APPL CATAL A-GEN 润色咨询

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL

出版年份：1991 年文章数：7074 投稿命中率： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看

出版周期：Semimonthly 自引率：5.2% 审稿周期： 开通期刊会员，数据随心看

前往期刊查询
期刊讨论 | 中国SCI论文 | 期刊主页 | 投稿经验 | 杂志官网 | 投稿链接 | 作者需知 | PMC链接 | Pubmed全文检索

期刊讨论

  1. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846359, encodeId=0244846359ed, content=审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0<br>经验分享：博士两年期间前后录用三篇，期刊办事效率很高，意见给的也比较有价值，该期刊对文章的完整性要求很严格！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=72, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Fri Aug 17 13:35:58 CST 2018, time=2018-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845567, encodeId=584784556efb, content=期刊要求很严格，编辑很nice，审稿很专业认真，提的问题都是很有建设性的，补充相关实验数据，大修后录用，历时3个半月，偏重于催化机理，比较舒服的一次投稿经历。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=54, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5d445414141, createdName=ms887994580797846, createdTime=Mon Jul 23 17:52:56 CST 2018, time=2018-07-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845459, encodeId=ac6b845459fc, content=之前中过两篇，这是第三篇，不过每次的审稿过程都是不同的经历，这一次二审的时间已经超过了一审的时间，至今还是under review，不知道是什么情况？难道是审稿人放假出去耍了？不过总的体会是难度越来越大了！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=42, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Thu Jul 19 10:02:16 CST 2018, time=2018-07-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842666, encodeId=17718426667f, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：2017.12.02 周六 submitted<br> 2017.12.04 周一 with editor<br> 2017.12.06 under review<br> 2018.01.23 under editor evaluation<br> 2018.01.31 major revision<br> 2018.02.21 major revision submitted to journal<br> 2018.02.23 under review<br> 2018.03.15 required reviews completed<br> 2018.03.19 accepted<br> 2018.03.20 online<br> 2018.03.28 proof submitted<br> 2018.03.31 published volume/issue<br> appl. catal. a, 2018, 558, 26-33.<br> 总共耗时大概4个月。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=46, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=30a25414006, createdName=ms3948389174368595, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 16:01:53 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842646, encodeId=e8ff842646cb, content=3.9 submit<br> 3.11 with editor 同一天 under review<br> 3.30 under editor evaluation<br> 4.2 under editor evaluation状态没变，时间变了<br> 4.4 major revision 四个审稿意见，前两个小修，第三个拒，第四个修后可接收，编辑给大修 。 综合来看应该3.30-4.2 状态没变，时间变，可能是因为第三个审稿人拒，编辑又找了第四个审稿人，所以说编辑真的很负责<br> 4.23 resubmit<br> 4.24 under review<br> 4.25 required reviews completed <br> 4.26 minor revision 原因是4月出了一篇相关的文章，其中一个审稿人要求引用<br> 4.26 resubmit<br> 4.27 with editor 然后一个小时内直接accept<br> 总体而言，是比较幸运的，没有遇到前面说的很多天都没有进展的情况，编辑和审稿人都是比较负责的，而且偏应用比较强的文章 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=36, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a45a5414149, createdName=ms3867726040880872, createdTime=Fri Apr 27 21:47:20 CST 2018, time=2018-04-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842098, encodeId=7e0884209802, content=审稿速度:6.0<br>经验分享：under review 已经70天了，真带劲啊！这期刊不是以高效著称嘛，这也太搞笑了！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Sun Apr 08 13:05:33 CST 2018, time=2018-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=841603, encodeId=7aaf841603c3, content=under review 持续45天了，日期也没变化，有谁也有类似的经历吗？不是很快吗？这是什么情况？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=39, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Fri Mar 16 22:57:32 CST 2018, time=2018-03-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=841331, encodeId=bf7e841331c3, content=一个多月了 还是under review 我记得第一篇速度挺快的啊 二十多天就会意见了 这篇不知道怎么了 可能是审稿人意见不同意吧 是不是要悲剧了呢 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=33, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=bdbe5414035, createdName=ms3036779279854874, createdTime=Tue Mar 06 22:36:28 CST 2018, time=2018-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840744, encodeId=055e840e446e, content=硕士第一篇sci论文，历时2个半月接收。机理研究较深，对数据量和新颖性要求不大，远不及后来中的催化b的水平。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Tue Jan 30 01:03:06 CST 2018, time=2018-01-30, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=838406, encodeId=ac72838406ce, content=一审很快，一个月不到就出结果。四个审稿人，意见挺专业，总共提了22条。二审后三个审稿人同意接收，一个小修，给了一些关于格式方面的意见，主编给了小修，并表示修回后即可录用。在投稿过程中给编辑部写信，两三天后就回复邮件了。感觉效率很高，速度较快。感谢~<br> 06/29/17 submitted to journal 投稿<br> 07/02 manuscript number assigned 分配稿件号<br> 07/27 interim decision-major revision 大修<br> 08/31 resubmitted<br> 09/02 under review 二审<br> 09/05 required revision completed 二审结束<br> 09/16 interim decision-minor revision 小修<br> 09/17 resubmitted <br> 09/18/17 accept , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Tue Sep 19 01:16:35 CST 2017, time=2017-09-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-08-17 ms622773450447966

    审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0
    经验分享：博士两年期间前后录用三篇，期刊办事效率很高，意见给的也比较有价值，该期刊对文章的完整性要求很严格！

