PLANT SOIL 润色咨询

PLANT AND SOIL

出版年份：1948 年文章数：9618 投稿命中率： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看

出版周期：Monthly 自引率：9.6% 审稿周期： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看

前往期刊查询
期刊讨论 | 中国SCI论文 | 期刊主页 | 投稿经验 | 杂志官网 | 投稿链接 | 作者需知 | PMC链接 | Pubmed全文检索

期刊讨论

  1. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857157, encodeId=7b9a85e157a9, content=如果这个是2区，那真的是疯了，作为一个农历科学土壤人。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6ecf5414129, createdName=ms1660087976288132, createdTime=Wed Jan 29 22:58:09 CST 2020, time=2020-01-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857021, encodeId=1fb885e02185, content=审稿速度:5.0<br>经验分享：19年初中了一篇，总体来说审稿速度挺快，一审3个审稿意见，意见挺全面，二审小修后接受。19年底又投了ldd，结果苦等3个月，发邮件问了一下什么情况，说审稿人太忙，然后拒了，我看同时期发表的相似文章都挺快的，我觉得网友说的对，ldd主要看认不认识人，有认识人审的就快，否则。。。今年年初又投一篇plant and soil，依然速度很快，正在审稿中，希望好运。祝大家2020年试验顺利，论文都中。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=122, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d7055413998, createdName=ms1387707191880519, createdTime=Tue Jan 21 10:01:18 CST 2020, time=2020-01-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856872, encodeId=161f8568e2c9, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：这个老牌专业期刊竟然变2区了，就因为if一直起不来，这种分区有点坑啊，就如同去年将nc和pnas分到2区一样可笑 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=80, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Thu Jan 16 10:01:10 CST 2020, time=2020-01-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856861, encodeId=a8b08568617c, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享：以前就以这个期刊为目标，这下分个二区，这不扯淡么，老老实实的去刷总环算了，美滋滋。总环今年也就才接收6000多篇，过两年接收1万篇的时候，就人人就都有一区了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=93af5414037, createdName=ms5106277377443647, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 21:57:47 CST 2020, time=2020-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856854, encodeId=17db85685475, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：啥情况，变成2区了？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=76, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d7055413998, createdName=ms1387707191880519, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 20:10:08 CST 2020, time=2020-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853543, encodeId=67ac8535437f, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：19年6月15号投稿，6.28号 under review，7月14号审稿完成，7月21号minor revise（三个审稿人均给出对文章肯定的态度并提出几个细节的问题和校正），7月27号提交修改稿，7月29号接受。投稿到接受十分顺利，编辑也十分效率。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Mon Sep 02 20:17:49 CST 2019, time=2019-09-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853055, encodeId=3de88530553a, content=审稿速度:10.0<br>经验分享：做的稳定同位素示踪，编辑给了两次大修，颠覆性修改了两次以后，一共邀请了4个审稿人，最后修回时，审稿人2要求多补充验证c分配假设，让把相关的主流3种假设都验证一遍，审稿人4要求一个都别验证，去掉就可以了。就这样被拒了，但是欢迎重投。已经改完了，很迷茫，不知道要不要重新投回。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=75, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8c235413991, createdName=ms2848770090237977, createdTime=Thu Aug 08 09:42:50 CST 2019, time=2019-08-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852807, encodeId=6b0985280e64, content=审稿速度很快，一个月左右给结果，但一个reviewer说我用得方法有问题，然后拒稿了。。其实这个方法很多研究都在用，也都发了不错的期刊。。已经给编辑写回信了，希望会有好结果。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=67, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=aba65413994, createdName=ms6179535627532318, createdTime=Thu Jul 25 16:35:54 CST 2019, time=2019-07-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852731, encodeId=0450852e31b0, content=我想问问大家，之前上传plant and soil，由于推荐审稿人出现点问题，所以编辑部 send back to author，更改后又重新上传，10号上传一直到21号仍显示的是new submission。想问问大家，这样是什么情况？是拒稿的节凑么？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=50165414105, createdName=ms5075507494691300, createdTime=Sun Jul 21 10:01:26 CST 2019, time=2019-07-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852207, encodeId=762285220e0d, content=我的也是reviewers assigned变成under review 后十天又变成reviewers assigned，然后持续reviewers assigned 一共都快两个星期了。plant soil 上很多相关文章，感觉邀请审稿人应该没这么费事吧！纠结 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=73, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=747c5414139, createdName=ms8486473624116251, createdTime=Tue Jun 25 10:36:47 CST 2019, time=2019-06-25, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-01-29 ms1660087976288132

