾期刊 <br> 如果想分数坐火箭其实很容易 参看以下bone research就行了<br> 不过这个期刊花钱买了一批shuijun海吹还是做了功课的 只不过水平太差<br> 劝国内科研圈要点脸 中科院够不要脸了 下面的期刊自重吧 自己看看你们发的垃圾文章 plos one 你比得上吗？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=47, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 09:09:08 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861359, encodeId=d75f86135964, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：评论里很多人对这个期刊持否认态度，但不管怎样强化国产刊物的趋势是变不了的了。sci bull编辑部的目标是5年内把if做到15，然后逐渐扩容，并明确了期刊发展目标是对标pnas。2019年实时if超过9.7了，最终可能会到9.8，2020年实时if已经3.8，和nc及sa相差不远，20年的最终if有望突破11，未来发展,会越来越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=80, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5f3f5413986, createdName=ms7242751882637620, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 14:48:21 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-06-04 ms5251117139357251

    哈哈哈哈 国内的垃圾期刊都是要多少多少分
    就这种心态做什么期刊 不如去做生意
    经典的期刊低分的很多 jbc才四分多 估计能完虐未来15分的这个垃圾期刊
    如果想分数坐火箭其实很容易 参看以下bone research就行了
    不过这个期刊花钱买了一批shuijun海吹还是做了功课的 只不过水平太差
    劝国内科研圈要点脸 中科院够不要脸了 下面的期刊自重吧 自己看看你们发的垃圾文章 plos one 你比得上吗？

    0

  10. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861984, encodeId=5469861984f8, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：中过隔壁的nc，没中过这个期刊。。<br> 客观的说nc是比较水，以后应该不会选择投nc了<br> sci bull 作为国产期刊的领头羊，未来发展不可限量！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=101, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e92c5414061, createdName=ms5413142457057855, createdTime=Tue Jun 16 17:39:33 CST 2020, time=2020-06-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861567, encodeId=88a886156e02, content=pnas真的那么牛逼的话，就不应该允许关系户的存在 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=cc565414142, createdName=ms2631524123839591, createdTime=Mon Jun 08 08:39:41 CST 2020, time=2020-06-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861539, encodeId=37eb86153962, content=查的很清楚，现在还是contribute submission 和 direct submission分开的。如果说公然开后门都能洗，那真是厉害，在下对你的价值观深感敬佩，只能敬而远之，无法再继续交流。至于sci bull是否有隐形的后门，不想揣测，因为即使nature及其子刊，投稿也是十分看关系，所以揣测也没意义。但是pnas是公然公开的，这就很可怕的，就像把支持犯罪写在法律中，简直不要脸皮。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=79, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Sun Jun 07 09:27:44 CST 2020, time=2020-06-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861533, encodeId=d330861533dc, content=最起码pnas直投文章上面会有标记<br> science bull的后门有标记吗？<br> 2014年10月院士推荐投稿就已经取消 自己去查 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=f8ed5413972, createdName=ms9325659851846900, createdTime=Sun Jun 07 08:54:29 CST 2020, time=2020-06-07, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861465, encodeId=c0bc861465da, content=楼下睁着眼睛说瞎话，pnas官网上contributed submission赫然在目，竟然说取消了？pnas这就是公然的给大佬走后门。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=108, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=567b5413997, createdName=ms7446073747655445, createdTime=Fri Jun 05 09:12:43 CST 2020, time=2020-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861460, encodeId=6d1c86146028, content=楼下你难道不知道pnas这个院士直投已经取消了吗？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=87, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Fri Jun 05 06:55:37 CST 2020, time=2020-06-05, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861450, encodeId=660586145082, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：pnas不也是美国大佬的游戏，美国科学院院士contribute的文章，几乎100%录用，不知楼下的键盘侠们为何如此吹嘘pnas。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=2, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=3de05414115, createdName=ms313574960747337, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 20:31:07 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861432, encodeId=87c9861432e0, content=国内大佬的游戏而已，很难和pnas和子刊相比 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=93, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 17:08:50 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861400, encodeId=880c86140086, content=哈哈哈哈 国内的垃圾期刊都是要多少多少分 <br> 就这种心态做什么期刊 不如去做生意<br> 经典的期刊低分的很多 jbc才四分多 估计能完虐未来15分的这个垃圾期刊 <br> 如果想分数坐火箭其实很容易 参看以下bone research就行了<br> 不过这个期刊花钱买了一批shuijun海吹还是做了功课的 只不过水平太差<br> 劝国内科研圈要点脸 中科院够不要脸了 下面的期刊自重吧 自己看看你们发的垃圾文章 plos one 你比得上吗？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=47, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=dedd5414056, createdName=ms5251117139357251, createdTime=Thu Jun 04 09:09:08 CST 2020, time=2020-06-04, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=861359, encodeId=d75f86135964, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：评论里很多人对这个期刊持否认态度，但不管怎样强化国产刊物的趋势是变不了的了。sci bull编辑部的目标是5年内把if做到15，然后逐渐扩容，并明确了期刊发展目标是对标pnas。2019年实时if超过9.7了，最终可能会到9.8，2020年实时if已经3.8，和nc及sa相差不远，20年的最终if有望突破11，未来发展,会越来越好。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=80, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5f3f5413986, createdName=ms7242751882637620, createdTime=Wed Jun 03 14:48:21 CST 2020, time=2020-06-03, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-06-03 ms7242751882637620

    审稿速度:2.0
    经验分享：评论里很多人对这个期刊持否认态度，但不管怎样强化国产刊物的趋势是变不了的了。sci bull编辑部的目标是5年内把if做到15，然后逐渐扩容，并明确了期刊发展目标是对标pnas。2019年实时if超过9.7了，最终可能会到9.8，2020年实时if已经3.8，和nc及sa相差不远，20年的最终if有望突破11，未来发展,会越来越好。

    0

共109条页码: 3/11页10条/页
分享您的投稿经验，提升MI经验值，获取更多积分