    0

  2. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846359, encodeId=0244846359ed, content=审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0<br>经验分享：博士两年期间前后录用三篇，期刊办事效率很高，意见给的也比较有价值，该期刊对文章的完整性要求很严格！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=72, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Fri Aug 17 13:35:58 CST 2018, time=2018-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845567, encodeId=584784556efb, content=期刊要求很严格，编辑很nice，审稿很专业认真，提的问题都是很有建设性的，补充相关实验数据，大修后录用，历时3个半月，偏重于催化机理，比较舒服的一次投稿经历。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=54, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5d445414141, createdName=ms887994580797846, createdTime=Mon Jul 23 17:52:56 CST 2018, time=2018-07-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845459, encodeId=ac6b845459fc, content=之前中过两篇，这是第三篇，不过每次的审稿过程都是不同的经历，这一次二审的时间已经超过了一审的时间，至今还是under review，不知道是什么情况？难道是审稿人放假出去耍了？不过总的体会是难度越来越大了！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=42, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Thu Jul 19 10:02:16 CST 2018, time=2018-07-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842666, encodeId=17718426667f, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：2017.12.02 周六 submitted<br> 2017.12.04 周一 with editor<br> 2017.12.06 under review<br> 2018.01.23 under editor evaluation<br> 2018.01.31 major revision<br> 2018.02.21 major revision submitted to journal<br> 2018.02.23 under review<br> 2018.03.15 required reviews completed<br> 2018.03.19 accepted<br> 2018.03.20 online<br> 2018.03.28 proof submitted<br> 2018.03.31 published volume/issue<br> appl. catal. a, 2018, 558, 26-33.<br> 总共耗时大概4个月。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=46, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=30a25414006, createdName=ms3948389174368595, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 16:01:53 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842646, encodeId=e8ff842646cb, content=3.9 submit<br> 3.11 with editor 同一天 under review<br> 3.30 under editor evaluation<br> 4.2 under editor evaluation状态没变，时间变了<br> 4.4 major revision 四个审稿意见，前两个小修，第三个拒，第四个修后可接收，编辑给大修 。 综合来看应该3.30-4.2 状态没变，时间变，可能是因为第三个审稿人拒，编辑又找了第四个审稿人，所以说编辑真的很负责<br> 4.23 resubmit<br> 4.24 under review<br> 4.25 required reviews completed <br> 4.26 minor revision 原因是4月出了一篇相关的文章，其中一个审稿人要求引用<br> 4.26 resubmit<br> 4.27 with editor 然后一个小时内直接accept<br> 总体而言，是比较幸运的，没有遇到前面说的很多天都没有进展的情况，编辑和审稿人都是比较负责的，而且偏应用比较强的文章 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=36, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a45a5414149, createdName=ms3867726040880872, createdTime=Fri Apr 27 21:47:20 CST 2018, time=2018-04-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842098, encodeId=7e0884209802, content=审稿速度:6.0<br>经验分享：under review 已经70天了，真带劲啊！这期刊不是以高效著称嘛，这也太搞笑了！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Sun Apr 08 13:05:33 CST 2018, time=2018-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=841603, encodeId=7aaf841603c3, content=under review 持续45天了，日期也没变化，有谁也有类似的经历吗？不是很快吗？这是什么情况？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=39, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Fri Mar 16 22:57:32 CST 2018, time=2018-03-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=841331, encodeId=bf7e841331c3, content=一个多月了 还是under review 我记得第一篇速度挺快的啊 二十多天就会意见了 这篇不知道怎么了 可能是审稿人意见不同意吧 是不是要悲剧了呢 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=33, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=bdbe5414035, createdName=ms3036779279854874, createdTime=Tue Mar 06 22:36:28 CST 2018, time=2018-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840744, encodeId=055e840e446e, content=硕士第一篇sci论文，历时2个半月接收。机理研究较深，对数据量和新颖性要求不大，远不及后来中的催化b的水平。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Tue Jan 30 01:03:06 CST 2018, time=2018-01-30, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=838406, encodeId=ac72838406ce, content=一审很快，一个月不到就出结果。四个审稿人，意见挺专业，总共提了22条。二审后三个审稿人同意接收，一个小修，给了一些关于格式方面的意见，主编给了小修，并表示修回后即可录用。在投稿过程中给编辑部写信，两三天后就回复邮件了。感觉效率很高，速度较快。感谢~<br> 06/29/17 submitted to journal 投稿<br> 07/02 manuscript number assigned 分配稿件号<br> 07/27 interim decision-major revision 大修<br> 08/31 resubmitted<br> 09/02 under review 二审<br> 09/05 required revision completed 二审结束<br> 09/16 interim decision-minor revision 小修<br> 09/17 resubmitted <br> 09/18/17 accept , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Tue Sep 19 01:16:35 CST 2017, time=2017-09-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-07-23 ms887994580797846

    期刊要求很严格，编辑很nice，审稿很专业认真，提的问题都是很有建设性的，补充相关实验数据，大修后录用，历时3个半月，偏重于催化机理，比较舒服的一次投稿经历。

    0

  3. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846359, encodeId=0244846359ed, content=审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0<br>经验分享：博士两年期间前后录用三篇，期刊办事效率很高，意见给的也比较有价值，该期刊对文章的完整性要求很严格！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=72, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Fri Aug 17 13:35:58 CST 2018, time=2018-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845567, encodeId=584784556efb, content=期刊要求很严格，编辑很nice，审稿很专业认真，提的问题都是很有建设性的，补充相关实验数据，大修后录用，历时3个半月，偏重于催化机理，比较舒服的一次投稿经历。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=54, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5d445414141, createdName=ms887994580797846, createdTime=Mon Jul 23 17:52:56 CST 2018, time=2018-07-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845459, encodeId=ac6b845459fc, content=之前中过两篇，这是第三篇，不过每次的审稿过程都是不同的经历，这一次二审的时间已经超过了一审的时间，至今还是under review，不知道是什么情况？难道是审稿人放假出去耍了？不过总的体会是难度越来越大了！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=42, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Thu Jul 19 10:02:16 CST 2018, time=2018-07-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842666, encodeId=17718426667f, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：2017.12.02 周六 submitted<br> 2017.12.04 周一 with editor<br> 2017.12.06 under review<br> 2018.01.23 under editor evaluation<br> 2018.01.31 major revision<br> 2018.02.21 major revision submitted to journal<br> 2018.02.23 under review<br> 2018.03.15 required reviews completed<br> 2018.03.19 accepted<br> 2018.03.20 online<br> 2018.03.28 proof submitted<br> 2018.03.31 published volume/issue<br> appl. catal. a, 2018, 558, 26-33.<br> 总共耗时大概4个月。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=46, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=30a25414006, createdName=ms3948389174368595, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 16:01:53 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842646, encodeId=e8ff842646cb, content=3.9 submit<br> 3.11 with editor 同一天 under review<br> 3.30 under editor evaluation<br> 4.2 under editor evaluation状态没变，时间变了<br> 4.4 major revision 四个审稿意见，前两个小修，第三个拒，第四个修后可接收，编辑给大修 。 综合来看应该3.30-4.2 状态没变，时间变，可能是因为第三个审稿人拒，编辑又找了第四个审稿人，所以说编辑真的很负责<br> 4.23 resubmit<br> 4.24 under review<br> 4.25 required reviews completed <br> 4.26 minor revision 原因是4月出了一篇相关的文章，其中一个审稿人要求引用<br> 4.26 resubmit<br> 4.27 with editor 然后一个小时内直接accept<br> 总体而言，是比较幸运的，没有遇到前面说的很多天都没有进展的情况，编辑和审稿人都是比较负责的，而且偏应用比较强的文章 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=36, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a45a5414149, createdName=ms3867726040880872, createdTime=Fri Apr 27 21:47:20 CST 2018, time=2018-04-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842098, encodeId=7e0884209802, content=审稿速度:6.0<br>经验分享：under review 已经70天了，真带劲啊！这期刊不是以高效著称嘛，这也太搞笑了！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Sun Apr 08 13:05:33 CST 2018, time=2018-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=841603, encodeId=7aaf841603c3, content=under review 持续45天了，日期也没变化，有谁也有类似的经历吗？不是很快吗？这是什么情况？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=39, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Fri Mar 16 22:57:32 CST 2018, time=2018-03-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=841331, encodeId=bf7e841331c3, content=一个多月了 还是under review 我记得第一篇速度挺快的啊 二十多天就会意见了 这篇不知道怎么了 可能是审稿人意见不同意吧 是不是要悲剧了呢 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=33, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=bdbe5414035, createdName=ms3036779279854874, createdTime=Tue Mar 06 22:36:28 CST 2018, time=2018-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840744, encodeId=055e840e446e, content=硕士第一篇sci论文，历时2个半月接收。机理研究较深，对数据量和新颖性要求不大，远不及后来中的催化b的水平。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Tue Jan 30 01:03:06 CST 2018, time=2018-01-30, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=838406, encodeId=ac72838406ce, content=一审很快，一个月不到就出结果。四个审稿人，意见挺专业，总共提了22条。二审后三个审稿人同意接收，一个小修，给了一些关于格式方面的意见，主编给了小修，并表示修回后即可录用。在投稿过程中给编辑部写信，两三天后就回复邮件了。感觉效率很高，速度较快。感谢~<br> 06/29/17 submitted to journal 投稿<br> 07/02 manuscript number assigned 分配稿件号<br> 07/27 interim decision-major revision 大修<br> 08/31 resubmitted<br> 09/02 under review 二审<br> 09/05 required revision completed 二审结束<br> 09/16 interim decision-minor revision 小修<br> 09/17 resubmitted <br> 09/18/17 accept , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Tue Sep 19 01:16:35 CST 2017, time=2017-09-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-07-19 ms622773450447966