    如果这个是2区，那真的是疯了，作为一个农历科学土壤人。

    0

  2. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857157, encodeId=7b9a85e157a9, content=如果这个是2区，那真的是疯了，作为一个农历科学土壤人。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6ecf5414129, createdName=ms1660087976288132, createdTime=Wed Jan 29 22:58:09 CST 2020, time=2020-01-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857021, encodeId=1fb885e02185, content=审稿速度:5.0<br>经验分享：19年初中了一篇，总体来说审稿速度挺快，一审3个审稿意见，意见挺全面，二审小修后接受。19年底又投了ldd，结果苦等3个月，发邮件问了一下什么情况，说审稿人太忙，然后拒了，我看同时期发表的相似文章都挺快的，我觉得网友说的对，ldd主要看认不认识人，有认识人审的就快，否则。。。今年年初又投一篇plant and soil，依然速度很快，正在审稿中，希望好运。祝大家2020年试验顺利，论文都中。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=122, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d7055413998, createdName=ms1387707191880519, createdTime=Tue Jan 21 10:01:18 CST 2020, time=2020-01-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856872, encodeId=161f8568e2c9, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：这个老牌专业期刊竟然变2区了，就因为if一直起不来，这种分区有点坑啊，就如同去年将nc和pnas分到2区一样可笑 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=80, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Thu Jan 16 10:01:10 CST 2020, time=2020-01-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856861, encodeId=a8b08568617c, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享：以前就以这个期刊为目标，这下分个二区，这不扯淡么，老老实实的去刷总环算了，美滋滋。总环今年也就才接收6000多篇，过两年接收1万篇的时候，就人人就都有一区了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=93af5414037, createdName=ms5106277377443647, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 21:57:47 CST 2020, time=2020-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856854, encodeId=17db85685475, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：啥情况，变成2区了？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=76, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d7055413998, createdName=ms1387707191880519, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 20:10:08 CST 2020, time=2020-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853543, encodeId=67ac8535437f, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：19年6月15号投稿，6.28号 under review，7月14号审稿完成，7月21号minor revise（三个审稿人均给出对文章肯定的态度并提出几个细节的问题和校正），7月27号提交修改稿，7月29号接受。投稿到接受十分顺利，编辑也十分效率。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Mon Sep 02 20:17:49 CST 2019, time=2019-09-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853055, encodeId=3de88530553a, content=审稿速度:10.0<br>经验分享：做的稳定同位素示踪，编辑给了两次大修，颠覆性修改了两次以后，一共邀请了4个审稿人，最后修回时，审稿人2要求多补充验证c分配假设，让把相关的主流3种假设都验证一遍，审稿人4要求一个都别验证，去掉就可以了。就这样被拒了，但是欢迎重投。已经改完了，很迷茫，不知道要不要重新投回。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=75, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8c235413991, createdName=ms2848770090237977, createdTime=Thu Aug 08 09:42:50 CST 2019, time=2019-08-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852807, encodeId=6b0985280e64, content=审稿速度很快，一个月左右给结果，但一个reviewer说我用得方法有问题，然后拒稿了。。其实这个方法很多研究都在用，也都发了不错的期刊。。已经给编辑写回信了，希望会有好结果。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=67, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=aba65413994, createdName=ms6179535627532318, createdTime=Thu Jul 25 16:35:54 CST 2019, time=2019-07-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852731, encodeId=0450852e31b0, content=我想问问大家，之前上传plant and soil，由于推荐审稿人出现点问题，所以编辑部 send back to author，更改后又重新上传，10号上传一直到21号仍显示的是new submission。想问问大家，这样是什么情况？是拒稿的节凑么？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=50165414105, createdName=ms5075507494691300, createdTime=Sun Jul 21 10:01:26 CST 2019, time=2019-07-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852207, encodeId=762285220e0d, content=我的也是reviewers assigned变成under review 后十天又变成reviewers assigned，然后持续reviewers assigned 一共都快两个星期了。plant soil 上很多相关文章，感觉邀请审稿人应该没这么费事吧！纠结 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=73, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=747c5414139, createdName=ms8486473624116251, createdTime=Tue Jun 25 10:36:47 CST 2019, time=2019-06-25, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-01-21 ms1387707191880519

    审稿速度:5.0
    经验分享：19年初中了一篇，总体来说审稿速度挺快，一审3个审稿意见，意见挺全面，二审小修后接受。19年底又投了ldd，结果苦等3个月，发邮件问了一下什么情况，说审稿人太忙，然后拒了，我看同时期发表的相似文章都挺快的，我觉得网友说的对，ldd主要看认不认识人，有认识人审的就快，否则。。。今年年初又投一篇plant and soil，依然速度很快，正在审稿中，希望好运。祝大家2020年试验顺利，论文都中。

    0

  3. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857157, encodeId=7b9a85e157a9, content=如果这个是2区，那真的是疯了，作为一个农历科学土壤人。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6ecf5414129, createdName=ms1660087976288132, createdTime=Wed Jan 29 22:58:09 CST 2020, time=2020-01-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857021, encodeId=1fb885e02185, content=审稿速度:5.0<br>经验分享：19年初中了一篇，总体来说审稿速度挺快，一审3个审稿意见，意见挺全面，二审小修后接受。19年底又投了ldd，结果苦等3个月，发邮件问了一下什么情况，说审稿人太忙，然后拒了，我看同时期发表的相似文章都挺快的，我觉得网友说的对，ldd主要看认不认识人，有认识人审的就快，否则。。。今年年初又投一篇plant and soil，依然速度很快，正在审稿中，希望好运。祝大家2020年试验顺利，论文都中。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=122, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d7055413998, createdName=ms1387707191880519, createdTime=Tue Jan 21 10:01:18 CST 2020, time=2020-01-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856872, encodeId=161f8568e2c9, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：这个老牌专业期刊竟然变2区了，就因为if一直起不来，这种分区有点坑啊，就如同去年将nc和pnas分到2区一样可笑 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=80, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Thu Jan 16 10:01:10 CST 2020, time=2020-01-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856861, encodeId=a8b08568617c, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享：以前就以这个期刊为目标，这下分个二区，这不扯淡么，老老实实的去刷总环算了，美滋滋。总环今年也就才接收6000多篇，过两年接收1万篇的时候，就人人就都有一区了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=93af5414037, createdName=ms5106277377443647, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 21:57:47 CST 2020, time=2020-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856854, encodeId=17db85685475, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：啥情况，变成2区了？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=76, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d7055413998, createdName=ms1387707191880519, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 20:10:08 CST 2020, time=2020-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853543, encodeId=67ac8535437f, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：19年6月15号投稿，6.28号 under review，7月14号审稿完成，7月21号minor revise（三个审稿人均给出对文章肯定的态度并提出几个细节的问题和校正），7月27号提交修改稿，7月29号接受。投稿到接受十分顺利，编辑也十分效率。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Mon Sep 02 20:17:49 CST 2019, time=2019-09-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853055, encodeId=3de88530553a, content=审稿速度:10.0<br>经验分享：做的稳定同位素示踪，编辑给了两次大修，颠覆性修改了两次以后，一共邀请了4个审稿人，最后修回时，审稿人2要求多补充验证c分配假设，让把相关的主流3种假设都验证一遍，审稿人4要求一个都别验证，去掉就可以了。就这样被拒了，但是欢迎重投。已经改完了，很迷茫，不知道要不要重新投回。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=75, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8c235413991, createdName=ms2848770090237977, createdTime=Thu Aug 08 09:42:50 CST 2019, time=2019-08-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852807, encodeId=6b0985280e64, content=审稿速度很快，一个月左右给结果，但一个reviewer说我用得方法有问题，然后拒稿了。。其实这个方法很多研究都在用，也都发了不错的期刊。。已经给编辑写回信了，希望会有好结果。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=67, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=aba65413994, createdName=ms6179535627532318, createdTime=Thu Jul 25 16:35:54 CST 2019, time=2019-07-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852731, encodeId=0450852e31b0, content=我想问问大家，之前上传plant and soil，由于推荐审稿人出现点问题，所以编辑部 send back to author，更改后又重新上传，10号上传一直到21号仍显示的是new submission。想问问大家，这样是什么情况？是拒稿的节凑么？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=50165414105, createdName=ms5075507494691300, createdTime=Sun Jul 21 10:01:26 CST 2019, time=2019-07-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852207, encodeId=762285220e0d, content=我的也是reviewers assigned变成under review 后十天又变成reviewers assigned，然后持续reviewers assigned 一共都快两个星期了。plant soil 上很多相关文章，感觉邀请审稿人应该没这么费事吧！纠结 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=73, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=747c5414139, createdName=ms8486473624116251, createdTime=Tue Jun 25 10:36:47 CST 2019, time=2019-06-25, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-01-16 ms6967342940128728

    审稿速度:2.0
    经验分享：这个老牌专业期刊竟然变2区了，就因为if一直起不来，这种分区有点坑啊，就如同去年将nc和pnas分到2区一样可笑

    0

  4. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857157, encodeId=7b9a85e157a9, content=如果这个是2区，那真的是疯了，作为一个农历科学土壤人。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6ecf5414129, createdName=ms1660087976288132, createdTime=Wed Jan 29 22:58:09 CST 2020, time=2020-01-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857021, encodeId=1fb885e02185, content=审稿速度:5.0<br>经验分享：19年初中了一篇，总体来说审稿速度挺快，一审3个审稿意见，意见挺全面，二审小修后接受。19年底又投了ldd，结果苦等3个月，发邮件问了一下什么情况，说审稿人太忙，然后拒了，我看同时期发表的相似文章都挺快的，我觉得网友说的对，ldd主要看认不认识人，有认识人审的就快，否则。。。今年年初又投一篇plant and soil，依然速度很快，正在审稿中，希望好运。祝大家2020年试验顺利，论文都中。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=122, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d7055413998, createdName=ms1387707191880519, createdTime=Tue Jan 21 10:01:18 CST 2020, time=2020-01-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856872, encodeId=161f8568e2c9, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：这个老牌专业期刊竟然变2区了，就因为if一直起不来，这种分区有点坑啊，就如同去年将nc和pnas分到2区一样可笑 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=80, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Thu Jan 16 10:01:10 CST 2020, time=2020-01-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856861, encodeId=a8b08568617c, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享：以前就以这个期刊为目标，这下分个二区，这不扯淡么，老老实实的去刷总环算了，美滋滋。总环今年也就才接收6000多篇，过两年接收1万篇的时候，就人人就都有一区了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=93af5414037, createdName=ms5106277377443647, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 21:57:47 CST 2020, time=2020-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856854, encodeId=17db85685475, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：啥情况，变成2区了？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=76, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d7055413998, createdName=ms1387707191880519, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 20:10:08 CST 2020, time=2020-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853543, encodeId=67ac8535437f, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：19年6月15号投稿，6.28号 under review，7月14号审稿完成，7月21号minor revise（三个审稿人均给出对文章肯定的态度并提出几个细节的问题和校正），7月27号提交修改稿，7月29号接受。投稿到接受十分顺利，编辑也十分效率。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Mon Sep 02 20:17:49 CST 2019, time=2019-09-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853055, encodeId=3de88530553a, content=审稿速度:10.0<br>经验分享：做的稳定同位素示踪，编辑给了两次大修，颠覆性修改了两次以后，一共邀请了4个审稿人，最后修回时，审稿人2要求多补充验证c分配假设，让把相关的主流3种假设都验证一遍，审稿人4要求一个都别验证，去掉就可以了。就这样被拒了，但是欢迎重投。已经改完了，很迷茫，不知道要不要重新投回。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=75, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8c235413991, createdName=ms2848770090237977, createdTime=Thu Aug 08 09:42:50 CST 2019, time=2019-08-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852807, encodeId=6b0985280e64, content=审稿速度很快，一个月左右给结果，但一个reviewer说我用得方法有问题，然后拒稿了。。其实这个方法很多研究都在用，也都发了不错的期刊。。已经给编辑写回信了，希望会有好结果。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=67, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=aba65413994, createdName=ms6179535627532318, createdTime=Thu Jul 25 16:35:54 CST 2019, time=2019-07-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852731, encodeId=0450852e31b0, content=我想问问大家，之前上传plant and soil，由于推荐审稿人出现点问题，所以编辑部 send back to author，更改后又重新上传，10号上传一直到21号仍显示的是new submission。想问问大家，这样是什么情况？是拒稿的节凑么？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=50165414105, createdName=ms5075507494691300, createdTime=Sun Jul 21 10:01:26 CST 2019, time=2019-07-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852207, encodeId=762285220e0d, content=我的也是reviewers assigned变成under review 后十天又变成reviewers assigned，然后持续reviewers assigned 一共都快两个星期了。plant soil 上很多相关文章，感觉邀请审稿人应该没这么费事吧！纠结 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=73, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=747c5414139, createdName=ms8486473624116251, createdTime=Tue Jun 25 10:36:47 CST 2019, time=2019-06-25, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-01-15 ms5106277377443647