    之前中过两篇，这是第三篇，不过每次的审稿过程都是不同的经历，这一次二审的时间已经超过了一审的时间，至今还是under review，不知道是什么情况？难道是审稿人放假出去耍了？不过总的体会是难度越来越大了！

    0

  4. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846359, encodeId=0244846359ed, content=审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0<br>经验分享：博士两年期间前后录用三篇，期刊办事效率很高，意见给的也比较有价值，该期刊对文章的完整性要求很严格！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=72, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Fri Aug 17 13:35:58 CST 2018, time=2018-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845567, encodeId=584784556efb, content=期刊要求很严格，编辑很nice，审稿很专业认真，提的问题都是很有建设性的，补充相关实验数据，大修后录用，历时3个半月，偏重于催化机理，比较舒服的一次投稿经历。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=54, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5d445414141, createdName=ms887994580797846, createdTime=Mon Jul 23 17:52:56 CST 2018, time=2018-07-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845459, encodeId=ac6b845459fc, content=之前中过两篇，这是第三篇，不过每次的审稿过程都是不同的经历，这一次二审的时间已经超过了一审的时间，至今还是under review，不知道是什么情况？难道是审稿人放假出去耍了？不过总的体会是难度越来越大了！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=42, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Thu Jul 19 10:02:16 CST 2018, time=2018-07-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842666, encodeId=17718426667f, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：2017.12.02 周六 submitted<br> 2017.12.04 周一 with editor<br> 2017.12.06 under review<br> 2018.01.23 under editor evaluation<br> 2018.01.31 major revision<br> 2018.02.21 major revision submitted to journal<br> 2018.02.23 under review<br> 2018.03.15 required reviews completed<br> 2018.03.19 accepted<br> 2018.03.20 online<br> 2018.03.28 proof submitted<br> 2018.03.31 published volume/issue<br> appl. catal. a, 2018, 558, 26-33.<br> 总共耗时大概4个月。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=46, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=30a25414006, createdName=ms3948389174368595, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 16:01:53 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842646, encodeId=e8ff842646cb, content=3.9 submit<br> 3.11 with editor 同一天 under review<br> 3.30 under editor evaluation<br> 4.2 under editor evaluation状态没变，时间变了<br> 4.4 major revision 四个审稿意见，前两个小修，第三个拒，第四个修后可接收，编辑给大修 。 综合来看应该3.30-4.2 状态没变，时间变，可能是因为第三个审稿人拒，编辑又找了第四个审稿人，所以说编辑真的很负责<br> 4.23 resubmit<br> 4.24 under review<br> 4.25 required reviews completed <br> 4.26 minor revision 原因是4月出了一篇相关的文章，其中一个审稿人要求引用<br> 4.26 resubmit<br> 4.27 with editor 然后一个小时内直接accept<br> 总体而言，是比较幸运的，没有遇到前面说的很多天都没有进展的情况，编辑和审稿人都是比较负责的，而且偏应用比较强的文章 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=36, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a45a5414149, createdName=ms3867726040880872, createdTime=Fri Apr 27 21:47:20 CST 2018, time=2018-04-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842098, encodeId=7e0884209802, content=审稿速度:6.0<br>经验分享：under review 已经70天了，真带劲啊！这期刊不是以高效著称嘛，这也太搞笑了！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Sun Apr 08 13:05:33 CST 2018, time=2018-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=841603, encodeId=7aaf841603c3, content=under review 持续45天了，日期也没变化，有谁也有类似的经历吗？不是很快吗？这是什么情况？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=39, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Fri Mar 16 22:57:32 CST 2018, time=2018-03-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=841331, encodeId=bf7e841331c3, content=一个多月了 还是under review 我记得第一篇速度挺快的啊 二十多天就会意见了 这篇不知道怎么了 可能是审稿人意见不同意吧 是不是要悲剧了呢 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=33, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=bdbe5414035, createdName=ms3036779279854874, createdTime=Tue Mar 06 22:36:28 CST 2018, time=2018-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840744, encodeId=055e840e446e, content=硕士第一篇sci论文，历时2个半月接收。机理研究较深，对数据量和新颖性要求不大，远不及后来中的催化b的水平。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Tue Jan 30 01:03:06 CST 2018, time=2018-01-30, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=838406, encodeId=ac72838406ce, content=一审很快，一个月不到就出结果。四个审稿人，意见挺专业，总共提了22条。二审后三个审稿人同意接收，一个小修，给了一些关于格式方面的意见，主编给了小修，并表示修回后即可录用。在投稿过程中给编辑部写信，两三天后就回复邮件了。感觉效率很高，速度较快。感谢~<br> 06/29/17 submitted to journal 投稿<br> 07/02 manuscript number assigned 分配稿件号<br> 07/27 interim decision-major revision 大修<br> 08/31 resubmitted<br> 09/02 under review 二审<br> 09/05 required revision completed 二审结束<br> 09/16 interim decision-minor revision 小修<br> 09/17 resubmitted <br> 09/18/17 accept , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Tue Sep 19 01:16:35 CST 2017, time=2017-09-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-04-28 ms3948389174368595