    审稿速度:3.0
    经验分享：以前就以这个期刊为目标，这下分个二区，这不扯淡么，老老实实的去刷总环算了，美滋滋。总环今年也就才接收6000多篇，过两年接收1万篇的时候，就人人就都有一区了。

    0

  5. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857157, encodeId=7b9a85e157a9, content=如果这个是2区，那真的是疯了，作为一个农历科学土壤人。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6ecf5414129, createdName=ms1660087976288132, createdTime=Wed Jan 29 22:58:09 CST 2020, time=2020-01-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857021, encodeId=1fb885e02185, content=审稿速度:5.0<br>经验分享：19年初中了一篇，总体来说审稿速度挺快，一审3个审稿意见，意见挺全面，二审小修后接受。19年底又投了ldd，结果苦等3个月，发邮件问了一下什么情况，说审稿人太忙，然后拒了，我看同时期发表的相似文章都挺快的，我觉得网友说的对，ldd主要看认不认识人，有认识人审的就快，否则。。。今年年初又投一篇plant and soil，依然速度很快，正在审稿中，希望好运。祝大家2020年试验顺利，论文都中。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=122, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d7055413998, createdName=ms1387707191880519, createdTime=Tue Jan 21 10:01:18 CST 2020, time=2020-01-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856872, encodeId=161f8568e2c9, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：这个老牌专业期刊竟然变2区了，就因为if一直起不来，这种分区有点坑啊，就如同去年将nc和pnas分到2区一样可笑 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=80, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Thu Jan 16 10:01:10 CST 2020, time=2020-01-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856861, encodeId=a8b08568617c, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享：以前就以这个期刊为目标，这下分个二区，这不扯淡么，老老实实的去刷总环算了，美滋滋。总环今年也就才接收6000多篇，过两年接收1万篇的时候，就人人就都有一区了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=93af5414037, createdName=ms5106277377443647, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 21:57:47 CST 2020, time=2020-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856854, encodeId=17db85685475, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：啥情况，变成2区了？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=76, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d7055413998, createdName=ms1387707191880519, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 20:10:08 CST 2020, time=2020-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853543, encodeId=67ac8535437f, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：19年6月15号投稿，6.28号 under review，7月14号审稿完成，7月21号minor revise（三个审稿人均给出对文章肯定的态度并提出几个细节的问题和校正），7月27号提交修改稿，7月29号接受。投稿到接受十分顺利，编辑也十分效率。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Mon Sep 02 20:17:49 CST 2019, time=2019-09-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853055, encodeId=3de88530553a, content=审稿速度:10.0<br>经验分享：做的稳定同位素示踪，编辑给了两次大修，颠覆性修改了两次以后，一共邀请了4个审稿人，最后修回时，审稿人2要求多补充验证c分配假设，让把相关的主流3种假设都验证一遍，审稿人4要求一个都别验证，去掉就可以了。就这样被拒了，但是欢迎重投。已经改完了，很迷茫，不知道要不要重新投回。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=75, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8c235413991, createdName=ms2848770090237977, createdTime=Thu Aug 08 09:42:50 CST 2019, time=2019-08-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852807, encodeId=6b0985280e64, content=审稿速度很快，一个月左右给结果，但一个reviewer说我用得方法有问题，然后拒稿了。。其实这个方法很多研究都在用，也都发了不错的期刊。。已经给编辑写回信了，希望会有好结果。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=67, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=aba65413994, createdName=ms6179535627532318, createdTime=Thu Jul 25 16:35:54 CST 2019, time=2019-07-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852731, encodeId=0450852e31b0, content=我想问问大家，之前上传plant and soil，由于推荐审稿人出现点问题，所以编辑部 send back to author，更改后又重新上传，10号上传一直到21号仍显示的是new submission。想问问大家，这样是什么情况？是拒稿的节凑么？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=50165414105, createdName=ms5075507494691300, createdTime=Sun Jul 21 10:01:26 CST 2019, time=2019-07-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852207, encodeId=762285220e0d, content=我的也是reviewers assigned变成under review 后十天又变成reviewers assigned，然后持续reviewers assigned 一共都快两个星期了。plant soil 上很多相关文章，感觉邀请审稿人应该没这么费事吧！纠结 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=73, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=747c5414139, createdName=ms8486473624116251, createdTime=Tue Jun 25 10:36:47 CST 2019, time=2019-06-25, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2020-01-15 ms1387707191880519

    审稿速度:1.0
    经验分享：啥情况，变成2区了？

    0

  6. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857157, encodeId=7b9a85e157a9, content=如果这个是2区，那真的是疯了，作为一个农历科学土壤人。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6ecf5414129, createdName=ms1660087976288132, createdTime=Wed Jan 29 22:58:09 CST 2020, time=2020-01-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857021, encodeId=1fb885e02185, content=审稿速度:5.0<br>经验分享：19年初中了一篇，总体来说审稿速度挺快，一审3个审稿意见，意见挺全面，二审小修后接受。19年底又投了ldd，结果苦等3个月，发邮件问了一下什么情况，说审稿人太忙，然后拒了，我看同时期发表的相似文章都挺快的，我觉得网友说的对，ldd主要看认不认识人，有认识人审的就快，否则。。。今年年初又投一篇plant and soil，依然速度很快，正在审稿中，希望好运。祝大家2020年试验顺利，论文都中。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=122, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d7055413998, createdName=ms1387707191880519, createdTime=Tue Jan 21 10:01:18 CST 2020, time=2020-01-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856872, encodeId=161f8568e2c9, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：这个老牌专业期刊竟然变2区了，就因为if一直起不来，这种分区有点坑啊，就如同去年将nc和pnas分到2区一样可笑 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=80, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Thu Jan 16 10:01:10 CST 2020, time=2020-01-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856861, encodeId=a8b08568617c, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享：以前就以这个期刊为目标，这下分个二区，这不扯淡么，老老实实的去刷总环算了，美滋滋。总环今年也就才接收6000多篇，过两年接收1万篇的时候，就人人就都有一区了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=93af5414037, createdName=ms5106277377443647, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 21:57:47 CST 2020, time=2020-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856854, encodeId=17db85685475, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：啥情况，变成2区了？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=76, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d7055413998, createdName=ms1387707191880519, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 20:10:08 CST 2020, time=2020-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853543, encodeId=67ac8535437f, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：19年6月15号投稿，6.28号 under review，7月14号审稿完成，7月21号minor revise（三个审稿人均给出对文章肯定的态度并提出几个细节的问题和校正），7月27号提交修改稿，7月29号接受。投稿到接受十分顺利，编辑也十分效率。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Mon Sep 02 20:17:49 CST 2019, time=2019-09-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853055, encodeId=3de88530553a, content=审稿速度:10.0<br>经验分享：做的稳定同位素示踪，编辑给了两次大修，颠覆性修改了两次以后，一共邀请了4个审稿人，最后修回时，审稿人2要求多补充验证c分配假设，让把相关的主流3种假设都验证一遍，审稿人4要求一个都别验证，去掉就可以了。就这样被拒了，但是欢迎重投。已经改完了，很迷茫，不知道要不要重新投回。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=75, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8c235413991, createdName=ms2848770090237977, createdTime=Thu Aug 08 09:42:50 CST 2019, time=2019-08-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852807, encodeId=6b0985280e64, content=审稿速度很快，一个月左右给结果，但一个reviewer说我用得方法有问题，然后拒稿了。。其实这个方法很多研究都在用，也都发了不错的期刊。。已经给编辑写回信了，希望会有好结果。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=67, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=aba65413994, createdName=ms6179535627532318, createdTime=Thu Jul 25 16:35:54 CST 2019, time=2019-07-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852731, encodeId=0450852e31b0, content=我想问问大家，之前上传plant and soil，由于推荐审稿人出现点问题，所以编辑部 send back to author，更改后又重新上传，10号上传一直到21号仍显示的是new submission。想问问大家，这样是什么情况？是拒稿的节凑么？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=50165414105, createdName=ms5075507494691300, createdTime=Sun Jul 21 10:01:26 CST 2019, time=2019-07-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852207, encodeId=762285220e0d, content=我的也是reviewers assigned变成under review 后十天又变成reviewers assigned，然后持续reviewers assigned 一共都快两个星期了。plant soil 上很多相关文章，感觉邀请审稿人应该没这么费事吧！纠结 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=73, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=747c5414139, createdName=ms8486473624116251, createdTime=Tue Jun 25 10:36:47 CST 2019, time=2019-06-25, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2019-09-02 ms2473638683998620

    审稿速度:1.0
    经验分享：19年6月15号投稿，6.28号 under review，7月14号审稿完成，7月21号minor revise（三个审稿人均给出对文章肯定的态度并提出几个细节的问题和校正），7月27号提交修改稿，7月29号接受。投稿到接受十分顺利，编辑也十分效率。