    审稿速度:2.0
    经验分享：2017.12.02 周六 submitted
    2017.12.04 周一 with editor
    2017.12.06 under review
    2018.01.23 under editor evaluation
    2018.01.31 major revision
    2018.02.21 major revision submitted to journal
    2018.02.23 under review
    2018.03.15 required reviews completed
    2018.03.19 accepted
    2018.03.20 online
    2018.03.28 proof submitted
    2018.03.31 published volume/issue
    appl. catal. a, 2018, 558, 26-33.
    总共耗时大概4个月。

    0

  5. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846359, encodeId=0244846359ed, content=审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0<br>经验分享：博士两年期间前后录用三篇，期刊办事效率很高，意见给的也比较有价值，该期刊对文章的完整性要求很严格！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=72, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Fri Aug 17 13:35:58 CST 2018, time=2018-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845567, encodeId=584784556efb, content=期刊要求很严格，编辑很nice，审稿很专业认真，提的问题都是很有建设性的，补充相关实验数据，大修后录用，历时3个半月，偏重于催化机理，比较舒服的一次投稿经历。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=54, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5d445414141, createdName=ms887994580797846, createdTime=Mon Jul 23 17:52:56 CST 2018, time=2018-07-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845459, encodeId=ac6b845459fc, content=之前中过两篇，这是第三篇，不过每次的审稿过程都是不同的经历，这一次二审的时间已经超过了一审的时间，至今还是under review，不知道是什么情况？难道是审稿人放假出去耍了？不过总的体会是难度越来越大了！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=42, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Thu Jul 19 10:02:16 CST 2018, time=2018-07-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842666, encodeId=17718426667f, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：2017.12.02 周六 submitted<br> 2017.12.04 周一 with editor<br> 2017.12.06 under review<br> 2018.01.23 under editor evaluation<br> 2018.01.31 major revision<br> 2018.02.21 major revision submitted to journal<br> 2018.02.23 under review<br> 2018.03.15 required reviews completed<br> 2018.03.19 accepted<br> 2018.03.20 online<br> 2018.03.28 proof submitted<br> 2018.03.31 published volume/issue<br> appl. catal. a, 2018, 558, 26-33.<br> 总共耗时大概4个月。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=46, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=30a25414006, createdName=ms3948389174368595, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 16:01:53 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842646, encodeId=e8ff842646cb, content=3.9 submit<br> 3.11 with editor 同一天 under review<br> 3.30 under editor evaluation<br> 4.2 under editor evaluation状态没变，时间变了<br> 4.4 major revision 四个审稿意见，前两个小修，第三个拒，第四个修后可接收，编辑给大修 。 综合来看应该3.30-4.2 状态没变，时间变，可能是因为第三个审稿人拒，编辑又找了第四个审稿人，所以说编辑真的很负责<br> 4.23 resubmit<br> 4.24 under review<br> 4.25 required reviews completed <br> 4.26 minor revision 原因是4月出了一篇相关的文章，其中一个审稿人要求引用<br> 4.26 resubmit<br> 4.27 with editor 然后一个小时内直接accept<br> 总体而言，是比较幸运的，没有遇到前面说的很多天都没有进展的情况，编辑和审稿人都是比较负责的，而且偏应用比较强的文章 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=36, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a45a5414149, createdName=ms3867726040880872, createdTime=Fri Apr 27 21:47:20 CST 2018, time=2018-04-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842098, encodeId=7e0884209802, content=审稿速度:6.0<br>经验分享：under review 已经70天了，真带劲啊！这期刊不是以高效著称嘛，这也太搞笑了！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Sun Apr 08 13:05:33 CST 2018, time=2018-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=841603, encodeId=7aaf841603c3, content=under review 持续45天了，日期也没变化，有谁也有类似的经历吗？不是很快吗？这是什么情况？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=39, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Fri Mar 16 22:57:32 CST 2018, time=2018-03-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=841331, encodeId=bf7e841331c3, content=一个多月了 还是under review 我记得第一篇速度挺快的啊 二十多天就会意见了 这篇不知道怎么了 可能是审稿人意见不同意吧 是不是要悲剧了呢 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=33, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=bdbe5414035, createdName=ms3036779279854874, createdTime=Tue Mar 06 22:36:28 CST 2018, time=2018-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840744, encodeId=055e840e446e, content=硕士第一篇sci论文，历时2个半月接收。机理研究较深，对数据量和新颖性要求不大，远不及后来中的催化b的水平。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Tue Jan 30 01:03:06 CST 2018, time=2018-01-30, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=838406, encodeId=ac72838406ce, content=一审很快，一个月不到就出结果。四个审稿人，意见挺专业，总共提了22条。二审后三个审稿人同意接收，一个小修，给了一些关于格式方面的意见，主编给了小修，并表示修回后即可录用。在投稿过程中给编辑部写信，两三天后就回复邮件了。感觉效率很高，速度较快。感谢~<br> 06/29/17 submitted to journal 投稿<br> 07/02 manuscript number assigned 分配稿件号<br> 07/27 interim decision-major revision 大修<br> 08/31 resubmitted<br> 09/02 under review 二审<br> 09/05 required revision completed 二审结束<br> 09/16 interim decision-minor revision 小修<br> 09/17 resubmitted <br> 09/18/17 accept , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Tue Sep 19 01:16:35 CST 2017, time=2017-09-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-04-27 ms3867726040880872

    3.9 submit
    3.11 with editor 同一天 under review
    3.30 under editor evaluation
    4.2 under editor evaluation状态没变，时间变了
    4.4 major revision 四个审稿意见，前两个小修，第三个拒，第四个修后可接收，编辑给大修 。 综合来看应该3.30-4.2 状态没变，时间变，可能是因为第三个审稿人拒，编辑又找了第四个审稿人，所以说编辑真的很负责
    4.23 resubmit
    4.24 under review
    4.25 required reviews completed
    4.26 minor revision 原因是4月出了一篇相关的文章，其中一个审稿人要求引用
    4.26 resubmit
    4.27 with editor 然后一个小时内直接accept
    总体而言，是比较幸运的，没有遇到前面说的很多天都没有进展的情况，编辑和审稿人都是比较负责的，而且偏应用比较强的文章