    0

  7. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857157, encodeId=7b9a85e157a9, content=如果这个是2区，那真的是疯了，作为一个农历科学土壤人。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6ecf5414129, createdName=ms1660087976288132, createdTime=Wed Jan 29 22:58:09 CST 2020, time=2020-01-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857021, encodeId=1fb885e02185, content=审稿速度:5.0<br>经验分享：19年初中了一篇，总体来说审稿速度挺快，一审3个审稿意见，意见挺全面，二审小修后接受。19年底又投了ldd，结果苦等3个月，发邮件问了一下什么情况，说审稿人太忙，然后拒了，我看同时期发表的相似文章都挺快的，我觉得网友说的对，ldd主要看认不认识人，有认识人审的就快，否则。。。今年年初又投一篇plant and soil，依然速度很快，正在审稿中，希望好运。祝大家2020年试验顺利，论文都中。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=122, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d7055413998, createdName=ms1387707191880519, createdTime=Tue Jan 21 10:01:18 CST 2020, time=2020-01-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856872, encodeId=161f8568e2c9, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：这个老牌专业期刊竟然变2区了，就因为if一直起不来，这种分区有点坑啊，就如同去年将nc和pnas分到2区一样可笑 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=80, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Thu Jan 16 10:01:10 CST 2020, time=2020-01-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856861, encodeId=a8b08568617c, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享：以前就以这个期刊为目标，这下分个二区，这不扯淡么，老老实实的去刷总环算了，美滋滋。总环今年也就才接收6000多篇，过两年接收1万篇的时候，就人人就都有一区了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=93af5414037, createdName=ms5106277377443647, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 21:57:47 CST 2020, time=2020-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856854, encodeId=17db85685475, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：啥情况，变成2区了？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=76, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d7055413998, createdName=ms1387707191880519, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 20:10:08 CST 2020, time=2020-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853543, encodeId=67ac8535437f, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：19年6月15号投稿，6.28号 under review，7月14号审稿完成，7月21号minor revise（三个审稿人均给出对文章肯定的态度并提出几个细节的问题和校正），7月27号提交修改稿，7月29号接受。投稿到接受十分顺利，编辑也十分效率。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Mon Sep 02 20:17:49 CST 2019, time=2019-09-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853055, encodeId=3de88530553a, content=审稿速度:10.0<br>经验分享：做的稳定同位素示踪，编辑给了两次大修，颠覆性修改了两次以后，一共邀请了4个审稿人，最后修回时，审稿人2要求多补充验证c分配假设，让把相关的主流3种假设都验证一遍，审稿人4要求一个都别验证，去掉就可以了。就这样被拒了，但是欢迎重投。已经改完了，很迷茫，不知道要不要重新投回。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=75, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8c235413991, createdName=ms2848770090237977, createdTime=Thu Aug 08 09:42:50 CST 2019, time=2019-08-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852807, encodeId=6b0985280e64, content=审稿速度很快，一个月左右给结果，但一个reviewer说我用得方法有问题，然后拒稿了。。其实这个方法很多研究都在用，也都发了不错的期刊。。已经给编辑写回信了，希望会有好结果。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=67, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=aba65413994, createdName=ms6179535627532318, createdTime=Thu Jul 25 16:35:54 CST 2019, time=2019-07-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852731, encodeId=0450852e31b0, content=我想问问大家，之前上传plant and soil，由于推荐审稿人出现点问题，所以编辑部 send back to author，更改后又重新上传，10号上传一直到21号仍显示的是new submission。想问问大家，这样是什么情况？是拒稿的节凑么？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=50165414105, createdName=ms5075507494691300, createdTime=Sun Jul 21 10:01:26 CST 2019, time=2019-07-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852207, encodeId=762285220e0d, content=我的也是reviewers assigned变成under review 后十天又变成reviewers assigned，然后持续reviewers assigned 一共都快两个星期了。plant soil 上很多相关文章，感觉邀请审稿人应该没这么费事吧！纠结 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=73, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=747c5414139, createdName=ms8486473624116251, createdTime=Tue Jun 25 10:36:47 CST 2019, time=2019-06-25, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2019-08-08 ms2848770090237977

    审稿速度:10.0
    经验分享：做的稳定同位素示踪，编辑给了两次大修，颠覆性修改了两次以后，一共邀请了4个审稿人，最后修回时，审稿人2要求多补充验证c分配假设，让把相关的主流3种假设都验证一遍，审稿人4要求一个都别验证，去掉就可以了。就这样被拒了，但是欢迎重投。已经改完了，很迷茫，不知道要不要重新投回。

    0

  8. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857157, encodeId=7b9a85e157a9, content=如果这个是2区，那真的是疯了，作为一个农历科学土壤人。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6ecf5414129, createdName=ms1660087976288132, createdTime=Wed Jan 29 22:58:09 CST 2020, time=2020-01-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857021, encodeId=1fb885e02185, content=审稿速度:5.0<br>经验分享：19年初中了一篇，总体来说审稿速度挺快，一审3个审稿意见，意见挺全面，二审小修后接受。19年底又投了ldd，结果苦等3个月，发邮件问了一下什么情况，说审稿人太忙，然后拒了，我看同时期发表的相似文章都挺快的，我觉得网友说的对，ldd主要看认不认识人，有认识人审的就快，否则。。。今年年初又投一篇plant and soil，依然速度很快，正在审稿中，希望好运。祝大家2020年试验顺利，论文都中。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=122, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d7055413998, createdName=ms1387707191880519, createdTime=Tue Jan 21 10:01:18 CST 2020, time=2020-01-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856872, encodeId=161f8568e2c9, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：这个老牌专业期刊竟然变2区了，就因为if一直起不来，这种分区有点坑啊，就如同去年将nc和pnas分到2区一样可笑 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=80, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Thu Jan 16 10:01:10 CST 2020, time=2020-01-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856861, encodeId=a8b08568617c, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享：以前就以这个期刊为目标，这下分个二区，这不扯淡么，老老实实的去刷总环算了，美滋滋。总环今年也就才接收6000多篇，过两年接收1万篇的时候，就人人就都有一区了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=93af5414037, createdName=ms5106277377443647, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 21:57:47 CST 2020, time=2020-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856854, encodeId=17db85685475, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：啥情况，变成2区了？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=76, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d7055413998, createdName=ms1387707191880519, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 20:10:08 CST 2020, time=2020-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853543, encodeId=67ac8535437f, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：19年6月15号投稿，6.28号 under review，7月14号审稿完成，7月21号minor revise（三个审稿人均给出对文章肯定的态度并提出几个细节的问题和校正），7月27号提交修改稿，7月29号接受。投稿到接受十分顺利，编辑也十分效率。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Mon Sep 02 20:17:49 CST 2019, time=2019-09-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853055, encodeId=3de88530553a, content=审稿速度:10.0<br>经验分享：做的稳定同位素示踪，编辑给了两次大修，颠覆性修改了两次以后，一共邀请了4个审稿人，最后修回时，审稿人2要求多补充验证c分配假设，让把相关的主流3种假设都验证一遍，审稿人4要求一个都别验证，去掉就可以了。就这样被拒了，但是欢迎重投。已经改完了，很迷茫，不知道要不要重新投回。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=75, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8c235413991, createdName=ms2848770090237977, createdTime=Thu Aug 08 09:42:50 CST 2019, time=2019-08-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852807, encodeId=6b0985280e64, content=审稿速度很快，一个月左右给结果，但一个reviewer说我用得方法有问题，然后拒稿了。。其实这个方法很多研究都在用，也都发了不错的期刊。。已经给编辑写回信了，希望会有好结果。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=67, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=aba65413994, createdName=ms6179535627532318, createdTime=Thu Jul 25 16:35:54 CST 2019, time=2019-07-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852731, encodeId=0450852e31b0, content=我想问问大家，之前上传plant and soil，由于推荐审稿人出现点问题，所以编辑部 send back to author，更改后又重新上传，10号上传一直到21号仍显示的是new submission。想问问大家，这样是什么情况？是拒稿的节凑么？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=50165414105, createdName=ms5075507494691300, createdTime=Sun Jul 21 10:01:26 CST 2019, time=2019-07-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852207, encodeId=762285220e0d, content=我的也是reviewers assigned变成under review 后十天又变成reviewers assigned，然后持续reviewers assigned 一共都快两个星期了。plant soil 上很多相关文章，感觉邀请审稿人应该没这么费事吧！纠结 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=73, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=747c5414139, createdName=ms8486473624116251, createdTime=Tue Jun 25 10:36:47 CST 2019, time=2019-06-25, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2019-07-25 ms6179535627532318

    审稿速度很快，一个月左右给结果，但一个reviewer说我用得方法有问题，然后拒稿了。。其实这个方法很多研究都在用，也都发了不错的期刊。。已经给编辑写回信了，希望会有好结果。

    0

  9. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857157, encodeId=7b9a85e157a9, content=如果这个是2区，那真的是疯了，作为一个农历科学土壤人。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6ecf5414129, createdName=ms1660087976288132, createdTime=Wed Jan 29 22:58:09 CST 2020, time=2020-01-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857021, encodeId=1fb885e02185, content=审稿速度:5.0<br>经验分享：19年初中了一篇，总体来说审稿速度挺快，一审3个审稿意见，意见挺全面，二审小修后接受。19年底又投了ldd，结果苦等3个月，发邮件问了一下什么情况，说审稿人太忙，然后拒了，我看同时期发表的相似文章都挺快的，我觉得网友说的对，ldd主要看认不认识人，有认识人审的就快，否则。。。今年年初又投一篇plant and soil，依然速度很快，正在审稿中，希望好运。祝大家2020年试验顺利，论文都中。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=122, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d7055413998, createdName=ms1387707191880519, createdTime=Tue Jan 21 10:01:18 CST 2020, time=2020-01-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856872, encodeId=161f8568e2c9, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：这个老牌专业期刊竟然变2区了，就因为if一直起不来，这种分区有点坑啊，就如同去年将nc和pnas分到2区一样可笑 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=80, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Thu Jan 16 10:01:10 CST 2020, time=2020-01-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856861, encodeId=a8b08568617c, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享：以前就以这个期刊为目标，这下分个二区，这不扯淡么，老老实实的去刷总环算了，美滋滋。总环今年也就才接收6000多篇，过两年接收1万篇的时候，就人人就都有一区了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=93af5414037, createdName=ms5106277377443647, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 21:57:47 CST 2020, time=2020-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856854, encodeId=17db85685475, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：啥情况，变成2区了？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=76, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d7055413998, createdName=ms1387707191880519, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 20:10:08 CST 2020, time=2020-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853543, encodeId=67ac8535437f, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：19年6月15号投稿，6.28号 under review，7月14号审稿完成，7月21号minor revise（三个审稿人均给出对文章肯定的态度并提出几个细节的问题和校正），7月27号提交修改稿，7月29号接受。投稿到接受十分顺利，编辑也十分效率。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Mon Sep 02 20:17:49 CST 2019, time=2019-09-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853055, encodeId=3de88530553a, content=审稿速度:10.0<br>经验分享：做的稳定同位素示踪，编辑给了两次大修，颠覆性修改了两次以后，一共邀请了4个审稿人，最后修回时，审稿人2要求多补充验证c分配假设，让把相关的主流3种假设都验证一遍，审稿人4要求一个都别验证，去掉就可以了。就这样被拒了，但是欢迎重投。已经改完了，很迷茫，不知道要不要重新投回。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=75, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8c235413991, createdName=ms2848770090237977, createdTime=Thu Aug 08 09:42:50 CST 2019, time=2019-08-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852807, encodeId=6b0985280e64, content=审稿速度很快，一个月左右给结果，但一个reviewer说我用得方法有问题，然后拒稿了。。其实这个方法很多研究都在用，也都发了不错的期刊。。已经给编辑写回信了，希望会有好结果。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=67, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=aba65413994, createdName=ms6179535627532318, createdTime=Thu Jul 25 16:35:54 CST 2019, time=2019-07-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852731, encodeId=0450852e31b0, content=我想问问大家，之前上传plant and soil，由于推荐审稿人出现点问题，所以编辑部 send back to author，更改后又重新上传，10号上传一直到21号仍显示的是new submission。想问问大家，这样是什么情况？是拒稿的节凑么？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=50165414105, createdName=ms5075507494691300, createdTime=Sun Jul 21 10:01:26 CST 2019, time=2019-07-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852207, encodeId=762285220e0d, content=我的也是reviewers assigned变成under review 后十天又变成reviewers assigned，然后持续reviewers assigned 一共都快两个星期了。plant soil 上很多相关文章，感觉邀请审稿人应该没这么费事吧！纠结 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=73, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=747c5414139, createdName=ms8486473624116251, createdTime=Tue Jun 25 10:36:47 CST 2019, time=2019-06-25, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2019-07-21 ms5075507494691300