    0

  6. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846359, encodeId=0244846359ed, content=审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0<br>经验分享：博士两年期间前后录用三篇，期刊办事效率很高，意见给的也比较有价值，该期刊对文章的完整性要求很严格！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=72, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Fri Aug 17 13:35:58 CST 2018, time=2018-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845567, encodeId=584784556efb, content=期刊要求很严格，编辑很nice，审稿很专业认真，提的问题都是很有建设性的，补充相关实验数据，大修后录用，历时3个半月，偏重于催化机理，比较舒服的一次投稿经历。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=54, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5d445414141, createdName=ms887994580797846, createdTime=Mon Jul 23 17:52:56 CST 2018, time=2018-07-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845459, encodeId=ac6b845459fc, content=之前中过两篇，这是第三篇，不过每次的审稿过程都是不同的经历，这一次二审的时间已经超过了一审的时间，至今还是under review，不知道是什么情况？难道是审稿人放假出去耍了？不过总的体会是难度越来越大了！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=42, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Thu Jul 19 10:02:16 CST 2018, time=2018-07-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842666, encodeId=17718426667f, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：2017.12.02 周六 submitted<br> 2017.12.04 周一 with editor<br> 2017.12.06 under review<br> 2018.01.23 under editor evaluation<br> 2018.01.31 major revision<br> 2018.02.21 major revision submitted to journal<br> 2018.02.23 under review<br> 2018.03.15 required reviews completed<br> 2018.03.19 accepted<br> 2018.03.20 online<br> 2018.03.28 proof submitted<br> 2018.03.31 published volume/issue<br> appl. catal. a, 2018, 558, 26-33.<br> 总共耗时大概4个月。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=46, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=30a25414006, createdName=ms3948389174368595, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 16:01:53 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842646, encodeId=e8ff842646cb, content=3.9 submit<br> 3.11 with editor 同一天 under review<br> 3.30 under editor evaluation<br> 4.2 under editor evaluation状态没变，时间变了<br> 4.4 major revision 四个审稿意见，前两个小修，第三个拒，第四个修后可接收，编辑给大修 。 综合来看应该3.30-4.2 状态没变，时间变，可能是因为第三个审稿人拒，编辑又找了第四个审稿人，所以说编辑真的很负责<br> 4.23 resubmit<br> 4.24 under review<br> 4.25 required reviews completed <br> 4.26 minor revision 原因是4月出了一篇相关的文章，其中一个审稿人要求引用<br> 4.26 resubmit<br> 4.27 with editor 然后一个小时内直接accept<br> 总体而言，是比较幸运的，没有遇到前面说的很多天都没有进展的情况，编辑和审稿人都是比较负责的，而且偏应用比较强的文章 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=36, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a45a5414149, createdName=ms3867726040880872, createdTime=Fri Apr 27 21:47:20 CST 2018, time=2018-04-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842098, encodeId=7e0884209802, content=审稿速度:6.0<br>经验分享：under review 已经70天了，真带劲啊！这期刊不是以高效著称嘛，这也太搞笑了！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Sun Apr 08 13:05:33 CST 2018, time=2018-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=841603, encodeId=7aaf841603c3, content=under review 持续45天了，日期也没变化，有谁也有类似的经历吗？不是很快吗？这是什么情况？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=39, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Fri Mar 16 22:57:32 CST 2018, time=2018-03-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=841331, encodeId=bf7e841331c3, content=一个多月了 还是under review 我记得第一篇速度挺快的啊 二十多天就会意见了 这篇不知道怎么了 可能是审稿人意见不同意吧 是不是要悲剧了呢 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=33, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=bdbe5414035, createdName=ms3036779279854874, createdTime=Tue Mar 06 22:36:28 CST 2018, time=2018-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840744, encodeId=055e840e446e, content=硕士第一篇sci论文，历时2个半月接收。机理研究较深，对数据量和新颖性要求不大，远不及后来中的催化b的水平。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Tue Jan 30 01:03:06 CST 2018, time=2018-01-30, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=838406, encodeId=ac72838406ce, content=一审很快，一个月不到就出结果。四个审稿人，意见挺专业，总共提了22条。二审后三个审稿人同意接收，一个小修，给了一些关于格式方面的意见，主编给了小修，并表示修回后即可录用。在投稿过程中给编辑部写信，两三天后就回复邮件了。感觉效率很高，速度较快。感谢~<br> 06/29/17 submitted to journal 投稿<br> 07/02 manuscript number assigned 分配稿件号<br> 07/27 interim decision-major revision 大修<br> 08/31 resubmitted<br> 09/02 under review 二审<br> 09/05 required revision completed 二审结束<br> 09/16 interim decision-minor revision 小修<br> 09/17 resubmitted <br> 09/18/17 accept , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Tue Sep 19 01:16:35 CST 2017, time=2017-09-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-04-08 ms7260643641707155

    审稿速度:6.0
    经验分享：under review 已经70天了，真带劲啊！这期刊不是以高效著称嘛，这也太搞笑了！

    0

  7. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846359, encodeId=0244846359ed, content=审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0<br>经验分享：博士两年期间前后录用三篇，期刊办事效率很高，意见给的也比较有价值，该期刊对文章的完整性要求很严格！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=72, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Fri Aug 17 13:35:58 CST 2018, time=2018-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845567, encodeId=584784556efb, content=期刊要求很严格，编辑很nice，审稿很专业认真，提的问题都是很有建设性的，补充相关实验数据，大修后录用，历时3个半月，偏重于催化机理，比较舒服的一次投稿经历。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=54, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5d445414141, createdName=ms887994580797846, createdTime=Mon Jul 23 17:52:56 CST 2018, time=2018-07-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845459, encodeId=ac6b845459fc, content=之前中过两篇，这是第三篇，不过每次的审稿过程都是不同的经历，这一次二审的时间已经超过了一审的时间，至今还是under review，不知道是什么情况？难道是审稿人放假出去耍了？不过总的体会是难度越来越大了！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=42, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Thu Jul 19 10:02:16 CST 2018, time=2018-07-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842666, encodeId=17718426667f, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：2017.12.02 周六 submitted<br> 2017.12.04 周一 with editor<br> 2017.12.06 under review<br> 2018.01.23 under editor evaluation<br> 2018.01.31 major revision<br> 2018.02.21 major revision submitted to journal<br> 2018.02.23 under review<br> 2018.03.15 required reviews completed<br> 2018.03.19 accepted<br> 2018.03.20 online<br> 2018.03.28 proof submitted<br> 2018.03.31 published volume/issue<br> appl. catal. a, 2018, 558, 26-33.<br> 总共耗时大概4个月。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=46, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=30a25414006, createdName=ms3948389174368595, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 16:01:53 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842646, encodeId=e8ff842646cb, content=3.9 submit<br> 3.11 with editor 同一天 under review<br> 3.30 under editor evaluation<br> 4.2 under editor evaluation状态没变，时间变了<br> 4.4 major revision 四个审稿意见，前两个小修，第三个拒，第四个修后可接收，编辑给大修 。 综合来看应该3.30-4.2 状态没变，时间变，可能是因为第三个审稿人拒，编辑又找了第四个审稿人，所以说编辑真的很负责<br> 4.23 resubmit<br> 4.24 under review<br> 4.25 required reviews completed <br> 4.26 minor revision 原因是4月出了一篇相关的文章，其中一个审稿人要求引用<br> 4.26 resubmit<br> 4.27 with editor 然后一个小时内直接accept<br> 总体而言，是比较幸运的，没有遇到前面说的很多天都没有进展的情况，编辑和审稿人都是比较负责的，而且偏应用比较强的文章 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=36, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a45a5414149, createdName=ms3867726040880872, createdTime=Fri Apr 27 21:47:20 CST 2018, time=2018-04-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842098, encodeId=7e0884209802, content=审稿速度:6.0<br>经验分享：under review 已经70天了，真带劲啊！这期刊不是以高效著称嘛，这也太搞笑了！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Sun Apr 08 13:05:33 CST 2018, time=2018-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=841603, encodeId=7aaf841603c3, content=under review 持续45天了，日期也没变化，有谁也有类似的经历吗？不是很快吗？这是什么情况？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=39, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Fri Mar 16 22:57:32 CST 2018, time=2018-03-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=841331, encodeId=bf7e841331c3, content=一个多月了 还是under review 我记得第一篇速度挺快的啊 二十多天就会意见了 这篇不知道怎么了 可能是审稿人意见不同意吧 是不是要悲剧了呢 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=33, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=bdbe5414035, createdName=ms3036779279854874, createdTime=Tue Mar 06 22:36:28 CST 2018, time=2018-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840744, encodeId=055e840e446e, content=硕士第一篇sci论文，历时2个半月接收。机理研究较深，对数据量和新颖性要求不大，远不及后来中的催化b的水平。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Tue Jan 30 01:03:06 CST 2018, time=2018-01-30, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=838406, encodeId=ac72838406ce, content=一审很快，一个月不到就出结果。四个审稿人，意见挺专业，总共提了22条。二审后三个审稿人同意接收，一个小修，给了一些关于格式方面的意见，主编给了小修，并表示修回后即可录用。在投稿过程中给编辑部写信，两三天后就回复邮件了。感觉效率很高，速度较快。感谢~<br> 06/29/17 submitted to journal 投稿<br> 07/02 manuscript number assigned 分配稿件号<br> 07/27 interim decision-major revision 大修<br> 08/31 resubmitted<br> 09/02 under review 二审<br> 09/05 required revision completed 二审结束<br> 09/16 interim decision-minor revision 小修<br> 09/17 resubmitted <br> 09/18/17 accept , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Tue Sep 19 01:16:35 CST 2017, time=2017-09-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-03-16 ms622773450447966

    under review 持续45天了，日期也没变化，有谁也有类似的经历吗？不是很快吗？这是什么情况？

    0

  8. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846359, encodeId=0244846359ed, content=审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0<br>经验分享：博士两年期间前后录用三篇，期刊办事效率很高，意见给的也比较有价值，该期刊对文章的完整性要求很严格！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=72, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Fri Aug 17 13:35:58 CST 2018, time=2018-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845567, encodeId=584784556efb, content=期刊要求很严格，编辑很nice，审稿很专业认真，提的问题都是很有建设性的，补充相关实验数据，大修后录用，历时3个半月，偏重于催化机理，比较舒服的一次投稿经历。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=54, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5d445414141, createdName=ms887994580797846, createdTime=Mon Jul 23 17:52:56 CST 2018, time=2018-07-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845459, encodeId=ac6b845459fc, content=之前中过两篇，这是第三篇，不过每次的审稿过程都是不同的经历，这一次二审的时间已经超过了一审的时间，至今还是under review，不知道是什么情况？难道是审稿人放假出去耍了？不过总的体会是难度越来越大了！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=42, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Thu Jul 19 10:02:16 CST 2018, time=2018-07-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842666, encodeId=17718426667f, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：2017.12.02 周六 submitted<br> 2017.12.04 周一 with editor<br> 2017.12.06 under review<br> 2018.01.23 under editor evaluation<br> 2018.01.31 major revision<br> 2018.02.21 major revision submitted to journal<br> 2018.02.23 under review<br> 2018.03.15 required reviews completed<br> 2018.03.19 accepted<br> 2018.03.20 online<br> 2018.03.28 proof submitted<br> 2018.03.31 published volume/issue<br> appl. catal. a, 2018, 558, 26-33.<br> 总共耗时大概4个月。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=46, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=30a25414006, createdName=ms3948389174368595, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 16:01:53 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842646, encodeId=e8ff842646cb, content=3.9 submit<br> 3.11 with editor 同一天 under review<br> 3.30 under editor evaluation<br> 4.2 under editor evaluation状态没变，时间变了<br> 4.4 major revision 四个审稿意见，前两个小修，第三个拒，第四个修后可接收，编辑给大修 。 综合来看应该3.30-4.2 状态没变，时间变，可能是因为第三个审稿人拒，编辑又找了第四个审稿人，所以说编辑真的很负责<br> 4.23 resubmit<br> 4.24 under review<br> 4.25 required reviews completed <br> 4.26 minor revision 原因是4月出了一篇相关的文章，其中一个审稿人要求引用<br> 4.26 resubmit<br> 4.27 with editor 然后一个小时内直接accept<br> 总体而言，是比较幸运的，没有遇到前面说的很多天都没有进展的情况，编辑和审稿人都是比较负责的，而且偏应用比较强的文章 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=36, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a45a5414149, createdName=ms3867726040880872, createdTime=Fri Apr 27 21:47:20 CST 2018, time=2018-04-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842098, encodeId=7e0884209802, content=审稿速度:6.0<br>经验分享：under review 已经70天了，真带劲啊！这期刊不是以高效著称嘛，这也太搞笑了！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Sun Apr 08 13:05:33 CST 2018, time=2018-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=841603, encodeId=7aaf841603c3, content=under review 持续45天了，日期也没变化，有谁也有类似的经历吗？不是很快吗？这是什么情况？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=39, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Fri Mar 16 22:57:32 CST 2018, time=2018-03-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=841331, encodeId=bf7e841331c3, content=一个多月了 还是under review 我记得第一篇速度挺快的啊 二十多天就会意见了 这篇不知道怎么了 可能是审稿人意见不同意吧 是不是要悲剧了呢 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=33, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=bdbe5414035, createdName=ms3036779279854874, createdTime=Tue Mar 06 22:36:28 CST 2018, time=2018-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840744, encodeId=055e840e446e, content=硕士第一篇sci论文，历时2个半月接收。机理研究较深，对数据量和新颖性要求不大，远不及后来中的催化b的水平。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Tue Jan 30 01:03:06 CST 2018, time=2018-01-30, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=838406, encodeId=ac72838406ce, content=一审很快，一个月不到就出结果。四个审稿人，意见挺专业，总共提了22条。二审后三个审稿人同意接收，一个小修，给了一些关于格式方面的意见，主编给了小修，并表示修回后即可录用。在投稿过程中给编辑部写信，两三天后就回复邮件了。感觉效率很高，速度较快。感谢~<br> 06/29/17 submitted to journal 投稿<br> 07/02 manuscript number assigned 分配稿件号<br> 07/27 interim decision-major revision 大修<br> 08/31 resubmitted<br> 09/02 under review 二审<br> 09/05 required revision completed 二审结束<br> 09/16 interim decision-minor revision 小修<br> 09/17 resubmitted <br> 09/18/17 accept , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Tue Sep 19 01:16:35 CST 2017, time=2017-09-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-03-06 ms3036779279854874