    我想问问大家，之前上传plant and soil，由于推荐审稿人出现点问题，所以编辑部 send back to author，更改后又重新上传，10号上传一直到21号仍显示的是new submission。想问问大家，这样是什么情况？是拒稿的节凑么？

    0

  10. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857157, encodeId=7b9a85e157a9, content=如果这个是2区，那真的是疯了，作为一个农历科学土壤人。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=103, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=6ecf5414129, createdName=ms1660087976288132, createdTime=Wed Jan 29 22:58:09 CST 2020, time=2020-01-29, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=857021, encodeId=1fb885e02185, content=审稿速度:5.0<br>经验分享：19年初中了一篇，总体来说审稿速度挺快，一审3个审稿意见，意见挺全面，二审小修后接受。19年底又投了ldd，结果苦等3个月，发邮件问了一下什么情况，说审稿人太忙，然后拒了，我看同时期发表的相似文章都挺快的，我觉得网友说的对，ldd主要看认不认识人，有认识人审的就快，否则。。。今年年初又投一篇plant and soil，依然速度很快，正在审稿中，希望好运。祝大家2020年试验顺利，论文都中。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=122, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d7055413998, createdName=ms1387707191880519, createdTime=Tue Jan 21 10:01:18 CST 2020, time=2020-01-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856872, encodeId=161f8568e2c9, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：这个老牌专业期刊竟然变2区了，就因为if一直起不来，这种分区有点坑啊，就如同去年将nc和pnas分到2区一样可笑 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=80, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=18ef5414095, createdName=ms6967342940128728, createdTime=Thu Jan 16 10:01:10 CST 2020, time=2020-01-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856861, encodeId=a8b08568617c, content=审稿速度:3.0<br>经验分享：以前就以这个期刊为目标，这下分个二区，这不扯淡么，老老实实的去刷总环算了，美滋滋。总环今年也就才接收6000多篇，过两年接收1万篇的时候，就人人就都有一区了。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=106, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=93af5414037, createdName=ms5106277377443647, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 21:57:47 CST 2020, time=2020-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=856854, encodeId=17db85685475, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：啥情况，变成2区了？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=76, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=d7055413998, createdName=ms1387707191880519, createdTime=Wed Jan 15 20:10:08 CST 2020, time=2020-01-15, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853543, encodeId=67ac8535437f, content=审稿速度:1.0<br>经验分享：19年6月15号投稿，6.28号 under review，7月14号审稿完成，7月21号minor revise（三个审稿人均给出对文章肯定的态度并提出几个细节的问题和校正），7月27号提交修改稿，7月29号接受。投稿到接受十分顺利，编辑也十分效率。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=e7315414029, createdName=ms2473638683998620, createdTime=Mon Sep 02 20:17:49 CST 2019, time=2019-09-02, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=853055, encodeId=3de88530553a, content=审稿速度:10.0<br>经验分享：做的稳定同位素示踪，编辑给了两次大修，颠覆性修改了两次以后，一共邀请了4个审稿人，最后修回时，审稿人2要求多补充验证c分配假设，让把相关的主流3种假设都验证一遍，审稿人4要求一个都别验证，去掉就可以了。就这样被拒了，但是欢迎重投。已经改完了，很迷茫，不知道要不要重新投回。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=75, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=8c235413991, createdName=ms2848770090237977, createdTime=Thu Aug 08 09:42:50 CST 2019, time=2019-08-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852807, encodeId=6b0985280e64, content=审稿速度很快，一个月左右给结果，但一个reviewer说我用得方法有问题，然后拒稿了。。其实这个方法很多研究都在用，也都发了不错的期刊。。已经给编辑写回信了，希望会有好结果。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=67, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=aba65413994, createdName=ms6179535627532318, createdTime=Thu Jul 25 16:35:54 CST 2019, time=2019-07-25, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852731, encodeId=0450852e31b0, content=我想问问大家，之前上传plant and soil，由于推荐审稿人出现点问题，所以编辑部 send back to author，更改后又重新上传，10号上传一直到21号仍显示的是new submission。想问问大家，这样是什么情况？是拒稿的节凑么？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=59, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=50165414105, createdName=ms5075507494691300, createdTime=Sun Jul 21 10:01:26 CST 2019, time=2019-07-21, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=852207, encodeId=762285220e0d, content=我的也是reviewers assigned变成under review 后十天又变成reviewers assigned，然后持续reviewers assigned 一共都快两个星期了。plant soil 上很多相关文章，感觉邀请审稿人应该没这么费事吧！纠结 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=73, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=747c5414139, createdName=ms8486473624116251, createdTime=Tue Jun 25 10:36:47 CST 2019, time=2019-06-25, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2019-06-25 ms8486473624116251

    我的也是reviewers assigned变成under review 后十天又变成reviewers assigned，然后持续reviewers assigned 一共都快两个星期了。plant soil 上很多相关文章，感觉邀请审稿人应该没这么费事吧！纠结

    0

共73条页码: 2/8页10条/页
分享您的投稿经验，提升MI经验值，获取更多积分