    一个多月了 还是under review 我记得第一篇速度挺快的啊 二十多天就会意见了 这篇不知道怎么了 可能是审稿人意见不同意吧 是不是要悲剧了呢

    0

  9. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846359, encodeId=0244846359ed, content=审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0<br>经验分享：博士两年期间前后录用三篇，期刊办事效率很高，意见给的也比较有价值，该期刊对文章的完整性要求很严格！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=72, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Fri Aug 17 13:35:58 CST 2018, time=2018-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845567, encodeId=584784556efb, content=期刊要求很严格，编辑很nice，审稿很专业认真，提的问题都是很有建设性的，补充相关实验数据，大修后录用，历时3个半月，偏重于催化机理，比较舒服的一次投稿经历。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=54, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5d445414141, createdName=ms887994580797846, createdTime=Mon Jul 23 17:52:56 CST 2018, time=2018-07-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845459, encodeId=ac6b845459fc, content=之前中过两篇，这是第三篇，不过每次的审稿过程都是不同的经历，这一次二审的时间已经超过了一审的时间，至今还是under review，不知道是什么情况？难道是审稿人放假出去耍了？不过总的体会是难度越来越大了！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=42, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Thu Jul 19 10:02:16 CST 2018, time=2018-07-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842666, encodeId=17718426667f, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：2017.12.02 周六 submitted<br> 2017.12.04 周一 with editor<br> 2017.12.06 under review<br> 2018.01.23 under editor evaluation<br> 2018.01.31 major revision<br> 2018.02.21 major revision submitted to journal<br> 2018.02.23 under review<br> 2018.03.15 required reviews completed<br> 2018.03.19 accepted<br> 2018.03.20 online<br> 2018.03.28 proof submitted<br> 2018.03.31 published volume/issue<br> appl. catal. a, 2018, 558, 26-33.<br> 总共耗时大概4个月。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=46, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=30a25414006, createdName=ms3948389174368595, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 16:01:53 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842646, encodeId=e8ff842646cb, content=3.9 submit<br> 3.11 with editor 同一天 under review<br> 3.30 under editor evaluation<br> 4.2 under editor evaluation状态没变，时间变了<br> 4.4 major revision 四个审稿意见，前两个小修，第三个拒，第四个修后可接收，编辑给大修 。 综合来看应该3.30-4.2 状态没变，时间变，可能是因为第三个审稿人拒，编辑又找了第四个审稿人，所以说编辑真的很负责<br> 4.23 resubmit<br> 4.24 under review<br> 4.25 required reviews completed <br> 4.26 minor revision 原因是4月出了一篇相关的文章，其中一个审稿人要求引用<br> 4.26 resubmit<br> 4.27 with editor 然后一个小时内直接accept<br> 总体而言，是比较幸运的，没有遇到前面说的很多天都没有进展的情况，编辑和审稿人都是比较负责的，而且偏应用比较强的文章 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=36, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a45a5414149, createdName=ms3867726040880872, createdTime=Fri Apr 27 21:47:20 CST 2018, time=2018-04-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842098, encodeId=7e0884209802, content=审稿速度:6.0<br>经验分享：under review 已经70天了，真带劲啊！这期刊不是以高效著称嘛，这也太搞笑了！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Sun Apr 08 13:05:33 CST 2018, time=2018-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=841603, encodeId=7aaf841603c3, content=under review 持续45天了，日期也没变化，有谁也有类似的经历吗？不是很快吗？这是什么情况？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=39, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Fri Mar 16 22:57:32 CST 2018, time=2018-03-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=841331, encodeId=bf7e841331c3, content=一个多月了 还是under review 我记得第一篇速度挺快的啊 二十多天就会意见了 这篇不知道怎么了 可能是审稿人意见不同意吧 是不是要悲剧了呢 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=33, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=bdbe5414035, createdName=ms3036779279854874, createdTime=Tue Mar 06 22:36:28 CST 2018, time=2018-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840744, encodeId=055e840e446e, content=硕士第一篇sci论文，历时2个半月接收。机理研究较深，对数据量和新颖性要求不大，远不及后来中的催化b的水平。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Tue Jan 30 01:03:06 CST 2018, time=2018-01-30, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=838406, encodeId=ac72838406ce, content=一审很快，一个月不到就出结果。四个审稿人，意见挺专业，总共提了22条。二审后三个审稿人同意接收，一个小修，给了一些关于格式方面的意见，主编给了小修，并表示修回后即可录用。在投稿过程中给编辑部写信，两三天后就回复邮件了。感觉效率很高，速度较快。感谢~<br> 06/29/17 submitted to journal 投稿<br> 07/02 manuscript number assigned 分配稿件号<br> 07/27 interim decision-major revision 大修<br> 08/31 resubmitted<br> 09/02 under review 二审<br> 09/05 required revision completed 二审结束<br> 09/16 interim decision-minor revision 小修<br> 09/17 resubmitted <br> 09/18/17 accept , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Tue Sep 19 01:16:35 CST 2017, time=2017-09-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2018-01-30 ms8261913720762277

    硕士第一篇sci论文，历时2个半月接收。机理研究较深，对数据量和新颖性要求不大，远不及后来中的催化b的水平。

    0

  10. [GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=846359, encodeId=0244846359ed, content=审稿速度:6.0 | 投稿命中率:75.0<br>经验分享：博士两年期间前后录用三篇，期刊办事效率很高，意见给的也比较有价值，该期刊对文章的完整性要求很严格！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=72, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Fri Aug 17 13:35:58 CST 2018, time=2018-08-17, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845567, encodeId=584784556efb, content=期刊要求很严格，编辑很nice，审稿很专业认真，提的问题都是很有建设性的，补充相关实验数据，大修后录用，历时3个半月，偏重于催化机理，比较舒服的一次投稿经历。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=54, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=5d445414141, createdName=ms887994580797846, createdTime=Mon Jul 23 17:52:56 CST 2018, time=2018-07-23, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=845459, encodeId=ac6b845459fc, content=之前中过两篇，这是第三篇，不过每次的审稿过程都是不同的经历，这一次二审的时间已经超过了一审的时间，至今还是under review，不知道是什么情况？难道是审稿人放假出去耍了？不过总的体会是难度越来越大了！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=42, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Thu Jul 19 10:02:16 CST 2018, time=2018-07-19, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842666, encodeId=17718426667f, content=审稿速度:2.0<br>经验分享：2017.12.02 周六 submitted<br> 2017.12.04 周一 with editor<br> 2017.12.06 under review<br> 2018.01.23 under editor evaluation<br> 2018.01.31 major revision<br> 2018.02.21 major revision submitted to journal<br> 2018.02.23 under review<br> 2018.03.15 required reviews completed<br> 2018.03.19 accepted<br> 2018.03.20 online<br> 2018.03.28 proof submitted<br> 2018.03.31 published volume/issue<br> appl. catal. a, 2018, 558, 26-33.<br> 总共耗时大概4个月。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=46, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=30a25414006, createdName=ms3948389174368595, createdTime=Sat Apr 28 16:01:53 CST 2018, time=2018-04-28, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842646, encodeId=e8ff842646cb, content=3.9 submit<br> 3.11 with editor 同一天 under review<br> 3.30 under editor evaluation<br> 4.2 under editor evaluation状态没变，时间变了<br> 4.4 major revision 四个审稿意见，前两个小修，第三个拒，第四个修后可接收，编辑给大修 。 综合来看应该3.30-4.2 状态没变，时间变，可能是因为第三个审稿人拒，编辑又找了第四个审稿人，所以说编辑真的很负责<br> 4.23 resubmit<br> 4.24 under review<br> 4.25 required reviews completed <br> 4.26 minor revision 原因是4月出了一篇相关的文章，其中一个审稿人要求引用<br> 4.26 resubmit<br> 4.27 with editor 然后一个小时内直接accept<br> 总体而言，是比较幸运的，没有遇到前面说的很多天都没有进展的情况，编辑和审稿人都是比较负责的，而且偏应用比较强的文章 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=36, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=a45a5414149, createdName=ms3867726040880872, createdTime=Fri Apr 27 21:47:20 CST 2018, time=2018-04-27, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=842098, encodeId=7e0884209802, content=审稿速度:6.0<br>经验分享：under review 已经70天了，真带劲啊！这期刊不是以高效著称嘛，这也太搞笑了！ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=0ed55413980, createdName=ms7260643641707155, createdTime=Sun Apr 08 13:05:33 CST 2018, time=2018-04-08, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=841603, encodeId=7aaf841603c3, content=under review 持续45天了，日期也没变化，有谁也有类似的经历吗？不是很快吗？这是什么情况？ , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=39, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=573a5414124, createdName=ms622773450447966, createdTime=Fri Mar 16 22:57:32 CST 2018, time=2018-03-16, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=841331, encodeId=bf7e841331c3, content=一个多月了 还是under review 我记得第一篇速度挺快的啊 二十多天就会意见了 这篇不知道怎么了 可能是审稿人意见不同意吧 是不是要悲剧了呢 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=33, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=bdbe5414035, createdName=ms3036779279854874, createdTime=Tue Mar 06 22:36:28 CST 2018, time=2018-03-06, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=840744, encodeId=055e840e446e, content=硕士第一篇sci论文，历时2个半月接收。机理研究较深，对数据量和新颖性要求不大，远不及后来中的催化b的水平。 , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=41, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=310c5414111, createdName=ms8261913720762277, createdTime=Tue Jan 30 01:03:06 CST 2018, time=2018-01-30, status=1, ipAttribution=), GetPortalCommentsPageByObjectIdResponse(id=838406, encodeId=ac72838406ce, content=一审很快，一个月不到就出结果。四个审稿人，意见挺专业，总共提了22条。二审后三个审稿人同意接收，一个小修，给了一些关于格式方面的意见，主编给了小修，并表示修回后即可录用。在投稿过程中给编辑部写信，两三天后就回复邮件了。感觉效率很高，速度较快。感谢~<br> 06/29/17 submitted to journal 投稿<br> 07/02 manuscript number assigned 分配稿件号<br> 07/27 interim decision-major revision 大修<br> 08/31 resubmitted<br> 09/02 under review 二审<br> 09/05 required revision completed 二审结束<br> 09/16 interim decision-minor revision 小修<br> 09/17 resubmitted <br> 09/18/17 accept , beContent=null, objectType=tool_impact_factor, channel=null, level=null, likeNumber=37, replyNumber=0, topicName=null, topicId=null, topicList=[], attachment=null, authenticateStatus=null, createdAvatar=null, createdBy=27a45414023, createdName=ms2983094698733738, createdTime=Tue Sep 19 01:16:35 CST 2017, time=2017-09-19, status=1, ipAttribution=)]
    2017-09-19 ms2983094698733738

    一审很快，一个月不到就出结果。四个审稿人，意见挺专业，总共提了22条。二审后三个审稿人同意接收，一个小修，给了一些关于格式方面的意见，主编给了小修，并表示修回后即可录用。在投稿过程中给编辑部写信，两三天后就回复邮件了。感觉效率很高，速度较快。感谢~
    06/29/17 submitted to journal 投稿
    07/02 manuscript number assigned 分配稿件号
    07/27 interim decision-major revision 大修
    08/31 resubmitted
    09/02 under review 二审
    09/05 required revision completed 二审结束
    09/16 interim decision-minor revision 小修
    09/17 resubmitted
    09/18/17 accept

    0

共48条页码: 2/5页10条/页
分享您的投稿经验，提升MI经验值，获取更多积分